PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx
DOCX document 38 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Mobile Crime Lab Upfit (4 Vehicles)
- Solicitation number
- 70B01C24R00000177
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) solicitation to provide equipment and system maintenance and repairs at government facilities in the Arizona Region. The questionnaire requests an evaluation of the offeror's performance across factors such as corporate commitment, quality of service, timeliness of performance, and teaming arrangements. Respondents are asked to provide an honest assessment and return the completed questionnaire directly to the DHS Contract Specialist by the solicitation closing date. The related federal contract opportunity is for the modification/upfit of four mobile crime lab vehicles for DHS Customs and Border Protection. The upfit will include work on the interior, exterior, driver cab, audio/video, emergency equipment, and window tint.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT TWO
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PART ONE: INSTRUCTIONS
The company who has provided you with this form is proposing on a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) solicitation to provide a full range of labor, supervision, tools, materials, parts, equipment, transportation, licenses, permits, certifications and management necessary to provide for equipment and system maintenance and repairs at government facilities in the Arizona Region to meet the mission needs of DHS. Past Performance is an extremely important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition, so your input is very important. The information is to be provided directly to, the DHS Contract Specialist. This information will not be disclosed to the offeror. Please provide an honest assessment and return the questionnaire to DHS, by e-mail, to the address shown below, no later than the time and date the solicitation closes _______________. If you have questions, please contact Dana L. Blake. Email address: Dana.L.Blake@cbp.dhs.gov.
Completed questionnaires should be emailed to the following address: Dana.L.Blake@cbp.dhs.gov.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. OFFEROR’S NAME AND ADDRESS 2. CUSTOMER ORGANIZATION
3. CONTRACT NUMBER: 2a. EVALUATOR
4. CONTRACT VALUE: _______________________ NAME:
TITLE:
PHONE NO:
5. CONTRACT AWARD DATE: 6. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
7. CONTRACT TYPE (Circle All That Apply): 8. COMPLEXITY OF WORK (Circle One Response):
Fixed Price Cost-Plus Fixed Price Cost-Plus Award Fee DIFFICULT ROUTINE
T & M OTHER
PART TWO: GENERAL INFORMATION CONTINUED
9. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION
PART THREE: OFFEROR PERFORMANCE RATING
On the following pages, please summarize the offeror’s performance in each rating factors. Each factor has a set of sub factors with four possible adjectival ratings. Determine the adjectival rating that most nearly represents your experience with this offeror and indicate your assessment by placing an “X” under the appropriate heading. Offeror performance factors are:
| A. CORPORATE COMMITMENT |
| B. QUALITY OF SERVICE |
| C. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE |
| D. TEAMING ARRANGEMENTS |
Adjectival ratings are defined below and should be used as a reference in assessing performance:
| OUTSTANDING | Contractors performance significantly exceeded the contract requirements. | |
| GOOD | Contractors performance exceeded the contract requirements. | |
| ACCEPTABLE | Contractors performance met contract requirements. | |
| UNSATISFACTORY | UNSATISFACTORY | Contractors performance was less than acceptable and was unable to perform contract requirements successfully. |
| N/A | Not applicable. | |
| A | ||
| CORPORATE COMMITMENT | ||
| Outstanding | ||
| Good | ||
| Accept. | ||
| Unsat. | ||
| N/A |
| 1. |
| Did contractor provide effective contract and project management? |
| 2. |
| Did the contractor provide a systematic approach to provide the most current technologies, services and techniques available in the marketplace? |
| 3. |
| How effective has the contractor been in understanding and responding to user requirements? |
| 4. |
| Did the contractor establish and maintain effective quality control standards and procedures? |
| B |
| QUALITY OF SERVICE |
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Accept. |
| Unsat. |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| Did the contractor provide quality goods/services? |
| 2. |
| Did the contractor provide quality reports and documentation (i.e., accurate, current and complete)? |
| 3. |
| Was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from counterparts? |
| 4. |
| Did the contractor supply professional and qualified personnel? |
| 5. |
| Did the contractor respond to emergency situations to include staffing and responsiveness? |
C
| TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE |
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Accept. |
| Unsat. |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| Did the contractor adhere to contract delivery schedules in the following areas: |
(a) Performance of services?
(b) Delivery of reports or other documentation?
(c) Qualified Staffing
D
| TEAMING ARRANGEMENTS |
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Accept. |
| Unsat. |
| N/A |
Did the contractor have an effective partnership with its team members?
What percentage of the contract award work was performed by the team members? (Provide Percentage)
| Did the Prime contractor execute a teaming arrangement? (Circle Y or N) | |
| Yes | YES |
| No | NO |
GENERAL TOPICS
| Did the contractor deputy EVM? |
| YES |
| NO |
Did the contractor comply with 508 requirements?
(when applicable)
| YES |
| NO |
1. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default? YES NO
If yes, please explain (e.g. inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules - also include contract number, name, address, and phone number of Terminating Contracting Officer - TCO).
2. What was the contractor’s greatest strength in the performance of the contract?
3. What was the contractor’s greatest weakness in the performance of the contract?
4. Would you award another contract to this contractor? YES No
COMMENTS:
PART FOUR: EVALUATOR’S CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION IN THIS FORM IS ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR
TITLE OF EVALUATOR DATE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .