CHEMM_Technical_Evaluation.pdf

PDF 10 KB Posted

Attached to
Chemical Hazards Emergency Medical Management (CHEMM)
Solicitation number
NIHLM2016834
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Addendum_CHEMM.pdf PDF
CHEMM_SOW_FOR_JUNE_2016_POSTING_Bert_Edits.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Evaluation Scheme

CRITERION A: Understanding the Requirements and Technical Approach

Evaluation Factor Description: Proposal demonstrates an understanding of the requirements and indicates a clear awareness of the contract purpose and objectives. The proposal demonstrates in a detailed manner the approach and ability to perform all tasks and deliverables in the statement of work. The proposal details the manner in which the project will be carried out and conveys an understanding of the information to be compiled and delivered.

Total Possible Points: 40 points

CRITERION B: Personnel

Evaluation Factor Description: Proposal demonstrates that staff is competent and experienced in the skills required in the Statement of Work. Resumes of staff/consultants reflect not only academic qualifications, but also length and variety of experience in similar tasks and clearly demonstrates relevant training, experience, and expertise. The availability and percentage of time each staff member will contribute to the project is adequately identified. The proposal identifies a clear line of responsibility for the project.

Total Possible Points: 35 points

CRITERION C: Proposed Facilities and Equipment

Evaluation Factor Description: Proposal provides detailed information describing the facilities and resources the organization has to carry out the tasks of the project. The proposal provides an explanation of how the corporation will allocate overall resources to this project.

Total Possible Points: 10 points

CRITERION D: Past Performance

Evaluation Factor Description: Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to customer satisfaction and timely delivery of high quality products and services. Past experience will be based upon the offeror's prior experience with similar activities.

a) Offerors shall submit a list and description of the last five relevant contracts that are similar to this type of requirement completed during the past three years and all contracts currently in process. Offerors shall be evaluated on (1) record of conforming to specifications and to

Technical Re-Evaluation of Proposals Received for NLM Solicitation No. NIHNLM_____ standards of good workmanship; (2) adherence to contract schedules, including the administrative aspects of performance; (3) reputation for reasonable and cooperative behavior and deep commitment satisfaction; and (4) business-like concern for the interests of the customer.

b) For each contract/subcontract identified, include a brief synopsis which includes the date the work was performed, the client for whom the work was performed (include client name and telephone number), and a description of work performed. The vendor is authorized to provide information on problems encountered on the identified contract/subcontract and the vendor's corrective actions, if necessary.

Total Possible Points: 15 points

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .