N6274223R0004_Synopsis.pdf

N62742-23-R-0004

INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR

VARIOUS BASE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS AND OTHER PROJECTS UNDER THE

COGNIZANCE OF NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND PACIFIC,

VARIOUS LOCATIONS

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM

SF 330, ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO

SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD.

This procurement will result in one Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for Architect-

Engineer (A-E) services for projects that involve significant base infrastructure and other civil design/engineering services with associated multi-discipline architect-engineering support services at various locations under the cognizance of Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Pacific, including the Indo-Asia-Pacific Region. These services will be procured in accordance with 40 USC

Chapter 11, Selection of Architects and Engineers, as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6. The IDIQ contract will be for a base period and four one-year option periods (if exercised). The total fee for the contract term shall not exceed $100,000,000. The minimum guarantee for the contract term (including option years) is $10,000. Firm-Fixed-Price task orders will be negotiated for this contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. Estimated start date is October 2022.

This proposed contract is being solicited on an UNRESTRICTED basis. The Small Business size standard classification is North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code 541330, Engineering Services. The Government seeks the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications, in accordance with the selection criteria.

The types of base infrastructure and other civil design/engineering services expected to be performed under this contract include, but are not limited to, the execution and delivery of Military Construction

(MILCON/MCON) project documentation (DD Form 1391), Functional Analysis and Concept

Development (FACD) workshops; 1391/Design Charrettes; Design-Build (DB) Request for Proposal

(RFP); Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Design contract documents; technical surveys and reports including concept and engineering studies, site engineering investigation, topographic survey, geotechnical investigation, hazardous material survey, Munitions of Explosive Concern (MEC) survey, hydrographic survey, and others; construction cost estimates; Collateral Equipment (CEQ) Buy Packages;

Comprehensive Interior Design (CID) including Structural Interior Design (SID) and Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (FF&E); and Post Construction Award Services (PCAS).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Firms responding to this synopsis will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firms to perform the required services in accordance with the published selection criteria. Failure to comply with instructions, or to provide complete information under each criterion, may affect the firm’s evaluation or disqualify the firm from further consideration. The following selection criteria are listed in descending order of importance:

(1) Specialized Experience

(2) Professional Qualifications

(3) Past Performance

(4) Quality Control Program

(5) Workload Capacity

(6) Sustainable Design

(7) Small Business Utilization

(8) Firm Location

(9) Volume of Work

SELECTION CRITERION (1): SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE.

Under Selection Criterion (1), firms will be evaluated on specialized experience in recent and relevant projects that involved the following services, which are similar to services anticipated under this contract:

Execution Of DD1391 Or Similar Project Programming Document

Functional Analysis Concept Development (FACD)/Design Charrettes

Development Of DB RFP Solicitation Documentation

Development Of DBB Design Contract Documents

Civil Engineering Studies

Relevant project types include base infrastructure and other civil design/engineering services experience in site development, drainage, water treatment/distribution, sewage/solid waste/hazardous waste collection/treatment systems, pavements, and waterfront/airfield/other facilities. New construction projects shall be $20 million or more in construction value per project and completed within the past ten

(10) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice.

Firms may be evaluated as more favorable under Selection Criterion (1) by demonstrating the following:

More variety in the types of specialized experience in relevant projects;

More variety in the types of facilities for relevant projects;

Projects located in tropical environments similar to Hawaii, Guam, Tinian, Diego Garcia, Australia, and other Pacific Ocean areas.

SELECTION CRITERION (1) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part 1, Section F. For the proposed team, provide in Section F a maximum of five (5) completed recent and relevant projects along with descriptions of correlated A-E support services rendered

(MILCON/MCON Region/FEC Team 1391 project documentation, FACD/Design Charrettes, RFP documentation for DB and DBB project design contract documents, and Civil Engineering Studies). The ten (10) year completion timeline for relevant projects applies to design and engineering services (Section

F, Block 22, “Professional Services”) and does not include PCAS services. Checklists/matrices identifying specialized experience will not be evaluated. Only information provided in Section F, Block

24 will be evaluated. Block 24 shall clearly discuss the scope of services to demonstrate specialized experience provided in a project. If more than five (5) projects are submitted for evaluation, the

Government will evaluate the first five (5) projects and disregard any other project information after the first five (5) projects. Specialized experience will not be evaluated for projects that are not relevant as defined in Selection Criterion (1). Projects submitted for evaluation under Selection Criterion (1) must either be a stand-alone contract or a single task order under an IDIQ contract. The Government will not evaluate specialized experience for an IDIQ contract.

All projects provided in the SF330 must be completed by the actual office/branch/regional office/individual team member proposed to manage and perform the work under this contract. Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from the evaluation.

To enable verification, firms should include the DUNS number along with each firm name in the SF330

Part I, Section F, Block 25, “Firm Name”. In Block 21, include (1) project title and (2) location. Block

22 shall include (3) the year design and engineering services completed. Block 23a shall include (4) project owner. Block 23b shall include (5) point-of-contact name and electronic mail (e-mail) address.

Block 23c shall include (6) the point-of-contact phone number. Block 24 shall include (7) the project description; (8) contract performance period; (9) original construction contract award amount; (10) final construction contract amount; and (11) a description of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to the types of specialized recent experience and relevant projects defined in Selection Criterion (1).

The submission shall include a discussion of who executed the project as pertinent to demonstrating the firm’s specialized experience. For example, if a project was performed by a Joint Venture (JV), and all

JV partners are not on the team proposed for this solicitation, the offeror should specifically indicate which team member(s) were involved in the project submitted. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by each proposed JV partner, the project will be evaluated as less favorable.

Likewise, if the proposed JV partner(s) worked as a subcontractor on a project, the offeror shall specifically address the work performed by the proposed JV partner(s) on the project submitted. If a project does not provide requested data, accessible point-of-contact, or valid phone number, that project may be evaluated as less favorable. Note: If the A-E firm is a JV, information should be submitted for projects performed by the JV; however, if there are no relevant projects performed by the JV, submit projects performed by the individual partner entities of the JV. Failure to submit experience for all JV partners will be evaluated as less favorable under Selection Criterion (1).

An A-E prime contractor’s or JV partner’s specialized experience on a project may be evaluated as more favorable in comparison to a sub-consultant’s specialized experience on a project. Specialized experience of an A-E subcontractor to a construction contractor, serving as the Designer-of-Record on a DB project, will be given the same level of evaluation as an A-E firm for a DBB project.

Prime contractor-subcontractor/JVs/LLCs/LTDs/LLPs with a demonstrated history of working together on prior projects will be evaluated as more favorable in comparison to those without such history.

All information for Selection Criterion (1) shall be submitted in the SF330, Part 1, Section F. The

Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part 1, Section F in evaluation of

Selection Criterion (1).

SELECTION CRITERION (2): PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS.

Under Selection Criterion (2), firms will be evaluated on:

(a) Professional qualifications of key personnel for two (2) design teams; and

(b) Specialized experience and technical competence in relevant projects that involved the execution of DD1391 or similar project programming document, FACD/Design Charrettes, development of

DB RFP solicitation documentation, development of DBB design contract documents, and civil engineering studies.

For Selection Criterion (2)(b), more favorable evaluation of Project Manager (PM) experience may be given for:

More variety in the types of specialized experience in relevant projects;

More variety in the types of facilities for relevant projects;

Projects located in tropical environments similar to Hawaii, Guam, Tinian, Diego Garcia, Australia, and other Pacific Ocean areas;

Professional qualifications and past performance as part of the prime or lead contractor’s key personnel (does not include professional qualifications and past performance as part of a subcontractor’s key personnel);

SELECTION CRITERION (2)(a) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part 1, Section H. Provide a list of key personnel for two (2) design teams that shall be limited to the following: Principal-In-Charge (PIC) of the Prime A-E firm, Project Manager (PM), Civil Project

Engineer, Structural Project Engineer, Project Architect, Mechanical Project Engineer, Electrical Project

Engineer, Fire Protection Project Engineer, Environmental Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, Land

Surveyor, and Cost Estimator. If more than two (2) design teams are submitted, the Government will only evaluate the first (2) design teams and will disregard any design teams submitted after the first (2) design teams. Note: The PIC of the Prime A-E firm may be the same person on both teams.

SF330, Part 1, Section E. Submit resumes for all proposed key personnel that demonstrates the necessary professional qualifications required for this contract. Resumes of key personnel shall indicate active U.S.

professional registration (include State and discipline), number of years of professional experience, role in this contract, firm name and location, and education. For Cost Estimator, indicate years of experience, role in this contract (identify the primary cost estimator if more than one cost estimator is submitted), firm name and location, and education. Professional registration for Cost Estimator is not required.

Professional qualifications of personnel of the design teams other than the key personnel (e.g., PM, Civil

Project Engineer, Structural Project Engineer, Project Architect, Mechanical Project Engineer, Electrical

Project Engineer, Fire Protection Project Engineer, etc.) shall not be submitted, and if submitted, will not be considered in the evaluation. Do not use other company titles such as “Type I Engineer” where the discipline and role are not identifiable. Failure to submit resumes for all key personnel will be evaluated as less favorable under Selection Criterion (2)(a).

SELECTION CRITERION (2)(b) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part I, Section E. Specialized experience and technical competence shall be limited to two (2)

PMs. Relevant project information for other key personnel is not required and if submitted, will not be considered in the evaluation. For key personnel other than the two (2) PMs, complete Blocks 12 through

18; and leave Block 19, Relevant Projects, blank. Complete one (1) Section E for each PM, providing all requested information. Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant projects for each PM, demonstrating specialized experience and technical competence in relevant projects.

A project is defined as either a stand-alone contract or a single task order in an IDIQ contract.

Specialized experience and relevant projects are defined in Selection Criterion (1). If more than five (5) projects for each PM are submitted, the Government will evaluate the first five (5) projects listed in Part I, Section E and disregard any other project information.

Each project shall include project title and location, year “professional services” (not including PCAS) completed, details of specialized experience, point-of-contact name, e-mail address, phone number, contract number or project identification number, contract period of performance, contract award amount, estimated construction cost, and the role and experience the PM had in performing the project.

Experience in a role other than the PM for project submittal will not qualify as specialized experience and technical competence. If a project description does not clearly define the work performed by the PM

(including the specialized design and engineering service) or if a project does not provide the requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers, that project may be evaluated as less favorable or less qualified.

SELECTION CRITERION (3): PAST PERFORMANCE.

Under Selection Criterion (3), firms will be evaluated on past performance on relevant projects with

Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and stakeholder/customer satisfaction.

SELECTION CRITERION (3) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part I, Section H. For each relevant project submitted in response to Selection Criterion (1), Specialized Experience, submit a DD2631, Performance Evaluation (Architect-Engineer) or Contractor

Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) Architect-Engineer. If a DD2631 or CPAR is not available, provide a NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ) (included with this announcement as Attachment A) and submit the Survey with the SF330. Ensure correct phone numbers and e-mail addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Do not submit a PPQ when a completed

DD2631 or CPAR is available. NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE shall be from the contracting agent and/or their representative responsible for the contract administration, or from the facility owner/user. It shall not be from the prime contractor on a design-build project nor shall it be from a prime contractor to a subcontractor. If work was performed as a subcontractor for a project under Selection Criterion (1), provide a completed Past Performance Questionnaire. Past performance evaluations for other than the firm will not be evaluated.

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE previously completed for other announcements/RFPs may also be submitted.

The information provided in the SF330 may provide the major portion of the information used in the

Government’s evaluation for past performance. The Government however, is not restricted to the information provided by the Offeror and may use other sources to assess past performance information such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) and inquiries with previous customers/owners. PPIRS will be evaluated for the firm that will perform the work and search will be based upon the CAGE/DUNS number provided for the firm.

If the A-E received any less than Satisfactory past performance evaluations from customers/owners for projects submitted under Selection Criterion (1) it is incumbent upon the A-E to provide an explanation of the rating, problems encountered, the corrective actions taken on the project, and what will be done to preclude less than satisfactory ratings on future contracts. Information shall not exceed two double-sided pages (or four single sided pages) in total, and will be counted as part of the maximum number of pages allowed for Part I.

Past performance of the A-E prime consultant or JV partner(s) may be evaluated as more favorable in comparison to the past performance of the sub-consultants.

Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation.

SELECTION CRITERION (4): QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM.

Under Selection Criterion (4), firms will be evaluated on the processes and procedures of their proposed internal design quality control programs that ensure quality products and services are provided under this contract, including quality services from their sub-consultants/subcontractors.

SELECTION CRITERION (4) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part I, Section H. Describe the design quality control organization structure that will be utilized for all deliverables of this contract and the management approach for quality control processes and procedures. The description shall:

1. Explain the quality control program including an example of how the plan has worked for one of the projects submitted as part of SF330, Section F, or how the plan will work if it has not been used previously.

2. Provide a quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and team components.

3. Describe specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract including checking documents for errors, omissions, inconsistencies, and quality; tracking and incorporating review comments; and implementing the latest criteria and lessons learned.

4. Describe how the prime A-E will ensure quality consistently across the entire team and how quality of subcontractor’s work is assured.

5. Describe internal quality assurance procedures and indicate the level of effectiveness.

6. Identify the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program and a description of their roles and responsibilities.

7. Describe how the firm’s quality control program extends to management of subcontractors.

SELECTION CRITERION (5): WORKLOAD CAPACITY.

Under Selection Criterion (5), firms will be evaluated on its capacity to accomplish multiple large projects concurrently and within the required time.

SELECTION CRITERION (5) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part 1, Section H. Describe the proposed team’s ability to complete several large projects or task orders concurrently requiring quick turnaround. Indicate the firm’s current workload and the availability of the prime and sub-consultants for the specified performance period. Address how the firm's organizational construct is most efficient and effective in the execution of work. Identify the team composition (prime A-E firm, subcontractor/sub-consultant of major design disciplines, and other required design firms) and personnel (key personnel and other personnel of major design disciplines only) of two (2) separate design teams that would be able to execute two (2) large base infrastructure or other civil projects concurrently. For all key personnel identified in Selection Criterion (2), explain their roles and responsibilities in the proposed organization. If the same Principal-in-Charge is proposed for more than one (1) design team, provide explanation substantiating such designation and ability to accomplish multiple projects concurrently. Describe the workload/availability of the key personnel during the anticipated contract performance period and the ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of services. General statements of availability/capacity may be evaluated as less favorable.

SELECTION CRITERION (6): SUSTAINABLE DESIGN.

Under Selection Criterion (6), firms will be evaluated on their knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying sustainability concepts through an integrated design approach and designing in accordance with the U.S. Green Building Council, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green

Building Rating System or equivalent Third Party Certification agency.

SELECTION CRITERION (6) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part I, Section H. Provide a maximum of three (3) projects that have attained or been submitted for sustainable design third party certification (LEED, Green Globes, Guiding Principles Compliance, or other equivalent certification). For projects not yet certified, identify the date the project was submitted.

For all projects, identify the team’s major contribution(s) (design elements, features, equipment, etc.) in attainment of the certification. If more than three projects are submitted for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first three projects and disregard any other project information after the first three projects. Certified projects will be evaluated as more favorable in comparison to projects that are not yet certified. Discuss key sustainable design personnel experience and qualifications.

SELECTION CRITERION (7): SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION.

Firms will be evaluated on the extent to which their proposals demonstrate a history of successfully supporting Government policies concerning utilization of small business concerns including, when applicable, achievements against established small business subcontracting plan goals. Firms will also be evaluated on the levels of small business participation proposed and the degree of commitment to use named sources. The anticipated benefits of proposed initiatives and tools to enhance small business participation and capabilities will be considered. The Government will assess proposal realism and the likelihood of success in achieving the small business objectives of this acquisition.

SELECTION CRITERION (7) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

(1) Achievements: All firms shall provide a narrative (shall not exceed two (2) single-sided pages or

(one (1) double-sided page) to describe their achievements in supporting the Government’s policy to provide maximum practicable opportunities for Small Business (SB), Veteran-Owned Small Business

(VOSB), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), Historically Underutilized

Business Zone (HUBZone) small business, Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), and Women-Owned

Small Business (WOSB) concerns to participate as subcontractors consistent with efficient contract performance. Provide the following in support of narrative submissions (excluded from page limitation):

a. All firms shall submit small business subcontracting information associated with each project cited under the Criterion 1 – Firm’s Specialized Relevant Experience Factor in the format provided in

Attachment B, Small Business Subcontracting Record.

b. Firms representing as other than small businesses shall also provide copies of the most current

Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) associated with each project cited under the Criterion 1 –

Firm’s Specialized Relevant Experience Factor if a small business subcontracting plan was required by the contract. If such projects were completed under specific task orders, provide ISRs for the overall contract. For cited projects with state and local Government agencies, provide similar subcontracting performance reports if required by the contracts. When not specifically addressed in the ISR or similar report, firms shall provide explanations for all instances of failures to meet dollar or percentage goals in individual subcontracting plans.

Notes:

The Government reserves the right to consider achievements information on other recent, relevant projects from all available sources.

If the prime firm is a new joint venture, partnership or other entity consisting of more than one firm, provide achievements information for each individual business entity(ies) that will be responsible for managing the subcontracting program and clearly describe those responsibilities.

Failure to provide ISRs or any other requested information may negatively impact your evaluation.

(2) Small Business Participation and Commitment: All firms shall submit a small business participation and commitment strategy including all data elements shown in Attachment C, Small

Business Participation and Commitment Strategy.

a. Identify in terms of dollar value and percentage of the total acquisition the extent of work the firm will self-perform as the prime contractor. If submitting an offer as a joint venture, identify the percentage of work each member will be responsible for and indicate the size status of each member (e.g. small business, woman-owned small business, other than small business).

b. Include supplemental narratives (shall not exceed five (5) single-sided pages) to address other elements of the firm’s strategy such as binding agreements covering post award roles for execution of the contract and specific initiatives and tools that will be employed under the contract to enhance small businesses opportunities to both participate in this acquisition and build capabilities to support future

NAVFAC acquisitions.

c. The anticipated prime and first tier overall small business participation rate for this acquisition

(i.e. work to be performed by small businesses as the prime and/or subcontractors) is 20% of the contract value. Firms are encouraged to exceed this percentage and seek meaningful levels of participation in each of the small business socioeconomic programs listed in Attachment C consistent with efficient contract performance. Firms shall explain in their participation and commitment strategies how proposed participation rates were established. The small business participation and commitment strategy must be in agreement with any required small business subcontracting plan and will be made a part of the contract upon award.

Slated large business firms will be required to submit a Small Business subcontracting plan prior to the interview. The NAVFAC Subcontracting targets for FY23 and beyond are as follows:

Small Business – 40%

Small Disadvantaged Business – 5%

HUBZone Small Business – 3%

Women-Owned Small Business – 9%

Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business – 3%

SELECTION CRITERION (8): FIRM LOCATION.

Under Selection Criterion (8), firms will be evaluated on the locations of their office or offices that will be performing the work under this contract and demonstrated knowledge of the general geographic areas in which projects could be located. Evaluation of firms will include consideration of their location within the general geographic area of the anticipated projects, primarily NAVFAC Pacific AOR.

SELECTION CRITERION (8) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part I, Section H. Indicate the location of the office(s) within the NAVFAC Pacific AOR that will be performing the work including main offices, branch offices, and offices of team members/sub-consultants, and include description(s) of staffing and functions for each office. Describe the team’s knowledge of the primary geographic areas to be covered by this contract. Address ability of the firm to ensure timely response to requests for on-site support.

SELECTION CRITERION (9): VOLUME OF WORK.

Firms will be evaluated in accordance with Department of Defense (DoD) Federal Acquisition Regulation

Supplement (DFARS) Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) 236.602-1, from data extracted from the Federal Procurement Data System. Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by DoD within the past twelve months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified A-E firms including small, disadvantaged business firms, and firms that have not had prior DoD A-E contracts.

SELECTION CRITERION (9) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

Firms do not submit data for this selection criterion.

SF-330 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

All contractors are advised that registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Website at https://www.sam.gov.

The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest. The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates that design or prepare specifications for a construction contract cannot provide the construction services for the same contract. This includes concept design, which includes preparation of project programming documents (DD1391), facility siting studies, environmental assessments, or other activities that result in identification of project scope and cost. The prime firm and sub-consultants for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term.

Interviews may be scheduled with firms slated as the most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to clarify information contained in the SF330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired.

Completion of electronic annual representations and certifications are also mandatory prior to award of a contract. Refer to FAR 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications.

The contract will require that the selected A-E firm have e-mail and Internet access for routine exchange of correspondence. Fee proposals may be subject to an advisory audit performed by the Defense Contract

Audit Agency.

In accordance with the FAR 36.601-4(b) contracts for A-E services may only be awarded to firms permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering. Firms must submit proof that they are permitted by law as required by FAR 36.601-4(b). If a firm is in a jurisdiction that requires A-E firm registration, the firm must provide proof of registration. If a firm is in a jurisdiction that does not require A-E firm registration, the firm must provide proof eligibility to practice (e.g., a summary explaining eligibility under the laws of that jurisdiction). Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration.

In addition to the information provided in the SF330, provide the CAGE and DUNS number for each member of the proposed team. Joint Ventures (JVs), Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs), Limited

Liability Companies (LLCs), and Limited Companies (LTDs) shall submit the following additional documentation regarding their business entities:

https://www.sam.gov/

a. A copy of the JV, LLP, LLC, or LTD agreement. Failure to include the applicable agreement with the SF330 may result in the firm’s elimination from further evaluation.

b. A detailed statement outlining the following in terms of percentages where appropriate -

(1) The relationship of the team/partners/parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, profit distribution, or loss sharing.

(2) The management approach in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise, and control.

(3) The structure and decision-making responsibilities of the partners/parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of work.

(4) Identify (by name and title) the personnel having the authority to legally bind the partners/parties

(including authority to execute the contract documents).

c. A list of partners/parties, to include company name, DUNS and CAGE numbers, address, point of contact, e-mail address, phone number, and facsimile number.

A-E firms desiring to be considered for this contract must submit a completed Standard Form (SF) 330 package, A-E Qualifications. The printed format shall be in an 8-1/2 x 11 paper format, bound in a 3-ring binder, typed with a minimum 11-point font size or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables), and one-sided. Part I shall not exceed 200 single–sided 8.5 by 11 inch pages (the page limit does not include ISRs, certificates, PPQs, licenses, or the draft joint venture agreement, proof of A-E firm registration provided that these do not contain any substantive information submitted in response to the synopsis or intended to demonstrate the qualifications of the firm). Part I pages shall be numbered sequentially. Except for the Organization Chart, sheets larger than 8-1/2” X 11” including fold-out sheets will not be accepted. Part II, shall be submitted for each firm identified in Part I, Section C. Please include your DUNS and CAGE numbers in Block 30 of the SF-330. Any other information submitted such as company brochures, leaflets, etc., will not be considered.

A-E firms that meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit an SF-330 package that addresses each requirement within the selection criteria. The SF-330 package submitted in response to this announcement must include (1) original and two (2) paper copies, and one (1) CD of the completed SF330.

The delivery addresses for SF 330s are as follows:

(1) For SF 330s sent via United States Postal Services (USPS):

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Pacific

Code CON31:KJ (N62742-23-R-0004)

258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100

JBPHH, HI 96860-3134

(2) For SF 330s sent via courier service or hand-delivered:

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Pacific

Code CON31:KJ (N62742-23-R-0004)

4256 Radford Drive, Building 62

Honolulu, HI 96818-3296

Notifications will be sent via e-mail to the e-mail address identified in Part I, Section B, Block 8.

Firms responding to this announcement shall submit an SF-330 package by 2:00 P.M. Hawaii Standard

Time (HST) on 28 November 2022. Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1.

THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.

The main point of contact is Katie Johnson, Contract Specialist, at katie.johnson2@navy.mil. The alternative point of contact is Erik Torngren, Contracting Officer, at erik.torngren@navy.mil.

All questions should be submitted in writing to include solicitation number and forwarded via e-mail to katie.johnson2@navy.mil, no later than 15 days of the closing date. Questions submitted after this date may not be addressed by the Government due to time constraints.

If an SF 254/SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. As required above, provide verifiable evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering (e.g., state registration number).

All potential offerors are advised to check the SAM website https://www.sam.gov for information pertaining to this announcement. It is the offerors responsibility to check the SAM website periodically for any modifications to the announcement.

Electronic (E-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized.

https://www.sam.gov/