Synopsis_Attachment_Form_SC_PP_Interview_and_Questionnaire_03_22_16.docx

ATTACHMENT FORM SC

SYNOPSIS NNM16577827L

Form SC-1

FORM SC – PAST PERFORMANCE INTERVIEW/QUESTIONNAIRE

This evaluation should be completed by the Contracting Officer (CO) and Contracting Officer’s Representative or Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COR or COTR), Task Monitor (TM), or other person identified in the contract by the appropriate Contracting Officer or business manager who monitors the contractor’s compliance with the requirements of the contract.

In compliance with the direction in the FAR, the information contained in this evaluation is not subject to view by anyone other than the designated source selection evaluation personnel.

INSTRUCTIONS, DEFINITIONS, AND RATING GUIDELINES

Instructions

This evaluation is to be completed as indicated below. For purposes of these evaluations, the term “project” is intended to mean “contract”. This package consists of the following:

For each contract selected, two separate assessments are required, an assessment by the appropriate CO and one by the cognizant COR or other designee.

In addition, the Offeror is responsible for completing Section I of Form SC before forwarding the questionnaire to the appropriate CO for the evaluations required. The Offeror shall request the CO to complete the remainder of the questionnaire, seal their submittals, and mail them directly to the Evaluation Board at the address specified below or via email to Kimberly N. Williams at kimberly.n.williams@nasa.gov on or before April 21, 2016.

NASA/George C. Marshall Space Flight Center ATTN: PS32/Kimberly N. Williams Building 4250, Room 36F Marshall Space Flight Center, AL 35812

Any questions you might have concerning completion of this form should be addressed to Kimberly N. Williams at (256) 544-1580 or kimberly.n.williams@nasa.gov.

RFP NNM13439796R

L-5-Form SC-2

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE REPORT

Section I

To be completed by Contractor requesting evaluation

1. Contractor Name and Address:

2. This past performance questionnaire is relevant to the following Facilities Design and Inspection Services (FEDIS) (select all that apply):

_____ Design Services _____ Master Planning Services _____ Surveillance and Inspection Services

5. During the contract performance being evaluated, this firm was a:

_____ Prime or Team Lead _____ Team Member _____ Subcontractor _____ Other (explain)

If the firm performed work under this contract as a team member or subcontractor, information about the subcontract, in addition to the prime information, shall be provided in the following blocks:

6a. Prime Contract Number:

6b. If the prime contract number is a BPA or IDIQ, list the task order(s) the team member or subcontracted effort was performed under:

7a. Prime Contract Period of Performance:

7b. Team Member or Subcontract Period of Performance:

8a. Prime Contract Type:

8b. Team Member or Subcontract contract type:

9a. Contract Value (with options):

9b. Team Member or Subcontract contract value:

10. Description of contract or subcontract requirements.

ATTACHMENT FORM SC

SYNOPSIS NNM16577827L

Section II

To be completed by Government and/or Industry Customer performing the evaluation

1. Evaluator’s Name:

2. Evaluator’s Signature:

3. Evaluator’s Title:

4. Evaluator’s Email Address:

5. Evaluator’s Phone Number:

6. Evaluator’s Role in Program/Contract:

7. Evaluator’s Length of Involvement in this Contract:

8. Date:

Form SC-3

Section III

To be completed by Government and/or Industry Customer performing the evaluation

Definitions and Rating Guidelines

The Factors/Ratings tables on the next page summarize contractor performance in each of the following rating areas. Each criterion should be assigned a rating, from highest to lowest, of Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. If a particular criterion is not applicable, it should be rated in the far right column as N/A. However, the evaluator is encouraged to provide comments on any rating to further support a particular rating.

The following definitions and instructions should be used as guidance to aid in evaluating the criteria in the Factors/Ratings tables. Please read the definitions and instructions before rating any criteria to be sure that each criterion is graded in the context of the definitions. Also, please ensure that this assessment is consistent with any other assessments that have been done for the same contractor for the same work, such as for payment of fee purposes, exercise of option, other past performance requests, etc.

· Compliance with contract requirement

· Appropriateness of personnel

· Technical excellence

· Product excellence

· Responsive to technical direction

· Effective contractor recommended solutions

· Within budget (over/under target costs)

· Current, accurate, and complete cost reporting and billings

· Cost efficiencies

· Met interim schedule milestones

· Contract administrative activities performed timely

· On-time delivery of products

· Quick turnaround capability

· Reliable

· Pro-active

· Reasonable and cooperative

· Innovative

· Prompt notification of problems

· Accuracy and thoroughness of reports

The four headings above relate to the actual ratings defined on the following pages.

Form SC-4

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE REPORT

Section III (Cont’d)

Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Satisfactory

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Form SC-5

Section III (Cont’d)

Item

FACTORS/RATINGS

Exceptional

Technical Performance

Cost Control

Timeliness of Performance

Management Effectiveness

Overall Evaluation

No

Form SC-7

Section III (Cont’d)

NARRATIVE SUMMARY (Use this section to explain additional information not included above)

Form SC-9

PAST PERFORMANCE FORM LETTER EXAMPLE

This form letter is provided for Offerors to use in transmitting the Past Performance Questionnaire to customers.

SYNOPSIS NNM16577827L Facilities Engineering Design and Inspection Services (FEDIS)

CLIENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER: FORMAT

[Date of Letter] [Name and Address of proposed Offeror’s customer] Attention: [Name and Designation of Customer’s Contract Manager or Appropriate Contact]

Dear [Contact Name]:

We are currently responding to the NASA, Marshall Space Flight Center SYNOPSIS NNM16577827L Facilities Engineering Design and Inspection Services (FEDIS). NASA is requesting that clients of entities responding to their Synopsis identified and their participation in the evaluation process requested. In the event you are contacted for information on work we have performed, you are hereby authorized to respond to those inquiries. Your cooperation with this effort is greatly appreciated. Please direct any questions to [Name and Phone Number of Offeror’s Point-of-Contact].

We have included our work for your agency as a past performance reference. A Past Performance Questionnaire is enclosed. Please complete Sections II and III of the enclosed evaluation and return the signed, completed document to the address specified below or via email to Kimberly N. Williams at kimberly.n.williams@nasa.gov.

NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center Attention: PS32/Kimberly N. Williams Building 4250, Room 36F MSFC, Alabama 35812

Please forward the completed evaluation to NASA at the above address to ensure it is received prior to 1:00 PM Central Time on April 21, 2016.

In order to maintain the integrity of this process, please DO NOT return the questionnaire to us. Return it to NASA/MSFC at the address listed above.

Sincerely, [Name of Signer] [Designation of Signer] cc:

NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center Attention: PS32/Kimberly N. Williams

MSFC, AL 35812