Atch9_Proposal Cross-Ref Matrix_15Oct26.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 24 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- Not on record
About this file
This file is a Proposal Cross-Reference Matrix template that instructs offerors on how to structure and reference their proposal sections in response to the technical, contractor documentation, and pricing evaluation criteria for the Next Generation Penetrator (NGP) Development through Production contract.
The matrix is organized into three primary sections. The Technical Requirements Cross-Reference Matrix evaluates offerors' capability across four subfactors: (1) System Level Experience—demonstrating recent, relevant experience throughout the lifecycle of 2,000 lbs or greater air-to-ground penetrator munitions, including engineering and integration authority, weapon-level systems engineering through design baselines, and established manufacturing and assembly lines capable of recurring All-UP-Round (AUR) deliveries; (2) Subcomponent Level Experience—providing evidence of development and production of mission-critical subcomponents within the last five years, progressing from developmental qualification through active manufacturing, and integrating components without adverse center-of-gravity, mass property, or interface discrepancies; (3) Integration, Test, and/or Data Analysis Support—demonstrating capability to execute developmental testing, production phase transitioning, Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT), Lot Acceptance Testing (LAT), and possess analytical infrastructure for reducing high-speed digital test data and producing certified test analysis reports; and (4) Logistics Support—providing lifecycle logistics support experience in at least two identified areas including integrated logistics support planning, maintenance planning, supply support, provisioning, support equipment, technical data, training, and demilitarization planning. The Contractor Documentation Cross-Reference Matrix requires submission of a signed solicitation with Sections A through K, identification of subcontractors with a Small Business Participation Plan, and proof of AS9100 and/or ISO 9001 certification. The Price Cross-Reference Matrix addresses pricing for a contractor-led, virtual kick-off meeting with the Government not to exceed two hours. All criteria reference the five-year requirement preceding solicitation release, anticipated for mid-December 2026.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1.Technical Requirements
| Cross-Reference Matrix |
| Instructions: Reference the proposal section(s) that corresponds to the relevant criteria for the subfactor/element/sub-element. The Rating Criteria Tables are located in the RFP. |
| Subfactor | Rating Criteria | Criteria | ||
| The Offeror's capability to demonstrate recent, relevant, and verifiable experience throughout the lifecycle (development through production) of 2000 lbs or greater air-to-ground penetrator munitions. The Offeror demonstrates engineering and integration authority over a complete, integrated air-to-ground munition within the last five (5) years preceding solicitation release date. | The Offeror provides proof of conducting weapon-level systems engineering through design baseline milestones and delivering technical data packages supporting airworthiness or flight release approvals. | The Offeror provides proof of establishing and executing a manufacturing and assembly line capable of recurring, production-level All-UP-Round (AUR) deliveries. | ||
| Proposal Reference | Proposal Reference | Proposal Reference | ||
| System Level Experience | Table 1.1 |
| Subfactor | Rating Criteria | Criteria | ||
| The Offeror's capability to demonstrate recent, relevant, and verifiable experience in development and production of subcomponents and integration into 2000 lbs or greater air-to-ground penetrator munitions. The Offeror provides work executed within the last five (5) years preceding solicitation release date, including the engineering, manufacturing, and delivery of mission-critical subcomponents. | The Offeror provides verifiable proof of progressing subcomponents from the developmental qualification phase through to active/recurring manufacturing. | The Offeror provides evidence of subcomponent integration and verification against weapon form, fit, function constraints without causing adverse center-of-gravity (CG), mass property, or interface discrepancies on host weapon body. | ||
| Proposal Reference | Proposal Reference | Proposal Reference | ||
| Subcomponent Level Experience | Table 1.2 |
| Subfactor | Rating Criteria | Criteria | ||
| The Offeror's capability to provide data analysis, test, and/or integration support of 2,000 lbs or greater air-to-ground penetrator munitions systems within the last five (5) years preceding solicitation release date. The Offeror demonstrates experience performing physical or electrical integration on individual air-to-ground munitions or warhead cases weighing no less than 2,000 pounds. | The Offeror provides a clear, substantiated capability to execute: (1) Developmental Testing (DT), supporting ground and range flight test events (including instrumentation, store separation profiling, and safety-of-flight verification). (2) Production Phase, transitioning test procedures into recurring manufacturing verification, including Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT) and Lot Acceptance Testing (LAT) for hardware assemblies. | The Offeror details a proven analytical infrastructure (processes, software, and personnel) capable of reducing high-speed digital test data, identifying electrical or mechanical interface anomalies, and producing certified test analysis reports suitable for airworthiness/range safety approval. | ||
| Proposal Reference | Proposal Reference | Proposal Reference | ||
| Integration, Test, and/or Data Analysis Support | Table 1.3 |
| Subfactor | Rating Criteria | Criteria |
| The Offeror’s capability to demonstrate recent, relevant, and verifiable experience, within the last five (5) years preceding solicitation release date, providing lifecycle logistics support for 2,000 lbs or greater air-to-ground penetrator munitions systems. The Offeror clearly identifies specific roles and responsibilities in efforts similar to the requirement in scope, magnitude, and complexity; and demonstrates experience in at least two (2) of the identified logistics areas: integrated logistics support planning, maintenance planning and analysis, supply support and spares, provisioning and cataloging, support and test equipment, technical data, training, DMSMS management, packaging, handling, storage, and transportation (PHS&T), field or depot maintenance support, and demilitarization or disposal planning. | ||
| Proposal Reference | ||
| Logistics Support | Table 1.4 |
2. Contractor Documentation
| Cross-Reference Matrix | ||
| Instructions: Reference the proposal section(s) that corresponds to the relevant criteria for the subfactor/element/sub-element. The Rating Criteria Tables are located in the RFP. | ||
| Subfactor | Rating Criteria | Criteria |
| The offeror’s proposal includes a signed copy of the solicitation and Sections A through K. By completing the SF 33 in this manner, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the solicitation, Sections A through K. This includes, acknowledging understanding of each section, providing required fill-ins, and any other pertinent information submitted to support each section. | ||
| Proposal Reference | ||
| Model Contract/Representations and Certification | 2.1 | |
| Subfactor | Rating Criteria | Criteria |
| If the Offeror requires the use of subcontractors, please identify the company or companies that could possibly collaborate with the Offeror on this effort. Proposal indicates an adequate approach and understanding of small business objectives and submittal of the Small Business Participation Plan Form. | ||
| Proposal Reference | ||
| Small Business Participation Plan & Subcontractor Identification | 2.2 | |
| Subfactor | Rating Criteria | Criteria |
| The Offeror shall provide proof of AS9100 and/or ISO 9001 certification. | ||
| Proposal Reference | ||
| Proof of AS9100/ISO 9001 Certification | 2.3 |
3. Price
| Cross-Reference Matrix | ||
| Instructions: Reference the proposal section(s) that corresponds to the relevant criteria for the subfactor/element/sub-element. The Rating Criteria Tables are located in the RFP. | ||
| Subfactor | Rating Criteria | Criteria |
| Price for a contractor-led Kick-Off meeting with the Government to begin this effort. The Kick-Off meeting will be virtual and last no more than 2 hours. | ||
| Proposal Reference | ||
| Price | 3.1 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .