N69450-20-R-0012.pdf

DESIGN-BUILD (DB) AND DESIGN-BID-BUILD (DBB) INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION

CONTRACT (MACC) FOR THE JACKSONVILLE/MAYPORT/ ORLANDO AREA OF OPERATION

Work w ill be for the Department of Defense (DOD) activates located at the Jacksonville/Mayport/Orlando Area of Operation are managed by NAVFAC SE. Work may be required in other areas managed by NAVFAC SE if deemed necessary and approved by the NAVFAC SE Chief of Contracting Office.

This procurement is being solicited in accordance w ith Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 6.205 as a HUBZone small business set-aside.

The North American Industry Classif ication Code System (NAICS) is 236220, Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. The small business size standard is $39,500,000.

LACORSHA NOEL 904-542-6809

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

07-May-2020

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________1825 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

YES X NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________ (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time of fers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHEAST

CORE CONSTRUCTION

BLDG 903 YORKTOWN

PO BOX 0030

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0030

N69450

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

(hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N6945020R0012 59

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N6945020R0012

Section 00010 - Solicitation Contract Form

NOT-TO-EXCEED (NTE)

The Not-To-Exceed (NTE) amount is for the total of all Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts awarded under the solicitation.

A task order for the minimum guarantee will be issued concurrently with the award of the basic contract. Once the value of task orders placed exceeds the minimum guarantee amount, the minimum guarantee task order will be modified to de-obligate the funds from the task order.

The minimum guarantee of $1,000 will be fulfilled by the issuance of the first Task Order.

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 99,000,000 Each General Construction Projects NTE 5 yrs

FFP

DESIGN-BUILD (DB) AND DESIGN-BID-BUILD (DBB) INDEFINITE

DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) MULTIPLE AWARD

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC) FOR

JACKSONVILLE/MAYPORT/ORLANDO AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY

(AOR)

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

CONTRACT MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CONTRACT VALUE

The minimum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not be less than the minimum quantity and contract value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not exceed the maximum quantity and contract value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

AMOUNT

$1,000.00 $99,000,000.00

DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

$150,000.00 $6,000,000.00

CLIN DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CLIN ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

CLIN

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 5 yrs. ADC 99,000,000 N/A

FOB: Destination

Section 00100 - Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

SECTION 00100 – INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

This procurement is being solicited in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 6.205 as a HUBZone small business set-aside. The North American Industry Classification Code System (NAICS) is 236220, Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. The small business size standard is $39,500,000.

EXHIBITS: The following documents are provided and considered part of the solicitation:

Exhibit A – Construction and Design Experience Project Data Sheet Exhibit B – Safety Data Sheet Exhibit C – NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ-0) Exhibit D – ProjNet How-to Guide

PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs)

All pre-proposal inquiries (PPIs) must be submitted in writing via the “Bidder Inquiry” in ProjNet at www.projnet.org/projnet. The bidder inquiry key for this solicitation is VGJ3FK-7P79H5. Be sure to select “NAVFAC” as the agency in the dropdown menu. All questions shall be submitted at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the closing date of the solicitation in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiry. Answers will be made via ProjNet; however, answers do not amend the solicitation. Any changes to the solicitation will be made via a formal amendment to the RFP and will be posted on Beta.SAM.Gov (www.beta.sam.gov).

All offerors are encouraged to register on ProjNet for alerts and to stay abreast of bidder inquiries and Government responses that are posted in reference to this solicitation. Only self-registered users on ProjNet can submit and review inquiries. A “how to” guide has been provided via Exhibit D. Those submitting inquiries will receive a system generated e-mail notification when their inquiry has been processed and responded to. Notifications are not made to registered users when a new inquiry is posted. It is the offeror's responsibility to monitor for inquiries and responses.

Beta.Sam.Gov

In Phase One, the posting of all amendments and attachments, etc. will be posted directly to www.beta.sam.gov. It is the offerors responsibility to check Beta.Sam.Gov for all postings. In Phase Two, amendments and attachments, etc. will be e-mailed directly to those offerors selected to participate in Phase Two.

PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT

The Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Visit information will be provided in Phase Two of the solicitation.

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

Phase One

In response to this request for proposal, the completed Phase One proposal shall include both the Submission Requirements Proposal and the Non-Price Proposal. Do not submit any additional information such as brochures.

Submission Requirements Proposal

The Submission Requirements Proposal shall be submitted by electronic mail (e-mail), shall be submitted as an Adobe PDF file and labeled “Submission Requirements”. It shall be organized as follows:

Tab 1 – Executed SF1442 and Acknowledgment of all amendments (DUNS Number, CAGE code, and Federal Tax ID number) Tab 2 – Original Bonding Capacity Letter (original shall be mailed to the address in block 7) Tab 3 – Representations & Certifications required by Section 00600 of the RFP Tab 4 – FAPIIS Certification Tab 5 – VETS-4212 registration (or statement that offeror is not required to submit a report)

Non-Price Proposal

The Non-Price proposals shall be submitted by electronic mail (e-mail), shall be submitted as an Adobe PDF file and labeled “Non-Price Proposal”. All pages shall be numbered. Page limits, if stipulated, must be adhered

to. Submissions related to the Factors shall be labeled, and organized as follows:

Tab 1– Factor 1, Technical Approach (Narrative; Organizational Chart; JV Agreement, etc.)

Tab 2 – Factor 2, Experience (EXH. A - Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheets) Tab 3 – Factor 3, Safety (EXH. B - Safety Data Sheet) Tab 4 – Factor 4, Past Performance (EXH. C or CPARS evaluations; Explanations, if applicable)

Hard copies of the Submission Requirements and/or Non-Price Proposal will not be accepted.

Phase Two

Only offerors invited to participate in Phase Two will need to submit a Phase Two proposal. Those offerors will receive a formal notification of the invitation to proceed into Phase Two. The completed Phase Two proposal shall include both the Price Proposal and the Non-Price Proposal. Do not submit any additional information such as brochures.

Price Proposal

The Price Proposal shall be submitted by electronic mail (e-mail), shall be submitted as an Adobe PDF file and labeled “Price Proposal,”. It shall be organized as follows:

Tab 1 – Executed DD1155 (Acknowledgment of all amendments) Tab 2 – Original Bid Bond (SF-24) Tab 3 – Representations & Certifications (If not included in Phase One proposal) Tab 4 – FAPIIS Certification (If not included in Phase One proposal) Tab 5 – VETS-4212 registration (or statement that offeror is not required to submit a report) (If not included in Phase One proposal) Tab 6 – Responsibility Determination Documents

Non-Price Proposal

The Non-Price proposals shall be submitted by electronic mail (e-mail), shall be submitted as an Adobe PDF file and labeled “Non-Price Proposal”. All pages shall be numbered. Page limits, if stipulated, must be adhered

to. Submissions related to the Factors shall be labeled, and organized as follows:

Tab 1 – Factor 5, Technical Solution (Narrative) Tab 2 – Factor 6, Energy Design Reducation (Narrative, Drawings, Simulation)

The Submission Requirements Proposal, Price Proposal and the Non-Price Proposal shall be submitted in accordance with the solicitation. The above list is provided for the offerors’ convenience and is not exhaustive.

Offerors shall refer to Section 00150 of the solicitation (“Evaluation Factors for Award”) for details regarding each submittal requirement.

The first page of the Proposals should clearly state:

Type of Proposal (Submission Proposal, Price Proposal or Non-Price) RFP Number and Title of Project Offeror’s Name

Offerors shall include the following information with their proposals:

Authorized negotiator’s Point of Contact (POC) POC telephone number POC email address DUNS Number (offeror and any team members) CAGE Code TIN (Federal Tax ID Number) Indicate Small Business Type *It is recommended to also include an additional POC including contact information.

The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information required by the solicitation and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated herein, for non-conformance may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

All proposal submissions shall be electronic, shall be e-mailed to Lacorsha.noel@navy.mil and contain “RFP N69450-20-R-0012 IDIQ DB/DBB JACKSONVILLE/MAYPORT/ORLANDO AREA OF OPERATION MACC” in the subject line. In Phase One the Submission Requirements and Non-Price Proposal shall be separate attached files and shall be labeled accordingly. In Phase Two, the Price Proposal and the Non-Price Proposal shall be separate attached files and shall be labeled accordingly. All files shall be Adobe PDF formatted and be under 10MB.

Offerors shall ensure that proposals are received electronically no later than the date and time stated in Block 13 of the SF 1442. Ultimately, it is the offeror’s responsibility to ensure timely proposal submission. An offeror risks the late receipt and rejection of a proposal where it delays submitting its proposal until the last few minutes before the time set for receipt of proposals. Hard copy submissions will not be accepted.

TIMELY RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS

PROPOSALS SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL MUST BE RECEIVED NO

LATER THAN THE DATE AND TIME SPECIFIED IN BLOCK 13A OF THE SF1442. Proposals not received by the time and date specified shall be treated in accordance with FAR 52.215-1 “Instruction to Offerors - Competitive Acquisitions” and may be rejected. You are highly advised to submit at least one day prior to avoid late submission. (See FAR 15.208(b)(1)(i))

DEFINITIONS

The following definitions apply to the evaluation of each non-price factor.

Strength: An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Significant Weakness: A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Deficiency: A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Past Performance relevancy will be rated as either “relevant” or “not relevant”.

Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Performance confidence assessments will be evaluated utilizing the following adjectival ratings:

Satisfactory Confidence: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence: No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

SECTION 00150 EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

I.INTRODUCTION

A. Intentionally left blank

B. DESCRIPTION OF ACQUISITION

1. This acquisition will result in the award of a Design Build (DB) and Design-Bid-Build (DBB), Firm- Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) for construction.

2. Construction projects to be performed will primarily consist of general building type projects both vertical and horizontal construction (new construction, renovation, alteration, demolition, repair work) including but not limited to: industrial, airfield, aircraft traffic control, infrastructure, administrative, training, dormitory and community support facilities. Projects may also require comprehensive interior design and incorporation of sustainable features. Projects may include design-build, modified design-build or full plans and specifications.

Work will be performed within Department of Defense (DoD) activities in the Jacksonville, Mayport, and Orlando areas managed by NAVFAC SE. Work may be required in other locations in the area of responsibility of NAVFAC SE if deemed necessary and approved by the NAVFAC SE Chief of Contracting Office.

The planned seed project for this solicitation will be FRC B101/794 painting and mixing, NAS Jacksonville, Florida.

This project is for building two (2) paint storage/mixing enclosures for FCSE Paint Shops. One is in building 794 and the other is in Building 101 Component paint shop. Building 101 enclosure shall be 16’W x 25’L x 9’H.

Building 794 enclosure shall be 9’W x 16’L x 9’H. The new rooms shall include electrical, compressed air, ventilated mixing bench, environmental controls, fire protection, personnel doors and roll up doors, eyewash/safety shower, LED lights, and ramps.

The seed project magnitude is between $1,000,000 to $5,000,000 with a completion schedule of 365 days from task order award.

3. The description of the basic contract award CLIN is as follows:

CLIN 0001 – General Construction Projects for a period not-to-exceed (NTE) five (5) years

4. Each contract under the MACC will be for a period of five (5) years or an aggregate maximum value of $99,000,000, whichever comes first.

5. The Government’s cost estimate for this work and total aggregate for all years is NTE $99,000,000 for all contracts awarded. Each contract under the MACC will include a minimum guarantee of $1,000 with a five (5) year ordering period. There is no yearly per contract limit except for the total five year maximum of $99,000,000.

Task orders will be firm-fixed price, normally in the range of $250,000 to $6,000,000 per order. However, task orders under or over these amounts may be considered if deemed to be in the Government’s best interest and approved by the NAVFAC SE Chief of Contracting Office.

6. The Government intends to award approximately five contracts resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offerors whose proposals represent the best value after evaluation in accordance with the factors in the solicitation.

7. This acquisition will be solicited as a competitive HUBZone small business set-aside as authorized in the approved acquisition plan.

II. Intentionally Left Blank

III. EVALUATION

A. BASIS FOR AWARD

1. In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation, the Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contracts; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contracts to the offerors submitting the proposals determined to represent the best value—the proposals most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. As stated in the solicitation, all technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to price.

5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

B. Intentionally Left Blank C. Intentionally Left Blank D. Intentionally Left Blank E. Intentionally Left Blank

F. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Phase One Non-Price Factors Factor 1 – Technical Approach Factor 2 – Experience Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Past Performance

Phase Two Non-Price Factors Factor 5 – Technical Solution Factor 6 – Energy and Sustainable Design

In accordance with FAR 36.3, this procurement will use Two-Phase Design-Build Selection Procedures. Phase One of the procurement process is a narrowing phase of up to ten (10) offerors (design-build teams) who offer the best technical value to the Government, unless the Government determines that a number greater or less than ten (10) is in the Government's best interest. Only those offerors selected in Phase One will be allowed to proceed into Phase Two. In Phase Two, the successful Phase One offerors will be required to submit technical and price proposals for a seed project. Offerors who fail to submit technical and price proposals for the seed project will not be considered for a MACC award.

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factors, 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6) are of equal importance to each other, and when combined, are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 4). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

For Two-Phase DB procurements, Factors 1-4 will be evaluated in Phase One and Factors 5 and 6 will be evaluated in Phase Two. Factor 1 will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an Offeror is rated Unacceptable in Factor 1, then they will not be considered for Phase Two. In making the best value award decision after Phase Two, the Government will consider Factors 2-6 and price.

Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Submission Requirements (Phase One):

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Provide one electronic copy of the solicitation submittal requirements identified below.

(1) Executed SF1442. Offeror shall insert its company name and address in Block #14, telephone number in Block #15, acknowledge all amendments in Block #19 (if applicable), name and title of person authorized to sign in Block #20A, signature in Block #20B, and offer date in Block #20C of the SF1442. In addition, offeror shall provide its DUNS Number, CAGE code, and Federal Tax ID number with its proposal. If proposing as a joint venture, offerors shall provide the DUNS Number and Cage code for the members of the joint venture.

(2) Bonding. Offeror shall confirm that it has a single award bonding capacity of at least $6,000,000 and the ability to bond multiple projects.

(3) SAM registration. Offeror shall ensure current registration on the SAM Website, www.sam.gov, including Annual Representations and Certifications are complete and updated for this procurement.

If a Representation or Certification required by Section 00600 of the RFP is not provided in SAM, include the representation or certification in your price proposal. This may include certifications such as FAR 52.204-8 and 52.209-12.

(4) FAPIIS Certification. Offeror shall ensure Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) Certification as required by FAR 52.209-7, Information Regarding Responsibility Matters (July 2013).

(5) VETS-4212 registration. Offeror shall ensure a current VETS-4212 report has been submitted to the Department of Labor website http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm, if the offeror is required to submit. An email confirmation of submission can be requested and received by the offeror from the DOL website and submitted in the proposal. If the offeror is not required to submit a report to VETS-4212, include a brief statement stating that the offeror is not required to submit a report. Visit the VETS-4212 website for details concerning if your company is required to submit a VETS-4212 report and to request an email confirmation of submission.

Note: The SAM, FAPIIS and VETS-4242 registrations must be in the name/CAGE/DUNS of the offeror identified on the SF1442.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

Offerors will be evaluated on the information required to be submitted in the solicitation submittal requirements identified above.

(b) Non-Price Factors (Phase One):

Provide one electronic copy of the solicitation submittal requirements identified below.

(1) Factor 1, Technical Approach:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The composition and management of the firms proposed as the design-build (DB) team for this contract will be evaluated in this factor.

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Provide a narrative describing the proposed prime construction firms and design firms for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6). The narrative shall also include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor 2, that entity must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart.

The technical approach narrative shall be limited to two (2) including the organizational chart.

(2) In addition to the narrative, the Offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.). This information does not count towards the page limitation.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: Insert the basis of evaluation for this factor.

The assessment of the Offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means to evaluate the organizational structure and teaming relationships proposed by the Offeror. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.

(2) Factor 2, Experience:

(1) Construction Experience:

Prime contractors submit a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) projects demonstrating Prime Contractor multi-discipline vertical and horizontal construction experience on projects with a contract value of $1,000,000 or greater. Projects submitted for the Prime Offeror shall be completed within the past five (5) years of the date of the issuance of this solicitation. Projects submitted for consideration shall include at least one (1) new construction project and one (1) renovation. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as a variety of project types including, but not limited to: new construction, renovation, alteration, and repair work. This includes but is not limited to: industrial, airfield, aircraft hangar, aircraft traffic control, administrative, training, dormitory and community support facilities.

Submitted construction projects must have been performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a single task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Exhibit A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed two (2) pages.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for each of the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

The Offeror MAY NOT utilize experience of a subcontractor to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor.

(2) Design Experience

Submit a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) projects demonstrating multi-discipline design experience on projects with a contract value of $1,000,000 or greater. The design for projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past five (5) years of issuance of this RFP. For design/build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Projects submitted for consideration shall include at least one (1) new construction project and one (1) renovation. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as a variety of project types including, but not limited to: new construction, renovation, alteration, and repair work. This includes but is not limited to: industrial, airfield, aircraft hangar, aircraft traffic control, administrative, training, dormitory and community support facilities.

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract.

For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a single task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Exhibit A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form.

Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed two (2) pages.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods).

In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment for this solicitation and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor.

A copy of the blank Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet to be used for submission is included as Exhibit A.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements.

The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects for construction and five projects for design. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience and five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered.

- Relevant projects where the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together may be considered more favorably than those that have not worked together.

- Relevant projects that demonstrate design-build experience may be considered more favorably than those that do not have design-build experience.

- Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with Department of Defense construction contracts may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate experience with Department of Defense construction contracts.

- Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with sustainable features may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate experience with sustainable features.

(3) Factor 3, Safety:

The Offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work and the Offeror’s method for qualifying, evaluating, selecting all tiers of sub-contractors. The narrative shall include:

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR); include three previous calendar years’ (2017, 2018, 2019) worth of data. This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The Offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If there is no EMR premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the element.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates; submit three previous calendar years’ (2017, 2018, 2019) worth of data. If the OSHA DART and TRC rates cannot be submitted, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data negatively should be addressed as part of this element.

(3) Technical Approach for Safety should describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Fully describe the safety management system that will be used to oversee safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work. Also describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and all subcontractor levels. Additionally, describe the methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to two pages.

Note: The narrative shall be limited to two pages. For a partnership or joint venture, the submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Safety narratives for joint ventures may be up to four pages in length.

A copy of the blank Safety Data Sheet to be used for submission is included as Exhibit B.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for its self-performed work and the work of its sub-contractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety management system, safety performance record, and the Offeror’s methodology of qualifying, evaluating, selecting and overseeing its subcontractors. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety will include, but are not limited to:

OSHA, NAVFAC’s Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS) database, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project and the specific management practices that will be in place for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention support.

Offeror’s Experience Modification Rates (EMR) will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk Very Low Risk Less than 0.6 Low Risk From 0.6 to less than 0.8 Moderate Risk From 0.8 to 1.0 High Risk Greater than 1.0 to 1.1 Extremely High Risk Greater than 1.1

Offeror’s DART and TRC rates will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk DART Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0 Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99 Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99 High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0 Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

Risk TRC Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49 Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49 Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49 High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99 Extremely High Risk Greater Than 6.0

4) Factor 4, Past Performance:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for construction experience. If a completed AE Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (AECPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for design experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation then the offeror shall submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Exhibit C) for each project included in Factor 2 for both Construction Experience and Design Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, LaCorsha Noel at Lacorsha.noel@navy.mil. PPQs and CPARS/AECPARS evaluation forms do not count towards the overall page limitation.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/Entity Identifier numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed four (4) pages in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

A copy of the blank Past Performance Questionnaire to be used for requesting client references is included as Exhibit C.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation will consider how well the Offeror’s team performed on relevant projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience and may also consider past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources.

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will receive a NEUTRAL Confidence rating.

Past performance ratings of “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” hold more value than a “Neutral Confidence” rating and will be considered more favorably in the evaluation of past performance.

(c) Price (Phase Two):

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(1) The executed DD1155. Offerors shall insert their company name and address in Block 9, signature, date signed, and name and title of person authorized to sign in Block 16, and the price proposed on Page 2 of the DD1155.

(2) Bid bond (SF-24). Offeror shall submit a bid bond (SF-24) in the amount of 20% of total project bid price or $3M, whichever amount is less.

(3) Acknowledgment of all amendments.

Note: The DD 1155 and bid bond must be in the name/CAGE/DUNS of the offeror identified on the SF1442.

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and any option items. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL PACKAGE:

RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION - In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards. In a separate tab, the offeror shall provide the following information in the price proposal package:

1. One (1) signed bank reference demonstrating adequate financial resources.

If offeror's firm has a line of credit - provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required).

2. The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization.

Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies.

The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.

3. Description of offeror's facilities and equipment.

4. Other offeror's work presently under contract.

Although required to be submitted with offeror's price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm's responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award.