RFI log -ACM MACC 26 Sept 2025.pdf
PDF 158 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6247325R3426
About this file
This document is a Request for Information (RFI) for a Definite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Unrestricted Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) for new construction, renovation, and repair of commercial and institutional facilities using Alternative Construction Methods (ACM). The solicitation (N62473-25-R-3426) covers government installations in California, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, and New Mexico, with a document date of 12 September 2025.
The RFI contains 10 clarification requests from the contractor, addressing topics such as subcontractor experience, project relevancy criteria, financial questionnaire submission requirements, and definitions of ACM vendors. Key clarifications include: Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) is accepted as an ACM method, the relevancy period for projects remains at 7 years with a minimum $15M construction cost, primary ACM vendors are not mandatory for Factor 1 submissions, and ACM vendors must be submitted for each project under Factor 2. The government's responses are mostly pending or provide direct clarifications to the contractor's questions, indicating an ongoing dialogue to refine the solicitation details.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFI # RFP Part # Chapter or
Section Sub-Section # CLARIFICATION REQUEST RFI reason from
KTR's Perspective
Comment [fill out if "Other" was chosen, specify reason(s)]
RFI Topic most closely relevant to:
Government Response
DATE
RECEIVED
DATE TO
KTR
Amendment
Number
1 Part 1 Factor 1 Technical Approach and Factor 2 Experience
Page 9, under Factor 1 Technical Approach, the RFP states to provide teaming agreement or letters of commitment "for any subcontractors that will be proposed as completing work."
However, under Factor 2 Experience, it states "The Offeror may NOT utilize experience of a subcontractor to demonstrate construction experience."
Given the specialty nature of the work, ACM, we suggest the Navy allows at least one (1) project from a subcontractor (modular for example) in Factor 2, as long as offerors provide a letter of commitment and demonstrate the subcontractor will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.
Conflicting Information
Contracting Pending
2 Part 1 Chapter-1
Factor 2 Exp states: The Offeror may NOT utilize experience of a subcontractor to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor unless the following information applies as a Small Business, etc.
However if the offeror is a Large Business can it can use ACM vendors as part of its project experience?
Intent needs clarification
Contracting Pending
TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE BIDDING KTR
SOLICITATION: N62473-25-R-3426
NDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY UNRESTRICTED MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION, AND REPAIR OF COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES USING ALTERNATIVE
CONSTRUCTION METHODS (ACM) AT VARIOUS GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS LOCATED IN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, NEVADA, UTAH, COLORADO, AND NEW MEXICO
DOCUMENT DATE: 12 SEPT 2025
TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE GOV'T
Section Sub-Section # CLARIFICATION REQUEST RFI reason from
KTR's Perspective
Comment [fill out if "Other" was chosen, specify reason(s)]
RFI Topic most closely relevant to:
Government Response
DATE
RECEIVED
DATE TO
KTR
Amendment
Number
TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE BIDDING KTR
SOLICITATION: N62473-25-R-3426
NDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY UNRESTRICTED MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION, AND REPAIR OF COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES USING ALTERNATIVE
CONSTRUCTION METHODS (ACM) AT VARIOUS GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS LOCATED IN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, NEVADA, UTAH, COLORADO, AND NEW MEXICO
DOCUMENT DATE: 12 SEPT 2025
TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE GOV'T
Section 00 21 00, Proposal Submission Requirements, para 4. Financial Questionnaire and the Financial Questionnaire Form. The solicitation and Form require the Financial Questionnaire “to be completed and submitted by financial institution”. Our financial institution has a policy that precludes them from completing a client/ owner’s form or questionnaire nor in communicating with the client/owner by email or other means.
a. As permitted on other recent NAVFAC SW RFPs (e.g., N6247323R1214; IDIQ MACC for Demolition Projects at Hunters Point Naval Shipyard), please revise the instructions in the RFP and the Financial Questionnaire Form to allow the Offeror to submit the Financial Questionnaire to the Navy directly when signed by an authorized representative of the Offeror and supported by a letter from the Offeror's financial institution on its own letterhead.
b. Please confirm the Offeror may, in lieu of the financial institution, submit the completed Financial Questionnaire package via email by the due date of Phase One.
Section 00 21 00, Proposal Submission Requirements, para 4 has been revised.
Section Sub-Section # CLARIFICATION REQUEST RFI reason from
KTR's Perspective
Comment [fill out if "Other" was chosen, specify reason(s)]
RFI Topic most closely relevant to:
Government Response
DATE
RECEIVED
DATE TO
KTR
Amendment
Number
TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE BIDDING KTR
SOLICITATION: N62473-25-R-3426
NDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY UNRESTRICTED MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION, AND REPAIR OF COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES USING ALTERNATIVE
CONSTRUCTION METHODS (ACM) AT VARIOUS GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS LOCATED IN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, NEVADA, UTAH, COLORADO, AND NEW MEXICO
DOCUMENT DATE: 12 SEPT 2025
TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE GOV'T
Section 00 21 00 – Instructions. The term ‘ACM Vendor’ is used in multiple sections of the solicitation (BASIS OF AWARD AND EVALUATION FACTORS; 2. DEFINITIONS and
4. EVALUATION FACTORS) and in Exhibit B, item 8. The term is not defined.
a. Please confirm the term ‘ACM vendor’ is in fact synonymous with the term ‘subcontractor,’ which is used in the definition for CONTRACTOR TEAMING ARRANGEMENT and is also a defined option in the Offeror’s Team Consent Form
1. The definition of an ACM Vendor is: A subcontractor or supplier who's primary role is the fabrication, assembly and/or installation of the ACM method for a project.
2. An ACM Vendor is considered a major subcontractor/teaming partner.
The Offeror shall submit an Offeror's Team Consent Form for the ACM Vendor(s) identified in their proposal.
ACM is defined as Alternative Construction Methods in the solicitation title and throughout the RFP, except in two locations, listed below.
a. SF1442 item 10, Project Title. Please revise Alternative Contracting Methods (ACM) MACC to Alternative Construction Methods
(ACM) MACC.
b. Section 00 73 01, item 5. DESCRIPTION OF WORK, first para. Please revise the description of the work from Alternative Contracting Methods (ACM) to Alternative Construction Methods (ACM).
a. SF1442 project title has been corrected.
b. Section 00 73 01, Item 5. Description of Work has been corrected.
Section Sub-Section # CLARIFICATION REQUEST RFI reason from
KTR's Perspective
Comment [fill out if "Other" was chosen, specify reason(s)]
RFI Topic most closely relevant to:
Government Response
DATE
RECEIVED
DATE TO
KTR
Amendment
Number
TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE BIDDING KTR
SOLICITATION: N62473-25-R-3426
NDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY UNRESTRICTED MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION, AND REPAIR OF COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES USING ALTERNATIVE
CONSTRUCTION METHODS (ACM) AT VARIOUS GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS LOCATED IN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, NEVADA, UTAH, COLORADO, AND NEW MEXICO
DOCUMENT DATE: 12 SEPT 2025
TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE GOV'T
We note that prior notices to industry Cross Laminated Timber was noted as an ACM methodology.
Further in recent testimony NAVFAC Chief Engineer stated “In Congressional testimony, Hamilton said the new facility will use a hybrid mass timber exterior envelope consisting of cross-laminated walls and diaphragms. "DOD has expressly acknowledged the applicability of CLT with the creation of a guide specification," Hamilton said. "As the CLT construction industry matures, CLT may prove more competitive and could be utilized more broadly in DOD construction."
Is CLT an ACM NAVFAC will accept? If so, will you expand the construction projects to six?
Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) is an acceptable form of ACM.
The number of construction projects allowed for Factor 2, Experience will remain unchanged with a maximum of five (5) projects.
7 Part 1
Section 01 20 00 Phase 1 FACTOR 2 states relevancy criteria for ACM projects to be within the last seven years and over $15M
USD.
Due to the infrequency of relevant projects in the market truly using ACM, we request that the relevancy period is extended to 15 years.
The relevancy period will remain unchanged. Relevant projects shall be 100% complete (see definition) within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.
Section Sub-Section # CLARIFICATION REQUEST RFI reason from
KTR's Perspective
Comment [fill out if "Other" was chosen, specify reason(s)]
RFI Topic most closely relevant to:
Government Response
DATE
RECEIVED
DATE TO
KTR
Amendment
Number
TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE BIDDING KTR
SOLICITATION: N62473-25-R-3426
NDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY UNRESTRICTED MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION, AND REPAIR OF COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES USING ALTERNATIVE
CONSTRUCTION METHODS (ACM) AT VARIOUS GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS LOCATED IN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, NEVADA, UTAH, COLORADO, AND NEW MEXICO
DOCUMENT DATE: 12 SEPT 2025
TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE GOV'T
Section 01 20 00 Phase 1 FACTOR 2 states relevancy criteria for ACM projects to be within the last seven years and over $15M
USD.
Due to the fact that ACM projects as defined in the governments part as "..modular components, offsite prefabricated construction, tension fabric structures, and pre-engineered metal or fiber reinforced panel buildings.." typically result in lower overall construction costs, we request the relevancy threshold lowered to $10M USD
The relevancy threshold will remain unchanged. Relevant projects shall have a minimum construction cost of $15 million.
9 Part 1 Chapter-1 Factor 1
Factor 1 requires contractors to provide their "primary ACM vendor(s)". Please confirm this is not mandatory for Offerors who are not teaming with ACM vendors at the MAC level and/or offering that ACM vendor's experience as a JV or designer under Factor 2.
Given the multiple types of ACM available, the different types of projects anticipated under this MAC, the number of ACM vendors, and the geographical coverage of this MAC, many offerors will choose ACM vendors as subcontractors at the task order level.
Intent needs clarification
Contracting
You may provide primary ACM vendor for Factor 1, if applicable to your Team Composition and Management, however, it is not required. ACM vendor(s) are required to be submitted for each project under Factor 2.
Section Sub-Section # CLARIFICATION REQUEST RFI reason from
KTR's Perspective
Comment [fill out if "Other" was chosen, specify reason(s)]
RFI Topic most closely relevant to:
Government Response
DATE
RECEIVED
DATE TO
KTR
Amendment
Number
TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE BIDDING KTR
SOLICITATION: N62473-25-R-3426
NDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY UNRESTRICTED MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION, AND REPAIR OF COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES USING ALTERNATIVE
CONSTRUCTION METHODS (ACM) AT VARIOUS GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS LOCATED IN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, NEVADA, UTAH, COLORADO, AND NEW MEXICO
DOCUMENT DATE: 12 SEPT 2025
TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE GOV'T
10 Part 1 Chapter-1 Section 00 21 00 - Instructions
PER the PIEE Solicitation page for this solicitation (N62473-25-R-3426), there is a box to checked stating that, "A Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) must be attached to offer submissions in accordance with FAR Clause 52.223-3. There is no reference to this requirement in the Solicitation. Is the MSDS required to be submitted?
Intent needs clarification
Other/Unsure That box is unchecked, therefore, a Material Safety Data Sheet is not required.
Section Sub-Section # CLARIFICATION REQUEST RFI reason from
KTR's Perspective
Comment [fill out if "Other" was chosen, specify reason(s)]
RFI Topic most closely relevant to:
Government Response
DATE
RECEIVED
DATE TO
KTR
Amendment
Number
TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE BIDDING KTR
SOLICITATION: N62473-25-R-3426
NDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY UNRESTRICTED MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION, AND REPAIR OF COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES USING ALTERNATIVE
CONSTRUCTION METHODS (ACM) AT VARIOUS GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS LOCATED IN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, NEVADA, UTAH, COLORADO, AND NEW MEXICO
DOCUMENT DATE: 12 SEPT 2025
TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE GOV'T
Section Sub-Section # CLARIFICATION REQUEST RFI reason from
KTR's Perspective
Comment [fill out if "Other" was chosen, specify reason(s)]
RFI Topic most closely relevant to:
Government Response
DATE
RECEIVED
DATE TO
KTR
Amendment
Number
TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE BIDDING KTR
SOLICITATION: N62473-25-R-3426
NDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY UNRESTRICTED MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION, AND REPAIR OF COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES USING ALTERNATIVE
CONSTRUCTION METHODS (ACM) AT VARIOUS GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS LOCATED IN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, NEVADA, UTAH, COLORADO, AND NEW MEXICO
DOCUMENT DATE: 12 SEPT 2025
TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE GOV'T
RFI (pre-award) Form_For KTR
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .