RFP_N6945019R0501_P160_SOLID_WASTE_FACILITY_NSGB.pdf

DESIGN-BUILD (DB) FIRM FIXED PRICE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR P-160 SOLID WASTE FACILITY AT NAVAL STATION GUANTANAMO

BAY (NSGB), CUBA.

THIS SOLICITATION IS SOLICITED ON AN UNRESTRICTED BASIS WITH FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION FOR PARTICIPATION BY ALL BUSINESS FIRMS WITH SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY THIS CONTRACT. THIS IS A TWO-PHASE NEGOTIATED PROCUREMENT.

NAICS CODE IS 237110, WATER AND SEWER LINE AND RELEATED STRUCTURES CONSTRUCTION, WITH A SIZE STANDARD OF $36,500,000.

ALL CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING THIS SOLICITATION SHALL BE DIRECTED TO JOHN GOGGIN AT john.goggin@navy.mil AND BARBARA CZINDER AT Barbara.Czinder@navy.mil.

BARBARA A. CZINDER 904-542-6834

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

10-Dec-2018

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________910 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________6 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________10 Jan 2019 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHEAST

GULFCST

BLDG 903, PO BOX 30

NAS JACKSONVILLE

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0030

N69450

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

03:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N6945019R0501 60

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N6945019R0501

Section 00010 - Solicitation Contract Form

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 Project Solid Waste Facility, NS Guantanamo Bay

FFP

Construction of a new solid waste facility with leachate management. The project includes two enclosed buildings; the Solid Waste Management (SWM) building and the Maintenance Building. IAW technical specifications and drawings.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 910 dys. ADC PWD GUANTANAMO BAY CUBA

INSPECTOR OF RECORD

PSC 1005, PO BOX 37

FPO AE 09593

011-5399-5615 FOB: Destination

N44251

Section 00100 - Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders

INFORMATION TO OFFERORS

CPARS

Contractor’s performance will be evaluated using the respective contractor performance evaluation report entry system located on the website http://www.cpars.gov/. Prior to commencement of work the contractor is required to provide the government with the name, phone number and e-mail address of the “Contractor’s Representative” that will be responsible for receipt and review of draft performance evaluations prepared by the government in the appropriate system. It is the contractor’s responsibility to keep this contact information current.

Information to Offerors:

This procurement is being solicited on an unrestricted basis with full and open competition for all business firms with specialized experience and qualifications required by this contract.

The North American Industry Classification Code System (NAICS) is 237110, Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures Construction, with a size standard of $36,500,000.

Project magnitude: Between $25,000,000 and $100,000,000

1. Inquiries/ Questions

1a. Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs)

All pre-proposal inquiries (PPIs) must be submitted in writing via the “Bidder Inquiry” in ProjNet at www.projnet.org/projnet <http://www.projnet.org/projnet>. The bidder inquiry key for this solicitation is ZR73C5-N7FYZH. All questions shall be submitted at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the closing date of the solicitation in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiry. Answers will be made via ProjNet, however, answers do not change the solicitation, any changes to the solicitation will be made via an amendment to the RFP and will be posted on FBO (www.fbo.gov <http://www.fbo.gov>).

All Offerors are encouraged to register on ProjNet for alerts and to stay abreast of bidder inquiries and Government responses that are posted in reference to this solicitation. Only self-registered users on ProjNet can submit and review inquiries. A “how to” guide has been provided via Attachment 2 and provided under additional documents in NECO. Those submitting inquiries will receive a system generated e-mail notification when their inquiry has been processed and responded to. It is the Offeror's responsibility to monitor for inquiries and responses.

1b. Questions

The Point of Contact (POC) for other questions/inquiries is as follows:

Questions/Inquiries Primary POC: Secondary POC:

John Goggin Barbara Czinder Phone: (904) 542-6685 Phone: (904) 542-6834 Email: john.goggin@navy.mil Email: Barbara.czinder@navy.mil

FAX: (904) 542-6349

2. Proposal Delivery Information:

This is a Two Phase Design Build requirement.

In response to this request for proposal, the complete proposal shall include for Phase One both the Submission Requirements and the Non-Cost/Price Proposal Price Proposal and for Phase Two both the Price Proposal and the Non-Cost/Price Proposal, submitted as follows:

The Submission Requirements and Non-Cost/Price Proposal shall be submitted in accordance with the solicitation.

All pages shall be numbered and appropriately tabbed, conforming to the proposal submittal requirements’ structure for each evaluation factor. Offerors are encouraged to simply securely staple or bind and three hole-punch proposals, and enclose each in an envelope. Binders or presentation folders are unnecessary.

Proposal Due Date/Time: 10 January 2019; 3:00 PM (Eastern Time)

Proposal Delivery Information:

(i) Hand Delivery:

Offerors submitting their proposal by hand shall submit the proposal to the following address located at the corner of Yorktown and Langley (the main entrance faces the parking lot):

Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast Acquisition Core Attention: John Goggin BLDG 903 Yorktown Jacksonville, FL 32212

Proposal(s) package must be clearly marked on the outside with the “RFP N69450-19-R-0501, NSGB PHASE

ONE, ATTN: JOHN GOGGIN, ACQ CORE; DO NOT OPEN IN MAIL ROOM”.

Offerors must submit the Attached AMAG form (NAS Jacksonville base access form) for hand delivery. This form must be submitted at least 5 business days in advance of the proposal receipt date. Submit your form to john.goggin@navy.mil and barbara.czinder@navy.mil.

On the day of proposal delivery you must bring the following with you to the NAS Jacksonville Base Security Office in order to obtain a temporary base pass:

Copy of the AMAG form that was previously submitted 5 business days in advance.

You will be required to have 2 forms of photo ID's on the day you are to pick-up your temporary base pass.

All contractors, vendors, workers and visitors must fill out this background application (B above, ID Card/Base Access Pass Registration Form) before gaining base access to NAS Jacksonville. The documents required to be shown have changed, they are more stringent. The following will have to be shown 1 document from List A or 1 document from List B establishing identity and 1 document form List C establishing employment authorization.

If the occupants in the vehicle do not have the proper documents when filling out or picking up their temporary Base Access Pass, base security will not be able to issue them a pass.

You must allow your firm’s delivery person sufficient time at the base security office for the processing of the application. Please expect delays from standing in line. The Base Security Office opens at 7 a.m.

and promptly closes at 3 p.m. You MUST go inside the Base Security Office to obtain your temporary pass.

NOTE: On the day of proposal delivery, the vehicle driver must have a valid driver’s license, current vehicle registration and/or rental car contract, current proof of insurance. The level of security at the Naval Air Station

Jacksonville may change at any time. As the level of security heightens, the amount of time required to gain access to the Naval Air Station also increases.

(ii) Courier Delivery:

Offerors submitting their proposal via courier delivery shall submit their proposal to the following address located at the corner of Yorktown and Langley (the main entrance faces the parking lot):

Acquisition Core Attention: John Goggin BLDG 903 Yorktown

(iii) U.S. Mail

Acquisition Core Attention: John Goggin P.O. Box 30

LATE SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.

3. Pre-Proposal Conference

The Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Visit information will be provided via amendment for Phase Two of this solicitation.

Only those Offerors selected to participate in Phase Two will be provided Pre-Proposal Conference information.

5. System for Award Management (SAM)

The System for Award Management (SAM) is a Federal Government owned and operated free web site that consolidates the capabilities in Central Contractor Registry (CCR),/Federal Registration(FedReg), Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA), and Excluded Parties List System (EPLS).

Contractors must be registered in SAM prior to award of a Department of Defense (DoD) contract. For more information and to complete the electronic representations and certifications, see the SAM website at https://www.sam.gov. A contract cannot be awarded to a contractor that is not registered in SAM. Remember to review the NAICS codes listed in your SAM record and make sure that you have listed the NAICS code for this procurement:

NAICS: 237110 - Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures Construction.

6. Federal Contractor Program

In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 22.1303, any contractor or subcontractor with a contract of $150,000 or more with the Federal Government must take affirmative action to hire and promote qualified targeted veterans which includes, special disabled veterans, veterans of the Vietnam-era, recently separated veterans, and any other veterans who served on active duty during a war or in a campaign or expedition for which a campaign badge has been authorized. Companies MUST file an annual VETS-4212 report, which shows the number of targeted veterans in their work force by job category, hiring location, and number of new hires, including targeted veterans hired during the reporting period and the maximum number and minimum number of employees of such contractor during the period covered by the report. Instructions, information and follow-up assistance is provided at VETS-4212 Internet site athttps://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm or employers may contact the VETS- 4212 Processing Center at (866) 237-0275 or e-mail at VETS4212-customersupport@dol.gov..

7. Women Owned Small Business Program Repository In accordance with the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) WOSB Federal Contract program regulations, EDWOSBs are required to upload and categorize all required documents in the SBA’s General Login System (GLS) at https://eweb.sba.gov/gls.

8. Incurred Expenses

The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation.

9. No Alternate or Multiple Proposals

Neither multiple proposals, nor proposal variations or options, nor alternate or alternative proposals will be considered in the evaluation.

10. Intent to Incorporate Contractor’s Non-Cost/Price (Technical) Proposal

(a) All or part of the successful offeror's Non-cost/price (technical) proposal may be incorporated in any contract resulting from this solicitation. The successful offeror's technical proposal may be incorporated by reference.

Nothing contained in the successful offeror's technical proposal shall constitute a waiver to any other requirement of the contract. In the event of any conflict between the successful offeror's technical proposal and any other requirement of the contract, the conflict shall be resolved in accordance with the Order of Precedence clause.

(b) The successful offeror will provide an updated technical proposal which reflects the results/responses to all exchanges and/or Evaluation Notices (ENs) issued during the negotiation process for incorporation in the contract.

If, after contract award, it is discovered that changes made during negotiations were not incorporated in the SOW and/or technical proposal, such changes to the Contractor's documents shall be considered administrative in nature and shall be made by unilateral modification to the contract, at no change in contract cost or price or other terms and conditions.

11. Navy Electronic Commerce On-line (NECO)

NECO website: HTTPS://www.neco.gov. Amendments will be posted directly to NECO. The posting of amendments generates an automated message to the contractor’s point of contact listed in NECO, alerting them to the posting. The drawings and specifications are available on NECO under the Additional Documents section of this RFP. Additionally, other postings will be made to NECO, such as the pre-proposal inquires (PPI) log, revised drawings, etc., under the Additional Documents section of the RFP. Postings to the Additional Documents section of NECO DOES NOT generate an automated email to contractors. It is the Contractors responsibility to check NECO for any amendments and Additional Documents section for updates to the RFP.

11. List of Attachments and Exhibits to the RFP:

Attachments:

1 Proposal Submission Forms

2 ProjNet “how to” Guide

The documents below can be located on for this solicitation on NECO, under: “Documents: Click here for Additional Documents.”

12. Use of Non-Federal Personnel in Evaluations:

(a) The Government intends to use one or more non-government personnel as advisor(s) in evaluating proposals.

These contractor-advisor(s) are required by the terms of their government contract and the Procurement Integrity Act (41 U.S.C. §23) to maintain the confidentiality of any materials to which they are given access. Submission of your proposal to the government constitutes implied consent to allow review of your proposal by contractor advisor(s).

(b) An offeror may require the contractor-advisor to execute a supplemental non-disclosure agreement (NDA) by including a copy of the NDA with their proposal. The NDAs are not considered part of the proposal and communications (if any) between the contractor-advisors and the offerors regarding the terms of the NDA are neither discussions nor clarifications.

(c) In the unlikely event the offeror and the contractor-advisor are unable to agree on the terms and conditions to be set forth in the NDA, offerors are advised that the inability of the government to obtain the contractor-advisor’s expertise in reviewing the offer may adversely impact the government’s evaluation of the proposal.

BASIS OF AWARD & EVAL FACTORS

A. BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. All technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to price.

5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

B. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Phase-One Non-Cost/Price Evaluation Factors

Factor 1 – Technical Approach Factor 2 – Experience Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Past Performance

Phase-Two Non-Cost/Price Evaluation Factors

All ratings for Phase One will be carried over into Phase-Two, unless new or revised information is provided.

Factor 5 – Technical Solution Factor 6 – Energy & Sustainable Design

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factors 2, 3, 5 and 6) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined, are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 4).

When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price (Phase One):

Provide one (1) original, one (1) copy, and one (1) electronic copy (CD) of the solicitation submittal requirements for Phase One pricing identified below.

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

i. Cover letter with the following information:

Authorized negotiator’s (POC) name POC telephone number POC email address CAGE code DUNS number TIN (taxpayer ID number)

ii. SF1442 (Solicitation, Offer, and Award) with blocks 14 through 20c completed

iii. Letter from Surety for a single project and aggregate bonding capacity showing bonding capacity

iv. Proof of the Offeror’s filled out Representations and Certifications and Active and Inactive Exclusions from the System for Award Management

(SAM)

v. Copy of annual Vet’s 4212 Report or confirmation notification email from VETS – 4212 (demonstrating proof of registration)

Note: The SAM, FAPIIS and VETS-4212 registrations must be in the name, CAGE, and DUNS of the offeror identified on the SF1442.

(b) Price Phase Two:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Provide one (1) original, one (1) copy and one electronic copy (CD format) of the solicitation submittal requirements identified below:

(i) Firm Fixed Price. The Offeror shall also submit a firm fixed price for the complete and total contract requirement (CLIN 0001).

(ii) Bid Bond (SF24). Offeror shall submit a bid bond (SF-24) in the amount of 20% of total project bid price or $3M, whichever amount is less.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price for CLIN 0001. Total price consists of the basic requirement. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(c) Non-cost/price Factors:

Phase I Non-Cost/Price Factors:

Factor 1 – Technical Approach Factor 2 – Experience Factor 3 – Past Performance

Factor 4 – Safety

Phase II Non-Cost/Price Factors:

All ratings from Phase I will be carried over into Phase II, unless new or revised information is provided.

Factor 5 – Technical Solution Factor 6 – Energy and Sustainable Design

Phase One Non-Cost/Price Factors:

Provide one (1) original, six (6) copies, and one (1) electronic copy (CD) of the solicitation submittal requirements for Factors 1-4 identified below. Entire proposal shall not exceed 50 pages in length (front side only) utilizing a minimum Arial Font of 12 or comparable size font for Factors 1-6 unless otherwise specified in the factor.

The 50 page limitation does not include Joint Venture Agreements, CPARS evaluations, past performance questionnaires or the schedule for Factor 3.

(1) Factor 1 – Technical Approach:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The composition and management of the firms proposed as the design-build (D-B) team for this contract will be evaluated in this factor.

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firms and primary design firms for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6).

The narrative shall also include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor 2, that entity must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart.

The technical approach narrative shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) including the organizational chart. The information requested in item #2 below is not included in this page limitation.

(2) In addition to the narrative, the Offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.).

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the Offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means to evaluate the organizational structure and teaming relationships proposed by the Offeror. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.

(2) Factor 2 – Experience:

(1) Construction Experience:

Submit a minimum of (2) and a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as construction of a solid waste handling facility and/or wastewater treatment facility with a minimum dollar value of approximately $15 million, including but not limited to the following components:

1. Construction of landfills and ancillary structures incorporating geosynthetic components, earthen components, sumps, leachate ponds and stormwater controls.

2. Construction of recycling and materials management facilities including, sorting systems, recycling balers, stationary waste processing shredder, and scrap metal balers.

3. Construction of wastewater treatment structure, including lined ponds, pump stations, receiving stations and aerators.

The Offeror shall demonstrate a minimum of two projects for landfills and two projects for recycling facilities as noted in items 1 and 2 above. Experience must demonstrate a minimum of one project that contains wastewater treatment as noted in item 3. The ability to work in remote locations may be evaluated more favorably.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design.

Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement that the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract. More weight may be given to the Offeror’s projects than to those submitted for subcontractors.

(2) Design Experience

Submit a minimum of (2) and a maximum of five (5) relevant design projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as design of a solid waste handling facility and/or wastewater treatment facility with a minimum dollar value of approximately $15 million, including but not limited to the following components:

1. Construction of landfills and ancillary structures incorporating geosynthetic components, earthen components, sumps, leachate ponds and stormwater controls.

2. Construction of recycling and materials management facilities including, sorting systems, recycling balers, stationary waste processing shredder, and scrap metal balers.

3. Construction of wastewater treatment structure, including lined ponds, pump stations, receiving stations and aerators.

The Offeror shall demonstrate a minimum of two projects for landfills and two projects for recycling facilities as noted in items 1 and 2 above. Experience must demonstrate a minimum of one project that contains wastewater treatment as noted in item 3. The ability to work in remote locations may be evaluated more favorably.

Projects submitted shall be completed within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

For design-build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design.

Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor. Offerors proposing multiple design firms should submit relevant project experience for all design firms. Failure to do so may result in a lower rating. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements.

The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects for construction and five for design. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience and five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered.

Relevant projects where the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together may be considered more favorably than those that have not worked together.

Relevant projects that demonstrate design-build experience may be considered more favorably than those that do not have design-build experience.

Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with sustainable features may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate experience with sustainable features.

Offerors who submit relevant projects that demonstrate experience self-performing relevant features of work may receive a higher rating than those who do not demonstrate self-performance.

(3) Factor 3 – Safety:

Attachment “D” SAFETY DATA SHEET is mandatory for this factor. Font for this attachment is Times New Roman 10.

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work and the Offeror’s method for qualifying, evaluating, selecting all tiers of sub-contractors. The narrative shall include:

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR); include three previous calendar years’ worth of data. This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The Offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If there is no EMR premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the element.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates; submit three previous calendar years’ worth of data. If the OSHA DART and TRC rates cannot be submitted, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data negatively should be addressed as part of this element.

(3) Technical Approach for Safety should describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Fully describe the safety management system that will be used to oversee safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work. Also describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and all subcontractor levels. Additionally, describe the methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to two pages.

Note: The narrative shall be limited to two pages. For a partnership or joint venture, the submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Safety narratives for joint ventures may be up to four pages in length.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: (Include in RFP)

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for its self-performed work and the work of its sub-contractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety management system, safety performance record, and the Offeror’s methodology of qualifying, evaluating, selecting and overseeing its subcontractors. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety will include, but are not limited to: OSHA, NAVFAC’s Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS) database, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror.

The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project and the specific management practices that will be in place for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention support.

Offeror’s Experience Modification Rates (EMR) will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk Very Low Risk Less than 0.6 Low Risk From 0.6 to less than 0.8 Moderate Risk From 0.8 to 1.0 High Risk Greater than 1.0 to 1.1 Extremely High Risk Greater than 1.1

Offeror’s DART and TRC rates will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk DART Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0 Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99 Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99 High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0 Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

Risk TRC Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49 Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49 Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49 High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99 Extremely High Risk Greater Than 6.0

(4) Factor 4 – Past Performance:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for construction experience. If a completed AE Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for design experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment E) for each project included in Factor 2 for both Construction Experience and Design Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, John Goggin, john.goggin@navy.mil and Barbara Czinder, Barbara.Czinder@navy.mil.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation will consider how well the Offeror’s team performed on relevant projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience and may also consider past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources.”

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will receive a NEUTRAL Confidence rating.

Past performance ratings of “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” hold more value than a “Neutral Confidence” rating and will be considered more favorably in the evaluation of past performance.

Phase Two Non-Cost/Price Factors:

Proposal Submission:

Provide one (1) original, six (6) copies, and one (1) electronic copy (CD) of the solicitation submittal requirements for Factors 5 and 6 identified below. Entire Phase Two proposal shall not exceed 50 pages in length (front side only) utilizing a minimum Arial Font of 12 for Factors 4-6.

Factor 1 through Factor 4: Resubmit only if changes have occurred since Phase One and identify changes in a different color and italicized bold font.

(4) Factor 5 – Technical Solution:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Provide a narrative describing the technical solution to the project that meets the requirements of the RFP. Include the following:

- Processing and marketing recyclables

- Processing and sizing other materials such as wood, scrap iron, tires, and concrete debris

- Proposed specialty equipment (i.e., sorting equipment) and materials (i.e., geosynthetics) by description and manufacturer, also identify whether authorized by the manufacturer to install

- Process flow diagram for proposed equipment and handling of various waste streams and recyclables; and

- Locations where the proposed equipment is currently in operation. Include facility name, throughput, recovery percentages, years in operation, and provide a contact name, phone number and email. Provide references for each of the different equipment manufacturers and processes proposed. If the proposed equipment/manufacturer is the first of its kind, or the first in the continental United States, identify it as such.

- Quality control processes to be implemented during design and during construction.

- An ability to work on a remote military base with limited equipment and material delivery options.

- OCONUS Work Plan. The narrative shall include:

o The Offeror’s plan for shipping materials and equipment to and from Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Materials and equipment are not available locally and must be provided at the contractor’s expense. Provide a plan of major equipment that is anticipated to be needed, major construction materials, and an anticipated plan for transporting to the worksite. The Contractor shall use U.S.-flag vessels when transporting any supplies by sea under this contract in accordance with DFARS Clause 252.247-7023.

o The Offeror’s plan for berthing and medical arrangements. As it is anticipated, no beds will be available, the Contractor shall construct new temporary housing facilities (man camp) in accordance with the RFP SECTION 00 73 01 for all prime and subcontractor workers required to complete this project. Provide a detailed plan of the temporary housing facilities including but not limited to housing capacity, design criteria, occupancy, shipping, delivery, and installation.

o The Offeror’s medical plan of action. Describe how the Offeror will provide and sustain a healthy workforce which includes all employees and labor force.

o The Offeror’s plan for Labor acquisition and sustainment. Local labor is unavailable and must be provided at the contractor’s expense. Provide a detailed plan of your expectations of the staffing requirements for this project, your source of labor for execution of the work, and management of personnel for the duration of the contract.

Offerors that demonstrate prior experience establishing international labor agreements may be evaluated more favorably.

o The Offeror’s plan for operation and demobilization of a concrete batch plant.

o Provide any other aspects of OCONUS work that the Offeror feels is critical to a successful project.

- Phasing Schedule and Narrative:

o Provide a schedule that demonstrates the Offeror’s understanding of the requirements contained in the technical specifications. Provide a narrative discussing the specifics of the Offeror’s proposed construction plan. Include in the narrative major milestones of the construction schedule and any other salient aspects that illustrate that the Offeror’s proposal meets the requirements contained in the technical specifications, takes into account the requirements of the Statement of Work and is otherwise acceptable to the Government. Provide a narrative describing how the contractor intends to coordinate with both the Public Works and the BOS contractor on scheduling construction to accommodate existing solid waste operation of the proposed construction site.

Narrative shall not exceed ten (10) double-sided pages (or twenty (20) single-sided pages). Up to six (6) conceptual drawings shall be provided to supplement the narrative (i.e., floor plan, facility site plan and process diagrams).

The Government will evaluate the narrative and conceptual drawings (if included) considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's technical solution to determine adherence to the technical requirements of the RFP.

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s OCONUS work plan, phasing schedule and phasing narrative considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s logistical ability to mobilize and ship materials and equipment though a well thought out Work Plan.