NP-FOOT-PMS(2)_BIP_STR 5460-197P_Redacted.pdf

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-197P

WILDLIFE UNDERPASS INSPECTION DATE: 1/22/19

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 13.0 FT (4.0 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 13.0 FT (4.0 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 46.5 FT (14.2 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 42.5 FT (13.0 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 000000000000 / NONE SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 20 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2013-ROADWAY REPAVED.

LOCATION

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 2.40 (KM PT 3.86)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 3.2 MILES EAST FROM TN ROUTE 321 OR 2.6 MILES WEST FROM INTERSTATE 40. FACILITY CARRIED: ............ FOOTHILLS PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. WILDLIFE CROSSING

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include minor efflorescence and rust staining from the minor longitudinal cracking on the slab underside, a fallen tree across the south side wingwalls, and missing reflective object markers from the north and south sides of the bridge.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: M.R. PUTALLAZ, N. KHANHANSUK (CLARK NEXSEN)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

MICHAEL R. PUTALLAZ, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 7/9/19

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-197P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7 INSTALL REFLECTIVE HEADWALL MARKERS ON NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF

BRIDGE.

2 EA

60.6 REMOVE FALLEN TREE ACROSS SOUTH SIDE WINGWALLS AND TREE GROWTH

FROM DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON UNDERPASS SLAB.

1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-197P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N N F N N N N N G

N G

G G N N G N

N

N

G

F

58.1, 59.3 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF SLAB UNDERSIDE; MINOR

EFFLORESCENCE AND RUST STAINING FROM CRACKS. MINOR

TEMPERATURE AND SHRINKAGE MAP CRACKING THROUGHOUT

SLAB UNDERSIDE. MINOR DIAGONAL CRACK WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE AT NORTHWEST CORNER.

58.1, 59.3, 60.6

MOSS GROWTH ALONG SIDES OF SLAB AND ON WINGWALLS.

58.3, 222.4 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT OVER

EAST END OF STRUCTURE AND MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING IN

NORTH LANE OVER STRUCTURE.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ABUTMENT

BREASTWALLS.

60.6 MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ON WINGWALLS AND EACH END OF

UNDERPASS SLAB. SEVERAL TREES GROWING ABOVE EACH

WINGWALL; LARGE TREE ABOVE SOUTHWEST WINGWALL. FALLEN

TREE ACROSS SOUTH SIDE OF STRUCTURE NEAR ENDS OF

WINGWALLS.

60.9 HEAVY DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON NORTH SIDE OF STRUCTURE

FROM MINOR SLOPE FAILURE WITH TREE GROWTH; MODERATE

DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON SOUTH SIDE.

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11. SLOPE PROTECTION N

12. OTHER N

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

14. PILE BENTS N

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

16. FOUNDATIONS N

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION N

19. OTHER N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-197P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL N 222.7 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS MISSING ON NORTH AND SOUTH

SIDES.

222.9 MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ON UNDERPASS SLAB

MAINLY ALONG CURBLINES. SEE ALSO 60.6 AND 60.9.

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER (UNDERPASS SLAB)

N N N G G G N G G

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-197P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 27 24 45 40

TYPE 3 24 22 40 37

TYPE 3S2 38 34 63 57

TYPE 3-3 47 43 78 72

DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE, AND

CONDITION.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-197P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... WILDLIFE UNDERPASS (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 155 - SEVIER

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-197P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 25 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... WILDLIFE CROSSING

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........197P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. FOOTHILLS PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460197P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 3.2 MILES EAST FROM TN RO

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................000000000000 (11) MILE POINT: .............................2.40 (KM PT 3.86)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

07 - FRAME

13.0 FT (4.0 M)

13.0 FT (4.0 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 27.0 TONS (24.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 45.0 TONS (40.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 1/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-197P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°49'07.20"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°12'44.20"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 20 MI (32 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 0 - OTHER

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

42.5 FT (13.0 M)

46.5 FT (14.2 M)

30.0 FT (9.1 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

4.0 FT (1.2 M)

4.0 FT (1.2 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

20 °

NO

42.5 FT (13.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0 - N/A

0 - N/A

0 - N/A

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

14.00 FT (4.30 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... NNNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2013-ROADWAY REPAVED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-197P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-197P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD COSBY

PHOTO #2 - NORTH SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW

LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #4 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF

ASPHALT PAVEMENT OVER EAST END OF

STRUCTURE

PHOTO #5 - LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF

ASPHALT PAVEMENT IN NORTH LANE OVER

STRUCTURE

PHOTO #6 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW

LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL

CRACKING OF SLAB UNDERSIDE WITH

EFFLORESCENCE AND RUST STAINING; FIRST

THROUGH THIRD CRACKS FROM SOUTH SIDE

SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL

CRACKING OF SLAB UNDERSIDE WITH

EFFLORESCENCE AND RUST STAINING;

SECOND CRACK FROM SOUTH SIDE SHOWN

PHOTO #9 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST

ABUTMENT; NOTE TYPICAL ACCUMULATION

OF DEBRIS ALONG UNDERPASS SLAB

CURBLINES

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING

WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ABUTMENT

BREASTWALLS; EAST ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - TREE GROWING ABOVE

SOUTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO #12 - FALLEN TREE ACROSS SOUTH

WINGWALLS

PHOTO #13 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION DUE TO

SLOPE FAILURE AT NORTH SIDE OF

STRUCTURE

PHOTO #14 - TREE GROWTH FROM DEBRIS

ACCUMULATION AT NORTH END OF

STRUCTURE

PHOTO #15 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT SOUTH SIDE OF STRUCTURE

PHOTO #16 - LOOKING SOUTH THROUGH STRUCTURE

PHOTO #17 - LOOKING NORTH THROUGH STRUCTURE