Past_Performance_Questionnaire_-_GATE_WWTP.pdf

PDF 40 KB Posted

Attached to
Sandy Hook WWTP - Resiliency Measures Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
P16PS00687
Issued by
Department of the Interior National Park Service

About this file

Amendment 0001 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Sandy Hook WWTP - Resiliency Measures, newest first.
File Type Posted
Sandy_Hook_WWTP_RFI_doc.docx DOCX document
1_Experience_Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
3_Key_Personnel_Qualifications.docx DOCX document
4_ProposedEquals.doc DOC document
0_RFPCover.rtf RTF text file
6_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc DOC document
2_Subcontractor_Reference.doc DOC document
7_SF_24_BidBond.pdf PDF
8_GeneralReferences.doc DOC document
5_HazMat.doc DOC document
SF30_Amend__4_P16PS00687.pdf PDF
Addendum_1_-_Geotech_Report_for_SAHO_WWTP_2016.07.26.pdf PDF
SF30_P16PS00687_Amd_000003.pdf PDF
SF30_P16PS00687_Amd_000001.pdf PDF
C4.1_with_Profiles.pdf PDF
C4.0_with_Profiles.pdf PDF
SF30_P16PS00687_Amd_000002.pdf PDF
Wage_Decision_7-01-2016.docx DOCX document
Q A_Amendment_00002.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal_Sign-In_Sheet.pdf PDF
2015.08.13_Geotech_RPT_SAHO_WWTP_8.13.15.pdf PDF
Prior_Experience_Form.pdf PDF
GATE_201037C_-_Project_Specifications.pdf PDF
GATE_201037C_-_DRAWINGS.pdf PDF
P16PS00687.pdf PDF
Wage_Decision_-_NJ160037_(06-03-2016).docx DOCX document
Pre-Solicitation_Notice.pdf PDF
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE SOLICITATION P16PS00687

Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) Resiliency Measures

(COMPLETE SECTIONS I AND II AND SUBMIT WITH THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL)

I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACTNO:

CONTRACTOR ADDRESS: CONTRACTTYPE:

FIRM-FIXED-PRICE

COST REIMBURSEMENT

OTHER: (specify)

ACTIVE COMPLETED

ROUTINE COMPLEX

DATESOF PERFORMANCE: AWARD AMOUNT: $

TOTAL WITH MODS $

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

II. AGENCY (CUSTOMER) IDENTIFICATION

AGENCY(CUSTOMER) NAME:

POCNAME/TITLE/PHONE:

III. PAST PERFORMANCE RATING

Rating Scale: E = Excellent. Considerably surpassed requirements/expectations.

G = Good. Surpassed requirements/expectations.

S = Satisfactory. Met requirements/expectations M = Marginal. Met some requirements/expectations U = Unsatisfactory. Did not meet requirements/expectations

1. QUALITY: (Circle applicable rating)

a. Conformance with contract requirements E G S M U

b. Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors) E G S M U

c. General oversight by project manager and superintendent E G S M U

d. Coordination with and control of subcontractors E G S M U

e. Compliance with Davis-Bacon wage rate and labor usage E G S M U requirements

f. Avoidance of accidents/safety violations E G S M U

2. TIMELINESS:

a. Adherence to project delivery schedules E G S M U

b. Submission of change proposals E G S M U

c. Response to technical direction and change orders E G S M U

d. Response to correction of identified problems E G S M U

e. Submission of timely/accurate/complete billings E G S M U

f. Submission of materials/other submittals E G S M U

3. BUSINESS RELATIONS:

a. Flexibility and cooperativeness in resolving problems E G S M U

b. Tenacity and innovativeness in resolving problems E G S M U

c. Relationships with subcontractors, including prompt payment E G S M U

d. End user was satisfied with services performed E G S M U

IV. COMMENTS

Required for ratings of C (Considerably Surpassed Requirements) or D (Did Not Meet Requirements)

Item No. Comment

Technical Evaluation Panel Member: Date:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .