Q_and_A's_for_Solicitation_N63394-17-R-0033_MK_235.8.16.17.pdf

Question for Solicitation N63394-17-R-0031 MK 235 Mod 14

Response

The solicitation states that the requirement is for 7104280-149.

The 7104280 drawing states that the -149 is 7572080-69. The 7572080 drawing provided doesn't reflect a -69 configuration. It only shows a -9, -19, -29, -39, and -49.

7572080F and NORs 24-32 will define 7572080-69.

Is there an updated 7572080 drawing that shows a -69 configuration?

7572080F and NORs 24-32 will define 7572080-69.

And although I don't know exactly what the -69 configuration entails, I have to assume that there are a considerable number of sub-level drawings that will be required as well.

Recommend contractor to review 7572080F and NORs 24-32 will define 7572080-69.

Regarding the drawings for this solicitation, the top level drawing #7572080 was provided in a previous post

Please provide a more details in order to better address the concern

The drawing references several other drawings; the drawings were not provided and are required to respond this solicitation.

Could you please provide the drawings?

Provide list of missing drawings, then we will review and provide.

The drawings we need were not provided in the latest posting in FBO. The drawings required are contained in the parts list (PL) document #7572080; this document was provided in the solicitation on FBO. In the said document, there is a column named “part or Identifying Number”; the documents required are in the column that begin with the digit “7”. For example 7572100-9.

to find 7572100-9, look for drawing 7572100 (without -9). You will find 7572100A, 7572100A (PL), 7572100_NOR 5-8. If you open the 7572100A (PL), you will see -9.