Past_Performance_Questionnaire_-_EVER_HID.pdf
PDF 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Hole-In-Donut Land Clearing (EVER) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- P16PS00219
About this file
Attachment 6 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q_and_A.docx | DOCX document | |
| P16PS00219.pdf | ||
| P16PS00219_(Amen_0003).pdf | ||
| Experience_and_Past_Performance.pdf | ||
| Sign-in_Sheet.pdf | ||
| Site_Visit.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| Q_and_A.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sub_Contractor_Reference.pdf | ||
| Q_ _A.docx | DOCX document | |
| Key_Personnel_Qualifications_Form.pdf | ||
| Hazardous_Materials_Identification_Listing.pdf | ||
| Proposed_Equals.pdf | ||
| P16PS00219-0001_(Amendment_01).pdf | ||
| P16PS00219.pdf | ||
| P16PS00219_-_Contract_Price_Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Task_Order_Price_Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFP_for_HID_IDIQ_Task_Order_0001.pdf | ||
| Proposed_Equals.pdf | ||
| Hazardous_Materials_Identification_Listing.pdf | ||
| Wage_Determination_(Miami-Dade_FL150168).pdf | ||
| SOW_-_Base_Year_Task_Order_0001.pdf | ||
| General_References.pdf | ||
| Statement_of_Work_(Base_IDIQ)_HID_Land_Clearing.pdf | ||
| HID_-_PSN_(Final).docx | DOCX document |
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE SOLICITATION P16PS00219
LAND CLEARING IDIQ - EVER HID
(COMPLETE SECTIONS I AND II AND SUBMIT WITH THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL)
I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NO:
CONTRACTOR ADDRESS: CONTRACT TYPE:
FIRM-FIXED-PRICE
COST REIMBURSEMENT
OTHER: (specify)
ACTIVE COMPLETED
ROUTINE COMPLEX
DATES OF PERFORMANCE: AWARD AMOUNT: $
TOTAL WITH MODS $
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
II. AGENCY (CUSTOMER) IDENTIFICATION
AGENCY (CUSTOMER) NAME:
POCNAME/TITLE/PHONE:
III. PAST PERFORMANCE RATING
Rating Scale: E = Excellent. Considerably surpassed requirements/expectations.
G = Good. Surpassed requirements/expectations.
S = Satisfactory. Met requirements/expectations M = Marginal. Met some requirements/expectations U = Unsatisfactory. Did not meet requirements/expectations
1. QUALITY: (Circle applicable rating)
a. Conformance with contract requirements E G S M U
b. Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors) E G S M U
c. General oversight by project manager and superintendent E G S M U
d. Coordination with and control of subcontractors E G S M U
e. Compliance with Davis-Bacon wage rate and labor usage E G S M U requirements
f. Avoidance of accidents/safety violations E G S M U
2. TIMELINESS:
a. Adherence to project delivery schedules E G S M U
b. Submission of change proposals E G S M U
c. Response to technical direction and change orders E G S M U
d. Response to correction of identified problems E G S M U
e. Submission of timely/accurate/complete billings E G S M U
f. Submission of materials/other submittals E G S M U
3. BUSINESS RELATIONS:
a. Flexibility and cooperativeness in resolving problems E G S M U
b. Tenacity and innovativeness in resolving problems E G S M U
c. Relationships with subcontractors, including prompt payment E G S M U
d. End user was satisfied with services performed E G S M U
IV. COMMENTS
Required for ratings of C (Considerably Surpassed Requirements) or D (Did Not Meet Requirements)
Item No. Comment
Technical Evaluation Panel Member: Date:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .