Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Concessionaire Barbershop - Randolph
- Solicitation number
- FA301620U0195
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q and A.docx | DOCX document | |
| Barbershop STATEMENT OF WORK.docx | DOCX document | |
| General Provisions.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQ Barbershop.rtf | RTF text file | |
| concessionaire contract.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CONCESSIONAIRE - BARBERSHOP
The below contractor has identified you or your (Agency) company as a reference as having knowledge of or experience with the contractor’s past performance, which is requested for the above referenced solicitation. Please take a moment to complete this survey; your candid response(s) to this questionnaire will be of assistance in the source selection process. Therefore, it is important that the information you provide be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to a person who does.
Upon completion of the questionnaire, please email a copy to:
Zachary Fordham Contract Specialist Email: zachary.fordham@us.af.mil Thank you for your assistance in the Past Performance evaluation process!
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by the Offeror)
1. Contractor and Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _______________________________________ B. Contract#: __________________ Period of Performance w/ Opt Yrs.: Start Date: _________ End Date: _________ C. Total Contract Amount (include mods and options): $_________________________________________________ D. Description of service provided: _________________________________________________________________ E. Identification of Offeror’s Representative:
| Name: _______________________________________________________________________________ |
| Title: _______________________________________________________________________________ |
| Date: _______________________________________________________________________________ |
| Phone No.: __________________________________________________________________________ |
| E-Mail Address: ______________________________________________________________________ |
F. Evaluator (Respondent) Point of Contract:
Name and Title: ______________________________________________________________________________ Organization/Agency Name: ___________________________________________________________________ Phone#_________________________ Email Address: _____________________________________________
SECTION 2: EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
Please complete this questionnaire based on the following guidance:
1. Handwritten responses are sufficient. Please write legibly.
1. Please discuss each and every rating for which you indicated 5/E (5/Exceptional), 2/M (2/Marginal) or 1/U (1/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions below. Space for your narrative remarks is provided in Section 3 REMARKS (use additional sheets, if necessary). Comment by SHORT, JEANNE M GS-12 USAF AETC 502 CONS/JBKAB [3]: What about remarks on the other two ratrings: 3/S (Satisfactory) and 4/VG (Very Good)? Don’t we want their remarks on these as well?
recommend changing the word ‘scoring to “rating”.
1. Indicate, based on the performance levels defined below, the contractor’s performance on the identified program. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance. The following is a definition of the rating levels:
PERFORMANCE LEVELS
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Exceptional |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgment of others in your organization.
Please return the completed questionnaire to: Zachary Fordham, Contract Specialist, Email: zachary.fordham@us.af.mil
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
| Contractor’s Performance |
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| N/A |
C1. Timeliness and accuracy of the Contractor fulfill financial responsibility for contract employees.
C2. Provide experienced managers and supervisors with technical and administrative abilities to meet contract requirements.
C3. Provide effective quality control/inspection procedures.
C4. Corrected deficiencies in a timely manner.
C5. Identifed problems as the occurred.
C6. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
C7. Displayed initiative to problem solving.
C8. Timeliness and accuracy of Contractor responsive to contract changes.
C9. Contractor’s overall performance.
| Employee Retention/Attraction |
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| N/A |
E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified highly specialized workforce to this effort.
E2. Ability to support the program with limited staff turnover.
E3. Ability to retain incumbent staffing upon award of contract.
E4. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.
Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or issued a cure or show cause notice?
___Yes ____Default ____Cure ____Show Cause ___No
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.).
SECTION 3: REMARKS. Please provide any additional information you feel is important and not covered elsewhere.
How would you describe your organization’s experience with the contractor?
Has the contractor failed to deliver a service as part of an agreement?
Would your organization consider entering into a new business partnership with this contractor?
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of the your critical and demanding programs?
Would you award another contract to this contractor?
Evaluator’s Printed Name/ Title
Evaluator’s Signature Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .