N66001-18-R-0255.docx
DOCX document 1 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N66001-18-R-0255
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| DraftPWS18-R-0255.docx | DOCX document | |
| N66001-18-R-0255 - RFP Attch 05 Org Exp - RFP Matrix 20180329.doc | DOC document | |
| N66001-18-R-0255 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| N66001-18-R-0255 - RFP Attch 04 Reference Information Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| N66001-18-R-0255 0002.pdf | ||
| N66001-18-R-0255 - RFP Attch 01 DD254.pdf | ||
| N66001-18-R-0255 - RFP Attch 03 PPQ.pdf | ||
| Exhibit A CDRL.pdf | ||
| N66001-18-R-0255 - RFP Attch 02 Rate Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N6600118R0255
Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices
| ITEM NO |
| SUPPLIES/SERVICES |
| QUANTITY |
| UNIT |
| UNIT PRICE |
| AMOUNT |
PNT Engineering Services
CPFF
Position, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Laboratory Support Engineering Services in accordance with the Statement of Work (SOW), Section C, and as specified in individual task orders.
FOB: Destination
ESTIMATED COST
FIXED FEE
TOTAL EST COST + FEE
| ITEM NO |
| SUPPLIES/SERVICES |
| QUANTITY |
| UNIT |
| UNIT PRICE |
| AMOUNT |
Other Direct Costs (ODC)
COST
ODC including but not limited to travel, material, and equipment in support of
CLIN 0001.
ESTIMATED COST
| ITEM NO |
| SUPPLIES/SERVICES |
| QUANTITY |
| UNIT |
| UNIT PRICE |
| AMOUNT |
Lot
CDRLs - NSP
| ITEM NO |
| SUPPLIES/SERVICES |
| QUANTITY |
| UNIT |
| UNIT PRICE |
| AMOUNT |
| OPTION |
| PNT Engineering Services |
CPFF
Position, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Laboratory Support Engineering Services in accordance with the Statement of Work (SOW), Section C, and as specified in individual task orders.
ESTIMATED COST
FIXED FEE
TOTAL EST COST + FEE
| ITEM NO |
| SUPPLIES/SERVICES |
| QUANTITY |
| UNIT |
| UNIT PRICE |
| AMOUNT |
| OPTION |
| Other Direct Costs (ODCs) |
COST
ODC including but not limited to travel, material, and equipment in support of
CLIN 1001.
ESTIMATED COST
| ITEM NO |
| SUPPLIES/SERVICES |
| QUANTITY |
| UNIT |
| UNIT PRICE |
| AMOUNT |
Lot
| OPTION |
| CDRLs - NSP |
| ITEM NO |
| SUPPLIES/SERVICES |
| QUANTITY |
| UNIT |
| UNIT PRICE |
| AMOUNT |
| OPTION |
| PNT Engineering Services |
CPFF
Position, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Laboratory Support Engineering Services in accordance with the Statement of Work (SOW), Section C, and as specified in individual task orders.
ESTIMATED COST
FIXED FEE
TOTAL EST COST + FEE
| ITEM NO |
| SUPPLIES/SERVICES |
| QUANTITY |
| UNIT |
| UNIT PRICE |
| AMOUNT |
| OPTION |
| Other Direct Costs (ODCs) |
COST
ODC including but not limited to travel, material, and equipment in support of
CLIN 2001.
ESTIMATED COST
| ITEM NO |
| SUPPLIES/SERVICES |
| QUANTITY |
| UNIT |
| UNIT PRICE |
| AMOUNT |
Lot
| OPTION |
| CDRLs - NSP |
| ITEM NO |
| SUPPLIES/SERVICES |
| QUANTITY |
| UNIT |
| UNIT PRICE |
| AMOUNT |
| OPTION |
| PNT Engineering Services |
CPFF
Position, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Laboratory Support Engineering Services in accordance with the Statement of Work (SOW), Section C, and as specified in individual task orders.
ESTIMATED COST
FIXED FEE
TOTAL EST COST + FEE
| ITEM NO |
| SUPPLIES/SERVICES |
| QUANTITY |
| UNIT |
| UNIT PRICE |
| AMOUNT |
| OPTION |
| Other Direct Costs (ODC) |
COST
ODC including but not limited to travel, material, and equipment in support of
CLIN 3001.
ESTIMATED COST
| ITEM NO |
| SUPPLIES/SERVICES |
| QUANTITY |
| UNIT |
| UNIT PRICE |
| AMOUNT |
Lot
| OPTION |
| CDRLs - NSP |
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT
B-TXT-01 PAYMENT OF FIXED FEE (COMPLETION TYPE) (JUN 2017)
FIXED FEE: $*. The Government shall make payment to the Contractor when requested as work progresses, but no more frequently than biweekly, on account of the fixed fee, equal to ** percent of the amounts invoiced by the Contractor under the “Allowable Cost and Payment” clause hereof for the related period, subject to the withholding provisions of paragraph (b) of the “Fixed Fee” clause. In the event of discontinuance of the work in accordance with clause of this contract entitled “Limitation of *** the fixed fee shall be redetermined by mutual agreement equitably to reflect the diminution of the work performed; the amount by which such fixed fee is less than, or exceeds payments previously made on account of fee, shall be paid, or repaid by, the Contractor, as the case may be.
*To be completed upon award of the contract.
**To be determined at the Task Order level. The allowable fee percentage will be negotiated at the Task Order level, and shall not exceed the percentage proposed at the basic contract level.
***To be determined at the Task Order level.
(End of clause)
B-TXT-04 LEVEL OF EFFORT--FEE ADJUSTMENT FORMULA (JUN 2017)
(a) Subject to the provisions of the “Limitation of Cost” or “Limitation of Funds” clause (whichever is applicable to this contract), it is hereby understood and agreed that the fixed fee is based upon the Contractor providing the below listed number of staff-hours of direct labor, hereinafter referred to as X, at the estimated cost and during the term of this contract specified elsewhere herein:
TBD at the Task Order Level.
The Contractor agrees to provide the total level of effort specified above in performance of work described in Sections “B” and “C” of this contract. The total staff-hours of direct labor shall include subcontractor direct labor hours for those subcontractors identified in the Contractor’s proposal as having hours included in the proposed level of effort.
(b) Of the total staff-hours of direct labor set forth above, it is estimated that 0 staff-hours are competitive time (uncompensated overtime). Competitive time (uncompensated overtime) is defined as hours provided by personnel in excess of 40 hours per week without additional compensation for such excess work. All other effort is defined as compensated effort. If no amount is indicated in the first sentence of this paragraph, competitive time (uncompensated overtime) effort performed by the contractor shall not be counted in fulfillment of the level of effort obligations under this contract.
(c) Effort performed in fulfilling the total level of effort obligations specified above shall only include effort performed in direct support of this contract and shall not include time and effort expended on such things as local travel from an employee’s residence to their usual work location, uncompensated effort while on travel status, truncated lunch periods, or other time and effort which does not have a specific and direct contribution to the tasks described in Section B.
(d) It is understood and agreed that various conditions may exist prior to or upon expiration of the term of the contract, with regard to the expenditure of labor staff-hours and/or costs thereunder which may require adjustment to the aggregate fixed fee. The following actions shall be dictated by the existence of said conditions:
(1) If the Contractor has provided not more than 105 % of X or not less than 95% of X, within the estimated cost, and at the term of the contract, then the fee shall remain as set forth in Section B.
(2) If the Contractor has provided X-staff-hours, within the term, and has not exceeded the estimated cost then the Contracting Officer may require the Contractor to continue performance until the expiration of the term, or until the expenditure of the estimated cost of the contract except that, in the case of any items or tasks funded with O&MN funds, performance shall not extend beyond 30 September. In no event shall the Contractor be required to provide more than 105 % of X within the term and estimated cost of this contract. The fee shall remain as set forth in Section B.
(3) If the Contractor expends the estimated cost of the contract, during the term of the contract and has provided less than X staff-hours, the Government may require the Contractor to continue performance, by providing cost growth funding, without adjusting the fixed fee, until such time as the Contractor has provided X staff-hours.
(4) If the Contracting Officer does not elect to exercise the Government’s rights as set forth in paragraph (d)(2) and (d)(3) above, and the Contractor has not expended more than 95 % of X staff-hours, the fixed fee shall be equitably adjusted downward to reflect the diminution of work.
(5) Nothing herein contained shall, in any way, abrogate the Contractor’s responsibilities, and/or the Government’s rights within the terms of the contract provision entitled “Limitation of Cost” or “Limitation of Funds” as they shall apply throughout the term of the contract, based upon the total amount of funding allotted to the contract during its specified term.
(e) Within 45 days after completion of the work under each separately identified period of performance hereunder, the Contractor shall submit the following information in writing to the Contracting Officer with copies to the cognizant Contract Administration Office and DCAA office to which vouchers are submitted:
| (1) The total number of staff-hours of direct labor expended during the applicable period. |
| (2) A breakdown of this total showing the number of staff-hours expended in each direct labor classification and associated direct and indirect costs. |
| (3) A breakdown of other costs incurred. |
| (4) The Contractor’s estimate of the total allowable cost incurred under the contract for the period. |
In the case of a cost under-run, the Contractor shall submit the following information in addition to that required above:
| (5) The amount by which the estimated cost of this contract may be reduced to recover excess funds and the total amount of staff-hours not expended, if any. |
| (6) A calculation of the appropriate fee reduction in accordance with this clause. |
All submissions required by this paragraph shall include subcontractor information, if any.
(f) SPECIAL INSTRUCTION TO THE PAYING OFFICE REGARDING WITHHELD FEE
Fees withheld pursuant to the provisions of this contract, such as the withholding provided by the “Allowable Cost and Payment” and “Fixed Fee” clauses, shall not be paid until the contract has been modified to reduce the fixed fee in accordance with paragraph (d) above, except that no such action is required if the total level of effort provided falls within the limits established in paragraph (d) above.
B-TXT-08 MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM QUANTITIES (JUN 2017)
As referred to in paragraph (b) of the “Indefinite Quantity” clause of this contract, the contract minimum quantity is a total of $10,000.00 worth of orders at the contract unit price(s). The maximum quantity is the total estimated amount of the contract. The maximum quantity is not to be exceeded without prior approval of the Procuring Contracting Officer.
Section C - Descriptions and Specifications
Statement of Work
Position, Navigation, and Timing Division Laboratory Support
1.0 SCOPE
This statement of work defines requirements for services and material to support enhancement and utilization of the Position, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Division Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) laboratories. The laboratories include the PNT engineering laboratories and the Global Positioning System (GPS) Central Engineering Activity (CEA), the United States Navy’s premier navigation laboratory for GPS User Equipment (UE) and modernization RDT&E. The other laboratories falling under the PNT laboratory umbrella support a wide variety of services including analysis of emergent PNT concept development, other Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) evaluations, inertial test and integration, antenna test and analysis, performance testing and analysis, prototype system development, security enhancements and validation, and additional PNT system engineering RDT&E functions.
The PNT engineering facilities are RDT&E laboratories established at Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center (SSC) Pacific under sponsorship of Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (SPAWAR), Program Executive Office for Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (PEO C4I) Communication and GPS Navigation Program Office (PMW/A-170), and the United States Air Force (USAF) GPS Directorate (SMC/GP). The laboratories are dedicated to PNT RDT&E, system integration, special engineering studies, anomaly analysis, and related GNSS investigations. This effort shall comprise engineering, analysis and design efforts as described below.
The purpose of this acquisition is to provide technical engineering services for:
· CEA Facility Requirements Analysis
· Data Analysis, Test and Evaluation
· Simulator Modification, Enhancement and Maintenance
· Digital Receiver Modification, Enhancement and Maintenance
· Generic Test Station Modification, Enhancement and Maintenance
· Real-Time Simulation System Modification, Enhancement and Maintenance
· Post-Test Processing Software Modification, Enhancement and Maintenance
· Laboratory Network Support
· Program Management / Monitoring / Reporting
1.1 Background
SSC Pacific, Position, Navigation, and Timing Division (Code 52300) is acquiring technical engineering services to support PNT systems to meet the Department of Defense (DoD), Joint, Coalition, and Navy’s needs for secure, functional, interoperable, and sustainable PNT capabilities.
1.1.1 Global Navigation Satellite System
1.1.1.1 The Global Positioning System
GPS is a U.S. space-based radio-navigation system that provides reliable PNT services to both military and civilian users on a continuous worldwide basis. GPS provides continuous highly accurate location and precise time information for an unlimited number of users in all weather conditions, day and night, anywhere in the world.
GPS is comprised of three segments: satellites orbiting the Earth, control and monitoring stations on Earth, and a wide variety of user equipment that ranges from small to large form factors such as mobile phones and wristwatches all the way to aircraft and satellite payloads. The USAF develops, maintains, and operates the space and control segments. GPS satellites broadcast signals from space that are acquired and identified by GPS receivers. Each GPS receiver then generates three-dimensional location (latitude, longitude, and altitude) as well as precise time.
1.1.1.2 Other GNSS
GLONASS is a Russian space based radio navigation system that provides reliable PNT services to both military and civilian users on a continuous highly worldwide accurate location and precise time information. It provides an alternative to GPS and is the second alternative navigational system in operation with global coverage and of comparable precision.
Galileo is a European Space Agency system that provides reliable PNT services to both military and civilian users. It also provides an alternative to GPS and GLONASS.
BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS), formerly known as COMPASS, is a Chinese space based radio navigation system that provides accurate location and precise time information for both military and civilian users.
1.1.2 Central Engineering Activity
The CEA has been established at SSC Pacific to serve as SPAWAR’s technical center for PNT, including GPS and related navigation technologies. As such, the CEA supports SPAWAR, PMW 170 and the GPS Directorate in ensuring Department of Defense (DoD) user equipment (UE) remains continually effective and in combat ready state for fleet utilization, “from the cradle to the grave”.
The CEA was established at SSC Pacific to support the investigation and resolution of fleet-reported problems, to aid in the development and evaluation of US Navy GPS integration, and to support continued DoD UE development. The CEA supports the following functions: scenario generation, host vehicle interface simulation, modernized satellite signal simulation, and post-test data reduction and analysis. The CEA Facility (figure 1) comprises the following components: Real-Time Simulation System (RTSS), Advanced Global Navigation Simulator (AGNS), Generic Test Stations (GTS) and the Data Processing Facility (DPF).
UE
AGNS
GTS
Data Processing Facility
RTSS
Figure 1: Central Engineering Activity Facility
1.1.3 Real Time Simulation System
RTSS simulates realistic operational environments for GPS receivers, motion profiles for all types of vehicles and configurable levels of navigation sensor performance. RTSS also provides the capability to define and control mission scenarios. AGNS generates a simulated high fidelity (radio frequency) (RF) signal environment injected into GPS receivers and antenna systems. GTS systems provide realistic interface environments (functionally and electrically), data logging and display of interface traffic and the capability to synchronize data transmission with additional events in the mission. The DPF reduces and analyzes mission test data.
The RTSS controls the overall execution of the test scenario. Commands from the RTSS are sent to a suite of emulation equipment that generate the appropriate signals and send them to the GPS equipment under test. Communication between the RTSS and the simulators is via Ethernet or SCRAMNet, a high speed distributed control network. Timing signals distributed throughout the test environment synchronize the generation of the simulated signals. Most of the modeling and significant computation is contained within the RTSS, but depending on the complexity of the environment being simulated certain functions can be off-loaded to the simulators for execution. Off-loading is done for convenience in executing legacy scenarios and for real-time requirements, such as emulating high-speed aiding information.
1.1.4 Advanced Global Navigation System
AGNS provides satellite simulation capabilities to SSC Pacific that include legacy satellite signals as defined on the Block II, IIA and IIR satellites as well as modernized signals as defined on the Block IIR-M, IIF and III satellites. The program strives to deploy a fully configurable, scalable, flexible and adaptable navigation simulator to meet the existing and future demands of the simulation testing community.
AGNS was designed and developed at SSC Pacific under tasking from the GPS Directorate to provide a state-of-the-art simulated signal-in-space (SIS) RF simulation environment to support testing of both legacy and next generation GPS UE specified by GPS modernization efforts. The system design largely decouples the software and hardware components of the system, allowing for rapid incorporation of new technology into the existing system architecture and allows for significant scalability relative to the availability of hardware resource.
AGNS consists of three distinct functional components: the system controller software, the signal generator hardware and the AGNS Interface Specification (IS) (IS-AGNS-001). The system controller software communicates with the signal generator hardware via the defined IS. In addition, the IS defines an external interface for external software to control the user motion inputs of the software and hardware in real-time and allows integration with both existing laboratory assets and future planned software testing tools. The AGNS Functional Block Diagram is shown below (figure 2).Signal Generator Card #M Signal Generator Card #1 RF Output Digital Receiver (Monitor Station) Unit Under Test Signal Generator
IS-AGNS-001
AGNS
External Software (User Supplied) Controller Software
RTSS
Other Future Aiding and Sensor Models Interface #1 Interface #K
IS-AGNS-001
Calibration Graphical User Interface System Control Software Simulation Control Truth Data Control Monitor Station Interface Control
N66001-18-R-0255
1.1.5 AGNS Test Station (ATS)
The AGNS Test Station (ATS), consists of Government-owned software and firmware hosted on commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) hardware and operating system. The ATS is based on a legacy design developed throughout the 1990’s by the California Institute of Technology’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) for the National Aeronautics and Space Agency (NASA).
The ATS hardware architecture (shown in figure 3) is designed primarily for laboratory use and consists of a discrete component front-end with a COTS analog-to-digital converter (ADC) connected to a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), which performs heterodyning, filtering, re-quantization, and quadrature super sampling. A second FPGA is hosted within a Windows PC. This FPGA performs high speed signal processing functions, primarily code generation, correlation, and time keeping. All high-level processing, such as acquisition logic and closing of the tracking loops, is performed by the PC in software.
Figure 3: ATS Architecture
1.1.6 Generic Test Station (GTS)
The Generic Test Station (GTS) consists of Government-owned software and firmware hosted on COTS hardware and operating system. It is a multi-function laboratory PC with capabilities for transmitting data to and collecting data from units under test. GTS also reads aiding data from a DEX file generated by RTSS and outputs aiding messages to the units under test. The current GTS supports many different interfaces, including RS-232, RS-422, ARINC-429, MIL-STD-1553, Bi-Directional Data Port (BDDP), Naval Tactical Data System (NTDS)-A/B, NTDS-E, and IP multicast. The GTS records both receiver-transmitted data and GTS transmitted control commands. The GTS also displays data in real-time and is capable of playback for post-test analysis.
2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
2.1 References:
The contractor shall adhere to the following documents in accordance with paragraph 3.0, Technical Requirements:
| Document Type |
| No./Version |
| Title |
| Date |
Operational Requirements Document
| Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) for Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Assurance (FOUO) |
| 30 Apr 2010 |
| Master Plan (MP) |
| CJCSI 6130.01E |
| CJCSI Master Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Master Plan (MPNTP) |
| 01 MAY 2013 |
Security Classification Guide (SCG)
| SMC JPO GPS Security Classification Guide |
| 02 DEC 2015 |
| PERSONNEL SECURITY PROGRAM INSTRUCTION |
| SECNAVINST 5510.30B |
| Department of Navy Personnel Security Program |
| OCT 2006 |
| INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAM INSTRUCTION |
| SECNAVINST 5510.36B |
| Department of Navy Information Security Program |
| JUL 2006 |
| ATFP |
| OPNAVINST F3300.53C |
| Navy Antiterrorism Program |
| MAY 2009 |
| INFORMATION SECURITY |
| DOD 5200.01 VOLS 1 through 4 |
| DOD Security Program |
| FEB 2012 |
| DATA SANITIZATION |
| DOD 5220.22-M Change 2 |
| National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) |
| MAY 2016 |
| OPSEC |
| DOD Directive 5205.02E |
| DOD Operations Security (OPSEC) Program |
| JUN 2012 |
| OPSEC |
| OPNAVINST 3432.1A |
| DON Operations Security (OPSEC) |
AUG 2011
| OPSEC |
| SECNAVINST 3070.2 |
| SECNAV Amplification to OPSEC |
| DEC 2016 |
| OPSEC POLICY |
| SPAWARINST 3432.1 |
| Operations Security |
| FEB 2005 |
| INTERFACE CONTROL DOCUMENT (ICD) |
| IS-GPS-200, Revision H |
| NAVSTAR GPS Space Segment / Navigation User Interfaces |
| MAR 2014 |
| SPECFICATIONS |
| IS-GPS-700, Rev A, (FOUO) IRN-700A-003 (NAICS Contracts) |
| NAVSTAR GPS Military-Unique Space Segment / User Segment Interfaces |
| 9 June 2006 |
| INTERFACE SPECIFICATION |
| IS-GPS-705, Revision A |
| NAVSTAR GPS Space Segment / User Segment L5 Interfaces |
| MAR 2014 |
| INTERFACE SPECIFICATION |
| IS-GPS-800, Revision D |
| NAVSTAR GPS Space Segment / User Segment L1C Interface |
| MAR 2014 SEP 2013 |
| VARIOUS |
| Other UE Protocol Documentation |
| ARINC, 1397A, 1397E, 1553, IP, GRAM |
| VARIOUS |
Most of the 2.1 references are publically released and available on-line. FOUO documents and project information will be managed within a government website such as Net-centric Enterprise Solutions for Interoperability (NESI) and/or Naval Systems Engineering Resource Center (NSERC) or other government website at the appropriate classification level and can be furnished upon request to the contracting officer representative or project manager.
3.0 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
The following tasks describe work to be performed in support of this statement of work.
3.1 CEA Facility Requirements Analysis
3.1.1 Description: The contractor shall participate, as part of an Integrated Planning Team (IPT), in technical reviews to evaluate the capabilities of existing laboratory and test facilities. Under this task, the contractor shall monitor on-going PNT development and production efforts and document the current status of all relevant PNT related activities in order to provide the information base required to update the laboratory facilities to support the latest PNT configuration requirements. This effort shall include the following:
3.1.1.1 Attend periodic PNT working group meetings.
3.1.1.2 Perform analyses to assess the impact of proposed laboratory modifications in support of new or reconfigured interfaces.
3.1.1.3 Provide current PNT development data for utilization in the preparation of presentation materials for PNT design reviews.
3.1.1.4 Participate in the resolution of interface problems and action items.
3.1.1.5 Extract appropriate comments for inclusion in CEA development and modification proposals.
3.2 Data Analysis, Test and Evaluation
3.2.1 Description: The contractor shall perform test and evaluation (T&E), to include data collection, correlation, processing, analysis and storage of information while performing work at or related to the RDT&E testing and analysis facilities. This effort shall include the following:
3.2.1.1 Identify performance requirements to be evaluated during testing in the RDT&E testing facilities.
3.2.1.2 Identify specific data processing and analysis requirements.
3.2.1.3 Develop test plan based on subject PNT Key Performance Parameters (KPP’s) and Key System Attributes (KSA’s) to ensure performance threshold and objective requirements are being achieved and document laboratory signal generation capabilities.
3.2.1.4 Develop and configuration manage test scenarios and configuration files based on subject PNT Verification and Validation (V&V) requirements and documented laboratory signal generation and CEA simulation capabilities.
3.2.1.5 Design and validate laboratory scenarios and configuration files required to implement test cases identified in the designated test plans.
3.2.1.6 Perform post-test processing and analysis of data collected during equipment and/or concept evaluations in the laboratory.
3.2.1.7 Maintain Configuration Management (CM) and archiving of all data associated with System Under Test (SUT) and associated scenario combinations for future analysis as they relate to the system architecture, configuration, input/ouput files as they relate to the associated test plan documentation.
3.2.1.8 Perform special studies, Analysis of Alternatives (AoA), proposed system modification evaluations, and system anomaly investigations related to various user and control segment issues.
3.3 Simulator Modification, Enhancement and Maintenance
3.3.1 Description: The contractor shall provide engineering services to support the modification, enhancement and maintenance of AGNS, the AGNS system controller software and related simulator functional software. This task additionally includes support of alternative simulation capabilities within the CEA laboratories. The effort includes impact assessment, analysis and system testing required to modify, enhance and maintain the simulator in response to identified problems and emergent PNT RDT&E requirements. This effort shall include the following:
3.3.1.1 Evaluate and Develop system Engineering Change Proposals(ECPs) and Software Change Requests (SCRs), including system requirements analysis and an assessment of the impact of the proposed simulation changes on the laboratory environment.
3.3.1.2 Identify the required system modifications and design changes to the simulation system.
3.3.1.3 Implement the identified simulation design and system modifications at the software/ system level.
| 3.3.1.4 | Verification and Validation Testing, to include full regression testing, will be performed to ensure implemented simulation ECPs/SCRs has had no undesired effect or degradation of laboratory functionality. |
| 3.3.1.5 | Maintenance of simulation software / system, including problem reports, new requirements, user training and support, enhancement of documentation and problem troubleshooting. |
3.3.1.6 Implement / update simulation system documentation to coincide with the ECPs/SCRs.
3.3.1.7 Actively maintain configuration management system containing simulation system software source code archives, and software and system documentation.
3.4 Digital Receiver Modification, Enhancement and Maintenance
3.4.1.1 Description: The contractor shall provide engineering services to support complete life cycle support of the software digital receiver and derivative projects including the AGNS Test Station (ATS) software system, the monitor and control software application and test applications associated with the testing and verification of the aforementioned applications. This effort shall include the following:
3.4.1.2 Evaluate and/or prepare system ECPs/SCRs, including system requirements analysis and an assessment of the impact of the proposed digital receiver changes on the laboratory environment.
3.4.1.3 Identify the required system modifications and design changes to the digital receiver system.
3.4.1.4 Implement the identified digital receiver design and system modifications at the software / system level.
3.4.1.5 Test implemented digital receiver ECPs/SCRs, including regression tests, to ensure that they were implemented properly and no undesired degradation of laboratory functionality has occurred.
3.4.1.6 Maintenance of digital receiver software / system, including problem reports, new requirements, user training and support, enhancement of documentation and problem troubleshooting.
3.4.1.7 Implement / update digital receiver system documentation to coincide with the ECPs/SCRs.
3.4.1.8 Actively maintain configuration management system containing digital receiver software source code archives, and software and system documentation.
3.5 Test Station Modification, Enhancement and Maintenance
3.5.1 Description: The contractor shall provide engineering services to support complete life cycle support of the GTS software and system components. This task additionally includes support of alternative test station capabilities within the CEA laboratories. The effort includes impact assessments, analysis and system testing required to modify, enhance and maintain the GTS system in response to identified problems and newly identified RDT&E requirements. This effort shall include the following:
3.5.1.1 Evaluate and / or prepare system ECPs/SCRs, including system requirements analysis and an assessment of the impact of the proposed GTS system changes on the laboratory environment.
3.5.1.2 Identify the required system modifications and design changes to the GTS system.
3.5.1.3 Implement the identified GTS design and system modifications at the software/system level.
3.5.1.4 Test implemented GTS ECPs/SCRs, including regression tests, to ensure that they were implemented properly and no undesired degradation of laboratory functionality has occurred.
3.5.1.5 Maintenance of GTS software/system, including problem reports, new requirements, user training and support, enhancement of documentation and problem troubleshooting.
3.5.1.6 Implement / update GTS system documentation to coincide with the ECPs/SCRs.
3.5.1.7 Actively maintain configuration management system containing GTS software source code archives, and software and system documentation.
3.6 Real-Time Simulation System Modification, Enhancement and Maintenance
3.6.1 Description: The contractor shall provide engineering services to include complete software life cycle support and sustainment of the Real-Time Simulation System (RTSS). The effort includes impact assessments, analysis and system testing required to modify, enhance and maintain the RTSS in response to identified problems and newly identified RDT&E requirements. This effort shall include the following:
3.6.1.1 Evaluate and / or prepare system ECPs/SCRs, including system requirements analysis and an assessment of the impact of the proposed RTSS changes on the laboratory environment.
3.6.1.2 Identify the required system modifications and design changes to the RTSS.
3.6.1.3 Implement the identified RTSS design and system modifications at the software/system level.
3.6.1.4 Test implemented RTSS ECPs/SCRs, including regression tests, to ensure that they were implemented properly and no undesired degradation of laboratory functionality has occurred.
3.6.1.5 Maintenance of RTSS software / system, including problem reports, new requirements, user training and support, enhancement of documentation and problem troubleshooting.
3.6.1.6 Implement/update RTSS system documentation to coincide with the ECPs/SCRs.
3.6.1.7 Actively maintain configuration management system containing RTSS software source code archives, and software and system documentation.
3.7 Post-Test Processing Software Modification, Enhancement and Maintenance
3.7.1 Description: The contractor shall provide engineering services to include complete software life cycle support of the Post-Test Processing (PTP) suite of software systems, including the Data Analysis and Plotting Program (DAPP), SATVIEW application, and related data conversion applications. This effort shall include the following:
3.7.1.1 Evaluate and / or prepare system ECPs/SCRs, including system requirements analysis and an assessment of the impact of the proposed PTP changes on the laboratory environment.
3.7.1.2 Identify the required system modifications and design changes to the PTP system.
3.7.1.3 Implement the identified PTP design and system modifications at the software/system level.
3.7.1.4 Test implemented PTP ECPs/SCRs, including regression tests, to ensure that they were implemented properly and no undesired degradation of laboratory functionality has occurred.
3.7.1.5 Maintenance of PTP software / system, including problem reports, new requirements, user training and support, enhancement of documentation and problem troubleshooting.
3.7.1.6 Implement / update PTP system documentation to coincide with the ECPs/SCRs.
3.7.1.7 Actively maintain configuration management system containing PTP software source code archives, and software and system documentation.
3.8 Laboratory Network Support
3.8.1 Description: The contractor shall provide enhancement and maintenance to ensure SSC Pacific general purpose and dedicated real-time test networks are updated and relevant to current operational needs.. This effort includes impact assessment analysis, hardware design and/or modification approach, implementation and testing as necessary to update or enhance the networks in response to new UE operational requirements or new organizational requirements.
3.9 Program Management / Monitoring / Reporting
3.9.1 Description: The contractor shall provide for and participate in Technical /Status Meetings with SSC Pacific engineering personnel. These technical reviews shall be held at SSC Pacific and or the contractor’s facilities. Program management personnel shall also attend and participate in designated technical meetings, design reviews, scheduling conferences, etc. Activity at these meetings shall be documented in “Conference Reports” which shall be specified in individual task orders.
4.0 CYBER SECURITY:
4.1 Cyber Security Workforce (CSWF): The contractor performing Information Assurance (IA) functions that are designated as Cyber Security Workforce (CSWF) positions in accordance with DoD 8570.01-M Information Assurance Workforce Improvement Program shall be trained and certified in accordance with DFARS Clause 252.239-7001, Information Assurance Contractor Training and Certification (IACT&C), and DoD 8570.01-M Series.
4.2 IAT Level I and Level II CSWF certifications will be required for engineering and technical personnel working directly with the networks.
5.0 TRAVEL
5.1 Specific trip destinations, durations, number of travelers and occurrences will be determined for each task/delivery order. The below destinations may change during performance of this contract.
5.2 If foreign travel is required, as specified per task order, all outgoing Country/Theater clearance message requests shall be submitted to the SPAWAR System Center Pacific foreign travel team, Topside, Building 27, 2nd Floor -Room 206 for action. A Request for Foreign Travel form shall be submitted for each traveler, in advance of the travel, to initiate the release of a clearance message at least 40 days in advance of departure. Each Traveler must also submit a Personal Protection Plan and have a Level 1 Antiterrorism/Force Protection briefing within one year of departure and a country specific briefing within 90 days of departure. Note: per OPNAVINST F3300.53C contractor employees must receive the AT/FP briefing annually.
Anticipated Locations
San Diego, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Patuxent River, MD
White Sands, NM
Philadelphia, PA
Norfolk, VA
Burlington, MA
Dayton, OH
Eglin AFB, FL
Germany
France
Luxembourg
6.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED EQUIPMENT/INFORMATION:
Access to information at SSC Pacific or other Government facilities will be arranged by the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) or the designated technical representative for each task. Access to information such as documents, computer programs, computer models, databases, and prototype systems will task order basis only. If required, GFE/GFI will be identified on individual task orders.
7.0 SECURITY
Work under this contractor will be up to and including SECRET. The work performed by the Contractor will include access to unclassified and up to SECRET data, information, and spaces. SECRET is required for access to spaces and to attend meetings as well as virtual teleconferences (VTC’s). The contractor will be required to attend meetings classified up to SECRET. The contractor will also require access to communications security (COMSEC) and secure internet protocol router network (SIPRNet) and complete the derivative classification training prior to being granted access. The contractor shall also be North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) briefed. Training is to be provided by the facility security officer.
As required by National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) Chapter 1, Section 3, contractors are required to report certain events that have an impact on: 1) the status of the facility clearance (FCL); 2) the status of an employee's personnel clearance (PCL); 3) the proper safeguarding of classified information; 4) or an indication that classified information has been lost or compromised. Contractors working under SSC Pacific contracts will ensure information pertaining to assigned contractor personnel are reported to the Contracting Officer Representative (COR)/Technical Point of Contact (TPOC), the Contracting Specialist, and the Security's COR in addition to notifying appropriate agencies such as Cognizant Security Agency (CSA), Cognizant Security Office (CSO), or Department Of Defense Central Adjudication Facility (DODCAF) when that information relates to the denial, suspension, or revocation of a security clearance of any assigned personnel; any adverse information on an assigned employee's continued suitability for continued access to classified access; any instance of loss or compromise, or suspected loss or compromise, of classified information; actual, probable or possible espionage, sabotage, or subversive information; or any other circumstances of a security nature that would affect the contractor's operation while working under SSC Pacific contracts.
If foreign travel is required, all outgoing Country/Theater clearance message requests shall be submitted to Commanding Officer, Attn: Foreign Travel Team, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific, 53560 Hull Street, Building 27, 2nd Floor -Room 206, San Diego, CA 92152 for action. A Request for Foreign Travel form shall be submitted for each traveler, in advance of the travel, to initiate the release of a clearance message at least 30 days in advance of departure. Each Traveler must also submit a Personal Protection Plan and have a Level 1 Antiterrorism/Force Protection briefing within one year of departure and a country specific briefing within 90 days of departure. Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) briefings are required for all personnel (Military, DOD Civilian, and contractor) per OPNAVINST F3300.53C. Contractor employees must receive the AT/FP briefing annually. The briefing is available at https://atlevel1.dtic.mil/at/, if experiencing problems accessing this website contact ssc_fortrav@navy.mil. Forward a copy of the training certificate to the previous email address or fax to (619) 553-6863. SERE 100.1 Level A Code of Conduct training is also required prior to OConus travel for all personnel. SERE 100.1 Level A training can be accessed at https://wwwa.nko.navy.mil. Other specialized training for specific locations may also be required contact the SSC Pacific foreign travel team.
Operations Security: OPSEC is a five step analytical process (identify critical information; analyze the threat; analyze vulnerabilities; assess risk; develop countermeasures) that is used as a means to identify, control, and protect unclassified and unclassified sensitive information associated with U.S. national security related programs and activities. All personnel working under this task will at some time handle, produce or process Critical Information or CPI, and therefore all Contractor personnel must practice OPSEC. All work is to be performed in accordance with DoD OPSEC requirements, and in accordance with the OPSEC attachment to the DD254.
7.1 ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION (AT/FP):
Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) briefings are required for all personnel (military, DOD civilian, and contractor) prior to commencement of foreign travel. Contractor employees must receive the AT/FP briefing annually. The briefing is available at Joint Knowledge Online (JKO): https://jkodirect.jten.mil (prefix): JS; course number: US007; title: Level 1 Anti-terrorism awareness training, if experiencing problems accessing this website contact ssc_fortrav@navy.mil. note: per OPNAVINST F3300.53C contractor employees must receive the AT/FP briefing annually.
7.2 INFORMATION ASSURANCE (IA) WORKFORCE:
All IA functions to be performed under this contract will be identified at the task order level in the statement of work or performance work statement. Task orders will specify, as applicable, IA workforce category, level, training, and certification requirements for contractor personnel with privileged access working in IA Technical (IAT) environments, IA Management (IAM) personnel with significant IA tasks, Computer Network Defense Service Providers (CND-SPs), and IA Systems Architects and Engineers (IASAEs). Task orders with IA functions will include a requirement for the contractor to report IA certification status and compliance.
8.0 OTHER
8.1 ENTERPRISE CONTRACTOR MANPOWER REPORTING APPLICATION (ECMRA)
The contractor shall report ALL contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract for the SSC Pacific via a secure data collection site. Contracted services excluded from reporting are based on Product Service Codes (PSCs). The excluded PSCs are:
W, Lease/Rental of Equipment;
X, Lease/Rental of Facilities;
Y, Construction of Structures and Facilities;
D, Automatic Data Processing and Telecommunications, IT and Telecom- Telecommunications Transmission (D304) and Internet (D322) ONLY;
S, Utilities ONLY;
V, Freight and Shipping ONLY.
The contractor is required to completely fill in all required data fields using the following web address: https://doncmra.nmci.navy.mil.
Reporting inputs will be for the labor executed during the period of performance during each Government fiscal year (FY), which runs October 1 through September 30. While inputs may be reported any time during the FY, all data shall be reported no later than October 31 of each calendar year. Contractors may direct questions to the help desk at: https://doncmra.nmci.navy.mil.
For the purposes of CMRA reporting, the Federal Supply Code/Product Service Code will be identified on individual task orders.
C-TXT-05 DELIVERY/TASK ORDER PROCEDURES (JUN 2017)
Both level of effort (term) and completion type orders may be issued under this contract. Each delivery or task order will include the order type deemed appropriate by the Government.
(a) Procedures. Each delivery/task order shall be placed in accordance with the following procedures:
| (1) Upon identification of a requirement, the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) or originator shall contact the Contractor for the purpose of arriving at a common understanding of the technical components which constitute the basis for performance under this delivery/task order and identifying the elements necessary for preparing a detailed Statement of Work (SOW) which contains sufficient definition to allow all parties to clearly identify an end product consistent with the scope of the contract. | |||
| (2) After both parties have reached agreement regarding the technical requirement of the SOW, and the SOW is completed, the Contractor and the COR shall sign and date the document to signify their common understanding of the delivery/task order requirements. | |||
| (3) Within five (5) calendar days after signing the SOW, the Contractor shall submit to the Ordering Officer/Administrator a complete cost estimate, with a copy of the SOW attached for the delivery/task order, sufficient to adequately describe how the Contractor will complete the requirements of the SOW. A copy of the cost estimate shall be forwarded concurrently to the COR and/or originator. The cost estimate shall contain the following documentation to enable the Ordering Officer/Administrator to make a determination of price reasonableness: | |||
| (i). Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF). | |||
| (A) Direct labor, including labor categories, hours, rates and total. | |||
| (B) Indirect Rates. | |||
| (C) Other Direct Costs (ODCs). | |||
| 1. Travel identified in the SOW needs only a total cost. Travel requirements not identified in the SOW must be fully documented including destination, number of people, number of days, airfare, per diem, car rental and other charges. | |||
| 2. Material exceeding a unit price in excess of the micro purchase threshold per FAR 2.101 must be itemized. All other materials need only a total cost. | |||
| 3. Equipment must be identified as Information Technology (IT) or non-IT. All IT equipment must be itemized. Non-IT equipment exceeding a unit price in excess of the micro purchase threshold per FAR 2.101 must be itemized. All other equipment not identified above needs only a total cost. | |||
| 4. Total miscellaneous charges under the micro purchase threshold per FAR 2.101 do not need to be itemized. | |||
| (D) Subcontractors. Subcontractors need only submit total cost with labor categories and hours to the prime contractor. Costs, with the same level of detail as submitted by the prime contractor for the task/delivery order, shall be submitted directly to the Government by the subcontractor. | |||
| (E) Consultants. Consultants need only submit total cost with labor categories and hours to the prime contractor. Costs, with the same level of detail as submitted by the prime contractor for the task/delivery order, shall be submitted directly to the Government by the subcontractor. | |||
| (F) Other Information. | |||
| 1. A statement that the cost estimate is based upon either a completion or level of effort task and the anticipated duration of the delivery/task order. | |||
| 2. For Small Business and 8(a) set-asides, the Contractor shall state that they are in compliance with the FAR 52.219-14 clause. | |||
| (G) Fee as specified in basic contract (NOTE: In T&M and LH contracts, the fee is incorporated into burdened rates). | |||
| (ii) Time and Material (T&M)/Labor Hour (LH).* | |||
| (A) Sub-CLIN. | |||
| (B) Labor Category. | |||
| (C) Hourly Rate. | |||
| (D) Number of Hours. | |||
| (E) ODCs (same as CPFF). | |||
| (F) Subcontractors. NOTE: If subcontractors are approved at the time of award of the basic contract, their hourly rates will be established as Sub-CLINs with associated hours. |
Any backup documentation not provided when you submit your cost estimate may be requested later by the Ordering Officer.
*NOTE: If the proposal is based on a labor hour contract, no material costs will be authorized.
(4) Once the Ordering Officer/Administrator has reviewed and accepted the Contractor’s cost estimate, a DD Form 1155 will be executed by the Contracting Officer/Ordering Officer and sent to the Contractor as notice to begin work. The Contractor is cautioned that no work is to be started prior to receipt of a properly signed and executed DD Form 1155, Order for Supplies/Services. If the cost estimate is insufficient or discussions are needed, the administrator will contact the Contractor to negotiate requirements.
(5)(i) Delivery or task orders may be issued under this contract by facsimile or by electronic commerce methods.
(b) Content and Effect.
| (1) Each CPFF delivery/task order shall include: | |
| (i) Effective date of order, | |
| (ii) Contract and delivery/task order numbers, | |
| (iii) Type of delivery/task order (i.e., completion or term), | |
| (iv) Estimated hours (provided for information only on completion-type orders), | |
| (v) Estimated cost, fee or price, | |
| (vi) Scope, including reference to applicable (contract) specifications, | |
| (vii) Delivery or performance date, | |
| (viii) Place of delivery or performance, | |
| (ix) Accounting and appropriation data, and | |
| (x) Other information as appropriate (e.g., Government Furnished Property, material, or facilities to be made available for performance of the order; safety requirements; security requirements set forth on DD Form 254; data requirements set forth on DD Form 1423; etc.). | |
| (2) Each T&M/LH delivery/task order shall include: | |
| (i) Effective date of order, | |
| (ii) Contract and delivery/task order numbers, | |
| (iii) Place of delivery or performance, | |
| (iv) Scope, including reference to applicable (contract) specifications, | |
| (v) Place and manner of inspection and acceptance, if different from that specified in the basic contract, | |
| (vi) Government furnished property, material or facilities to be made available for performance of the order, | |
| (vii) An estimate of the number of hours of labor, by labor categories, with rates required to perform the order, | |
| (viii) A ceiling price, set forth as a “not-to-exceed” amount, | |
| (ix) Delivery date or period of performance, | |
| (x) Accounting and appropriation data, | |
| (xi) Any other information deemed necessary for the performance of the order. |
(c) Maintenance of Records. The Contractor shall maintain the following cost records under this contract as a minimum:
| (1) Records for each delivery/task order, indicating the number of hours of direct labor performed, segregated to the individual employee performing the work, |
| (2) Records for each individual employee, identifying direct labor performed and segregated as to delivery/task order for which performed, and |
| (3) Records of all direct non-labor costs, allocated to individual delivery/task order. |
| (4) Nothing herein shall be deemed to excuse the Contractor from maintaining records required by other provisions of this contract. |
(d) Contractor Notification. (1) The Contractor is responsible for immediately…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.