NEFRSC II Sasebo BoM JA_REDACTED_260923.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

COMMANDER

NAVAL FACILITES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND PACIFIC

258 MAKALAPA DRIVE SUITE 100

PEARL HABOR HI 96860-3134

J&A No. 26-036

JUSTIFICATION AND APPROVAL FOR USE OF OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN

COMPETITION

1. Contracting Activity. The contracting activity is Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command (NAVFAC), Pacific.

2. Description of the Action Being Approved. This replaces the justification approved on 21 May 2026 based on the revised scope of work registered to NAVFAC Pacific from the 30th

Naval Construction Regiment (30NCR). This justification is for the award of a sole source modification to provide services in Sasebo, Japan under contract number N62742-25-C-3570 Navy Expeditionary Forces Regional Services Contract II (NEFRSC II) in accordance with the following Performance Work Statement Annexes.

Annex 0304010 IT Support and Management Annex 1000000 Supply and Material Management Services Annex 1700000 Transportation

3. Description of Supplies/Services. The proposed acquisition is to provide services for 30NCR in support of three Seabee troop labor projects in Sasebo, Japan: P-357U Operational Storage Pads, P-358U Battery Container Pad, P-359U Weapons Assembly Pad. The estimated value of this requirement is based on the independent government estimate developed by 30NCR. A total of in UMMC funds is available for this requirement; funds are split as follows: FY26 UMMC funds in the amount of for services in Option Period 01 and FY27 UMMC funds in the amount of for services in Option Period 02. Required services include IT services, construction material procurement, storage/laydown requirements, porta-john and dumpster services, material logistics management, and construction equipment rentals. The period of performance is approximately 9 months and spans between Option Period 01 (January 2026 through December 2026) and Option Period 02 (January 2027 through December 2027). Services are anticipated to start 30 days from Notice to Proceed and complete in March 2027.

4. Statutory Authority Permitting Other Than Full and Open Competition. The statutory authority permitting other than full and open competition is Title 10 U.S.C. 3204(a)(2), Unusual and compelling urgency.

5. Rationale Justifying Use of Cited Statutory Authority. Seabee troop labor construction of projects P-357U, P-358U & P-359U must start by 31 July 2026 and reach full operational capability by the mission need date of March 2027. These projects are to support critical naval assets. Mission operations are contingent on these assets being in-place. Failure to achieve this mission need date will compromise both regional and national security in this contentious area, jeopardize the safety and security of U.S. assets including U.S. military and civilian personnel, as well as established partnering agreements with the Host Nation with potential

CUI

for negative impacts to critical posture requirements within INDOPACOM’s area of responsibility.

Services provided on the NEFRSC II are urgently needed to ensure Seabee execution remains on schedule. The NEFRSC II provides an established contract vehicle with a prime contractor that has been consistently providing similar services at a satisfactory level or better to the Seabees in similar geographical locations. The proposed modification is within the scope of the NEFRSC II in all regards (e.g. performance work statement, supported command, period of performance, estimated contract value, etc.) except that it is outside the geographical area of performance. The NEFRSC II geographical area is limited to South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Oceania; however, it is reasonably anticipated that the Seabees would require the same or similar services in East Asia.

The condensed timeline derived from the extreme urgency of this requirement does not allow NAVFAC Pacific sufficient time to utilize full and open competition. The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) was the primary option to fulfill this requirement however they stopped accepting material orders on 08 May 2026 due to a change in their Prime Vendor, and they could not provide a timeline for when the new contractor would be operational. DLA’s late notification of its inability to meet this requirement was unanticipated and beyond NAVFAC Pacific control.

The urgency was not due to the lack of advanced planning. Standard competitive acquisition timelines would result in severe, unacceptable delays, causing serious injury to posture initiative and strategic interests of the United States.

The contracting officer will use cost analysis techniques and procedures in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(c)(2) to ensure a fair and reasonable price is established for the services covered by this J&A. Techniques will include a review and verification of cost data and evaluation of cost elements, comparison to actual costs incurred and historical cost estimates by the same contractor for same or similar services, and comparison to the independent Government cost estimate.

6. Description of Efforts Made to Solicit Offers from as Many Offerors as Practicable.

For the reasons set forth in Paragraph 5, NAVFAC Pacific did not post a synopsis of the proposed procurement in accordance with FAR 5.202 Exceptions(a)(2) as the Government would be seriously injured if required to follow the time periods specified in FAR 5.203. The approved J&A will be released in accordance with FAR 6.305(b).

7. Determination of Fair and Reasonable Cost.

The Contracting Officer has determined the anticipated cost to the Government of the supplies/services covered by this J&A will be fair and reasonable.

8. Actions to Remove Barriers to Future Competition.

For the reasons set forth in Paragraph 5, NAVFAC Pacific has no plans at this time to compete future contracts for the types of supplies/services covered by this document. If another potential source emerges, NAVFAC Pacific will assess whether competition for future requirements is feasible.

J&A No. 26-036

CERTIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL

TECHNICAL/REQUIREMENTS CERTIFICATION

I certify that the facts and representations under my cognizance which are included in this Justification and its supporting acquisition planning documents, except as noted herein are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Technical/Requirements Cognizance:

Phone No. Date

Expeditionary Operations SGE Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Pacific

LEGAL SUFFICIENCY REVIEW

I have determined this Justification is legally sufficient.

Phone No. Date

Associate Counsel Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Pacific

CONTRACTING OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I certify that this Justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Phone No. Date

Supervisory Contract Specialist, ACQ23 Contingency Services Contracts Branch Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Pacific

18 Jun 26

CHIEF OF CONTRACTING APPROVAL

Upon the basis of the above justification, I hereby approve, as Chief of Contracting, the solicitation of the proposed procurement described herein using other than full and open competition, pursuant to the authority of 10 U.S.C. 3204(a)(2).

Phone No. Date

Chief of the Contracting Office Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Pacific

6/18/2026