The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
SPAWARSYSCEN Atlantic CYBER RED TEAM AND OPERATIONAL TEST SUPPORT N65236‐16‐R‐0032
1 | P a g e
Pre‐Acquisition Planning Industry Day Q&As
| 1. Will | the | attendee | list | be | published | in | e‐Commerce/FedBizOpps? | | | | | | | | |
| Yes, | we | will | provide | a | list | of | companies | that | attended | this | event. | This | has | been | included |
| as | a | separate | attachment | to | this | posting. | | | | | | | | | |
| 2. Will | the | Government | consider | non‐DCAA/CPFF | contract | format? | | | | | | | |
| No. | | Based | on | the | unknown | and | undefined | nature | of | the | individual | task | order |
| requirements, | utilization | of | a | cost | type | (i.e. | CPFF) | contract | is | required. | | | |
| 3. Will | there | be | any | restrictions | on | how | many | proposal | submissions | a | company | | | |
| can | be | listed | as | a | subcontractor? | | | | | | | | | |
| No. | | However, | the | tentative | RFP | will | include | the | requirement | for | offerors | to | submit | a |
| written | teaming | agreement | disclosure | form | to | be | signed | by | both | parties. | | | | |
| 4. Is | there | a | possibility | the | $5M | invoicing | requirement | may | be | relaxed? | | | |
| The | $5M | invoicing | requirement | is | currently | under | review. | | The | final | RFP | will | identify |
| the | Government’s | final | decision | regarding | this | invoice | threshold | requirement. | | | | | |
| 5. Can | you | describe | in | more | depth | the | past | performance | evaluation | (specifically | | | | | |
| how | many)? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| The | past | performance | references | are | based | solely | on | the | contract | references | submitted. | | | | |
| At | this | time, | the | Government | estimates | that | up | to | eight | (8) | past | performance | references | | |
| will | be | permitted. | | This | number | (of | past | performance | references) | is | subject | to | change | | |
| and | therefore | you | will | want | to | refer | to | the | formal | solicitation | that | is | posted | for | specific |
information.
| 6. Why | is | this | procurement | a | Service | Disabled | Veteran‐Owned | Small | Business | | | | |
| (SDVOSB) | and | not | a | Small | Business | (SB) | or | Full | and | Open? | | | |
| Based | on | the | Sources | Sought | Notice | responses | and | the | market | research | findings, | it | was |
| determined | that | at | least | 2 | SDVOSBs | were | capable | of | performing | the | requirements. | | |
| 7. Is | this | work | truly | $50 | ‐ | $100M | in | value? | | |
| Yes. | The | Government | anticipates | the | IDIQ | ceiling | to | be | approximately | $99M. |
| 8. Are | you | still | accepting | market | research | input? | | Who | is | the | POC? |
| No. | | The | period | to | accept | market | research | is | closed. | | |
| 9. Will | résumés | be | required | at | submission? | | | | | | |
| The | final | evaluation | factors | are | in | development | and | may | include | résumés. | The |
| Government’s | decision | will | be | reflected | in | the | final | RFP | | | |
SPAWARSYSCEN Atlantic CYBER RED TEAM AND OPERATIONAL TEST SUPPORT N65236‐16‐R‐0032
2 | P a g e
| 10. Who | is | the | incumbent | / | Which | vendor(s) | are | currently | supporting | the | | | |
| SPAWAR | Red | Team | now? | | | | | | | | | | |
| KSH | Solutions, | Inc. | (now | ECS | Federal) | has | performed | a | small | subset | of | this | requirement. |
| However, | this | is | a | new | requirement | and | therefore | there | is | no | incumbent | for | this |
requirement.
| 11. Can | we | use | CLASSIFIED | contract | references | in | an | UNCLASSIFIED | proposal? | | | | |
| The | Government | is | currently | reviewing | the | potential | for | the | submission | of | classified | | |
| contract | references. | | The | Government’s | final | decision | will | be | identified | in | the | final | RFP. |
| 12. Is | SPAWAR | using | the | SeaPort‐e | contracting | vehicle | for | this | effort? | | I | believe | | | | |
| the | mandated | NAICS | for | SeaPort | is | 541330. | | | | | | | | | | |
| No. | The | Government | will | NOT | be | utilizing | SeaPort‐e | for | this | effort. | | As | stated | in | the | Pre‐ |
| Acquisition | Planning | Industry | Day | presentation, | the | solicitation | will | be | released | on | the | | | | | |
| SPAWAR | e‐Commerce | website | and | FedBizOpps. | | The | NAICS | code | chosen | for | this | specific | | | | |
| requirement | was | based | on | the | appropriate | Product | Service | Code | (PSC) | ‐ | D310. | | The | | | |
| corresponding | and | applicable | NAICS | code | is | 541519 | – | Other | Computer | Related | Services. | | | | | |
| 13. For | joint | ventures, | will | the | past | performance | of | both | companies | be | taken | into | |
| account | or | just | the | past | performance | that | the | joint | venture | has | done | as | the |
| joint | venture | (i.e. | the | joint | venture | is | a | SBA‐accredited | mentor‐protégé | JV)? | | | |
| In | accordance | with | CFR | §125.18 | (b)(5), | it | states | that | when | evaluating | the | | |
| past | performance | and | experience | of | an | entity | submitting | an | offer | for | a | Service | Disabled |
| Veteran | Owned | (SDVO) | contract | as | a | joint | venture | established | pursuant | to | this | section, | |
| a | procuring | activity | must | consider | work | done | individually | by | each | partner | to | the | joint |
| venture | as | well | as | any | work | done | by | the | joint | venture | itself | previously. | |
| 14. Can | a | joint | venture | prime | if | they | do | 50% | of | the | work? | | | |
| An | answer | to | this | question | is | forthcoming. | | The | Government | is | working | with | the | Deputy |
| Director | for | Small | Business | Program | to | provide | this | response. | | Please | continue | to | | |
| monitor | e‐Commerce | and | FedBizOpps | for | additional | updates. | | | | | | | | |
15. Is this “as required” work or will the staff be 100% tasked during the contract?
| The | staffing | requirements | will | be | identified | at | the | individual | task | order | level. | | However, | | |
| there | may | be | a | requirement | for | Key | Personnel | at | the | time | of | award. | | The | Government’s |
| decision | will | be | identified | in | the | final | RFP. | | | | | | | | |
| 16. The | Pentagon | has | embraced | Secure | Crowd‐Sourced | Penetration | Testing | (hack | | | | | | | |
| the | Pentagon) | as | well | as | the | Army, | Air | Force, | and | DiSA. | Is | the | Navy | Red | Team |
| open | to | this | approach? | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SPAWARSYSCEN Atlantic CYBER RED TEAM AND OPERATIONAL TEST SUPPORT N65236‐16‐R‐0032
3 | P a g e
| Yes; | however, | it | must | meet | the | requirements | of | the | RFP | (i.e. | provided | it | was | done | in |
| support | of | a | certified | Red | Team). | | | | | | | | | | |
| 17. What | size | of | team | / | Full‐time | Equivalents | (FTEs) | will | this | be? | | | | | | | |
| It | is | anticipated | that | the | size | of | the | team | will | be | 8‐10 | per | task | order | but | could | also |
| increase | to | up | to | 100 | FTEs | based | on | the | requirements | of | individual | task | orders, | | | | |
| concurrently | executed. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 18. Can | penetration | testing | experience | count | as | Red | Team | experience? | | | | |
| Yes, | only | if | it | was | done | in | support | of | an | accredited | Red | Team. |
| 19. Please | confirm | if | the | Government | will | accept | examples | of | experience | from |
| commands | outside | the | 9 | NSA‐certified | Red | Teams | as | relevant | experience | |
| The | Government | requires | that | all | contract | reference | examples | of | experience | identify |
| experience | supporting | a | DoD | accredited | Cyber | Red | Team. | | | |
| 20. What | risk | management | framework | support | is | required | by | the | Red | Team | to | | | |
| operate | the | infrastructure? | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| It | varies | based | upon | the | number | and | types | of | system | necessary | to | conduct | and | sustain |
| the | Red | Team | operations. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 21. Is | a | level | 3 | CMMI | certification | required? | | If | so, | what | level | and | in | what |
| capabilities? | Must | the | Prime | hold | the | CMMI | certs? | | | | | | | |
| The | CMMI | certification | is | not | a | requirement, | but | may | be | considered | a | benefit | to | the |
| Government | if | certified | at | level | 3 or higher. | | | | | | | | | |
| 22. How | are | you | handling | OCI | with | DT/OT | services? | | For | example, | there | may | be | a |
| situation | where | a | contractor | could | be | designing | software | for | the | Navy | under | | | |
| another | contract | (OT) | and | then | testing | their | own | work | under | this | contract. | | | |
| The | Government | is | evaluating | this | potential | and | will | include | any | necessary | | | | |
| organization | conflict | of | interest | clauses | in | the | final | RFP, | if | warranted. | | | | |
23. Do you expect to expand into close access operations to access physical security?
Yes. It is anticipated for this to occur no later than the next inspection (March 2020).
| 24. Must | the | Prime | have | a | TS | facility | clearance | (FCL)? | | | | |
| Yes. | | This | FCL | clearance | level | is | required | at | the | time | of | award. |
| 25. Please | confirm | the | Government | will | allow | team | members | who | have | valid | | | |
| capabilities | outside | of | the | 9 | NSA‐certified | Red | Teams | to | join | a | prime | who | has |
| experience | with | a | certified | Red | Team. | | | | | | | | |
SPAWARSYSCEN Atlantic CYBER RED TEAM AND OPERATIONAL TEST SUPPORT N65236‐16‐R‐0032
4 | P a g e
| All | submitted | contract | reference | experience | shall | cite | experience | supporting | a | DoD |
| accredited | Cyber | Red | Team. | | | | | | | |
| 26. What | are | the | local | off‐site | requirements, | if | any? | | | | | | | |
| The | local | off‐site | requirements | will | be | determined | at | the | task | order | level. | At | this | time, |
| the | Government | anticipates | this | to | be | 3,000 | – | 5,000 | square | feet. | | | | |
27. What internal training is conducted or expected to be conducted on the Red Team?
| There | are | SPAWARSYSCEN | Atlantic | Red | Team | operator | levels | that | individual | team | | | | |
| members | can | attain | by | participating | in | the | Red | Team’s | formal | training | program. | | | |
| Individuals | must | attain | and | maintain | a | “Level | 1” | to | conduct | operations | on | the | team. | |
| There | are | currently | four | (4) | levels. | | Each | Red | Team | service | area | is | assessed | uniquely |
| (e.g. | local, | remote, | wireless, | etc.). | | | | | | | | | | |
28. What are the minimum and expected individual certifications for Operators?
Developers?
The minimum and expected individual certifications that an Operator and Developer shall possess is CSSP Auditor defined in DOD 8570.01-M and found here: https:// iase.disa.mil/iawip/Pages/iabaseline.aspx.
| 29. What | is | the | nature | of | the | infrastructure | support | required? | | | |
| The | nature | of | the | infrastructure | support | required | includes | the | security | of | operations |
| and | support | of | the | infrastructure | (hardware, | software, | laptops, | servers, | testing | gear) | |
| used | by | the | Red | Team | operators | to | safely | conduct | assessments. | | |
| 30. Will | you | have | infrastructure | in | the | cloud? | | | | |
| Yes. | Infrastructure | will | be | in | one | or | more | cloud | service | providers. |