Past Perf Questionnaire - 12444825Q0013.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Explicit Parcel Ownership Data Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 12444825Q0013
- Issued by
- Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation 12444825Q0013, issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, seeking to evaluate a contractor's performance for a Parcel and Ownership Data Retrieval Service. The questionnaire is designed to assess the contractor's capabilities across multiple performance dimensions, including management effectiveness, problem-solving, quality control, cooperation, and overall performance, using a 1-5 rating scale.
The related federal contract opportunity seeks spatially explicit parcel ownership data for all 50 U.S. states, to be delivered in an ESRI GeoDatabase format with polygon and point files containing property boundaries, addresses, ownership details, and assessment information. The Forest Inventory & Analysis (FIA) requires quarterly data updates, with the contract to be awarded as a firm fixed-price agreement under Simplified Acquisition Procedures. The solicitation is classified under NAICS code 541990 for Professional, Scientific and Technical Services, with a size standard of $19.5M. The response deadline for the performance questionnaire is September 5th, 2025, with the submission to be sent to Gayle Geiger at gayle.geiger@usda.gov.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SCHEDULE OF ITEMS - WITH OPTIONS.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Experience Questionaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sol_12444825Q0013_CO Signed.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
12444825Q0013 Parcel and Ownership Data Retrieval Service
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: _____________________ Telephone Number: ______________________
Address: ________________________________________________________________________
Project Title or Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: __________________Dollar Amount: $ _____________________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ___________________________
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
Name of Respondent: _____________________________
Title: __________________________________________
Telephone Number: _______________________________
Email Address: __________________________________
NOTE: Please return no later than September 5th, 2025, via email to:
Gayle Geiger @ gayle.geiger@usda.gov
B. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. Alternatively, select N/A where appropriate.
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| SATISFACTORY |
| VERY GOOD |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| NEUTRAL or N/A |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. |
There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance met contractual requirements.
There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. |
Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
No record of past performance, the record is inconclusive, or rated area is not applicable.
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 2. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 3. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 4. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 5. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 6. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 7. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 8. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 9. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 10. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 11. |
| Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO |
| 12. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER
Remarks:
NOTE: Please return no later than September 5th, 2025, via email to:
Gayle Geiger @ gayle.geiger@usda.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .