P03. security systems J and A Signed.pdf

Part 806.3 Other Than Full and Open Competition (OFOC) Attachment 7: Request for Sole Source Justification Format >SAT

Rev: 13 Effective Date: 02/01/22 Page 1 of 3

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Justification and Approval (J&A) For

Other Than Full and Open Competition (>SAT)

Acquisition Plan Action ID:___________________________________________

1. Contracting Activity: Department of Veterans Affairs, VISN 4, Lebanon VAMC, Facilities Service is requesting this J & A approval from the NCO4 Construction Team - West

2. Nature and/or Description of the Action Being Processed: This is a Justification and Approval for Other Than Full and Open Competition, Brand Name Only, for Siemans Security Systems components which are a small portion of the construction materials for construction project 595-25-108 Relocate Emergency Cache, a new requirement to award a firm fixed price contract.

3. Description of Supplies/Services Required to Meet the Agency’s Needs: Proximity Card Readers, security hardware, sensors, cameras, alarms, control units, power supplies, wiring and other associated access control hardware and systems to create a complete and usable Siemens security system. Siemens security systems seamlessly integrate with our existing facility wide Siemens security system, as per Specificaiton Section 28 05 00 and related drawings. The total estimated value of the Siemens security system is out of a total estimated project value of

4. Statutory Authority Permitting Other than Full and Open Competition:

(X) (1) Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy

Agency Requirements per 41 USC §3304(a)(1) as implemented by FAR 6.302-1;

( ) (2) Unusual and Compelling Urgency per 41 USC §3304(a)(2) as implemented by FAR 6.302-2;

( ) (3) Industrial Mobilization, Engineering, Developmental or Research Capability or Expert Services per 41 USC §3304(a)(3) as implemented by FAR 6.302-3;

( ) (4) International Agreement per 41 USC §3304(a)(4) as implemented by FAR 6.302-4 ( ) (5) Authorized or Required by Statute per 41 USC §3304(a)(5) as implemented by FAR 6.302-5;

( ) (6) National Security per 41 USC §3304(a)(6) as implemented by FAR 6.302-6;

( ) (7) Public Interest per 41 USC §3304(a)(7) as implemented by FAR 6.302-7;

5. Demonstration that the Contractor’s Unique Qualifications or Nature of the Acquisition Requires the Use of the Authority Cited Above (applicability of authority): Only One Responsible Source (FAR 6.302-1) – Although there are other manufacturers of security systems that can meet the same general performance standards as the Siemens security system, they are not compatible with the Siemens security system. The Siemens security system is exclusively used at this facility. Use of additional manufacturers would result in the requirement to purchase and store additional spare inventory, have additional service contracts, install duplicative monitoring equipment at multiple locations in the hospital, and provide additional training for our electricians, police, and operators.

Accordingly, Siemens is the only firm capable of providing the supplies and services described in Section 3 above without the Veteran’s Health Administration experiencing substantial duplication of cost that could not be expected to be recovered through competition.

36C244-25-AP-1009

Rev: 13 Effective Date: 02/01/22 Page 2 of 3

6. Description of Efforts Made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as deemed practicable: A Notice of Intent to Sole Source Security Systems Components, SIemans will be posted on SAM.GOV with the solicitation. Offerors will be able to obtain Siemans security systems components from various distributors and sources available in the open market.

7. Determination by the CO that the Anticipated Cost to the Government will be Fair and

Reasonable: The contract is a firm fixed price contract with multiple bidders and the Siemans security system components are available from multiple vendors. Bid prices will be compared with the independent government cost estimate to verify that the proposed contract cost is fair and reasonable.

8. Description of the Market Research Conducted and the Results, or a Statement of the Reasons Market Research Was Not Conducted: As described in Section 6 above, market research, in accordance with FAR Part 10, was conducted by synopsis of the proposed acquisition, advising industry of the pending acquisition and soliciting inquiries from interested parties.

9. Any Other Facts Supporting the Use of Other than Full and Open Competition: The security system is critical to maintaining safety of our veterans, staff and visitors and installing non-compatible equipment will lead to functionality issues that will reduce patient, staff and visitor safety. No other manufacturer makes a system that is guaranteed, as a whole, to be compatible with our installed Siemens sytem. System incompatibility can lead to the failure of operators and staff to receive timely and accurate notification of intrusions, elopements, duress and other time sensitive emergencies and has the potential to result in the loss of life of veterans, staff, or visitors.

10. Listing of Sources that Expressed, in Writing, an Interest in the Acquisition: See paragraph 6, above.

11. A Statement of the Actions, if any, the Agency May Take to Remove or Overcome any Barriers to Competition before Making subsequent acquisitions for the supplies or services required: If, in the future, there is a requirement to replace the security system for the entire facility, then we will consider all manufacturers of patient lifts with the appropriate performance specifications.

Rev: 13 Effective Date: 02/01/22 Page 3 of 3

12. Requirements Certification: I certify that the requirement outlined in this justification is a Bona

Fide Need of the Department of Veterans Affairs and that the supporting data under my cognizance, which are included in the justification, are accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

David C. Scharf Date Assistant Chief Engineer Lebanon VAMC

13. Approvals in accordance with the VHAPM Part 806.3 OFOC SOP:

a. Contracting Officer or Designee’s Certification (required): I certify that the foregoing justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Date Contracting Officer NCO4 West Construction Team

b. One Level Above the Contracting Officer (Required over SAT but not exceeding $750K): I certify the justification meets requirements for other than full and open competition.

Michelle Y. Lappen Date Chief, NCO4 West Construction Team

DAVID

SCHARF

Digitally signed by

DAVID SCHARF

Date: 2024.11.07 13:35:45 -05'00'