Eval Plan REVISED (0756 H53K O-Level 1-Deficit Bag-TBD).docx

Evaluation Plan Solicitation No. N68335-24-0022 CH-53K SE Peculiar Support Equipment

The above solicitation is for the procurement of the following items to support the CH-53K SE Program. The resultant contract will be a Fixed-Price Purchase Order.

The Government does own the technical data associated with the items above. This procurement will be issued as a Small Business Set Aside competition through beta.SAM.

Basis of Award

1.0 GENERAL

Award will be made to the responsible Offeror who is considered the lowest price technically acceptable offeror

Award will be made to the responsible offeror who is considered the lowest price technically acceptable offeror. In order for the offeror to be found technically acceptable, the offeror must be considered a small business under the NAICS code of the solicitation in accordance with their representations and certifications in beta.sam.gov. The offeror must demonstrate in their quote the exact part numbers and quantities required. The offeror must demonstrate in their quote a delivery date of 220 days after date of contract award. The offeror must have an acceptable or neutral past performance in the Supplier Performance Risk System for the Federal Supply Class and Product Service Code of the supplies being purchased. The offeror must have a current NISTSP 800-171 assessment in the Supplier Performance Risk System as per DFAR Provision 252.204- 7019, and DFAR Clause 252.204-7020.

2.0 PRICE

For competitive evaluation purposes, the evaluated price for this procurement will be based on a sum of all CLINs. Offers must provide pricing for all CLINs. All CLINs will be included in the total evaluated price. Each offeror’s price proposal shall be evaluated to determine if it is complete.

3.0 PAST PERFORMANCE

SPRS: Per DFARS 213.106-2, evaluation of each supplier’s past performance history in SPRS for the Federal Supply Class (FSC) and Product or Service Code (PSC) of the supplies being purchased. In the case of a supplier without a record of relevant past performance history in SPRS for the FSC or PSC of the supplies being purchased, the supplier may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably for its past performance history. SPRS assigns each contractor a color rating based on the contractor’s quality performance. Color is based on the high five percent in the commodity (Dark Blue), next 10 percent (Purple), next 70 percent (Green), next 10 percent (Yellow), and last five percent (Red). Past performance ratings are as follows:

Past Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

Quality: The vendor shall be evaluated based on production quality through research in the Joint Deficiency Reporting Systems (JDRS) to evaluate Product Quality Deficiency Reports (PQDRs) recorded.

PQDR Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

4.0 TECHNICAL

Technical Subfactors

(A) Delivery Schedule: The vendor shall submit a delivery schedule by contract CLIN to show to demonstrate ability to meet the required delivery date.

(B) Manufacturing Capacity/Facilities/Personnel Resources: This shall include the capacity of the production facility- the Offeror shall demonstrate to the Government that its production facility will be able to accommodate the quality fabrication and timely delivery of the hardware identified in the RFP in addition to its current and anticipated workload. The Offeror shall also identify potential manufacturing risks and corresponding mitigation plans to be implemented in order to maintain the schedule.

The Offeror shall also include identification of personnel and other resources needed to support the fabrication and production for the proposed effort, and shall identify whether those resources are presently available for allocation in support of this requirement. If the resources are not currently available, the Offeror shall detail its plan to obtain those resources and/or to train the necessary personnel to meet or exceed the requirements of the SOW.

Proposals that do not conform to the requirements of the request for quote may be rejected without further evaluation, deliberation or discussion.

Contract Award

After considering the above information, the Government will award to the contractor whose proposal who is technically acceptable is the lowest price offeror.

Prepared By: Tammy Fossa, Contract Specialist

_________________________________ Date:_____________

Approved By: Kyle Perry, Contracting Officer

_________________________________ Date:_____________