Attachment_A_Statement_of_Work_-_Copy.pdf

RRM3-SOW-001571

Revision -

Effective Date: June 20, 2016 Expiration Date: June 20, 2021

Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland

STATEMENT OF WORK,

ROBOTIC REFUELING MISSION 3 (RRM3)

XENON DIAPHRAGM ASSEMBLY

June 2016

CHECK WITH SSCO NGIN DATABASE AT:

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

https://sscngin1.ndc.nasa.gov/

CM FOREWORD

This document is a Satellite Servicing Capabilities Office (SSCO) Configuration Management (CM)-controlled document. Changes to this document require prior approval of the applicable Configuration Control Board (CCB) Chairperson or designee. Proposed changes shall be submitted to the SSCO Code 408 CM Office (CMO), along with supportive material justifying the proposed change. Changes to this document will be made by complete revision.

Questions or comments concerning this document should be addressed to:

NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center SSCO, Code 408 Attention: Configuration Management Office Greenbelt, Maryland 20771

CHECK WITH SSCO NGIN DATABASE AT:

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

SATELLITE SERVICING CAPABILITIES OFFICE

DOCUMENT CHANGE RECORD

Date: June 20, 2016 Sheet 1 of 1

TITLE: Statement of Work, Robotic Refueling Mission 3 (RRM3)

Xenon Diaphragm Assembly

REV

LEVEL DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE AUTHORIZATION

- Initial Release Per Signature Page

SSCO CM RELEASE

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

Statement of Work

Robotic Refueling Mission 3 (RRM3) Xenon Diaphragm Assembly

Prepared By:

Approved Stephen M. Anthony Gas and Fluid Systems Engineer, KSC:NEF20

6/20/16 Date

Reviewed By:

Approved Mark A. Neuman RRM3 Hardware Manager, Orbital ATK/Code 408

Sofia M. Stachel RRM3 Systems Engineer, Orbital ATK/Code 408

Willliam D. (Dewey) Willis RRM3 Xenon Transfer Subsystem Lead/Code 597

Joseph C. Joyner RRM3 Quality Assurance, Orbital ATK/Code 373

Justin Cassidy RRM3 Office Head, Lockheed Martin/Code 408

Samantha A. Hurley RRM3 Gas and Fluid Systems Engineer, KSC:NEF20 https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov/

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

Table of Contents

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 General Information and Scope

1.2 Applicable Documents

1.3 Precedence

2. MANAGEMENT, DOCUMENTATION, AND REVIEWS

2.1 Program Management

2.2 Responsibility and Location

2.3 Reviews and Meetings

2.3.1 Technical Kickoff Review

2.3.2 Preliminary Design Review

2.3.3 Final Design Review

2.3.4 Pre-Ship Review

2.3.5 Visit to Vendor’s Site

3. DELIVERABLES

3.1 Data Deliverables

3.1.1 End Item Data Package (EIDP)

3.1.2 As-Built Drawings

3.1.3 Subcontractor Specifications

3.1.4 Test Documentation

3.2 Preliminary Design

3.3 Final Design

3.4 Diaphragm Assembly Qualification and Delivery

4. HARDWARE MANUFACTURE

4.1 Interchangeability

4.2 Welding Requirements

4.2.1 Alternative Weld Inspection

4.2.2 Post-Proof Test Inspection

4.3 Contamination Control

4.4 Materials List

4.5 Certificate of Compliance

4.5.1 Statement of Resubmission of Reworked Material

4.5.2 Certificate of Compliance – Raw Materials

4.6 Certificate of Analysis (C of A)

4.7 Nondestructive Inspection / Nondestructive Test Certification

4.8 Product Marking

CHECK WITH SSCO NGIN DATABASE AT:

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

5. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

5.1 Quality Management System

5.2 Supplemental Quality Management System Requirements

5.3 Configuration Management

5.4 Control of Nonconforming Product

5.5 Material Review Board (MRB)

5.6 Reporting of Non-conformances

5.7 Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) Alerts

5.8 Counterfeit Parts Prevention

5.9 Control of Monitoring and Measuring Devices

5.10 Flow Down

5.11 Shipping Documentation

6. ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 General Information and Scope

This specification establishes the technical, design, fabrication, verification, acceptance, and qualification requirements for the Satellite Servicing Capabilities Office (SSCO) Robotic Refueling Mission 3 (RRM3) Xenon Transfer Subsystem (XTS) Xenon Diaphragm Assembly as flight-certified hardware for ground testing, and on-orbit operations at the International Space Station (ISS).

The technical requirements for these assemblies are defined in the specification, RRM3-SPEC- 001573.

This Statement of Work (SOW) sets forth the requirements for the manufacture of the diaphragm assembly and includes a list of deliverables and a schedule for delivery. The Xenon Diaphragm Assembly, referred to hereafter as “the diaphragm assembly” or “the assembly”, is intended to act as a pump in the xenon transfer demonstration.

1.2 Applicable Documents

The following documents are applicable to this SOW:

Specification Number Title

ANSI/NCSL Z540 Calibration Laboratories and Measuring and Test Equipment - General Requirements

NASA-HDBK-6003

Application of Data Matrix Identification Symbols to Aerospace Parts Using Direct Part Marking Methods/Techniques

NASA-STD-6002 Applying Data Matrix Identification Symbols on Aerospace Parts

RRM3-SPEC-001573 Robotic Refueling Mission 3 (RRM3) Xenon Diaphragm Assembly Specification

SAE AS9100 Quality Management Systems - Requirements

1.3 Precedence

If any of the documents invoked herein are changed during the period of performance of the Contract/Purchase Order, the vendor shall not use the later issue without prior written approval of SSCO. Where there is a conflict in requirements, SSCO shall be notified.

CHECK WITH SSCO NGIN DATABASE AT:

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

2. MANAGEMENT, DOCUMENTATION, AND REVIEWS

2.1 Program Management

Program deliverables and milestones are listed in Table 1. The vendor shall provide all of the items listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Contract Deliverables and Milestones

Item Deliverable/Milestone SOW Section Due Date

01 Kickoff Meeting 2.3.1 Within seven (7) business days of contract award.

02 SAE AS9100

certification or a project-specific quality assurance plan

5.1 Within seven (7) business days of

contract award.

03 Preliminary Design Submittal/Review

3.2, 4.2 4.2.2

Thirty (30) calendar days after contract award.

04 Mission Assurance Plan Submitted

5.2 Thirty (30) calendar days after contract

award.

05 Final Design Submittal/Review

3.3 Ninety (90) calendar days after contract

award

06 Material List, Materials Usage Agreements, NDE Plan

4.4

Preliminary submitted with Preliminary Design.

Final submitted with Final Design.

07 Welder Certifications and Weld Procedures

4.2 Ten (10) business days prior to start of

welding.

08 Contamination Control and Cleaning Procedures

4.3 At least ten (10) business days prior to

fabrication start.

09 Test Documentation 3.1.4 At least ten (10) business days prior to planned test start for test plans and procedures.

No later than ten (10) business days after test completion for test reports.

10 Pre-Ship Review (PSR) 2.3.4 Ten (10) business days prior to diaphragm assembly delivery.

11 Qualification Unit Delivery

3.4 Quantity: One (1)

One hundred twenty (120) calendar days from SSCO approval of final design.

CHECK WITH SSCO NGIN DATABASE AT:

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

Item Deliverable/Milestone SOW Section Due Date

12 Flight Unit Delivery 3.4 Quantity: Two (2) One hundred twenty (120) calendar days from SSCO approval of final design.

13 End Item Data Package

(EIDP)

3.1.1 At time of flight unit/qualification unit

delivery.

2.2 Responsibility and Location

The vendor shall be responsible for the development of the diaphragm assembly design, fabrication, and performance of all inspections and tests. The vendor shall also be responsible for implementing any testing related quality assurance requirements not occurring at government facilities. Except as otherwise noted, the vendor may use their own facilities, government furnished facility, or any commercial laboratory acceptable to SSCO. SSCO reserves the right to perform any of the inspections necessary to ensure conformance of the test and test location to the requirements of RRM3-SPEC-001573.

2.3 Reviews and Meetings

2.3.1 Technical Kickoff Review

The vendor shall conduct a Technical Kickoff Review per Table 1 with at least one technical lead representative from the vendor present (other support parties may participate via teleconference, if desired). At a minimum this review should cover the proposed basic designs, review of the requirement verifications and the initial schedule for design and acceptance testing.

This meeting will also be used to establish a schedule for regular teleconferences SSCO will ask the vendor to participate in to report progress on the hardware development. SSCO expects to hold monthly teleconferences through the design phase, with more frequent teleconferences occurring during the manufacturing and integration and test (I&T) phases.

This meeting will also serve as first technical exchange of vendor engineering for clarification of any specification technical items.

2.3.2 Preliminary Design Review

Details can be found in Section 3.2.

2.3.3 Final Design Review

Details can be found in Section 3.3.

CHECK WITH SSCO NGIN DATABASE AT:

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

2.3.4 Pre-Ship Review

A Pre-Ship Review (PSR) shall be conducted per Table 1 to review each unit’s EIDP, any problem records or non-conformances, and any remaining open work on the diaphragm assembly.

2.3.5 Visit to Vendor’s Site

SSCO may visit the vendor’s worksite during the designing, building, and testing of the diaphragm assembly and to view the manufacturing facilities. SSCO reserves the right to visit the vendor’s facility or their contractors at any time to review processes and procedures.

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

3. DELIVERABLES

3.1 Data Deliverables

All data deliverables shall be delivered electronically in common computer searchable formats such as Word, Excel, Acrobat, etc. unless otherwise specified. All engineering records - drawings, reports, calculations, etc. shall be provided to the SSCO in root file format as well as scanned image file with ‘paper capture’ or Optical Character Recognition (OCR) to convert the file to a searchable format, such as Adobe PDF (Portable Document Format), and one clean hard copy minimum. All vendor detail proprietary documents such as shop practices/procedures shall be appropriately marked per individual sheet or image.

All documents provided to the vendor that contain an Export Control Determination, or similar information sensitivity marking, shall have that marking maintained with that document and information at all times. Vendor-created drawings created based on such documents must carry-over the information sensitivity marking as that determination belongs to the information and not the document.

3.1.1 End Item Data Package (EIDP)

The vendor shall develop, maintain and deliver, for each unique serial number assembly, an EIDP.

Delivery of EIDP to SSCO shall be per Table 1. The EIDP shall include the following as a minimum:

A. As-built assembly drawings per Section 3.1.2.

B. Test documentation per Section 3.1.4.

C. Material certifications per RRM3-SPEC-001573 Section 3.6.1.

D. Certificate of Compliance per Section 4.5.

E. Materials List per RRM3-SPEC-001573 Section 3.6.1.1 and SOW Section 4.4.

F. NDE documentation per RRM3-SPEC-001573 Section 3.6.2.1.1 and SOW Section4.7.

G. Pressurization log per RRM3-SPEC-001573 Section 3.6.2.

H. Welding documentation per RRM3-SPEC-001573 Section 3.6.3.

I. Verification of all the requirements and ICDs in RRM3-SPEC-001573 for each unit.

J. ICDs per RRM3-SPEC-001573 Sections 3.2.7 and 3.2.8.

K. Digital photographs of each unit

CHECK WITH SSCO NGIN DATABASE AT:

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

All common final signed documentation items applicable to all serial number deliverable end items provided may be submitted one time with first unit delivery and designated as “common submit” to subsequent end items.

3.1.2 As-Built Drawings

The vendor shall provide full-size as-built drawings with the EIDP, reflecting any alterations and redlines made to the original engineering drawings provided by SSCO. The vendor shall indicate the official communication that drove each change on the as-built drawings. Drawings may be provided electronically.

3.1.3 Subcontractor Specifications

The vendor shall provide SSCO with specifications that the vendor intends to submit to any vendor’s subcontractors for SSCO to review prior to any vendor’s subcontract work being performed.

3.1.4 Test Documentation

3.1.4.1 Qualification Tests

The vendor shall deliver to SSCO the Qualification Test Plans and Test Procedures for the tests defined in RRM3-SPEC-001573 per Table 1. The preliminary Test Reports shall be transmitted to SSCO per Table 1. Final certified test data with test records shall be delivered as part of EIDP per each unique serial number assembly.

Documentation content requirements can be found in Sections 3.1.4.3 to 3.1.4.5.

3.1.4.2 Acceptance Tests

The vendor shall deliver to SSCO the Acceptance Test Plans and Test Procedures for the tests defined in RRM3-SPEC-001573 per Table 1. The preliminary Test Reports shall be transmitted to SSCO per Table 1. Final certified test data shall be delivered as part of EIDP per each unique serial number assembly.

Documentation content requirements can be found in Sections 3.1.4.3 to 3.1.4.5.

3.1.4.3 Test Plan

Test planning information shall include the following as a minimum:

A. Complete description of article under evaluation, including the description of the interface requirements between the article and the test facility (or apparatus).

B. The overall philosophy, approach, and objective for each item, including any special SSCO approved tailoring or interpretation of design and testing requirements.

CHECK WITH SSCO NGIN DATABASE AT:

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

C. Detail descriptions of all test activities (i.e., tests, analyses, inspections) to be performed based on the identified requirements. Identify any prerequisites, constraints, and objectives for all the test activities.

D. Description and planned usage of the support equipment, software, facilities, and tooling necessary to execute the test activities, and required tools, test beds, etc.

3.1.4.4 Test Procedures

Test Procedures shall contain the following as a minimum:

A. Identification of item/article being subjected to test, inspection, or demonstration.

B. Identification of objectives established for the particular test, inspection, or demonstration.

C. Description of steps and operations, in sequence, to be taken.

D. Identification of measuring and recording equipment to be used, specifying range, accuracy, and type and any special instructions for operating such equipment.

E. Layouts, schematics, or diagrams showing identification, location, and interconnection of item/article, support equipment, and measuring equipment.

F. Environmental and/or other conditions to be maintained with tolerances.

G. Constraints on test, inspection, or demonstration.

H. Pass-fail criteria for evaluating results, if applicable.

I. Instructions for handling non-conformances and anomalous occurrences during activity.

J. Confirmation that required support equipment has been calibrated and certification of the calibration is still valid.

3.1.4.5 Test Reports

Test reports shall include the following as a minimum:

A. Conclusions and recommendations relative to success of the test activity.

B. Description of deviations from nominal results, failures, approved corrective actions and procedures, and retest.

C. Traceability back to the requirement.

D. Copy of as-run procedure (as appropriate).

CHECK WITH SSCO NGIN DATABASE AT:

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

E. Identification of test configuration.

F. Specific results of each procedure including automated test segments and associated analyses.

G. Digital photograph(s) of test configuration.

H. Digital photograph(s) of test article prior to and upon completion of test.

3.2 Preliminary Design

A preliminary design package shall be submitted per Table 1 and presented for review. Technical drawings and presentation charts shall be submitted. The designer(s) and/or lead engineer(s) shall present the design to SSCO, either at GSFC or at the vendor facility.

SSCO’s comments shall be dispositioned with SSCO approval.

During the preliminary design phase of the contract, SSCO will work closely with the vendor to clarify details of the design. The vendor shall include in the package details on the diaphragm assembly testing methods. The goal is to have minimal changes to the design after the preliminary design phase.

Mandatory inspection points (MIPs) will be identified by SSCO based on the preliminary design package. SSCO reserves the right to add MIPs if the need arises during the development process.

Note: The need for a preliminary design review may be eliminated depending on the vendor’s experience building spaceflight hardware and whether the proposed design is closely aligned with an existing vendor design. SSCO recommends this be addressed in the vendor’s proposal.

3.3 Final Design

A final design package shall be submitted per Table 1 and presented for review. Technical drawings and presentation charts shall be submitted at least 2 business days before the review meeting. The designer(s) and/or lead engineer(s) shall present the design to SSCO either at GSFC or at the vendor facility.

SSCO’s comments shall be dispositioned with SSCO approval into the final design. The final design shall include an updated version of the preliminary design paper describing the specific apparatus used to meet the requirements in RRM3-SPEC-001573. It shall also include a complete detailed set of technical drawings of all components in the unit. Once the final design is approved by SSCO the construction of the unit shall begin. Preliminary test plans and procedures shall be submitted along with the final design for review. SSCO’s feedback shall be incorporated into the test plans and procedures.

3.4 Diaphragm Assembly Qualification and Delivery

Following the construction of the units, testing shall be performed as described in RRM3-SPEC- 001573. Upon completion, the units and their EIDPs shall be delivered to GSFC per Table 1.

Acceptance of the units will occur at GSFC no later than 30 days after delivery.

CHECK WITH SSCO NGIN DATABASE AT:

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

4. HARDWARE MANUFACTURE

The vendor shall manufacture and assemble the units at the vendor site. The units shall be the same as the final design. Any change or modification of the final design shall be reported to SSCO before applying to the design/hardware.

4.1 Interchangeability

Hardware assemblies, components, and parts with the same part number shall be physically and functionally interchangeable.

4.2 Welding Requirements

All welding shall be accomplished in accordance with the standards referenced in RRM3-SPEC- 001573. Certified welders with the appropriate certification for the material being worked shall be used. Welder certifications and weld procedures shall be submitted prior to the start of the work per Table 1. The vendor shall present a quality plan for weldment records with the preliminary design.

4.2.1 Alternative Weld Inspection

All pressure containing welds must be 100% Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) volumetric inspected or equivalent methods ensuring similar quality such as automated recorded parameter processes to an approved process that was verified by random sample section NDE and other alternative high precision NDE. NDE inspection types shall be approved by SSCO.

4.2.2 Post-Proof Test Inspection

The vendor shall submit a Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) Plan outlining the implementation of the requirements of Section 3.6.2.1.1 of RRM3-SPEC-001573.

4.3 Contamination Control

The vendor shall develop and implement a Cleaning Procedure that meets the requirements in RRM3-SPEC-001573. The final approved Procedure shall be provided to SSCO per Table 1. The procedure shall address as a minimum the following:

A. Cleaning and Surface Cleanliness - All materials shall be cleaned and verified clean to meet RRM3-SPEC-001573 requirements. The cleaning methods shall include required solvents and method for cleaning and verification / sampling and shall also be forwarded to SSCO for review and approval.

B. Preparation for delivery.

CHECK WITH SSCO NGIN DATABASE AT:

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

4.4 Materials List

The vendor shall provide a materials list as defined in RRM3-SPEC-001573. The SSCO Materials Assurance Engineer must agree with the material usage.

4.5 Certificate of Compliance

The vendor must submit a Certificate of Compliance (C of C), in the vendor’s own format, to certify that the materials and processes used in the parts supplied on this order meet all drawing, specification, and contract requirements. The C of C must include the following:

• Supplier’s name and address

• Purchase order number

• Part number as specified on the purchase order

• As-built revision level

• Serial or lot number(s)

• Date code

• Date of manufacture for each enclosed item (if applicable)

• Quantity

• Certifying signature, title, and date

• Any Class 1 MRB or deviation/waiver

Class 1 issues are those that affect form, fit, function, cost, or schedule of the end item.

4.5.1 Statement of Resubmission of Reworked Material

All items rejected by SSCO and subsequently resubmitted to SSCO for acceptance shall be indicated on the C of C.

4.5.2 Certificate of Compliance – Raw Materials

The following clause applies when the vendor will purchase raw materials to defined specification(s), not including Government Furnished Property.

The vendor shall include with each serial number/ end item with each shipment the raw material manufacturer’s test report (e.g., mill test report) that states that the lot of material furnished has been tested, inspected, and found to be in compliance with the applicable material specifications.

The test report will list the specifications, including revision numbers or letters, to which the material has been tested and/or inspected and the identification of the material lot to which it applies.

When the material specification requires quantitative limits for chemical, mechanical, or physical properties, the test report shall contain the actual test and/or inspection values obtained.

CHECK WITH SSCO NGIN DATABASE AT:

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

4.6 Certificate of Analysis (C of A)

The vendor shall submit a Certificate of Analysis (C of A) to certify that the material supplied on this order meets all the specification requirements. The C of A must, as a minimum, include the following:

• Supplier’s name and address

• Supplier’s cage code

• Purchase order number

• Part number and revision level

• Serial or lot number(s)

• Batch, heat or melt number(s), when applicable

• Chemical analysis of composition, by percentage

• Mechanical properties, as applicable

• Certifying signature, title, and date

• Any Class 1 MRB or deviation/waiver

4.7 Nondestructive Inspection / Nondestructive Test Certification

The vendor shall include in the EIDP (see Section 3.1.1) with each serial number/ end item shipment a certificate for the nondestructive inspection (NDI)/nondestructive test (NDT) performed. As a minimum, the certification shall contain the following information:

• Customer’s Purchase Order / Contract number;

• Name and address of the Company performing NDI/NDT;

• Date of Inspection;

• Specification or other requirement defining the NDI/NDT acceptance / rejection criteria;

• Inspector/name/stamp and NDI/NDT certification level;

• NDI/NDT specification including revision;

• Material or item identification (part number, heat lot number, Foundry Record (FR) number;

• Inspection results (accept/reject);

• Reference to attached recordings i.e., films or photographs if applicable;

• Supplemental weld records of automated key parameters during fabrication runs to within allowable tolerances, if used as alternative to 100% volumetric NDE.

These records shall include all information required in this section as well as acceptance / rejection criteria, and related test instrument data used in the NDI/NDT process.

CHECK WITH SSCO NGIN DATABASE AT:

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

4.8 Product Marking

The vendor shall identify all equipment using NASA-HDBK-6003 and NASA-STD-6002, or through the use of commercial marking techniques that: (1) are sufficiently durable to remain intact through the typical lifespan of the property (including cleaning): and, (2) contain the data and data format required by the standards. This requirement includes deliverable equipment listed in Table 1 and other equipment when no longer required for contract performance and SSCO directs physical transfer to SSCO or a third party. The Contractor shall identify property in both machine and human readable form unless the use of a machine readable-only format is approved by SSCO.

Equipment shall be marked in a location that will be human-readable, without disassembly or movement of the equipment, when the items are placed in service unless such placement would have a deleterious effect on safety or on the item’s operation.

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

5. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

5.1 Quality Management System

The vendor’s quality system shall be certified to SAE AS9100.

The vendor shall submit to the SSCO either (1) proof of SAE AS9100 certification or (2) a project-specific quality assurance plan (QAP) or its equivalent per Table 1.

5.2 Supplemental Quality Management System Requirements

Some assurance related activities are not covered by SAE AS9100. These activities are identified in the following sections and should supplement the SAE AS9100 requirements. The vendor shall provide a Mission Assurance Plan in accordance with Table 1 describing how the requirements in this SOW will be met.

Note: If the vendor already has a Mission Assurance Plan that meets the intent of this requirement, that document can be submitted with the SAE AS9100 certification at project kick-off and SSCO may then in turn waive the requirement for any additional submission in accordance with Item 04 of Table 1.

5.3 Configuration Management

The vendor shall document and maintain a configuration management system to properly manage change control and the functional and physical characteristics of configuration items during design, fabrication, assembly, and testing. The vendor’s Configuration Management Plan shall be available for review by SSCO.

5.4 Control of Nonconforming Product

The vendor shall have a closed loop system for identifying and reporting non-conformances, ensuring that positive corrective action is implemented to preclude recurrence and verification of the adequacy of implemented corrective action by audit and test as appropriate. The system shall include a nonconformance review process, which shall consist of a preliminary review and a Materials Review Board (MRB). SSCO shall be provided access to any related nonconforming reports and corrective action information.

5.5 Material Review Board (MRB)

The vendor is not authorized to conduct Material Review Board (MRB) actions (Class 1 non-conformances) on SSCO products manufactured within their facilities. SSCO must be notified of the Class 1 nonconformance via e-mail within 1 business day and SSCO acknowledgement of receipt must be received by the vendor.

Class 1 issues are those that affect form, fit, function, cost, or schedule of the end item.

CHECK WITH SSCO NGIN DATABASE AT:

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

5.6 Reporting of Non-conformances

Reporting of operational non-conformances shall begin with the first test usage or assembly at the start of end item acceptance testing or the first operation of a mechanical item; it shall continue through formal Government acceptance of the end item. Any Class 1 MRB issues that result in a disposition of “repair” or result in a possible risk to the integrity of the part shall be reported at any point in the manufacturing process of the diaphragm assembly.

5.7 Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) Alerts

The vendor shall establish and implement a system to review and take action, as necessary, on Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) Alerts. The supplier shall be responsible for reviewing GIDEP Alerts for impact to hardware delivered to GSFC. SSCO shall be notified where matches are found between GIDEP Alerts and material delivered to GSFC.

Suspect parts identified on GIDEP Alerts shall be removed from all stores, kits, assemblies, and any other allocation used as a source of parts for SSCO hardware.

5.8 Counterfeit Parts Prevention

The manufacturer must certify in writing that counterfeit parts are not included in this shipment.

Should suspect/counterfeit parts be furnished under this order, such items shall be impounded by SSCO. The manufacturer shall promptly replace such suspect/counterfeit parts with parts acceptable to the buyer and the manufacturer shall be liable for all costs, including but not limited to buyer’s internal and external costs.

5.9 Control of Monitoring and Measuring Devices

The vendor shall maintain a calibration system based on standards traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). A system compliant with ANSI/NCSL Z540 is preferred. SSCO reserves the right to conduct a survey of the vendor’s facilities to determine the adequacy of the calibration system.

5.10 Flow Down

The vendor’s procurement, QA and safety programs shall ensure proper flow-down and verification of requirements to all suppliers.

5.11 Shipping Documentation

A preliminary copy of the DD 1149 submitted to SSCO must be forwarded electronically to the SSCO Government Property Representative 24 hours prior to SSCO review and/or source inspection.

https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

6. ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS

ANSI American National Standard

COC Certificate of Compliance

EIDP End Item Data Package

GSFC Goddard Space Flight Center

ITAR International Traffic in Arms Regulation

NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NDE Nondestructive Evaluation

NDI Nondestructive Inspection

NDT Nondestructive Test

NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology

OCR Optical Character Recognition

PDF Portable Document Format

QA Quality Assurance

RRM3 Robotic Refueling Mission 3

SOW Statement of Work

SSCO Satellite Servicing Capabilities Office https://sscongin.ndc.nasa.gov

TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the restriction(s) on the title page of this document.

https://sscngin1.ndc.nasa.gov/

6. ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS