Past Performance Data Sheet-Questionniare.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Motor Vehicles Operator Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- M0068124R0003
- Issued by
- United States Marine Corps
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Data Sheet / Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity titled "Motor Vehicles Operator Support" with Solicitation Number M0068124R0003. The contract is a 5-year Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) with Firm Fixed Price, Labor Hour, and Cost Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) to provide motor vehicle operator services for the United States Marine Corps (USMC) Southwest Region Fleet Transportation (SWRFT) Department. The contract will be a 100% Total Small Business Set-Aside with a NAICS code of 485113 (Bus and Other Motor Vehicle Transit Systems) and a size standard of $32.5M. The Past Performance Questionnaire must be completed by the offeror and assessor, providing details on the offeror's prior relevant contract experience, performance evaluations, and other key information to be submitted with the proposal by the closing date of 11 October 2024.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| M0068124R00030002.pdf | ||
| WD 2015-5629 Rev 24 Dtd 07-22-24.pdf | ||
| RFP ATTACHMENT 2 - Pricing Workbook.XLSX | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| M0068124R0003.pdf | ||
| M0068124R00030001.pdf | ||
| WD 2015-5475 Rev 23 Dtd 7-22-24.pdf | ||
| WD 2015-5635 Rev 25 Dtd 07-22-24.pdf | ||
| WD 2015-5671 Rev 25 Dtd 7-22-24.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 3: Past Performance Data Sheet / Questionnaire M0068124R0003
Instructions:
· Fill out 1 of these for each Past Performance reference.
· Sections I and II to be completed by the Offeror/Major Subcontractor and provided to the assessor (Government personnel who had experience with the Offeror/Major Subcontractor on a previous relevant contract). The assessor, in turn, to verify Sections I and II, complete the questionnaire (Section III), and submit to the Contracting Office. The Offeror should also submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Sections I and II of all questionnaires as provided to assessors.
· Section II to be validated by the assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.
· Section III to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.
Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the USMC to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: Jody.Koch@usmc.mil. Responses are due by:
11 October 2024 at 0900 (AM, local time, Los Angeles, CA)
1. Referenced Contract Data:
Contractor Name:
Contract Number:
Client / Agency:
Type of Contract:
Total Dollar Value of work performed:
Period of Performance:
Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:
| Contracting Role |
| |_| PRIME |
| |_| SUBCONTRACTOR |
| Termination History |
| |_| Convenience |
| |_| Default |
| |_| N/A |
Requirement Description: Include a description of the work performed, specific responsibilities of the Offeror, major deliverables produced, performance measures/service levels applied, any problems/issues that occurred and correction action taken.
Describe how the scope is similar to this requirement:
Describe how the magnitude is similar to this requirement:
Describe how the complexity is similar to this requirement:
1. Contact Information for Reference:
Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address:
Identify their role in the contract award or administration and the period of involvement.
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
Contract Specialist
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
Quality Assurance Specialist
Other:
1. Performance Evaluation
Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable (N/A). See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| N/A |
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING
Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.
a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.
c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.
d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.
Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired
| _________________________________ | ____________________ | |
| Assessor’s Signature | Date |
Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .