Past_Performance_Evaluation.pdf
PDF 56 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fountain Center Roof Rehabilitation
- Solicitation number
- 2026-009
- Issued by
- Hidalgo County, Texas
About this file
This is a Past Performance Evaluation form from the City of Edinburg, Texas, designed to assess contractor performance for the Fountain Center Roof Rehabilitation project. The form serves as a reference document that project owners complete to evaluate contractors' past performance across multiple criteria. The Fountain Center requires roof rehabilitation to prevent water penetration, and potential contractors are invited to visit the site prior to submitting proposals.
The evaluation form assesses seven key performance areas: overall quality of work, timely completion of punch list items, provision of warranty documents and timely warranty work, schedule adherence, cooperative attitude in resolving construction issues, diligence in documentation and change order pricing assessment, and likelihood of future selection. Evaluators rate contractors on a scale including Excellent, Good, Satisfactory, and Poor for qualitative measures, with yes/no responses for task completion and future contractor consideration. The form requires the reference company name, evaluator signature, printed name, and date to validate the assessment. This reference documentation is intended to inform selection decisions and establish a record of contractor performance history for municipal projects.
View the file
Other files
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CITY OF EDINBURG Page 1 of 1
REFERENCE FROM OWNER FOR PAST PERFORMANCE RESPONSE ITEMS #1-7
Reference For: ________________________________
Reference Company Name:
REFERENCE(S) FROM Owner FOR PAST PERFORMANCES:
1. Overall quality of work: Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor
2. Performed and Completed Punch List items timely: Yes No
3. Provided completed warranty documents and performed warranty items timely: Yes No
4. Contractor's history of completing on schedule: Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor
5. Contractor's cooperative attitude when working with the owner's in resolving construction issues:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor
6. Contractor's diligence in providing detailed documentation and a fair assessment of change order pricing:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor
7. Would THIS CONTRACTOR BE WITHIN YOUR TOP THREE CHOICHES ON YOUR
FUTURE PROJECTS?
Yes No
Signature:
Printed Name:
Date:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .