Attachment_A_Restore-L-SOW-001980_released.pdf

Attachment A

RESTORE-L-SOW-001980

Revision -

CHECK WITH SSCO NGIN DATABASE AT:

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

CM FOREWORD

This document is a Satellite Servicing Capabilities Office (SSCO) Configuration Management

(CM)-controlled document. Changes to this document require prior approval of the applicable

Configuration Control Board (CCB) Chairperson or designee. Proposed changes shall be submitted to the SSCO Code 408 CM Office (CMO), along with supportive material justifying the proposed change. Changes to this document will be made by complete revision.

Questions or comments concerning this document should be addressed to:

NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center

SSCO, Code 408

Attention: Configuration Management Office

Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 ii

SATELLITE SERVICING CAPABILITIES OFFICE

DOCUMENT CHANGE RECORD

Date: September 20, 2016 Sheet 1 of 1

TITLE: Rendezvous & Proximity Operations Subsystem IRCam Statement of Work

REV

LEVEL

DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE AUTHORIZATION

- Baseline Release Per SSCO-CCR-000133R1

SSCO CM RELEASE

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1-1

1.1 General Information ............................................................................................. 1-1

1.2 Basic Hardware Description ................................................................................ 1-1

1.3 Required Quantities ............................................................................................. 1-3

1.4 Optional Quantites ............................................................................................... 1-4

1.5 Verb Application .................................................................................................. 1-4

1.6 Document Change Procedure .............................................................................. 1-4

1.7 Applicable Documents ......................................................................................... 1-5

1.7.1 Precedence ............................................................................................... 1-5

2.0 Schedule ............................................................................................................................. 2-1

2.1 Required Hardware Deliverables ......................................................................... 2-1

2.2 Optional Hardware Deliverables .......................................................................... 2-1

2.3 Project Schedule................................................................................................... 2-1

3.0 Management, Reporting, Documentation, and Reviews ............................................... 3-1

3.1 Reviews and Meetings ......................................................................................... 3-1

3.1.1 Weekly Status Teleconference ................................................................. 3-1

3.1.2 Written Monthly Reports ......................................................................... 3-1

3.1.3 Kickoff Meeting (KOM)/ Systems Requirements Review (SRR) ........... 3-2

3.1.4 Preliminary Design Review (PDR) .......................................................... 3-3

3.1.5 Critical Design Review (CDR) ................................................................ 3-4

3.1.6 Pre-Environmental Review (PER) ........................................................... 3-5

3.1.7 Test Readiness Review ............................................................................ 3-6

3.1.8 Pre-Ship Reviews (PSR) .......................................................................... 3-7

4.0 Manufacturing Requirements.......................................................................................... 4-1

4.1 Use of Travelers ................................................................................................... 4-2

4.2 Prohibited Plating and Alloys .............................................................................. 4-2

4.3 Fastener Integrity ................................................................................................. 4-2

4.3.1 Thread Locking ........................................................................................ 4-2

4.3.2 Fastener Torqueing .................................................................................. 4-3

4.4 Soldering .............................................................................................................. 4-3

4.5 Silicones ............................................................................................................... 4-3

4.6 Contamination Control......................................................................................... 4-3

5.0 Quality Assurance Requirements .................................................................................... 5-1

5.1 Mandatory Inspection Points ............................................................................... 5-1

6.0 Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) .................................................................... 6-1

6.1 Technical Requirements Compliance Matrix ...................................................... 6-1

6.2 Materials Identification and Usage List ............................................................... 6-2

6.3 Optical Deliverables............................................................................................. 6-2 iv

6.3.1 Optical Model .......................................................................................... 6-2

6.3.2 Stray Light Analysis ................................................................................ 6-2

6.4 Mechanical Deliverables ...................................................................................... 6-2

6.4.1 Interface Control Drawing (ICD)............................................................. 6-2

6.4.2 Computer Aided Design (CAD) Electronic Model ................................. 6-2

6.4.3 Stress Analysis Report ............................................................................. 6-3

6.5 Electrical Deliverables ......................................................................................... 6-4

6.5.1 Electrical ICD .......................................................................................... 6-4

6.5.2 EEE Parts List .......................................................................................... 6-4

6.5.3 Radiation Test Report .............................................................................. 6-4

6.6 Thermal Deliverables ........................................................................................... 6-4

6.7 End Item Data Package ........................................................................................ 6-5

6.7.1 Certificate of Conformance...................................................................... 6-5

6.7.2 As-Built Parts List.................................................................................... 6-5

6.7.3 As-Built Assembly Procedures ................................................................ 6-5

6.7.4 Material Certifications ............................................................................. 6-6

6.7.5 Test Reports ............................................................................................. 6-6

6.7.6 Summary of Non-conformances .............................................................. 6-7

6.8 Data Deliverables Summary and Expected Delivery ........................................... 6-8

7.0 Testing ................................................................................................................................ 7-1

7.1 Performance Test ................................................................................................. 7-1

7.2 EMI / EMC Test................................................................................................... 7-2

7.3 Random Vibration Test ........................................................................................ 7-2

7.4 Thermal Vacuum Test.......................................................................................... 7-2

7.5 Optical Performance Testing ............................................................................... 7-2

8.0 Hardware Handling, Cleaning, Packing & Shipping ................................................... 8-1

8.1 Handling & Storage ............................................................................................. 8-1

8.2 Cleaning ............................................................................................................... 8-1

8.3 Packing ................................................................................................................. 8-1

8.4 Shipping ............................................................................................................... 8-1

9.0 Abbreviations and Acronyms .......................................................................................... 9-1 v

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

Table 1-1: Applicable Documents ............................................................................................... 1-5

Table 2-1: Required Hardware Deliverable Schedule ................................................................. 2-1

Table 2-2: Optional Hardware Deliverable Schedule .................................................................. 2-1

Table 6-1: Data Deliverable Schedule ......................................................................................... 6-8

Table 9-1: Acronym List .............................................................................................................. 9-1

1-1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 GENERAL INFORMATION

The Satellite Servicing Capabilities Office (SSCO) at Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) was established in 2009 to continue NASA’s 40-year legacy of satellite servicing and repair. Among its various pursuits, SSCO is responsible for the development of the Restore-L satellite servicing mission. Restore-L is a free-flying mission to be launched in 2020 to perform on-orbit satellite servicing on an operational Government asset (the Client) in Low Earth Orbit (LEO).

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the scope of work to be performed for the design, development, fabrication, testing, and delivery of the Restore-L Rendezvous and Proximity

Operations (RPO) subsystem infrared wavelength camera (IRCam) system.

The technical requirements for performance, interfaces, design, performance testing, and certification are provided in the accompanying technical specification, RESTORE-L-SPEC-

001981.

1.2 BASIC HARDWARE DESCRIPTION

The RPO IRCam will be utilized on the Restore-L servicing vehicle to provide bearing and relative translation and attitude information of the Client vehicle. The RPO IRCam will be utilized during the “Autonomous Rendezvous & Docking” portion of the mission as shown below.

Figure 1: Restore-L Mission Concept of Operations

1-2

Each RPO IRCam will consist of the following major components: an optical assembly (lens) and camera body (including the detector, processor, electrical interface, etc.). The implementation of a stray light rejection baffle system is left to the discretion of the Contractor.

The Contractor will be responsible for the design, fabrication, integration, and test of all RPO

IRCam components, including the baffle if applicable.

As stated in the accompanying technical specification, the Government desires to utilize the RPO

IRCam for future NASA missions such as the Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission (ARRM).

Therefore, the Contractor will design the RPO IRCam to the overlapping Restore-L and ARRM requirements specified within the technical specification (RESTORE-L-SPEC-001981). This direction will require the Contractor to ensure that the RPO IRCam will meet all of its requirements for a four year mission duration in interplanetary orbit.

1-3

1.3 REQUIRED QUANTITIES

The Contractor will design, fabricate, test and deliver the following units:

Order quantity of one (1) protoflight RPO IRCam unit, as defined in the accompanying technical specification document, “RESTORE-L-SPEC-001981.”

Order quantity of one (1) protoflight RPO IRCam unit, as defined in the accompanying o This sole RPO IRCam will be fabricated per flight standards as dictated by this

Statement of Work (SOW) document as well as the accompanying technical specification document, “RESTORE-L-SPEC-001981.” However, the

Government waives all environmental testing on this particular unit. As such, sections 4.5.3 through section 4.5.6 of RESTORE-L-SPEC-001981 do not apply.

Note: This unit is intended as a flight spare IRCam. Environmental testing will be completed by the Government if the need for the spare arises.

Order quantity of one (1) Engineering Development Unit (EDU) RPO IRCam, as defined in the accompanying technical specification document, “RESTORE-L-SPEC-001981.”

Order quantity of one (1) set of Electrical Ground Support Equipment (EGSE), as defined in the accompanying technical specification document, “RESTORE-L-SPEC-001981.

Set of documentation deliverables as defined in Section 6.0, the Contract Data

Requirements List (CDRL).

1-4

1.4 OPTIONAL QUANTITES

As an option, the Contractor will design, fabricate, test and deliver the following units:

Order quantity of one (1) Engineering Development Unit (EDU) RPO IRCam, without baffle assembly (if applicable), as defined in the accompanying technical specification document, “RESTORE-L-SPEC-001981.”

Order quantity of one (1) RPO IRCam digital emulator, as defined in the accompanying

Order quantity of one (1) RPO IRCam Camera Data Generator (CDG), as defined in the accompanying technical specification document, “RESTORE-L-SPEC-001981.”

Note: The Government wishes to evaluate each of these options independently from one another.

1.5 VERB APPLICATION

Statements containing the verb “shall” are binding requirements regardless of location within this statement of work. The verbs “should” and “may” are used for stating non-mandatory goals or denoting a statement of best practice. The verb “will” is used in a statement of fact, expected occurrence, or declaration of purpose.

1.6 DOCUMENT CHANGE PROCEDURE

The Satellite Servicing Capabilities Office (SSCO, Code 408) maintains configuration control of this document. All changes will require a document revision to be processed through the SSCO

Next-Generation Integrated Network (NGIN) Configuration Management System.

3-1

3.0 MANAGEMENT, REPORTING, DOCUMENTATION, AND REVIEWS

3.1 REVIEWS AND MEETINGS

The Contractor will provide labor, facilities, equipment, materials, and data (electronic and hard copy) to support the meetings and reviews defined in this SOW. Reviews may be conducted at

NASA GSFC, at the Contractor’s facility, or remotely via teleconference or videoconference.

The Contractor will provide a review agenda no less than 2 weeks prior to the start of the review.

Advanced (draft acceptable) review packages will be provided no less than 2 days prior to the start of the review.

A final version of the presentation package will be delivered within five (5) working days following the review and will include review meeting minutes, final agenda, all required deliverable data described in each review subsection, and responses to all recommendations and action items discussed during the review.

3.1.1 Weekly Status Teleconference

The Contractor will provide an informal weekly status teleconference via phone. This approximately thirty-minute long meeting will provide updates on technical and schedule progress.

3.1.2 Written Monthly Reports

The Contractor will provide a monthly status report via email. The first report will be delivered approximately thirty (30) days after authority to proceed is received. These reports will provide data for the assessment of technical and programmatic (i.e., cost, schedule, etc.) progress. The monthly status reports will include:

Current project schedule and changes from previous version.

Work accomplished for current reporting period.

Action item status.

Work planned for next reporting period.

Current problems which impede performance or impact program schedule, and proposed corrective action.

Other information that assists NASA GSFC in evaluating technical and schedule performance.

Any Class 1 MRB issues which are required to be reported and tracked

3-2

3.1.3 Kickoff Meeting (KOM)/ Systems Requirements Review (SRR)

Within thirty (30) days after contract award, the Contractor will convene a Kickoff Meeting /

SRR. The Kickoff Meeting will provide a forum for the Contractor to present the preliminary technical specification compliance matrix and solicit additional clarifications from NASA GSFC.

The KOM / SRR package will cover the following:

Review of preliminary technical specification Compliance Matrix per Section 6.1

Additional clarification of requirements from RPO IRCam technical specification

Discussion of design concepts, manufacturing plans, integration and test plans, cleanliness plans (as available)

Identification of trade studies (if available)

Review and additional identification of Mandatory Inspection Points (MIPs) not specifically outlined in Section 5.1

Scheduling of additional milestone reviews (PDR, CDR, PER, PSR, etc.)

3-3

3.1.4 Preliminary Design Review (PDR)

A PDR will be held at a Government approved location to review the preliminary design of the

RPO IRCam and evaluate the design for compliance with the requirements of RESTORE-L-

SPEC-001981.

The PDR package will contain the following:

Preliminary RPO IRCam design and architecture

Estimated technical parameters and comparison to requirements

Discussion of critical trade studies, as applicable

Results of any electrical breadboard testing

Review of updates to Technical Compliance Matrix per Section 6.1

Review of preliminary Materials Identification and Usage List (MIUL) per Section 6.2

Review of preliminary optical models per Section 6.3.1

Review of preliminary mechanical Interface Control Drawing per Section 6.4.1

Review of preliminary mechanical CAD model per Section 6.4.2

Review of preliminary electrical Interface Control Document per Section 6.5.1

Review of preliminary EEE Parts List per Section 6.5.2

Review of preliminary thermal analysis per Section 6.6Manufacturing plans, including:

o Provisions for meeting cleanliness requirements o Provisions for meeting ESD requirements o Provisions for meeting RPO IRCam delivery dates per Section 2.1

Identification of long-lead and / or high-risk items

Review of any required radiation test plans (if applicable)

Risk mitigation plans, if any

3-4

3.1.5 Critical Design Review (CDR)

A CDR will be held at a Government approved location to review the final design of the RPO

IRCam and evaluate the design’s readiness to proceed to manufacturing.

The CDR package will contain the following:

Final RPO IRCam design / architecture

Final technical parameters and comparison to requirements

Any delta’s from PDR

Responses to any PDR Requests For Action (RFA)

Results of engineering unit testing, as applicable

Review of updates to Technical Compliance Matrix per Section 6.1

Delivery of final Materials Identification and Usage List (MIUL) per Section 6.2

Delivery of final optical models per Section 6.3.1

Delivery of final stray light analysis per Section 6.3.2

Delivery of final Mechanical Interface Control Drawing per Section 6.4.1

Delivery of final mechanical CAD model per Section 6.4.2

Delivery of final stress analysis report per Section 6.4.3

Delivery of final Electrical Interface Control Document per Section 6.5.1

Delivery of final EEE Parts List per Section 6.5.2

Delivery of final radiation test report (if applicable) per Section 6.5.3

Delivery of final thermal analysis per Section 6.6

Review of Assembly Procedures

A drawing tree with Configuration Management status of all detailed drawings o Goal is at least 80% of drawings released into Contractor’s CM system prior to start of manufacturing

Review of hardware performance test procedures

Review of any outstanding impediments to expedient delivery

3-5

3.1.6 Pre-Environmental Review (PER)

A PER will be held at a Government approved location to review the status of the RPO IRCam program prior to start of environmental testing.

The PER package will contain the following:

Review of updates to Technical Compliance Matrix per Section 6.1

Any delta’s from CDR

Responses to any CDR Request For Action

Review of executed Assembly Procedures for completed hardware

Review of as-built inspection photos for completed hardware

Review of executed Procedures

Review of environmental / performance test plans:

o Optical Performance o EMI/EMC o Vibration o Thermal Vacuum

3-6

3.1.7 Test Readiness Review

The Contractor will hold a Test Readiness Reviews (TRR) prior to the commencement of each environmental test. Government concurrence of a successful TRR is required in order for the

Contractor to proceed to test. Government participation in TRRs is expected remotely via teleconference.

The TRR will verify:

Acceptability of test procedures for the specific test under consideration

Test facilities are functionally able to receive the hardware

Test equipment, MGSE and EGSE is certified and calibrated, available for test duration, configured, and properly checked prior to connection to the flight hardware

All pre-test operations are complete

Calibration of all environmental equipment is current

Test specification/verification documents are under configuration control and available

Necessary test personnel are appropriately trained and certified and they are available to support the test

All associated risks and / or non-conformances have been mitigated or resolved

Any unresolved risks and / or non-conformances will have NASA GSFC written concurrence to proceed at-risk

At the conclusion of the TRR, all parties must provide positive concurrence the subject hardware is ready for test. The Contractor will provide for managing all resources, controlling schedules, managing all engineering, manufacturing and procurement activities, configuration management, Quality Assurance, documentation control, and distribution.

3-7

3.1.8 Pre-Ship Reviews (PSR)

The Contractor will hold a Pre-Ship Reviews (PSR) prior to delivering the final flight hardware to NASA GSFC. Hardware deliverables are detailed in Table 2-1. The populated compliance matrix will be presented at this review. Evidence for verification of each item in the compliance matrix for which the Contractor is responsible will be provided.

The PSR will take place at the completion of requirement verification tests and prior to shipment of the hardware to NASA GSFC.

The Pre-Ship Review (PSR) package will contain the following:

Final review and approval of Technical Compliance Matrix per Section 6.1

Detailed review of executed environmental test procedures

Witness of final pre-ship functional test execution to verify hardware functionality prior to shipment.

o No further assembly, test or modification of hardware will occur after the

Government witnessed Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP) without a failure report and a Government approved waiver.

A visual inspection for cosmetic defects and workmanship, and for proper marking and serialization

Documentation of any liens, nonconformance reports, NASA GSFC MRB’s, requests for deviation, open/unresolved issues and GSFC approved plans to close/resolve the issues

Detailed Review of the Correlated Thermal Model per Section 6.6

Detailed Review of the End Item Data Package per Section 6.7

4-1

4.0 MANUFACTURING REQUIREMENTS

The RPO IRCam shall be manufactured in accordance with the, “Restore-L Mission Assurance

Requirements (MAR)” document (RESTORE-L-RQMT-000518).

The Contractor shall review the MAR and provide a compliance matrix indicating its ability to conform to the various requirements. Within this compliance matrix, the Contractor shall indicate one the following responses for each of the various sections or Data Item Deliverables

(DID):

Full Compliance: The Contractor fully meets the requirement as defined by the MAR.

Full Compliance, with exception: The Contractor fully meets the intent of the requirement, but with an exception. (i.e., a different industry standard is used or an internal work instruction). Additional details on the specific exception shall be provided.

This scenario may required the contractor to submit an SSCO Request For Waiver

(RFW) form.

Partial-Compliance: The Contractor meets some subset, but not all of the requirement as defined by the MAR. Additional details on the specific shortcomings of compliance shall be provided. Under this scenario, the Contractor shall submit an SSCO Request For

Waiver (RFW) form.

Non-Compliance: The Contractor does not meet any aspect of the requirement as defined by the MAR. Under this scenario, the Contractor shall submit an SSCO Request For

Waiver (RFW) form.

As the MAR is a program-level document whose contents may not be applicable to all component-level hardware builds, the Government will address exceptions, partial, and non-compliances on a case-by-case basis as part of the negotiations during the contract award process. Waivers may be granted where permissible.

4-2

4.1 USE OF TRAVELERS

Each RPO IRCam shall have an associated fabrication / assembly traveler that documents, the following information:

Detailed fabrication / assembly steps

Material lots and date codes

As-built material and parts lists

Polymeric mix records, cure data, and shelf life (including hardness verification)

Calibration information for measurement equipment

Actual inspected dimensions, where applicable

Actual recorded running and final torque for torqueing operations

Approval of Government mandated Mandatory Inspection Points (see Section 5.1)

Travelers shall describe each step in the assembly process in detail; including the name and signature of the operator, the name and signature of the inspector, and the date the operation was completed.

4.2 PROHIBITED PLATING AND ALLOYS

Cadmium and zinc plating is prohibited. Zinc containing alloys shall be considered for vacuum suitability. Only tin alloys containing less than 97% tin are acceptable. The use of electrolytic nickel plating requires a Materials Usage Agreement (MUA) to assess that it does not result in electromagnetic interference.

4.3 FASTENER INTEGRITY

The requirements of section 4.2.6.5 of NASA-STD-6016 are applicable as written (including those in sections 4.2.6.5.1 and 4.2.6.5.2), except as discussed below.

NASA GSFC directive 541-PG-8072.1.2B shall be used instead of NASA-STD-6008 to define the fastener management and control policy, responsibilities, and practices for structural fasteners, fracture-critical fasteners, and safety-critical fasteners that are procured, received, tested, inventoried, installed in space flight hardware, or used in critical ground support equipment applications (such as vibration test fixtures).

Where procurement and screening of fasteners in accordance with this specification is prohibitive in terms of cost, schedule, or special processing requirements, the Contractor may solicit pre-screened fasteners from NASA GSFC as Government Furnished Equipment (GFE).

4.3.1 Thread Locking

All fasteners shall be thread locked, staked, or otherwise positively secured in accordance with

540-PG-8072.1.2, Sections 1.4 and 1.5.

4-3

4.3.2 Fastener Torqueing

All fasteners shall be torqued in accordance with 540-PG-8072.1.2, Section 2.

4.4 SOLDERING

Any solder joints and soldering practices used in the RPO IRCam shall be compliant with the requirements of IPC J-STD-001ES. Operators performing soldering shall be certified to or IPC

J-STD-001ES.

4.5 SILICONES

The use of silicone containing materials shall require a Government approved MUA.

4.6 CONTAMINATION CONTROL

The Contractor shall provide its contamination control plan to the Government for approval.

Individual parts and assembly of the RPO IRCam shall conform to the Contractor’s contamination control plan for assembly of spaceflight hardware.

Cleaning of component parts shall be performed with acetone, hexane, and/or isopropyl alcohol

(IPA). If either solvent is too aggressive for a particular part, the Contractor shall apply a cleaning procedure using an alternative solvent that results in a surface contamination level of molecular contaminate of less than 1.0 mg/m2 (< Level A per IEST-STD-1246E). Cleaning of optics shall be performed using Optima grade acetone.

Prior to Government delivery, each RPO IRCam shall be cleaned to a VC-0.5-1000-1500UV

(365 nm) per IEST-STD-1246E. Each RPO IRCam shall be double-bagged in heat-sealed, waterproof, vapor-proof, ESD-shielded, cleanroom compatible bagging along with redundant maximum humidity indicators.

5-1

5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

The Contractor shall meet the quality assurance requirements for the RPO IRCam program found in the Restore-L Mission Assurance Requirements, “RESTORE-L-RQMT-000518.”

5.1 MANDATORY INSPECTION POINTS

Government Source Inspection is required. All work on this order is subject to inspection and test by the Government. The Government Quality Assurance (QA) representative shall be notified no less than five (5) working days in advance of the time articles or materials are ready for inspection or test. Shipment of RPO IRCam hardware shall not be made until inspected by or documented authorization to ship is received from the Government QA representative.

Mandatory government source inspection points shall include the following:

Manufacturing Facility Source Inspection: Prior to the start of hardware fabrication, the Contractor shall allow Government inspection the Contractor’s manufacturing facility in order to verify compliance with the ANDI/ISO/ASQ Q9001 standard.

Camera Assembly: Solder joints and soldering applications on the RPO IRCam flight

Printed Circuit Boards (PCB) shall be inspected post assembly, prior to burn in and conformal coating. Inspections will be conducted by the Government to determine compliance with IPC J-STD-001ES.

Camera Assembly: Staking and conformal coating applications to the RPO IRCam

PCBs shall be inspected prior to installation into the camera flight housings. Inspections will be conducted to determine compliance with NASA-STD-8739.1, as referenced in

Section 7.1 of the Restore-L Mission Assurance Requirements, “RESTORE-L-RQMT-

000518.”

Camera Testing: Performance testing of each serial numbered RPO IRCam unit shall be witnessed by the Government to verify conformance with the camera technical specification, “RESTORE-L-SPEC-001394, Rev B,” unless waived by the Government.

6-1

6.0 CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRL)

Unless otherwise specified, all data deliverables shall be delivered electronically in Government approved formats such as Word, Excel, Acrobat, etc. Engineering records such as drawings, reports, calculations, etc. shall be provided to the Government in root file format. As-run travelers, procedures and / or Work Instructions shall be delivered as a scanned image file with

‘paper capture’ or Optical Character Recognition (OCR) to convert the file to a searchable format, such as Adobe PDF (Portable Document Format).

All documents provided to the Government that contain an Export Control Determination, or similar information sensitivity marking, shall have that marking maintained with that document and information at all times.

Data deliverables shall include all items outlined in the following subsections.

6.1 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS COMPLIANCE MATRIX

The Contractor shall develop a compliance matrix that contains the technical requirements listed in RESTORE-L-SPEC-001981.

This matrix shall indicate the particular requirement and the document, procedure, or test that the

Contractor will utilize to confirm that said requirement has been met (i.e., analysis document or test document). In addition, the Contractor shall identify any exceptions within the compliance matrix that are planned and shall propose a method for meeting the intent of each requirement, or explain why the requirement is not feasible.

A preliminary completed compliance matrix addressing all requirements of the technical specification, indicating a plan for how each requirement will be met will be presented at the

Kickoff Meeting / SRR as requested in Section 3.1.3.

The compliance matrix shall be updated throughout the contract with the final completed version due to the Government as part of the End Item Data Package (EIDP).

6-2

6.2 MATERIALS IDENTIFICATION AND USAGE LIST

The Contractor shall provide an electronic searchable parts list or separate electronic searchable

Materials Identification and Usage List (MIUL), as described in Section 9.3 of the Restore-L

Mission Assurance Requirements (MAR).

A single MIUL will be acceptable (i.e., each serial number camera will not require an individual materials list). The MIUL shall be submitted to the Government’s Material and Processes

Engineer (MPE) for review and approval, in a format agreed upon by both parties.

Material Usage Agreement (MUA) forms shall be prepared and submitted to the Government

MPE for all materials that do not meet the requirements specified in the MAR, as described in

Section 9.2 of that document.

6.3 OPTICAL DELIVERABLES

6.3.1 Optical Model

The Contractor shall provide the optical design model of the RPO IRCam optical assembly in its native file format (Code V, Zemax, etc.) prior to the start of lens manufacturing.

6.3.2 Stray Light Analysis

The Contractor shall submit a report detailing the stray light analysis performed on the RPO

IRCam optical design in accordance with Requirements 3.2.11 and 3.2.12.

6.4 MECHANICAL DELIVERABLES

6.4.1 Interface Control Drawing (ICD)

The Contractor shall submit a top-level interface control drawing of the RPO IRCam as defined by requirements 3.5.1 of RESTORE-L-SPEC-001981. The ICD shall include details of the RPO

IRCam both with and without the stray light baffle (if applicable). A final version of the ICD shall be included in the EIDP reviewed at the PSR.

6.4.2 Computer Aided Design (CAD) Electronic Model

The Contractor shall provide a mechanical CAD model for the RPO IRCam as defined by requirement 3.5.2 of RESTORE-L-SPEC-001981.

6-3

6.4.3 Stress Analysis Report

A full stress analysis, based on the loading cases given in RESTORE-L-SPEC-001981, shall be performed and an analysis report shall be supplied as part of the CDR data package for a) verification of fracture classification and b) demonstration of compliance with structural factors of safety. The stress analysis report shall be made available as early in the contract as possible so that the Government may identify any fracture-critical parts that require Non-Destructive

Evaluation (NDE) and additional crack growth analysis before integration into the final assembly. A one-time submittal for the report will be acceptable (i.e., each serial number camera will not require a separate analysis). The final stress report shall also be included in the EIDP.

6-4

6.5 ELECTRICAL DELIVERABLES

6.5.1 Electrical ICD

The Contractor shall provide an electrical ICD for the RPO IRCam as defined by requirement

3.6.5.1 of RESTORE-L-SPEC-001981. A final version of the ICD shall be included in the EIDP reviewed at the PSR.

6.5.2 EEE Parts List

The Contractor shall provide a EEE parts list for the RPO IRCam as defined by requirement 8.4 of RESTORE-L-RQMT-000518. A final version of the parts list shall be included in the EIDP reviewed at the PSR.

6.5.3 Radiation Test Report

If applicable, the Contractor shall provide a test report detailing the radiation testing performed on any RPO IRCam EEE part (including the camera detector) required to meet the radiation environment defined in Section 3.8.8 of RESTORE-L-SPEC-001981.

6.6 THERMAL DELIVERABLES

The Contractor shall provide correlated thermal model of the RPO IRCam as defined by requirements 3.7.1 and 3.7.2 of RESTORE-L-SPEC-001981.

6-5

6.7 END ITEM DATA PACKAGE

The End Item Data Package (EIDP) shall be delivered with the RPO IRCam and be made available for review at the Pre-Ship Review (PSR).

To expedite acceptance of the completed cameras, the Contractor shall provide any partial or completed EIDP data as early as possible prior start of the PSR, preferably at least five (5) working days prior to the start of the review.

The EIDP shall include all deliverables described in the following subsections. Minor deviations in the EIDP may be approved on a case-by-case basis by the Government.

6.7.1 Certificate of Conformance

The Contractor shall submit a Certificate of Conformance (C of C), to certify that the materials and processes used in the parts supplied on this order, as well as the finished RPO IRCam assembly, meet all drawing, specification, and contract requirements. The C of C shall include the following information:

Supplier’s name and address

Purchase order number

Part number as specified on the purchase order

As-built revision level

Serial or lot number(s)

Date code

Date of manufacture for each enclosed item (if applicable)

Quantity

Certifying signature, title, and date

Any Class 1 MRB or deviation/waiver

6.7.2 As-Built Parts List

The Contractor shall provide the completed As-Built Parts List for each delivered RPO IRCam assembly serial numbers. This list shall include serialization, revisions, lot number, and expiration dates associated with all components used in the RPO IRCam assembly.

6.7.3 As-Built Assembly Procedures

The Contractor shall provide the completed as-built procedures that were used to fabricate and assemble each RPO IRCam.

6-6

6.7.4 Material Certifications

The Contractor shall provide complete Materials Certifications and Test Reports for every component used in the RPO IRCam assembly.

This documentation shall include:

Material chemical and physical reports

Material hardness test(s) results

Non-Destructive Examination reports

Sub-tier supplier certification paperwork

In-process work orders / logs

Polymeric mix records / cure data, including hardness verification

Dimensional inspection reports

6.7.5 Test Reports

The Contractor shall provide test reports for all mandatory testing performed on the RPO IRCam as outlined in Section 4.5 of RESTORE-L-SPEC-001981.

Test reports shall include the following:

Actual test data and confirmation of acceptance / rejection by Contractor QAE

Conclusions and recommendations regarding success of the test activity

Description of deviations from nominal results, failures, approved corrective actions and procedures, and retest

Traceability back to the requirement being verified by the specific test

Copy of as-run procedure (as appropriate), including name and signature of the Test

Operator and Quality Assurance witness

Identification of test configuration

Specific results of each procedure including automated test segments and associated analyses

Photograph(s) of test configuration

Photograph of test article prior to and upon completion of test

In addition to a copy of the as-run procedure, data collected during testing shall be compiled into a single file for all serial numbers and delivered electronically in mutually agreed upon format

(such as Excel), unless otherwise specified.

6-7

6.7.6 Summary of Non-conformances

The Contractor shall provide a summary list of all non-conformances affecting the RPO IRCam.

This completed list shall include the following information:

Problem/anomaly reporting (complete copies of reports & correspondences)

Deviations/waivers/open items/non-conformances and their dispositions

Material Review Board (MRB) Reports

Failure Review Board (FRB) Reports

Root Cause and Corrective Action Notices / Forms

7-1

7.0 TESTING

The Contractor will perform the testing outlined in this section as it pertains to the specific RPO

IRCam types:

The sole RPO IRCam protoflight unit shall be tested per the following sections to

Protoflight Qualification levels as defined by GSFC-STD-7000A, “General

Environmental Verification Standard (GEVS).”

The RPO IRCam protoflight spare unit will not undergo environmental testing. As such, only Section 7.1 and 7.5 herein applies.

The RPO IRCam engineering development unit (EDU) will not undergo environmental testing. As such, only Section 7.1 and 7.5 herein applies.

Additional information and applicable caveats for each subset of tests are provided to the

Contractor below for consideration.

7.1 PERFORMANCE TEST

The summary of the required performance testing is covered in Section 4.5.2 of RESTORE-L-

SPEC-001981. The Government will review the RPO IRCam performance test procedure at the program CDR. All RPO IRCam units shall undergo performance testing at the following milestones:

Upon completion of RPO IRCam manufacturing

Pre & post each environmental test o Not applicable to RPO IRCam Spare & EDU

Prior to delivery of the hardware to the Government

7-2

7.2 EMI / EMC TEST

The summary of the required EMI / EMC testing is covered in Section 4.5.3 of RESTORE-L-

SPEC-001981. The Government will review the RPO IRCam EMI / EMC test plan at the program PER.

7.3 RANDOM VIBRATION TEST

The summary of the required vibration testing is covered in Sections 4.5.4 and 4.5.5 of

RESTORE-L-SPEC-001981. The Government will review the RPO IRCam vibration test plan at the program PER.

7.4 THERMAL VACUUM TEST

The summary of the required thermal vacuum testing is covered in Section 4.5.6 of RESTORE-

L-SPEC-001981. The Government will review the RPO IRCam thermal vacuum test plan at the program PER.

7.5 OPTICAL PERFORMANCE TESTING

The summary of the required optical performance testing is covered in Section 4.5.7 of

RESTORE-L-SPEC-001981. The Government will review the RPO IRCam optical performance test plan at the program PER.

The optical performance testing shall occur pre & post the full environmental test campaign.

8-1

8.0 HARDWARE HANDLING, CLEANING, PACKING & SHIPPING

8.1 HANDLING & STORAGE

All RPO IRCam units shall be stored, preserved, and packaged when not in use to prevent loss of marking, deterioration, contamination, excessive condensation and moisture, or damage during all phases of the program.

8.2 CLEANING

Each RPO IRCam unit shall undergo a final cleaning prior to delivery to the Government per the accepted methods defined in Section 4.6. The camera units shall receive a cleaning to a VC-0.5-

1000-1500UV (365 nm) per IEST-STD-1246E.

8.3 PACKING

The Contractor shall provide an acceptable hardware case that protects the hardware appropriately, such as a Pelican case or similar. Each RPO IRCam shall have its own individual hardware case. While in the hardware case, each RPO IRCam shall be double-bagged in heat-sealed, waterproof, vapor-proof, ESD-shielded, cleanroom compatible bagging (inner bag – nitrogen purged with humidity indicator; outer bag – humidity indicator). Pink poly ESD bagging is prohibited by NASA and is not acceptable. Each RPO IRCam lens and baffle assembly (if applicable) shall be covered when not in use.

8.4 SHIPPING

Multiple RPO IRCams, in their own hardware case, may be packed into a single shipping container. The shipping container shall include 5G, 10G and 20G shock indicators as well as humidity indicators. The Contractor shall document what action the Government is to take if the shock sensors have been tripped when hardware arrives at the Government receiving area. A copy of this document shall be included with shipping documentation.

The Contractor shall ship Freight On Board (F.O.B.) to Greenbelt, Maryland. The Contractor shall be responsible for any damage incurred during shipment.

9-1

9.0 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

Table 9-1: Acronym List

Abbreviation/ Acronym Definition

CAD Computer Aided Design

CDR Critical Design Review

CDRL Contract Data Requirements List

DID Data Item Deliverable

EDU Engineering Development Unit

EEE Electrical, Electronic and Electromechanical

EGSE Electrical Ground Support Equipment

EIDP End of Item Data Package

EMC Electromagnetic Compatibility

EMI Electromagnetic Interference

ESD Electrostatic Discharge

GEVS General Environmental Verification Standard

GFE Government Furnished Equipment

FRB Failure Review Board

GSFC Goddard Space Flight Center

ICD Interface Control Document

LEO Low Earth Orbit

MAR Mission Assurance Requirements

MGSE Mechanical Ground Support Equipment

MIPS Mandatory Inspection Points

MIUL Materials Identification and Usage List

MPE Materials & Process Engineer

MRB Material Review Board

MUA Material Usage Agreement

NGIN Next-Generation Integrated Network

OCR Optical Character Recognition

PCB Printed Circuit Board

PDF Portable Document Format

PDR Preliminary Design Review

PER Pre-Environmental Review

QA Quality Assurance

RFA Request For Action

RFP Request For Procurement

RPO Rendezvous Proximity Operations

PSR Pre-Ship Review

SOW Statement of Work

SRR System Requirements Review

SSCO Satellite Servicing Capabilities Office

TRR Test Readiness Review