OPSEC REVIEW RFI W911N2-23-Q-0029.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
INSTALLATION OF AERIAL FIBER OPTIC CABLE NETWORK
Solicitation number
W911N2-23-R-0029
Issued by

About this file

This request for information (RFI) outlines a scope of work for the installation of an aerial fiber optic cable network at a Department of the Army facility. The contractor will be responsible for surveying the existing telecommunications infrastructure, installing approximately 62,625 feet of single-mode fiber optic cable in loops and spurs to connect buildings, providing splice enclosures and distribution frames, labeling all terminations and splices, testing all fibers, and producing as-built documentation including GIS maps and fiber databases. The contractor must also supply 300 10G SFP transceiver modules and may be asked to provide additional optional cabling. The response deadline is not specified.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Contractor Personnel Security Requirments.pdf PDF
RFI draft 22May23 V2.pdf PDF
SOW W911N2-23-Q-0029.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND OPSEC REVIEW FORM

(OPSEC Program is Governed by AR 530-1, Operations Security)

I am aware that there is foreign intelligence interest in publicly available information. I have sufficient technical expertise in the subject matter to certify that it is appropriate to release this information to the public, because there are no operational, legal, or security reasons for withholding its release. Information that was given a previous OPSEC Review, does not require a second review, unless the original information has been changed.

DESCRIPTION OF INFORMATION TO RECEIVE OPSEC REVIEW Date:

Title/Description of item to be released:

(STEP 1) Author/Originator: Organization/Section: Phone:

Are you a contractor? Yes No If YES, Contract #:

Forum where this information is to appear:

Purpose of release: Anticipated Date of Release:

Product Format (check one): Article Briefing Web site Other:

(STEP 2) SME/Tech Reviewer (if applicable): Grade: Position

Signature: Date: Phone:

(STEP 3) Gov't Supervisor (if author/originator is a contractor): Grade: Position

Signature: Date: Phone:

(STEP 4) Legal Office Reviewer (if applicable):

Signature: Date: Phone:

(STEP 5) OPSEC Officer: Position

Signature: Date Phone:

(STEP 6) Public Affairs Reviewer (if applicable): Position

Signature: Date: Phone:

Author Tech

Reviewer Gov't

Supervisor

Legal OPSEC

Officer Public Affairs

a. Concur for Public Release

b. Concur for Public Release w/comment

c. Nonconcur

Comment:

joshua.p.pepe.ctr Typewritten Text joshua.p.pepe.ctr Typewritten Text joshua.p.pepe.ctr Typewritten Text

ACC FORM 101 - 2, AUG 2013

ACC Operations Security (OPSEC) Review Process

1. Before ACC personnel can release U.S. Government information to the public, t h a t i n f o r m a t i o n must receive an OPSEC Review.

2. The purpose of an OPSEC Review is to ensure the continued protection of government information, which for operational, legal, or security reasons is considered sensitive or critical information that should not be released to the public. It is intended to evaluate government information (document, video tape, voice tape, briefing, article, or equipment) to determine if it can be designated for unclassified and unlimited (public domain) distribution.

3. A CC , i ts subordinate commands , will use the ACC OPSEC Review F o r m 1 0 1 to guide and document the OPSEC Review process. While individuals involved in the OPSEC Review Process can send the ACC Form 1 0 1 electronically. A c o m p le t e d copy of the proposed release must be provided to the OPSEC Officer once completed.

4. OPSEC Review Steps:

STEP 1

STEP 2

- Author describes information for public release (periodical, briefing, etc.)

- Depending on the technical complexity of the product, a technical expert reviews the prepared product (must be someone other than the author).

STEP 3 - Government supervisor reviews and approves product f o r r e v i e w (must be someone other than the author).

STEP 4 - Legal office reviews if contractor information, proprietary information, or copyrighted materials (e.g. text, illustrations, photos, movie clips or soundtracks) are involved. Attach owner's written consent to use copyright material, if available.

STEP 5 - OPSEC Officer reviews for operational security.

STEP 6 - Public Affairs Office reviews for p roduc ts be ing p laced on the web or FO IA responses to reques ts for in format ion.

STEP 7

- Product is returned to originator for release. Ensure to add the da te o f the OPSE C Rev iew and t he following statement to the front page of the document: OPSEC Review conducted per AR 530-1 and any local OPSEC policies and guidance.

STEP 8 - If OPSEC Review is returned with comments or is disapproved, a face-to-face or telephonic meeting will be held to resolve comment concerns, if necessary.

STEP 9

- A copy of the A CC Form 1 0 1 and a hard copy of the product will be retained by the originator and OPSEC Officer as the official record copy.

5. Examples of potentially inappropriate information for public release.

a. Procurement sensitive information which includes, but is not limited to, contractor bid or proposal information and source selection.

b. Details on plans or operations: exercise orders, operation plans or orders, contingency orders, etc.

c. Details on the protection of classified documents/materials.

d. Capabilities, limitations, and vulnerabilities of equipment, systems, and Protection Programs.

e. Test locations and dates.

f. Inventory charts and reports.

g. Detailed budget data.

h. Internal installation maps and photographs.

i. Standard Operating Procedures and tactics.

j. Detailed personal biographies.

k. Detailed organization charts (with phones and emails listings).

l. Sensitive unclassified reports for internal Army use.

m. Technical and scientific proprietary data developed by a contractor.

n. Unclassified technical data with military applications (force structure/readiness).

o. Critical maintenance information.

p. Information extracted from an intranet website.

q. Personally identifiable information (PII).

r. Lessons learned that could reveal sensitive military operations, exercises, or vulnerabilities.

s. Movement of assets where uncertainty of location is a program or operational element.

t. Logistics support (munitions, weapons movement).

6. Ensure that final product is marked IAW AR 380-5 if classified and AR 25-55 if FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO).

joshua.p.pepe.ctr Typewritten Text joshua.p.pepe.ctr Typewritten Text joshua.p.pepe.ctr Typewritten Text joshua.p.pepe.ctr

PAGE OF 43

joshua.p.pepe.ctr Typewritten Text ACC Operations Security (OPSEC) Review Findings:

joshua.p.pepe.ctr

PAGE OF 44

joshua.p.pepe.ctr Typewritten Text ACC Operations Security (OPSEC) Review Findings:

joshua.p.pepe.ctr

TitleDescription of item to be released: SYNOPSIS W911N2-23-R-0029
STEP 1 AuthorOriginator: Jonathan K. Carroll
OrganizationSection: ACC Redstone CCAM-MLK
Phone: 717-267-8357
Are you a contractor: No
If YES Contract:
Forum where this information is to appear: www.sam.gov
Purpose of release: RFI/Sources Sought w/SOW draft
Anticipated Date of Release: ASAP
undefined: Off
undefined_2: Off
undefined_3: Off
undefined_4: On
STEP 2 SMETech Reviewer if applicable: N/A
Grade:
Position:
Phone_2:
STEP 3 Gov t Supervisor if authororiginator is a contractor: N/A
Grade_2:
Position_2:
Date_2:
Phone_3:
Date_3:
Phone_4:
STEP 5 OPSEC Officer: Purdin, Kenneth R.
Position_3: ACC-RSA G3
Date_4:
Phone_5: (256)955-9336
STEP 6 Public Affairs Reviewer if applicable: N/A
Position_4:
Date_5:
Phone_6:
Authora Concur for Public Release: X
Tech Reviewera Concur for Public Release:
Govt Supervisora Concur for Public Release:
Legala Concur for Public Release:
OPSEC Officera Concur for Public Release: X
Public Affairsa Concur for Public Release:
Authorb Concur for Public Release wcomment:
Tech Reviewerb Concur for Public Release wcomment:
Govt Supervisorb Concur for Public Release wcomment:
Legalb Concur for Public Release wcomment:
OPSEC Officerb Concur for Public Release wcomment:
Public Affairsb Concur for Public Release wcomment:
Authorc Nonconcur:
Tech Reviewerc Nonconcur:
Govt Supervisorc Nonconcur:
Legalc Nonconcur:
OPSEC Officerc Nonconcur:
Public Affairsc Nonconcur:
Comment:
PAGE:
PAGE_2:
Date:
DateTop: 05/23/2023
OtherText:
LegalOfficeReviewerIfApplicable: N/A

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .