2.05 Industry Questions3.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 19 KB Posted
- Attached to
- KABA LOCKS
- Solicitation number
- N6883626Q0061
About this file
This is a Question and Answer Log documenting industry inquiries and Government responses for Amendment 1 to a KABA electronic locks solicitation (N6883626Q0061) issued by the Department of the Navy Naval Supply Systems Command.
The log addresses 14 key questions regarding lock installation requirements and specifications. Critical responses clarify that doors and frames are metal; lock characteristics, quantity requirements, and cylinder reuse decisions are detailed in the Statement of Work (SOW) section 3.0-3.1 and section 4.1; door modifications beyond trim plate installation are not anticipated; and a lay-down area is available for new locks and programming. The Government explicitly states that the existing locks are Onity model units and that billing for parts upon arrival at the base is not permitted. Most significantly, the Government confirms that part number 7901021KF30-626 is not acceptable as a replacement for the solicitation-specified KABA 790 RFID electronic-lock part number 7901011KF30-626, that the newer part number has not officially superseded the original requirement, and that manufacturers' current replacement models are not acceptable—only the exact solicitation part number will be approved. No documentation can be submitted to establish that replacement parts satisfy requirements, as replacements are categorically not acceptable. Amendment 1 extends the proposal due date to 18 August 2026 and updates CLIN 0007 in the Statement of Work.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2.04 Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| 2.02 N6883626Q0061.pdf | ||
| 1.11 JA Brand Name KABA LOCKS.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| QUESTION & ANSWER LOG | ||
| AMEDMENT 1 | ||
| QUESTION | ANSWER | |
| 1 | Are the door and frames metal or wood? | Metal |
| 2 | What are the salient characteristics of the locks? | Refer to DOR section 3.0 Deliverables |
| 3 | What are to be done with the old locks? | Refer to DOR section 4.1 |
| 4 | Will the existing cylinders/cores be reused, or is the contractor expected to provide new cylinders and/or cores? | Refer to DOR section 3.1 |
| 5 | Are all existing openings currently equipped with locks require preparations? | No |
| 6 | Should contractors anticipate door modifications beyond the installation of the specified trim plates? | No |
| 7 | Is there a lay-down area for new locks and programming available? | Yes |
| 8 | How many locks are needed? | Refer to DOR section 3.0 Deliverables. |
| 9 | What is the name and model of the existing locks? | Onity |
| 10 | Can we bill for the parts when they arrive on base? | No |
| 11 | While obtaining pricing, we identified a possible discrepancy involving the required KABA 790 RFID electronic-lock part number. The solicitation lists part number: |
7901011KF30-626
An authorized source has quoted part number:
7901021KF30-626
| Is 7901021KF30-626 an acceptable product for this requirement? | No | ||
| 12 | Has 7901021KF30-626 officially replaced or superseded 7901011KF30-626? | No | |
| 13 | If the exact solicitation part number is unavailable, will the Government accept the manufacturer’s current replacement model? | No | |
| 14 | If so, what documentation must an offeror submit to establish that the replacement satisfies the requirement? | Replacements are NOT acceptable. | |
| 14 | |||
| 15 | |||
| 16 | |||
| 17 | |||
| 18 | |||
| 19 | |||
| 20 | |||
| 21 | |||
| 22 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .