Past Performance Questionnaire 2017.doc
DOC document 101 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Glass Video Wall Removal Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N0001520PR11435
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 5926 AUDITORUM GLASS REMOVAL RFQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| PR 5926 GLASS WALL REMOVAL SOW.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Past Performance Information Section A: Past Performance Questionnaire (completed by offeror)
Offeror Name (Company/Division):
CAGE Code:
DUNS No.:
Address:
Program Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type(s):
List all that apply
Date of Award:
Status:
Contracting Agency/Customer:
Period of Performance:
Contract Value:
Exclude unexercised options
| Ceiling: |
| Original: |
| Current: |
Reason for Change(s) in Value:
| Completion Date: |
| Original: |
| Current: |
| Estimate at Completion ($): |
Number and Reason for Change(s) in Schedule:
Type and extent of subcontracting:
Description of effort:
Section B: Points of Contact (completed by Respondent)
Program Manager/COR (Completed by Offeror) Contracting Officer (Completed by Offeror) Respondent (Completed by Respondent)
Name:
Office:
Address:
Phone:
E-Mail:
RATING GUIDELINES AND INSTRUCTIONS:
Use the following descriptions as guidance in providing element ratings. Ratings should reflect only the performance of the contractor in question.
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| Exceptional |
| Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the Government’s (or customer’s) benefit. If the contractual performance was accomplished with any problems, they were few and minor and corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the Government’s (or customer’s) benefit. If the contractual performance was accomplished with problems, they were minor and corrective actions taken by the customer were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflected a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains a problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Not Applicable |
| The question does not apply. No performance record identifiable within the area of evaluation. |
Contract Past Performance Information:
For each question, please place an “X” in the box corresponding to the rating. Please provide a comment for “Marginal” and “Unsatisfactory” ratings. The comments need not be lengthy, just detailed, clear and concise. Space for comments is provided after each question, and the blocks will expand to accommodate the text as it is entered.
Section C: OVERALL PERFORMANCE Please rate contractor performance in the following areas:
a. How would you rate the contractor’s overall execution of the contract?
| Exceptional |
| Very good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Applicable |
Comments:
b. How would you rate the contractor’s compliance with contract terms and conditions?
| Exceptional |
| Very good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Applicable |
Comments:
c. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to solve problems or correct discrepancies or deficiencies effectively and in a timely manner?
| Exceptional |
| Very good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Applicable |
Comments:
d. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to meet established project schedules/deliveries?
| Exceptional |
| Very good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Applicable |
Comments:
e. How would you rate the contractor’s focus on customer service?
| Exceptional |
| Very good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Applicable |
Comments:
Narrative Summary
Would you recommend this contractor?
Additional Comments?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .