About this file

P17PS00003-000001 - Pre-bid clarifications and contact list information from the pre-bid meeting held on November 17 2016. Additionally contains government responses to contractor questions to date (Questions 1 - 5).

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
B02_P17PS00003-000003_Att-01_CWD-NY3_2017-02-17.pdf PDF
B02_P17PS00003-000003_Att-02_RevisedClauses&Provisions.pdf PDF
P17PS00003-000003_SignedSF-30.pdf PDF
P17PS00003-000002_Amendment_signed.pdf PDF
GATE_200607B_FOWA_Geotech_Report_20151026.pdf PDF
P17PS00007-000002_Q&As_06-43.pdf PDF
GATE_200607B_MIFI_Geotech_Report_20151026.pdf PDF
P17PS00003-000001_Amendment_signed.pdf PDF
P17PS00003-000001_Att-02_CWD-NY3_11-25-2016.pdf PDF
207_P17PS00003_ProposedEquals.docx DOCX document
105_P17PS00003_Performance_Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
103_P17PS00003_Key_Personnel_Form.docx DOCX document
Att-1_GATE_200607B_STIS-Spec_FINAL.pdf PDF
P17PS00003_SF-1442_w-Contract_Clauses_ _Provisions.pdf PDF
203_P17PS00003_Contract_Price_Sked.xls XLS spreadsheet
203_P17PS00003_Contract_Price_Sked.pdf PDF
202_P17PS00003_SF-1442_Solicitation.pdf PDF
Att-2c_GATE_200607B_STIS-Dwgs-Combined_Set_05-12-2016_Shts_091-131.pdf PDF
100_P17PS00003_Sol_Cover_Sheet-Tech_Proposal.pdf PDF
204_P17PS00003_Reps_ _Certs.pdf PDF
Att-4_GATE_200607B_Preproposal_Meeting_Location.pdf PDF
101_P17PS00003_Experience_Form.docx DOCX document
Att-2a_GATE_200607B_STIS-Dwgs-Combined_Set_05-12-2016_Shts_001-045.pdf PDF
205_P17PS00003_GeneralReferences.docx DOCX document
206_P17PS00003_HazmatForm.docx DOCX document
200_P17PS00003_Sol_Cover_Sheet-Bus_Proposal.pdf PDF
00_P17PS00003_Comp_Constr_Prop_Subm_Pkg.pdf PDF
Att-2b_GATE_200607B_STIS-Dwgs-Combined_Set_05-12-2016_Shts_046-090.pdf PDF
201_SF_24_Bid_Bond.pdf PDF
Att-3_CWD-NY3_11-04-2016.pdf PDF
Show all 30

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

United States Department of the Interior

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

DENVER SERVICE CENTER

12795 W. Alameda Parkway P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225-0287

NPS Solicitation P17PS00003

GATE 200607B – November 17, 2016 – Pre-Bid Comments/Clarifications

1. All questions must be written and emailed to the Contracting Officer: albert_omara@nps.gov

Cc: Contract Specialist, alan_stormont@nps.gov Project Manager, amy_sebring@nps.gov Project Specialist, gregory_kaiser@nps.gov

2. Any information provided today shall be considered unofficial and is solely to introduce the project to interested parties.

3. The deadline for submission of proposals is 3:00 p.m. Mountain Time, Friday, January 6, 2017. If submitting proposals by courier, use the following address:

Alan Stormont, Contract Specialist Contracting Services Group (DSC-CS) Denver Service Center National Park Service Contracting Services 12795 West Alameda Parkway Lakewood, CO 80228

4. Program discussion:

a. The maintenance building is roughly 3,000 SF total. 2,393 for the building office, breakroom, restrooms and maintenance bays.

b. Site work – hardscape, driveway, wash station, utility (permit to NYC water sewer), storage bins, fence, lighting.

c. Ranger building – 800 SF – Storage, roll-up door

d. Vehicle shelter at Fort Wadsworth – 1,500 SF. Carport, concrete surface

e. Option: Lightning protection for maintenance building.

5. Questions provided by bidders and government responses in red:

a. Archaeology needed? Archaeology will not be needed. GATE staff will facilitate monitoring.

b. Building permit needed? It is not expected to have NYC building inspectors having Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AJH) for the buildings. It is expected to have utility connection inspections by local authorities that provide services to the site.

c. Closing the parking lot? It would be preferred if the Contractor could facilitate a partial closing to allow some parking and access into the site.

mailto:albert_omara@nps.gov mailto:alan_stormont@nps.gov mailto:amy_sebring@nps.gov mailto:gregory_kaiser@nps.gov

d. Is there a concrete base at the FOWA shelter? Sheet L1.0 W shows concrete slab under the carport.

e. Will major renovation projects with similar complexity, size, and scope be considered as valid experience, as opposed to new construction? If unable to provide experience for new construction projects, providing renovation experience may be taken into consideration.

However, per Technical Evaluation Factor 1: Experience, “The number of similar project experience may be considered more favorably. Similar experience performed by prime contractor may be considered more favorably. Similar experience working with the major subcontractor may be considered more favorably.”

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .