Attachment_5_-_Report_of_Geotechnical_Data_2017-04-24.pdf
PDF 7 MB Posted
- Attached to
- NAMA 151059D Rehabilitate Water Systems for Emergency and Potable Water Supply in West Potomac Park
- Solicitation number
- P17PS00712
About this file
Attachment 5 Geotechnical Report
View the file
Other files
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Corporate HQ: 3015 Dumbarton Road Richmond, Virginia 23228 T 804.264.2701 F 804.264.1202 www.fandr.com
VIRGINIA • NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA • MARYLAND • DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Report of Geotechnical Data
NAMA Rehabilitate Potable Water Lines
Washington, DC
F&R Project No. 72U0289
Prepared For:
CH2M Hill
8720 Stony Point Parkway, Suite 110
Richmond, Virginia 23235
Prepared By:
Froehling & Robertson, Inc.
22923 Quicksilver Drive, Suite 111 Dulles, Virginia 20166
April 24, 2017
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
Engineering Stability Since 1881
Capital Region, Dulles Operation Center
22923 Quicksilver Drive, Suite 111 Dulles, Virginia 20166‐2013
T 703.996.0123 I F 703.996.0124
Corporate HQ: 3015 Dumbarton Road Richmond, Virginia 23228 T 804.264.2701 F 804.264.1202 www.fandr.com
VIRGINIA • NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA • MARYLAND • DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
April 24, 2017
Mr. Howard Lusk, PE, CH2M Hill 8720 Stony Point Parkway, Suite 110 Richmond, Virginia, 23235
Subject: Report of Geotechnical Data
NAMA 151059 D Water Lines Washington, DC
F&R Project No. 72U0289
Dear Mr. Lusk:
The purpose of this study is to present the results of the subsurface exploration program and geotechnical data collection undertaken by Froehling & Robertson, Inc. (F&R) in connection with the proposed NAMA Rehabilitate Potable Water Lines project. Our services were performed in general accordance with F&R Proposal No. 1772‐00285 dated December 14, 2016, as authorized by your office.
The attached report presents our understanding of the project, reviews our exploration procedures, and describes the existing site and general subsurface conditions.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact either of the undersigned.
Respectfully, Froehling & Robertson, Inc.
Parham Safarian Bahri, Oscar R. Merida, J.R, P.E, Staff Engineer Senior Geotechnical Engineer
CH2M HILL NAMA Rehabilitate Potable Water Lines
F&R Project No. 72U0289 April 24, 2017 ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 PURPOSE & SCOPE OF SERVICES
2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION
2.2 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
3.0 EXPLORATION PROCEDURES
3.1 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
3.2 LABORATORY TESTING
4.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY & SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
4.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY
4.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
4.2.1 General
4.2.2 Fill and Possible Fill Materials
4.3 SUBSURFACE WATER
4.4 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
5.0 LIMITATIONS
iii
APPENDICES
APPENDIX I
Site Location Plan (Drawing No. 1) Boring Location Plans (Drawings No. 2 through 6)
APPENDIX II
Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes Key to Soil Classification Unified Soil Classification Chart Boring Logs (B‐1 and B‐10)
APPENDIX III
Laboratory Testing Reports
APPENDIX IV
GBA Document “Important Information about Your Geotechnical Engineering Report”
1.0 PURPOSE & SCOPE OF SERVICES
The purpose of our involvement in this project was to provide general descriptions of the subsurface soil conditions encountered at the locations explored. In order to accomplish the above objectives, we undertook the following scope of services:
Reviewed and summarized available geologic and subsurface information relative to the project site.
Visited the site to observe existing surface conditions and features.
Performed a stakeout of the boring locations based on the Boring Location Plan provided by your office using a Series 7 Trimble GPS Unit.
Hired a private utility locator to mark the private utility lines at the site and coordinated with Miss Utility.
Executed a subsurface program consisting of ten (10) borings, B‐1 through B‐10, drilled to a depth of 25 feet.
Performed geotechnical laboratory testing on representative soil samples.
Prepared this written report summarizing our work on the project and providing descriptions of the subsurface conditions encountered.
Our scope of services did not include any design recommendations for the geotechnical aspects of the project, quantity estimates, preparation of plans or specifications, the identification and evaluation of environmental related aspects of the project site, or any other item not specifically included in our scope of work.
2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
2.1 Site Description
The site is located on the National Mall area from the Washington Monument east to the Lincoln
Memorial and along Independence Avenue SW and Ohio Drive SW to the Jefferson Memorial in
Washington, DC, as shown on the attached Site Location Plan, Drawing No. 1, located in Appendix
A of this report.
The site is relatively flat ranging in elevation from EL 1.9 at Boring B‐10 located near the intersection of Ohio Drive SW and West Basin Drive SW to elevation EL 10.9 feet at Boring B‐7 located near the intersection of 21st Street NW and Constitution Avenue NW. Ground surface elevations were determined using a Geo 7 Series Trimble GPS Unit and converted to 1929
Maryland State Plane Datum.
2.2 Proposed Construction
We understand that the project consists of the installation of approximately 12,000 LF of new potable water line that vary in size from 8” to 12” diameter, and approximately 4,000 LF of small service lines with diameter of generally less than 2”. The work includes appurtenances like fire hydrants, backflow prevention valves, gate valves, water meters, and water taps.
Horizontal directional drilling with the use of high density polyethylene (HDPE) or polyethylene (PE) will be utilized for the construction of the proposed water lines due to the sensitive nature of the park monuments, high traffic, and the landscapes in the construction area.
3.0 EXPLORATION PROCEDURES
3.1 Subsurface Exploration
The subsurface exploration program (consisting of ten test borings designated B‐1 through B‐10) was performed between March 13, and March 21, 2017, at the approximate locations shown on the attached Boring Location Plans (Drawings No. 2 through 6 Appendix I of this report). F&R personnel marked the boring locations in the field using a Series 7 Trimble GPS Unit based on the drawings provided to us by your office. Mr. Howard Lusk with CH2M Hill oversaw the stake‐out procedure. In consideration of the methods used in their determination, the boring locations shown on the attached Boring Location Plan and the elevations shown on the Boring Logs should be considered approximate.
The test borings were performed in accordance with generally accepted drilling practice using a truck‐mounted CME‐55 rotary drill rig. Hollow‐stem augers were advanced to pre‐selected depths, the center plug was removed, and representative soil samples were recovered with a standard split‐spoon sampler (1.375 in. ID & 2 in. OD) in general accordance with ASTM D 1586, the Standard Penetration Test. The split‐spoon sampler was driven into the soil by freely dropping a weight of 140 pounds from a height of 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the split‐spoon sampler three consecutive 6‐inch increments is recorded, and the blows of the last two increments are summed to obtain the Standard Penetration Resistance (N‐value). The N‐ value provides a general indication of in‐situ soil conditions and has been correlated with certain engineering properties of soils. Standard Penetration Testing was conducted utilizing an automatic hammer.
Research has shown that the Standard Penetration Resistance (N‐value) determined by the automatic hammer is different than the N‐value determined by the safety hammer method.
Most corrections that are published in the technical literature are based on the N‐value determined by the safety hammer method. This is commonly termed N60 as the rope and cathead with a safety hammer delivers about 60 percent of the theoretical energy delivered by a 140‐ pound hammer falling 30 inches. Several researchers have proposed correction factors for the use of hammers other than the safety hammer. The correction is made by the following equation:
N60 = Nfield x CE where Nfield is the value recorded in the field, and CE is the drill rod energy ratio for the hammer used. A correction factor (CE) of 1.46 should be utilized to convert Nfield values to N60 values as noted on the Boring Logs. The correction factor is based on previous energy measurements made for the automatic hammer system utilized. The N‐values reported on the Boring Logs included in this report are the actual, uncorrected, field derived values (Nfield). It is recommended that corrected N60 values be used for engineering analysis.
Subsurface water level readings were taken in each of the borings during drilling. All boreholes were grouted using a grout mixture consisting of bentonite and cement in accordance with the
DCRA requirements up to 18 inches and the top 18 inches were backfilled with sandy loam per
NPS requirements upon completion of drilling.
Split‐spoon soil samples recovered on this project will be stored at F&R’s office for a period of sixty days. After sixty days, the samples will be discarded unless prior notification is provided to us in writing.
3.2 Laboratory Testing
Representative portions of the split‐spoon soil samples obtained throughout the exploration program were placed in glass jars and transported to our laboratory. Bulk samples were also obtained from the top 5 feet of the borings. In the laboratory, the soil samples were evaluated by a member of our professional staff in general accordance with techniques outlined in the visual‐manual identification procedure (ASTM D 2488) and the Unified Soil Classification System
(ASTM D 2487). The soil descriptions and classifications discussed in this report and shown on the attached Boring Logs are based on visual observations and should be considered approximate. Copies of the Boring Logs are provided and classification procedures are further explained in the attached Appendix II.
Laboratory tests were performed on selected split‐spoon and bulk soil samples in general accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). The test samples were selected by your office after reviewing the draft boring logs on April 12, 2017. The tests performed on the soils samples were Atterberg limits (ASTM D 4318), mechanical sieve analysis
(ASTM D 6913), Hydrometer analysis (ASTM D 7928), Standard Proctor (ASTM D 698), and natural moisture content (ASTM D 2216).
4.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY & SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
4.1 Regional Geology
Available geologic references including the The Geologic Map of the Washington West
Quadrangle, District of Columbia, Montgomery and Prince Georges Counties, Maryland, and
Arlington and Fairfax Counties, Virginia by Flemming, Drake and McCartan (1994) indicate that the site is underlain by artificial fill with heterogeneous composition and texture overlying
Alluvium of stream bottoms and flood plains: swamp deposits, and tidal deposits (Holocene). This formation contains gravel, sand, silt, and clay and ranges from gray to gray brown in color with variable thickness up to several feet. The sediment is derived from older terraces, colluvium, and saprolite, and from fresh crystalline rock.
This alluvium formation consists of mostly quartz sand and silt, illite, and illite‐smectite mixed layer clay. The sand and silt include feldspar and immature heavy minerals such as hornblende, epidote, and chlorite.
4.2 Subsurface Conditions
4.2.1 General
The subsurface conditions discussed in the following paragraphs and those shown on the attached boring logs represent an estimate of the subsurface conditions based on interpretation of the boring data using normally accepted geotechnical engineering judgments. The transitions between different soil strata are usually less distinct than those shown on the boring logs.
Sometimes the relatively small sample obtained in the field is insufficient to definitively describe the origin of the subsurface material. In these cases, we qualify our origin descriptions with
“possible” before the word describing the material’s origin (i.e. possible fill, etc.). Although individual soil test borings are representative of the subsurface conditions at the boring locations on the dates shown, they are not necessarily indicative of subsurface conditions at other locations or at other times. Data from the specific soil test borings are shown on the attached
Boring Logs in Appendix II.
Approximately 6 inches of surficial soils were encountered at the ground surface within the borings. Surficial soil is typically a dark colored soil material containing roots, fibrous matter, and/or other organic components, and is generally unsuitable for engineering purposes. F&R has not performed any laboratory testing to determine the organic content or other horticultural properties of the observed surficial soil material; therefore, the term surficial soil is not intended to indicate suitability for landscaping and/or other purposes. The surficial soil depths provided in this report are based on driller observations and should be considered approximate. We note that the transition from surficial soil to underlying materials may be gradual, and therefore, the observation and measurement of surficial soil depths are subjective. Actual surficial soil depths should be expected to vary.
4.2.2 Fill and Possible Fill Materials
Fill and possible fill materials were encountered within the test borings to a termination depth of approximately 25 feet. Fill and possible fill materials encountered in this exploration consisted
FAT CLAY (CH), ELASTIC SILT (MH) with varying amounts of sand, SILT (ML) with varying amounts of sand, silty SAND (SM), poorly graded SAND (SM), clayey GRAVEL (GC), silty GRAVEL (GM), and poorly graded GRAVEL (GP). Standard Penetration Test (SPT) N‐values ranging from 0 to 30 blows per foot (bpf) were recorded for the soils in this stratum, indicating a very loose to medium dense state for the granular soils and a very soft to very stiff consistency for the cohesive soils.
4.3 Subsurface Water
Subsurface water was encountered within borings during drilling at elevations ranging from approximately EL 0.7 to EL ‐8.1 feet. Fluctuations in subsurface water levels and soil moisture can be anticipated with changes in precipitation, run‐off, and season. The subsurface water elevations are summarized in Table 1 below.
Table 1 – Ground Water Level Readings
Boring B‐1 B‐2 B‐3 B‐4 B‐5 B‐6 B‐7 B‐8 B‐9 B‐10
Subsurface Water
Elevation (ft)
‐2.3 ‐5.1 ‐5.7 ‐5.3 ‐2.4 0.7 ‐7.1 ‐3.4 ‐6.8 ‐8.1
4.4 Laboratory Test Results
The results of the laboratory tests are summarized in Table 2 below and included in Appendix III of this report.
Table 2 ‐ Summary of Classification Testing
Boring Depth (ft)
LL PL PI Moisture Content
Gravel
Sand
Fines
USCS
Classification
Maximum Dry
Density* (pcf)
Optimum Moisture Content*
B‐1 4.0 ‐ ‐ ‐ 20.0 0.1 81.7 18.2 ‐ ‐ ‐
B‐1 8.0 52 30 22 45.4 0.0 2.8 97.2 MH ‐ ‐
B‐10 0.5 33 19 14 18.5 9.4 38.9 51.7 CL 115.1 13.1
B‐10 2.0 ‐ ‐ ‐ 17.0 0.0 28.2 71.8 ‐ ‐ ‐
B‐10 10.0 ‐ ‐ ‐ 27.1 0.4 88.9 10.7 ‐ ‐ ‐
B‐2 10.0 ‐ ‐ ‐ 30.3 32.6 48.3 19.0 ‐ ‐ ‐
B‐3 2.0 ‐ ‐ ‐ 13.7 0.0 30.8 69.1 ‐ ‐ ‐
B‐3 6.0 ‐ ‐ ‐ 14.1 34.3 31.9 33.8 ‐ ‐ ‐
B‐4 8.0 NP NP NP 30.7 0.0 73.1 26.9 SM ‐ ‐
B‐5 4.0 61 29 32 39.6 0.0 1.3 98.7 CH ‐ ‐
B‐6 0.5 24 20 4 14.2 5.6 62.6 31.8 SC‐SM 112.1 12.9
B‐6 2.0 ‐ ‐ ‐ 16.1 5.0 67.1 27.9 ‐ ‐ ‐
B‐7 4.0 ‐ ‐ ‐ 33.5 0.0 2.0 98.0 ‐ ‐ ‐
B‐7 8.0 49 29 20 44.0 0.0 1.6 98.4 ML ‐ ‐
B‐8 6.0 ‐ ‐ ‐ 38.1 0.0 6.9 93.1 ‐ ‐ ‐
B‐9 6.0 ‐ ‐ ‐ 4.0 1.7 92.8 5.5 ‐ ‐ ‐
* Maximum dry density and optimum moisture content were determined by ASTM D 698
5.0 LIMITATIONS
This report does not reflect any variations, which may occur beyond the test borings. No warranty, express or implied, is made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of CH2M Hill to aid in the evaluation of this site and to assist their office and other design professionals in the design of this project. It is intended for use with regard to the specific project described herein.
There are important limitations to this and all geotechnical studies. Some of these limitations are discussed in the information prepared by GBA, which is included in Appendix IV. We ask that you please review this GBA information.
Regardless of the thoroughness of a subsurface exploration, there is the possibility that conditions between borings will differ from those at the boring locations, that conditions are not as anticipated by the designers, or that the construction process has altered the soil conditions. Therefore, experienced geotechnical engineers should evaluate earthwork, pavement, and foundation construction to verify that the conditions anticipated in design actually exist. Otherwise, we assume no responsibility for construction compliance with the design concepts, specifications, or recommendations.
In the event that changes are made in the design or location of the proposed pipeline, the recommendations presented in the report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed by our firm and conclusions of this report modified and/or verified in writing. If this report is copied or transmitted to a third party, it must be copied or transmitted in its entirety, including text, attachments, and enclosures. Interpretations based on only a part of this report may not be valid.
APPENDIX I
DATE: February 2017
SOURCE: Google Maps
DRAWN: PSB F&R # 72U0289
Site Location Plan NAMA 151059 D Water Lines
Washington Monument Washington, DC
Drawing No.
Approximate Project Location
Scale: See Above
Approximate Site Location o
B-01
B-02
B-03
B-05
B-07
B-06
B-08
B-04
B-09
B-10
Date:
Scale:
Drawn:
As ShownFROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
Engineering Stability Since 1881
April, 2017
72U-0289
NAMA Rehabilitate Potable Water Lines Washington, DC CH2M Hill
KHH
Drawing No.
Boring Location Plan
Index
Drawing No. 3 Drawing No. 4
Drawing No. 5
Drawing No. 6
0 700' 1400'
LEGEND
BOREHOLE LOCATIONN
o o o o o
10''W
W
12''W
10''W
12''W
12''W
10''W
10''W
10''W
W
SHRUBS
8" AMERICAN
HOLLY
AMERICAN
4" TWIN
AMERICAN
4" TWIN
CHERRY
4" YOSHINO
U T
B-05
B-07
B-06
Date:
Scale:
Drawn:
As ShownFROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
Engineering Stability Since 1881
April, 2017
72U-0289
NAMA Rehabilitate Potable Water Lines Washington, DC CH2M Hill
0 200' 400'
LEGEND
BOREHOLE LOCATIONN KHH
Drawing No.
Boring Location Plan
6''W 6''W
W
12''W
12''W
W
W
W
6''W 6''W
W
W
10''W
W
6''W
SHRUBS
8" AMERICAN
HOLLY
AMERICAN
4" TWIN
AMERICAN
4" TWIN
CHERRY
4" YOSHINO
U T
U T
U
T
U
E
UE
U
T
B-02
B-03
Date:
Scale:
Drawn:
As ShownFROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
Engineering Stability Since 1881
April, 2017
72U-0289
NAMA Rehabilitate Potable Water Lines Washington, DC CH2M Hill
0 200' 400'
LEGEND
BOREHOLE LOCATIONN KHH
Drawing No.
o
W
4''W
W
W
W
10''W
W
10''W
10''W
10''W
SHRUBS
SHRUBS
CHERRY
6" YOSHINO
HOLLY
AMERICAN
6" & 8" TWIN
HOLLY
8" AMERICAN
HOLLY
8" AMERICAN
HOLLY
AMERICAN
4" TWIN
HOLLY
AMERICAN
4" TWIN
CHERRY
2" YOSHINO
CHERRY
4" YOSHINO
U E
U
T
U T
U T
U T
U T
U T
U
T
B-05
B-06
B-08
B-04
B-09
Date:
Scale:
Drawn:
As ShownFROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
Engineering Stability Since 1881
April, 2017
72U-0289
NAMA Rehabilitate Potable Water Lines Washington, DC CH2M Hill
0 200' 400'
LEGEND
BOREHOLE LOCATIONN KHH
Drawing No.
U T
U T
B-01
B-10
Date:
Scale:
Drawn:
As ShownFROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
Engineering Stability Since 1881
April, 2017
72U-0289
NAMA Rehabilitate Potable Water Lines Washington, DC CH2M Hill
0 200' 400'
LEGEND
BOREHOLE LOCATIONN KHH
Drawing No.
APPENDIX II
KEY TO SOIL CLASSIFICATION
Correlation of Penetration Resistance with
Relative Density and Consistency
Sands and Gravels Silts and Clays
No. of Relative No. of
Blows, N Density Blows, N Consistency
0 - 4 Very loose 0 - 2 Very soft
5 - 10 Loose 3 - 4 Soft
11 - 30 Medium dense 5 - 8 Firm
31 - 50 Dense 9 - 15 Stiff
Over 50 Very dense 16 - 30 Very stiff
31 - 50 Hard
Over 50 Very hard
Particle Size Identification
(Unified Classification System)
Boulders: Diameter exceeds 12-in. (300-mm)
Cobbles: 3-in. (75-mm) to 12-in. (300-mm) diameter
Gravel: Coarse - ¾-in. (19-mm) to 3 in. (75-mm) diameter
Fine - No. 4 (4.75-mm) sieve to ¾-in. (19-mm) diameter
Sand: Coarse – No. 10 (2.0-mm) to No. 4 (4.76 mm) sieve
Medium – No. 40 (0.425-mm) to No. 10 (2.0-mm) sieve
Fine - No. 200 (0.075-mm) to No. 40 (0.425-mm) sieve
Silt and Clay: Less than No. 200 (0.075-mm) sieve
Modifiers
The modifiers provide our estimate of the amount of silt, clay or sand size particles in the soil sample.
Approximate
Content
Modifiers
Field Moisture
Description
≤ 5%: Trace Dry Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to touch
5 to 10%: Few Moist Damp but no visible water
15 to 25%: Little Wet Visible free water, usually soil is below water table
30 to 45%: Some
50 to 100% Mostly
CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES
ASTM Designation: D 2487
(Based on Unified Soil Classification System)
Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests A Soil Classification
Group Symbol Group Name B
COARSE-GRAINED
SOILS
More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve
Gravels
More than 50% coarse fraction retaining on No. 4 sieve
Clean Gravels
Less than 5% fines c
Cu ≥ 4 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3 E GW Well graded gravel
F
Cu < 4 and/or 1> Cc >3
GP Poorly graded gravel
F
Gravels with Fines
More than 12 % fines c
Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel F,G,H
Fines classify as CL or CH
GC
Clayey gravel F,G,H
Sands
50% or more of coarse fraction passes No. 4 sieve
Clean Sands
Less than 5% fines D
Cu ≥ 6 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤3
SW Well-graded sand
I
Cu < 6 and/or 1 > Cc > 3
SP Poorly graded sand
I
Sands with Fines
More than 12% fines D
Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sand G,H,I
Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sand G,H,I
FINE-GRAINED SOILS
50% or more passes the No. 200 sieve
Silts and Clays
Liquid Limit less than
Inorganic PI > 7 and plots on or above
“A” line J
CL
Lean clay
K,L,M
PI < 4 or plots below “A” line J ML Silt
Organic Liquid limit - ovendried <0.75
Liquid limit - not dried
OL
Organic clay K,L,M,N
Organic silt K,L,M,O
Silts and Clays
Liquid Limit 50 or more
Inorganic PI plots on or above “A” line CH Fat clay
PI plots below “A” line MH Elastic silt
Organic Liquid limit - ovendried <0.75
Liquid limit - not dried
OH
Organic clay K,L,M,P
Organic silt K,L,M,Q
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor PT Peat
A Based on the material passing the 3-in (75 mm) sieve
B If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add
“with cobbles or boulders, or both” to group name.
C Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols:
GW-GM well-graded gravel with silt
GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay
GP-GM poorly graded gravel with silt
GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay
D Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols:
SW-SM well-graded sand with silt
SW-SC well-graded sand with clay
SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt
SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay
E Cu=D60/D10 Cc = (D30)
/(D10*D60)
F If soil contains ≥ 15% sand, add “with sand” to the group name
G If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM, or
SC-SM
H If fines are organic, add “with organic fines” to the group name
I If soil contains ≥ 15% gravel, add “with gravel” to group name
J If Atterberg limits plot in hatched area, soils is a CL-ML, silty clay
K If soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200, add “with sand” or
“with gravel,” whichever is predominant
L If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200, predominantly sand, add “sandy” to group name
M If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200, predominantly gravel, add “gravelly” to group name
N PI ≥ 4 and plots on or above “A” line
O PI < 4 or plots below “A” line
P PI plots on or above “A” line
Q PI plots below “A” line
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Screen (in) Sieve No.
1.5 ¾ 4 10 20 40 60 100 200
D60 = 3 mm
D30 = 0.6 mm
D10 = 0.2 mm
Cu = D60/D10 = (3/0.2) = 15
Cc = (D30) /(D10*D60) = (0.6
)/(0.2*3) = 0.6
“U” Line “A” Line
CL or OL
CH or OH
ML or OL
MH or OH
CL-ML
For classification of fine-grained soils and fine-grained fraction of coarse-grained soils:
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Liquid Limit (LL)
Plasticity Index (PI)
Equation of “A” line: Horizontal at PI = 4 to LL = 22.5, then PI = 0.73*(LL-20)
Equation of “U” line: Vertical at LL = 16 to PI = 7, then PI = 0.9*(LL-8)
LETTERGRAPH
SYMBOLS
MAJOR DIVISIONS
SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART
OH
CH
MH
OL
CL
ML
SC
SM
SP
COARSE
GRAINED
SOILS
SW
TYPICAL
DESCRIPTIONS
WELL-GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL -
SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO
FINES
POORLY-GRADED GRAVELS,
GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE
OR NO FINES
SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND -
SILT MIXTURES
GC
GM
GP
GW
CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND -
CLAY MIXTURES
WELL-GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY
SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES
POORLY-GRADED SANDS,
GRAVELLY SAND, LITTLE OR NO
FINES
SILTY SANDS, SAND - SILT
MIXTURES
CLAYEY SANDS, SAND - CLAY
MIXTURES
INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE
SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR
CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY
SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY
INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO
MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY
CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY
CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS
ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC
SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY
INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR
DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR
SILTY SOILS
INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH
PLASTICITY
ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO
HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS
CLEAN
GRAVELS
GRAVELS WITH
FINES
CLEAN SANDS
(LITTLE OR NO FINES)
SANDS WITH
FINES
LIQUID LIMIT
LESS THAN 50
LIQUID LIMIT
GREATER THAN 50
GRAVEL
AND
GRAVELLY
SOILS
FINE
GRAINED
SOILS
SAND
AND
SANDY
SOILS
SILTS
AND
CLAYS
SILTS
AND
CLAYS
MORE THAN 50%
OF COARSE
FRACTION
RETAINED ON NO.
4 SIEVE
MORE THAN 50%
OF COARSE
FRACTION
PASSING ON NO.
4 SIEVE
MORE THAN 50%
OF MATERIAL IS
SMALLER THAN
NO. 200 SIEVE
SIZE
MORE THAN 50%
OF MATERIAL IS
LARGER THAN
NO. 200 SIEVE
SIZE
(LITTLE OR NO FINES)
(APPRECIABLE
AMOUNT OF FINES)
(APPRECIABLE
AMOUNT OF FINES)
NOTE: DUAL SYMBOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERLINE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS
EXISTING FILL FILL EXISTING FILL MATERIALS
1.5
3.5
5.5
7.5
9.5
11.5
13.5
15.5
17.5
19.5
21.5
23.5
25.0
R: Recovery length of the samples
Water encountered at 6 feet during drilling
W: Spoon driven by the weight of the hammer Pocket Pen at 8 feet: 0.25
TSF
Pocket Pen at 16 feet: 0
TSF
6 inches of SURFICIAL SOIL FILL, Brown, clayey SAND (SC) with gravel, trace root matter, loose, moist Brown, sandy ELASTIC SILT (MH), trace root matter, firm, moist
Brown, silty SAND (SM), loose to very loose, moist
- Wet at 6 feet
Dark gray, sandy ELASTIC SILT (MH), very soft, wet
Dark gray, silty SAND (SM), contains seams of fat clay, very loose, wet
Boring was terminated at 25 feet. Boring was grouted per DCRA requirements up to 18 inches.
The top 18 inches was backfilled with sandy loam per NPS requirements.
* Elevation was determined with a Geo 7 Series GPS Unit in 1929 Maryland State Plane.
3.2
1.7
-0.3
-4.3
-12.3
-21.3
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
22.0
23.5
0.5
2.0
4.0
8.0
16.0
25.0
3-3-6 -R=2"
2-3-3 -R=18"
3-3-3 -R=18"
2-1-1 -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-2 -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-2 -R=18"
W-1-1 -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-1-2 -R=18"
F r o e h l in g & R o b e r t s o n , I n c .
Client: CH2M Hill
City/State: Washington, D.C.
Project: NAMA 151059 D Water Lines
*Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30" to drive 2" O.D., 1.375" I.D. sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6" increments.
The sum of the second and third increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance, N-Value.
Project No: 72U0289
Elevation Remarks
Boring: B-1 (1 of 1)
Location: See Boring Location Plan Hammer Type: Automatic
Sample Depth (feet)
Depth
R
Total Depth: 25.0' Elevation: 3.7 ± *
Driller: Wilhelm
Drilling Method: 2.25" HSA
Date Drilled: 3/20/17
* Sample Blows
Description of Materials (Classification)
N-Value (blows/ft)
BORING LOG
BO
RI
N
G _L
O G
2U
L O
G S.
G
PJ
F
R.
G
D T
/2
4/
5.5
7.5
9.5
11.5
13.5
15.5
17.5
19.5
21.5
23.5
25.0
R: Recovery length of the samples
Water encountered at 10 feet during drilling
W: Spoon driven by the weight of the hammer
6 inches of SURFICIAL SOIL FILL, Brown, silty SAND (SM) with gravel, contains quartz, trace root matter, medium dense, moist Brown, silty GRAVEL (GM), contains quartz, medium dense, moist
Brown, silty SAND (SM), loose, moist
Brown, clayey GRAVEL (GC), very loose to loose, moist
- Wet at 10 feet
- Trace debris (ceramic) at 14 feet
Dark gray, sandy ELASTIC SILT (MH), very soft to stiff, wet
- Trace gravel, contains quartz, contains wood fragments at 18 feet
Dark gray, silty GRAVEL (GM) with sand, loose, wet
POSSIBLE FILL Brown, FAT CLAY (CH), contains wood fragments, stiff, moist
Gray and brown, silty SAND (SM) with gravel, some clay, loose, wet
Boring was terminated at 25 feet. Boring was grouted per DCRA requirements up to 18 inches.
The top 18 inches was backfilled with sandy loam per NPS requirements.
* Elevation was determined with a Geo 7 Series GPS Unit in 1929 Maryland State Plane.
4.4
2.9
-1.1
-3.1
-11.1
-15.1
-17.1
-18.6
-20.1
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
22.0
23.5
0.5
2.0
6.0
8.0
16.0
20.0
22.0
23.5
25.0
3-5-8 -R=12"
6-6-8 -R=18"
3-5-6 -R=18"
5-6-4 -R=18"
2-3-3 -R=18"
2-3-3 -R=18"
1-1-1 -R=6"
W-W-W -R=6"
2-1-1 -R=10"
3-5-7 -R=18"
3-4-5 -R=6"
4-4-5 -R=2"
3-3-5 -R=18"
F r o e h l in g & R o b e r t s o n , I n c .
Client: CH2M Hill
City/State: Washington, D.C.
Project: NAMA 151059 D Water Lines
*Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30" to drive 2" O.D., 1.375" I.D. sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6" increments.
The sum of the second and third increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance, N-Value.
Project No: 72U0289
Elevation Remarks
Boring: B-2 (1 of 1)
Location: See Boring Location Plan Hammer Type: Automatic
Sample Depth (feet)
Depth
R
Total Depth: 25.0' Elevation: 4.9 ± *
Driller: Wilhelm
Drilling Method: 2.25" HSA
Date Drilled: 3/16/17
* Sample Blows
Description of Materials (Classification)
N-Value (blows/ft)
BORING LOG
BO
RI
N
G _L
O G
2U
L O
G S.
G
PJ
F
R.
G
D T
/2
5.5
7.5
9.5
11.5
13.5
15.5
17.5
19.5
21.5
23.5
25.0
R: Recovery length of the samples
Water encountered at 8 feet during drilling
Pocket Pen at 14 feet: 0.75
TSF
W: Spoon driven by the weight of the hammer
6 inches of SURFICIAL SOIL FILL, Brown, silty GRAVEL (GM), contains quartz, contains wood fragments, medium dense, moist Brown, sandy SILT (ML), little gravel, stiff to firm, moist
Brown and orange and gray, silty GRAVEL (GM), contains organics, contain rubble, medium dense to very loose, moist
- Color change to gray, wet at 8 feet
Black, poorly graded SAND (SP) with gravel, contains clay, contains wood fragments, loose, wet
Black, poorly graded GRAVEL (GP), contains debris (metal), loose, wet
Dark gray, sandy ELASTIC SILT (MH), very soft to soft, wet
- Contains wood fragments at 16 feet
- Contains organics, no wood fragments at 18 feet
Dark gray, silty SAND (SM), contains seams of fat clay, loose, wet
Boring was terminated at 25 feet. Boring was grouted per DCRA requirements up to 18 inches.
The top 18 inches was backfilled with sandy loam per NPS requirements.
* Elevation was determined with a Geo 7 Series GPS Unit in 1929 Maryland State Plane.
1.8
0.3
-3.7
-7.7
-9.7
-11.7
-17.7
-22.7
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
22.0
23.5
0.5
2.0
6.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
20.0
25.0
6-13-11 -R=5"
5-5-6 -R=10"
3-3-4 -R=10"
4-8-3 -R=18"
3-3-1 -R=18"
2-2-3 -R=18"
2-2-3 -R=18"
1-1-1 -R=18"
2-2-1 -R=18"
W-W-2 -R=18"
2-2-3 -R=18"
1-3-3 -R=18"
3-3-3 -R=18"
F r o e h l in g & R o b e r t s o n , I n c .
Client: CH2M Hill
City/State: Washington, D.C.
Project: NAMA 151059 D Water Lines
*Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30" to drive 2" O.D., 1.375" I.D. sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6" increments.
The sum of the second and third increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance, N-Value.
Project No: 72U0289
Elevation Remarks
Boring: B-3 (1 of 1)
Location: See Boring Location Plan Hammer Type: Automatic
Sample Depth (feet)
Depth
R
Total Depth: 25.0' Elevation: 2.3 ± *
Driller: Wilhelm
Drilling Method: 2.25" HSA
Date Drilled: 3/15/17
* Sample Blows
Description of Materials (Classification)
N-Value (blows/ft)
BORING LOG
BO
RI
N
G _L
O G
2U
L O
G S.
G
PJ
F
R.
G
D T
/2
5.5
7.5
9.5
11.5
13.5
15.5
17.5
19.5
21.5
23.5
25.0
R: Recovery length of the samples
Pocket Pen at 2 feet: 3 TSF
Water encountered at 8 feet during drilling
W: Spoon driven by the weight of the hammer
Pocket Pen at 10 feet: 0
TSF
Pocket Pen at 12 feet: 0.75
TSF
Pocket Pen at 14 feet: 0.75
TSF
Pocket Pen at 22 feet: 1.25
TSF
6 inches of SURFICIAL SOIL FILL, Brown, silty GRAVEL (GM), contains quartz, trace root matter, medium dense, moist Brown, sandy SILT (ML), trace gravel, firm, moist
Brown, silty SAND (SM), loose, moist
Brown, silty SAND (SM), loose to very loose, moist
- Color change to dark gray, wet at 8 feet
Dark gray, sandy ELASTIC SILT (MH), very soft, wet
Dark gray, silty SAND (SM) with clay, very loose, wet
Dark gray, ELASTIC SILT (MH) with sand, very soft, wet
Boring was terminated at 25 feet. Boring was grouted per DCRA requirements up to 18 inches.
The top 18 inches was backfilled with sandy loam per NPS requirements.
* Elevation was determined with a Geo 7 Series GPS Unit in 1929 Maryland State Plane.
2.2
0.7
-1.3
-3.3
-7.3
-13.3
-15.3
-22.3
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
22.0
23.5
0.5
2.0
4.0
6.0
10.0
16.0
18.0
25.0
4-6-6 -R=10"
3-3-4 -R=10"
4-4-5 -R=18"
2-3-2 -R=18"
2-2-2 -R=18"
2-1-1 -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
1-1-1 -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-1 -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
F r o e h l in g & R o b e r t s o n , I n c .
Client: CH2M Hill
City/State: Washington, D.C.
Project: NAMA 151059 D Water Lines
*Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30" to drive 2" O.D., 1.375" I.D. sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6" increments.
The sum of the second and third increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance, N-Value.
Project No: 72U0289
Elevation Remarks
Boring: B-4 (1 of 1)
Location: See Boring Location Plan Hammer Type: Automatic
Sample Depth (feet)
Depth
R
Total Depth: 25.0' Elevation: 2.7 ± *
Driller: Wilhelm
Drilling Method: 2.25" HSA
Date Drilled: 3/16/17
* Sample Blows
Description of Materials (Classification)
N-Value (blows/ft)
BORING LOG
BO
RI
N
G _L
O G
2U
L O
G S.
G
PJ
F
R.
G
D T
/2
5.5
7.5
9.5
11.5
13.5
15.5
19.0
21.5
23.5
25.0
R: Recovery length of the samples
Pocket Pen at 4 feet: 1 TSF
W: Spoon driven by the weight of the hammer Water encountered at 8 feet during drilling
Pocket Pen at 8 feet: 0.5
TSF
Pocket Pen at 10 feet: 0.25
TSF
Pocket Pen at 12 feet: 1.5
TSF
Pocket Pen at 14 feet: 0.75
TSF
Shelby Tube sample was taken from 15.5 to 17.5 feet; R=24"
Pocket Pen at 22 feet: 1
TSF
6 inches of SURFICIAL SOIL FILL, Brown, sandy SILT (ML), trace gravel, contains quartz, trace root matter, medium dense, moist Black and brown, silty SAND (SM), contains organics, trace gravel, contains wood fragments, loose, moist Dark gray and brown, FAT CLAY (CH), trace organics, soft to very soft, moist
- Wet at 8 feet
Dark gray, silty SAND (SM), contains seams of fat clay, very loose, wet
Dark gray, ELASTIC SILT (MH), very soft, wet
Boring was terminated at 25 feet. Boring was grouted per DCRA requirements up to 18 inches.
The top 18 inches was backfilled with sandy loam per NPS requirements.
* Elevation was determined with a Geo 7 Series GPS Unit in 1929 Maryland State Plane.
5.1
3.6
1.6
-11.9
-14.4
-19.4
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
17.5
20.0
22.0
23.5
0.5
2.0
4.0
17.5
20.0
25.0
2-6-6 -R=18"
3-3-3 -R=18"
2-1-2 -R=18"
W-W-2 -R=18"
W-2-1 -R=18"
1-1-1 -R=18"
W-W-2 -R=18"
W-1-1 -R=18"
W-W-2 -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-2 -R=18"
F r o e h l in g & R o b e r t s o n , I n c .
Client: CH2M Hill
City/State: Washington, D.C.
Project: NAMA 151059 D Water Lines
*Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30" to drive 2" O.D., 1.375" I.D. sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6" increments.
The sum of the second and third increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance, N-Value.
Project No: 72U0289
Elevation Remarks
Boring: B-5 (1 of 1)
Location: See Boring Location Plan Hammer Type: Automatic
Sample Depth (feet)
Depth
R
Total Depth: 25.0' Elevation: 5.6 ± *
Driller: Wilhelm
Drilling Method: 3.25" HSA
Date Drilled: 3/20/17
* Sample Blows
Description of Materials (Classification)
N-Value (blows/ft)
BORING LOG
BO
RI
N
G _L
O G
2U
L O
G S.
G
PJ
F
R.
G
D T
/2
5.5
7.5
9.5
13.5
15.5
17.5
19.5
21.5
23.5
25.0
R: Recovery length of the samples Pocket Pen at 0 feet: 3 TSF
W: Spoon driven by the weight of the hammer
Water encountered at 6 feet during drilling
Shelby Tube sample was taken from 9.5 to 11.5 feet; R=20"
Pocket Pen at 14 feet: 0.75
TSF
Pocket Pen at 22 feet: 1.5
TSF
Pocket Pen at 23.5 feet:
1.25 TSF
6 inches of SURFICIAL SOIL FILL, Brown, silty SAND (SM), trace root matter, contains organics, some gravel, very loose to medium dense, moist
- Trace gravel at 2 feet
- Color change to dark gray, wet at 6 feet
Dark gray, ELASTIC SILT (MH) with sand, trace organics, very soft, wet
Dark gray, silty SAND (SM), contains seams of fat clay, very loose, wet
Dark gray, sandy ELASTIC SILT (MH), trace gravel, contains quartz, very soft, wet
Dark gray, silty SAND (SM), contains seams of fat clay, very loose, wet
Dark gray, sandy SILT (ML), very soft, wet
Boring was terminated at 25 feet. Boring was grouted per DCRA requirements up to 18 inches.
The top 18 inches was backfilled with sandy loam per NPS requirements.
* Elevation was determined with a Geo 7 Series GPS Unit in 1929 Maryland State Plane.
6.2
-1.3
-5.3
-7.3
-11.3
-16.8
-18.3
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
22.0
23.5
0.5
8.0
12.0
14.0
18.0
23.5
25.0
4-5-8 -R=10"
10-6-7 -R=12"
4-4-3 -R=18"
W-1-2 -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
2-1-2 -R=18"
1-1-1 -R=12"
1-W-1 -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-1-1 -R=18"
W-1-2 -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
F r o e h l in g & R o b e r t s o n , I n c .
Client: CH2M Hill
City/State: Washington, D.C.
Project: NAMA 151059 D Water Lines
*Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30" to drive 2" O.D., 1.375" I.D. sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6" increments.
The sum of the second and third increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance, N-Value.
Project No: 72U0289
Elevation Remarks
Boring: B-6 (1 of 1)
Location: See Boring Location Plan Hammer Type: Automatic
Sample Depth (feet)
Depth
R
Total Depth: 25.0' Elevation: 6.7 ± *
Driller: Wilhelm
Drilling Method: 3.25" HSA
Date Drilled: 3/17/17
* Sample Blows
Description of Materials (Classification)
N-Value (blows/ft)
BORING LOG
BO
RI
N
G _L
O G
2U
L O
G S.
G
PJ
F
R.
G
D T
/2
5.5
7.5
9.5
11.5
13.5
15.5
17.5
19.5
21.5
23.5
25.0
R: Recovery length of the samples
W: Spoon driven by the weight of the hammer
Pocket Pen at 8 feet: 0.5
TSF
Pocket Pen at 14 feet: 0.75
TSF
Water encountered at 18 feet during drilling
Pocket Pen at 20 feet: 0.25
TSF
6 inches of SURFICIAL SOIL FILL, Brown, silty SAND (SM) with gravel, trace debris (glass), medium dense, moist
- Color change to black and brown at 2 feet
Gray, sandy SILT (ML), trace gravel, firm, moist
Gray, ELASTIC SILT (MH), contains wood fragments, very soft, moist
Gray, SILT (ML), contains wood fragments, very soft, moist
Gray, ELASTIC SILT (MH), contains wood fragments, very soft, moist
Dark gray, silty SAND (SM), very loose, moist
- Wet at 18 feet
Dark gray, sandy ELASTIC SILT (MH), very soft, wet
Boring was terminated at 25 feet. Boring was grouted per DCRA requirements up to 18 inches.
The top 18 inches was backfilled with sandy loam per NPS requirements.
* Elevation was determined with a Geo 7 Series GPS Unit in 1929 Maryland State Plane.
10.4
6.9
4.9
2.9
0.9
-5.1
-9.1
-14.1
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
22.0
23.5
0.5
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
16.0
20.0
25.0
4-5-6 -R=18"
3-5-7 -R=18"
4-3-3 -R=18"
W-1-1 -R=18"
W-1-1 -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-1 -R=18"
W-1-1 -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
F r o e h l in g & R o b e r t s o n , I n c .
Client: CH2M Hill
City/State: Washington, D.C.
Project: NAMA 151059 D Water Lines
*Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30" to drive 2" O.D., 1.375" I.D. sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6" increments.
The sum of the second and third increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance, N-Value.
Project No: 72U0289
Elevation Remarks
Boring: B-7 (1 of 1)
Location: See Boring Location Plan Hammer Type: Automatic
Sample Depth (feet)
Depth
R
Total Depth: 25.0' Elevation: 10.9 ± *
Driller: Wilhelm
Drilling Method: 2.25" HSA
Date Drilled: 3/17/17
* Sample Blows
Description of Materials (Classification)
N-Value (blows/ft)
BORING LOG
BO
RI
N
G _L
O G
2U
L O
G S.
G
PJ
F
R.
G
D T
/2
5.5
7.5
9.5
11.5
13.5
15.5
17.5
19.5
21.5
23.5
25.0
R: Recovery length of the samples
Pocket Pen at 2 feet: 3.5
TSF
W: Spoon driven by the weight of the hammer
Pocket Pen at 6 feet: 0 TSF
Water encountered at 8 feet during drilling
Pocket Pen at 14 feet: 0.25
TSF
6 inches of SURFICIAL SOIL FILL, Brown, silty SAND (SM), trace gravel, contains quartz, very loose to medium dense
- Trace root matter at 4 feet
Dark gray, ELASTIC SILT (MH), little sand, very soft, moist
- Trace gravel, trace root matter, wet at 8 feet
- No root matter at 10 feet
- Contains organics at 14 feet
- Contains pieces of bricks at 20 feet
POSSIBLE FILL, Dark gray, silty SAND (SM), very loose, wet
Dark gray, sandy ELASTIC SILT (MH), very soft, wet
Boring was terminated at 25 feet. Boring was grouted per DCRA requirements up to 18 inches.
The top 18 inches was backfilled with sandy loam per NPS requirements.
* Elevation was determined with a Geo 7 Series GPS Unit in 1929 Maryland State Plane.
4.1
-1.4
-17.4
-18.9
-20.4
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
22.0
23.5
0.5
6.0
22.0
23.5
25.0
2-3-5 -R=10"
2-4-7 -R=18"
3-2-1 -R=4"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-W -R=18"
W-W-2 -R=18"
W-W-1 -R=18"
F r o e h l in g & R o b e r t s o n , I n c .
Client: CH2M Hill
City/State: Washington, D.C.
Project: NAMA 151059 D Water Lines
*Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30" to drive 2" O.D., 1.375" I.D. sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6" increments.
The sum of the second and third increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance, N-Value.
Project No: 72U0289
Elevation Remarks
Boring: B-8 (1 of 1)
Location: See Boring Location Plan Hammer Type: Automatic
Sample Depth (feet)
Depth
R
Total Depth: 25.0' Elevation: 4.6 ± *
Driller: Wilhelm
Drilling Method: 2.25" HSA
Date Drilled: 3/21/17
* Sample Blows
Description of Materials (Classification)
N-Value (blows/ft)
BORING LOG
BO
RI
N
G _L
O G
2U
L O
G S.
G
PJ
F
R.
G
D T
/2
5.5
7.5
9.5
11.5
13.5
15.5
17.5
19.5
21.5
23.5
25.0
R: Recovery length of the samples
Pocket Pen at 2 feet: 3 TSF
Water encountered at 10 feet during drilling
W: Spoon driven by the weight of the hammer
Pocket Pen at 20 feet: 0.5
TSF
6 inches of SURFICIAL SOIL FILL, Brown, silty GRAVEL (GM), contains quartz, medium dense, moist Brown, sandy SILT (ML), trace gravel, loose, moist
Brown, silty SAND (SM), contains quartz, loose to very loose, moist
- Color change to gray-brown, wet at 10 feet
Dark gray, sandy SILT (ML), very soft, wet
Dark gray, silty SAND (SM), very loose to loose, wet
Dark gray, sandy ELASTIC SILT (MH), firm, wet
POSSIBLE FILL, Dark gray, silty SAND (SM), contains wood fragments, loose to very loose, wet
Boring was terminated at 25 feet. Boring was grouted per DCRA requirements up to 18 inches.
The top 18 inches was backfilled with sandy loam per NPS requirements.
* Elevation was determined with a Geo 7 Series GPS Unit in 1929 Maryland State Plane.
2.7
1.2
-0.8
-8.8
-10.8
-16.8
-18.8
-21.8
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
22.0
23.5
0.5
2.0
4.0
12.0
14.0
20.0
22.0
25.0
6-12-18 -R=7"
4-3-4 -R=10"
3-3-3 -R=18"
2-3-3 -R=18"
3-2-2 -R=18"
2-1-1 -R=18"
W-W-1 -R=18"
1-1-2 -R=18"
2-3-2 -R=18"
2-2-2 -R=18"
2-2-3 -R=18"
1-3-2 -R=18"
W-2-2 -R=18"
F r o e h l in g & R o b e r t s o n , I n c .
Client: CH2M Hill
City/State: Washington, D.C.
Project: NAMA 151059 D Water Lines
*Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30" to drive 2" O.D., 1.375" I.D. sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6" increments.
The sum of the second and third increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance, N-Value.
Project No: 72U0289
Elevation Remarks
Boring: B-9 (1 of 1)
Location: See Boring Location Plan Hammer Type: Automatic
Sample Depth (feet)
Depth
R
Total Depth: 25.0' Elevation: 3.2 ± *
Driller: Wilhelm
Drilling Method: 2.25" HSA
Date Drilled: 3/13/17
* Sample Blows
Description of Materials (Classification)
N-Value (blows/ft)
BORING LOG
BO
RI
N
G _L
O G
2U
L O
G S.
G
PJ
F
R.
G
D T
/2
5.5
7.5
9.5
11.5
13.5
15.5
17.5
19.5
21.5
23.5
25.0
R: Recovery length of the samples
Water encountered at 10 feet during drilling
6 inches of SURFICIAL SOIL FILL, Brown, clayey GRAVEL (GC), contains quartz, medium dense, moist Brown, SILT (ML) with sand, stiff, moist
Brown, silty SAND (SM), very loose to loose, moist
- Color change to dark gray, contains organics at 8 feet
- Wet at 10 feet
- Contains seams of fat clay at 20 feet
- No fat clay at 22 feet
Boring was terminated at 25 feet. Boring was grouted per DCRA requirements up to 18 inches.
The top 18 inches was backfilled with sandy loam per NPS requirements.
* Elevation was determined with a Geo 7 Series GPS Unit in 1929 Maryland State Plane.
1.4
-0.1
-2.1
-23.1
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
22.0
23.5
0.5
2.0
4.0
25.0
6-11-12 -R=18"
5-6-5 -R=18"
3-4-4 -R=18"
2-2-3 -R=18"
1-1-2 -R=18"
2-3-2 -R=18"
2-2-2 -R=18"
2-2-2 -R=18"
1-1-1 -R=18"
1-1-1 -R=18"
2-2-2 -R=18"
1-1-1 -R=18"
3-2-2 -R=18"
F r o e h l in g & R o b e r t s o n , I n c .
Client: CH2M Hill
City/State: Washington, D.C.
Project: NAMA 151059 D Water Lines
*Number of blows required for a 140 lb hammer dropping 30" to drive 2" O.D., 1.375" I.D. sampler a total of 18 inches in three 6" increments.
The sum of the second and third increments of penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance, N-Value.
Project No: 72U0289
Elevation Remarks
Boring: B-10 (1 of 1)
Location: See Boring Location Plan Hammer Type: Automatic
Sample Depth (feet)
Depth
R
Total Depth: 25.0' Elevation: 1.9 ± *
Driller: Wilhelm
Drilling Method: 2.25" HSA
Date Drilled: 3/13/17
* Sample Blows
Description of Materials (Classification)
N-Value (blows/ft)
BORING LOG
BO
RI
N
G _L
O G
2U
L O
G S.
G
PJ
F
R.
G
D T
/2
APPENDIX III
B-1 4.0 20.0 0.1 81.7 18.2
B-1 8.0 52 30 22 45.4 0.0 2.8 97.2 MH A-7-5
B-10 0.5 33 19 14 18.5 9.4 38.9 51.7 CL A-6 115.1 13.1
B-10 2.0 17.0 0.0 28.2 71.8 B-10 10.0 27.1 0.4 88.9 10.7 B-2 10.0 30.3 32.6 48.3 19.0 B-3 2.0 13.7 0.0 30.8 69.1 B-3 6.0 14.1 34.3 31.9 33.8
B-4 8.0 NP NP NP 30.7 0.0 73.1 26.9 SM A-2-4
B-5 4.0 61 29 32 39.6 0.0 1.3 98.7 CH A-7-6
B-6 0.5 24 20 4 14.2 5.6 62.6 31.8 SC-SM A-2-4 112.1 12.9
B-6 2.0 16.1 5.0 67.1 27.9 B-7 4.0 33.5 0.0 2.0 98.0
B-7 8.0 49 29 20 44.0 0.0 1.6 98.4 ML A-7-6
B-8 6.0 38.1 0.0 6.9 93.1 B-9 6.0 4.0 1.7 92.8 5.5
AASHTO
Class.
Gravel
Sheet: 1 of 1
LL PL %
Sand
Fines
CBR
Value @ 0.1
PI
Optimum
Water Content (%)
Maximum Dry Density
(pcf) Depth (ft) USCS
Class.
LABORATORY TEST
SUMMARY SHEET
Boring/ Sample No.
Water Content (%)
City/State: Washington, D.C.
Project: NAMA 151059 D Water Lines Client: CH2M Hill
F r o e h l in g & R o b e r t s o n , I n c .
Project No: 72U0289
R
LA
B
SU
M
M
AR
Y
2U
L
O G
S.
G
PJ
F
R.
G D
T
/2 1/
0.0010.010.1110100 Grain Size (mm)
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION
COBBLES
3/8 3 4 6 810 1416 20 30 40 50 60 100140
9.52 9.52 25.4 9.52 25.4
D60 0.151 0.149 0.319 0.006 0.047
0.008 0.071 0.01
0.002
%Gravel 0.1 0.4
32.6 0.0
34.3
%Sand 81.7 88.9 48.3 30.8 31.9
4.0 10.0 10.0
2.0 6.0
%Silt 9.8
10.7 12.9 41.3 20.0
%Clay 8.3 0.0 6.1
27.8 13.8
Cu
U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER
6 4 3 2 1.5 1 3/4 1/2
Pe rc en t F in er
(B y
W ei gh t)
GRAVEL
coarse fine coarse medium
SAND
fine
SILT OR CLAY
Boring No. Depth B-1 B-10 B-2 B-3 B-3 at at at at at
4.0 10.0 10.0
2.0 6.0
Classification
LL PL PI
0.254 0.256 2.95
0.047 0.628
D30 D10
33.55 3.59
288.03
308.28
Cc 11.95 1.22 3.37
1.74
U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES
Boring No. Depth B-1 B-10 B-2 B-3 B-3 at at at at at
D100
Client: CH2M Hill
City/State: Washington, D.C.
Project: NAMA 151059 D Water Lines
Project No: 72U0289
R
F r o e h l in g & R o b e r t s o n , I n c .
U
S_ G
RA
IN
_S
IZ
E
2U
L
O G
S.
G
PJ
F
R.
G D
T
/2
0.0010.010.1110100 Grain Size (mm)
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION
COBBLES
3/8 3 4 6 810 1416 20 30 40 50 60 100140
4.76
D60 0.002 0.079 0.001 0.003
0.035
%Gravel 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%Sand 2.8
73.1 1.3 1.6
8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0
%Silt 53.3 23.6 38.9 56.4
%Clay 43.9 3.3
59.8 41.9
Cu
U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER
6 4 3 2 1.5 1 3/4 1/2
NP
NP
NP
Pe rc en t F in er
(B y
W ei gh t)
GRAVEL
coarse fine coarse medium
SAND
fine
SILT OR CLAY
Boring No. Depth B-1 B-4 B-5 B-7 at at at at at
8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0
Classification
ELASTIC SILT (MH)
SILTY SAND (SM)
FAT CLAY (CH)
SILT (ML)
LL PL PI
0.01 0.137 0.005 0.01
D30 D10
3.86
Cc
1.30
U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES
Boring No. Depth B-1 B-4 B-5 B-7 at at at at at
D100
Client: CH2M Hill
City/State: Washington, D.C.
Project: NAMA 151059 D Water Lines
Project No: 72U0289
R
F r o e h l in g & R o b e r t s o n , I n c .
U
S_ G
RA
IN
_S
IZ
E
2U
L
O G
S.
G
PJ
F
R.
G D
T
/2
0.0010.010.1110100 Grain Size (mm)
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION
COBBLES
3/8 3 4 6 810 1416 20 30 40 50 60 100140
4.76
19.1
D60 0.003 0.005
0.251 0.115
%Gravel 0.0 0.0 1.7
%Sand 2.0 6.9
92.8
4.0 6.0 6.0
%Silt 60.5 62.9 4.6
%Clay 37.4 30.2 0.9
Cu
U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER
6 4 3 2 1.5 1 3/4 1/2
Pe rc en t F in er
(B y
W ei gh t)
GRAVEL
coarse fine coarse medium
SAND
fine
SILT OR CLAY
Boring No. Depth B-7 B-8 B-9 at at at at at
4.0 6.0 6.0
Classification
LL PL PI
0.011 0.02
0.387
D30 D10
3.36
Cc
1.41
U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES
Boring No. Depth B-7 B-8 B-9 at at at at at
D100
Client: CH2M Hill
City/State: Washington, D.C.
Project: NAMA 151059 D Water Lines
Project No: 72U0289
R
F r o e h l in g & R o b e r t s o n , I n c .
U
S_ G
RA
IN
_S
IZ
E
2U
L
O G
S.
G
PJ
F
R.
G D
T
/2
0 20 40 60 80 100
PI
NP
PLLL Classification % Natural Water Content
8.0
8.0
4.0
8.0
45.4
30.7
39.6
44.0
ATTERBERG LIMITS
NP
NP
Liquid Limit
Pl as tic ity
In de x
FinesBoring No. Depth
CH
ML MH
ELASTIC SILT (MH)
SILTY SAND (SM)
FAT CLAY (CH)
SILT (ML)
97.2
26.9
98.7
98.4
CL-ML
CL
Sheet: 1 of 1
B-1
B-4
B-5
B-7 at at at at
Client: CH2M Hill
City/State: Washington, D.C.
Project: NAMA 151059 D Water Lines
Project No: 72U0289
R
F r o e h l in g & R o b e r t s o n , I n c .
AT
TE
RB
ER
G
_L
IM
IT
S_
U
SC
S
2U
L
O G
S.
G
PJ
F
R.
G D
T
/2
0.0010.010.1110100 Grain Size (mm)
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION
COBBLES
3/8 3 4 6 810 1416 20 30 40 50 60 100140
25.4 4.76 25.4 19.1
D60
0.015
0.089 0.014
%Gravel 9.4 0.0 5.6 5.0
%Sand 38.9 28.2 62.6 67.1
0.5 2.0 0.5 2.0
%Silt
54.6
24.1
%Clay
17.2
3.8
51.7
31.8
Cu
U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER
6 4 3 2 1.5 1 3/4 1/2
Pe rc en t F in er
(B y
W ei gh t)
GRAVEL
coarse fine coarse medium
SAND
fine
SILT OR CLAY
Boring No. Depth B-10 B-10 B-6 B-6 at at at at at
0.5 2.0 0.5 2.0
Classification
SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL)
SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM)
LL PL PI
0.138 0.053 0.22
0.297
D30 D10
20.86
Cc
1.87
U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES
Boring No. Depth B-10 B-10 B-6 B-6 at at at at at
D100
Client: CH2M Hill
City/State: Washington, D.C.
Project: NAMA 151059 D Water Lines
Project No: 72U0289
R
F r o e h l in g & R o b e r t s o n , I n c .
U
S_ G
RA
IN
_S
IZ
E
2U
L
O G
S.
G
PJ
F
R.
G D
T
/2
0 20 40 60 80 100
PI
PLLL Classification % Natural Water Content
0.5
0.5
18.5
14.2
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Liquid Limit
Pl as tic ity
In de x
FinesBoring No. Depth
CH
ML MH
SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL)
SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM)
51.7
31.8
CL-ML
CL
Sheet: 1 of 1
B-10
B-6 at at
Client: CH2M Hill
City/State: Washington, D.C.
Project: NAMA 151059 D Water Lines
Project No: 72U0289
R
F r o e h l in g & R o b e r t s o n , I n c .
AT
TE
RB
ER
G
_L
IM
IT
S_
U
SC
S
2U
L
O G
S.
G
PJ
F
R.
G D
T
/2
S p g r.
f o r Z
A V i s a s s u m e d
Tested By: JA Checked By: JA
MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP For Curve No. B-6(124777)
D ry d e n s it y p c f
Wate…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .