Tab_A3_QASP.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 11 KB Posted

Attached to
Research Support Services in support of the Naval Medical Research Unit Dayton (NAMRU-Dayton)
Solicitation number
N62645-16-R-0006
Issued by

About this file

QASP

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N62645-16-R-0006_Amendment_01.doc DOC document
N62645-16-R-0006.doc DOC document
Tab_A5_DD_Form_254_Research_Support_Services.doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Sheet1

TASK / DELIVERABLEPERFORMANCE STANDARDPERFORMANCE INDICATOR / ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE (ALP)METHOD OF SURVEILLANCEPERFORMANCE RATING
Compliance of products, services, documents, related deliverables, and overall quality of performance.Contract requirements met with few minor and no significant problems encountered.

Performance meets all technical and functional requirements in the PWS, and contains pertinent, useful, and informative data and information. Contractor's technical performance meets all contract requirements. Problems that are encountered are minor in nature, and are as follows: does not cause a delay in schedule; does not cause costs to increase; involves minimal effort to correct; and does not affect overall contractor performance.

All matters shall be resolved in a satisfactory and timely manner. 100 % inspection.

Are study reports complete and compliant with various government regulations? Assignment of performance rating and criteria:

Excellent: Performance meets and exceeds all contract requirements. Performance delivered with no required re-performance or rework; problems encountered are minor and resolved in a highly effective manner.

Acceptable: Performance and deliverables meet all contract requirements. Performance delivered with no re-performance or rework; problems encountered are minor and resolved in a satisfactory manner.

Unacceptable: Many contract requirements are not met. Re-performances of rework required. Substantial problems were encountered and were resolved in a less than satisfactory manner.

Timeliness of performance and services and product deliverables, including administrative aspects of performance. Contract requirements met with few minor and no significant problems encountered.

Performance meets all technical and functional requirements in the PWS, and contains pertinent, useful, and informative data and information. Contractor's technical performance meets all contract requirements. Problems that are encountered are minor in nature, and are as follows: does not cause a delay in schedule; does not cause costs to increase; involves minimal effort to correct; and does not affect overall contractor performance.

All matters shall be resolved in a satisfactory and timely manner. 100% inspection.

Is the contractor meeting established timeframes? Assignment of performance rating and criteria:

Excellent: Performance meets and exceeds all contract requirements. Performance delivered with no required re-performance or rework; problems encountered are minor and resolved in a highly effective manner.

Acceptable: Performance and deliverables meet all contract requirements. Performance delivered with no re-performance or rework; problems encountered are minor and resolved in a satisfactory manner.

Unacceptable: Many contract requirements are not met. Re-performances of rework required. Substantial problems were encountered and were resolved in a less than satisfactory manner.

Overall satisfaction Contract requirements met with few minor and no significant problems encountered.

Performance meets all technical and functional requirements in the PWS, and contains pertinent, useful, and informative data and information. Contractor's technical performance meets all contract requirements. Problems that are encountered are minor in nature, and are as follows: does not cause a delay in schedule; does not cause costs to increase; involves minimal effort to correct; and does not affect overall contractor performance.

All matters shall be resolved in a satisfactory and timely manner. Periodic inspection and customer input.

What is the government's overall satisfaction with the contractor? Assignment of performance rating and criteria:

Excellent: Performance meets and exceeds all contract requirements. Performance delivered with no required re-performance or rework; problems encountered are minor and resolved in a highly effective manner.

Acceptable: Performance and deliverables meet all contract requirements. Performance delivered with no re-performance or rework; problems encountered are minor and resolved in a satisfactory manner.

Unacceptable: Many contract requirements are not met. Re-performances of rework required. Substantial problems were encountered and were resolved in a less than satisfactory manner.

Sheet2

Sheet3

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .