Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 57 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Chapel Services for Joint Base Charleston, SC Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4418-20-Q0024
About this file
This federal contract opportunity is a solicitation for chapel services at Joint Base Charleston in South Carolina. The Air Force is seeking a contractor to provide religious services including one Catholic religious education coordinator, one each Protestant and Catholic music director, one rabbi, and one imam. The contractor must also provide services at the Naval Weapons Station and Naval Brig. Pricing is to be submitted using the attached pricing worksheet and the total evaluated price will be evaluated. The solicitation is set aside for small businesses and responses are due by August 28, 2020. Past performance will be evaluated using questionnaires completed by the offeror's references. The award will be made to the offeror with a satisfactory confidence past performance rating and lowest total evaluated price.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions and Answers Chapel Services.pdf | ||
| Chapel Support Services PWS (27 July 2020).pdf | ||
| WD 2015-4427 REV 14 Dated 3 Jun 2020.pdf | ||
| RFQ Chapel Services JB CHS.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
RFQ FA441820Q0024
Name of Respondent:
_____________________ Title:
Telephone Number:
__________________ Email Address: ___________________
Project Title or Brief Description of work: __________________________________________*
Contract Number: ____________________ Dollar Amount: _________________* Contract Period or Dates of Performance: __________________________* Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor
B.
EMAIL FORM TO: anthony.lawston.1@us.af.mil or melissa.adams.21@us.af.mil NLT 28 Aug 2020.
C. Were any of the following Positions provided?
Music Director ________
For what faith(s) _____________________________
IMAM ________
RABI _________
Education Coordinator ________ For what faith(s) ______________________________
Other Services Provided ______________________________________________________
C.
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Exceptional |
| Neutral (N) |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner |
| No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive. |
The contractor:
| 1. |
| Provided adequate experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 3. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 4. |
| Provided timely resolution of discrepancies |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 5. |
| Identified risks/problems as they occurred. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 6. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7. |
| Cooperated with personnel after award and was responsive to contract changes. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 8. |
| How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 9. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 10. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
Remarks:____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .