Amendment_0001_Q892_Q964.pdf

ACQR4813894

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACT Q-892 AND Q-964 SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES, SEA, AIR, AND LAND (SEAL) TEAM OPERATIONS FACILITIES FOR SEAL TEAMS ONE AND THREE AT THE NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COASTAL CAMPUS, CORONADO, CALIFORNIA

The purpose of this amendment is to respond to Request for Information (RFI).

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 16-Nov-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247317R0824

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

07-Nov-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

16-Nov-2017

CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHWEST

COASTAL IPT CODE ROPMA

NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO

2730 MCKEAN ST BLDG 291

SAN DIEGO CA 92136

N62473 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247317R0824

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0001

AMENDMENT 0001

Subj: SOLICITATION N62473-17-R-0824, DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACT Q-892 AND Q-964 SPECIAL

OPERATIONS FORCES, SEA, AIR, AND LAND (SEAL) TEAM OPERATIONS FACILITIES

FOR SEAL TEAMS ONE AND THREE AT THE NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COASTAL

CAMPUS, CORONADO, CALIFORNIA

16 November 2017

1. The following are responses to Request for Information (RFIs):

Contractor RFI #1: Factor 2 - Experience, (a) Solicitation Requirements, (1) Construction Experience, first paragraph, page 14 of 60. As a prime contractor with project experience ranging from $10 million to $500 million, we understand the importance of qualifying prime contractors by similar/large magnitude past performance. We also understand the extreme importance of ensuring proper SCIF/SAPF experience on this project. Our concern is that the government might not end up with the right amount of expertise on the project because the RFP currently qualifies sufficient SCIF/SAPF experience by associating that specific experience to a project magnitude dollar value of $40 Million or more as opposed to actual magnitude of experience inside the classified Program construction sector.

Would it be acceptable to meet the qualifications of this project if the prime contractor possessed successful past performance experience in large/similar magnitude dollar value projects and had formal teaming partner who specializes in SCIF/SAPF construction on projects under $40 Million?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Please see the RFP, SF1442, as stated in paragraph 4. PHASE 1 Basis of Evaluation/Submission Requirements/Criteria Description, pages 14 thru 16.

Contractor RFI #2: Attachments A-M. Will NAVFAC please provide Attachments A-M in Microsoft Word format for ease of completion?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Attachments A thru M in Microsoft Word format has been uploaded in NECO.

Contractor RFI #3: SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: The Proposal Submission Requirements for Factor 1 require Offerors to submit a “technical approach narrative” and Organization Chart, not to exceed 2 pages (combined). The RFP also includes Exhibit “A” - Offeror Team Composition and Management, but there is no mention of this Exhibit in the Submission requirements for Factor 1 (or any other Factor). Exhibit “A” also states a 2-page limit. Is Exhibit “A” required? Under which Factor shall it be submitted? For the page limits, is the requirement for a 1-page narrative, plus a 1-page Organization Chart, plus the 2-page Exhibit “A”? [Note: This form is titled an “Exhibit” while all other forms are called an “Attachment”.]

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Exhibit “A” is to be used for Factor 1, Technical Approach. Exhibit “A” does not count toward the two (2) single-sided page limit. The (2) single-sided pages need to include the technical approach narrative and organizational chart, but the organizational chart does not need to take up one whole page.

N6247317R0824

Contractor RFI #4: SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: The Proposal Submission Requirements for Factor 1 require Offerors to submit a “technical approach narrative” and Organization Chart, not to exceed 2 pages (combined). In addition to the narrative, Factor 1 requires Offerors to “submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team”. The RFP also includes Attachment B - Offeror’s Team Consent Form, but there is no mention of this Attachment in the Submission requirements for Factor 1 (or any other Factor). Is Attachment B required? Is Attachment B required instead of or in addition to the signed agreement?

Under which Factor shall it be submitted? If part of Factor 1, please confirm that Attachment B does not count against the 2-page limit.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Attachment B is required for Factor 3, Past Performance if the consenting entity’s past performance is used. The signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team are required for team members included in Part 1, Technical Approach.

Contractor RFI #5: Section 00100 Instruction to Offerors, 2. Proposal Submission Requirements "A total of one (1) original and three (3) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy on CD of the complete Phase I proposal..."

Will the government accept a "thumb drive" as an acceptable electronic copy of the Phase I proposal in lieu of a CD? "Burning" CD's is an old technology not commonly used anymore and cumbersome to make.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Provide CD in accordance with the RFP. Government computers cannot read thumb drives due to cybersecurity restrictions.

Contractor RFI #6: SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: The Proposal Submission Requirements for Factor 2 Experience defines relevant experience to include projects with “secure compartment information facilities (SCIF), or open secure storage (OSS) facilities with a minimum cost of $40,000,000”. While the SCIF component is both important and relevant to this solicitation, past facilities with SCIF/OSS are not all that common, and SCIF/OSS facilities valued at more than $40,000,000 are uncommon. As currently stated, the word “or” is used in the requirement and therefore Offerors are not required to submit any projects demonstrating SCIF/OSS Experience.

Please consider revising the Factor 2 submission requirement to include the following addition: “Submit at least one (1) construction project demonstrating experience with secure compartment information facilities (SCIF) or open secure storage (OSS). SCIF/OSS facilities must have a minimum value of $30,000,000.” This change assures the Government that Offeror teams have this critical experience.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Please see response to RFI #1. No change to Factor 2.

ALL OTHER PARAGRAPHS, PROVISIONS, AND CONDITIONS TO SOLICITATION N62473-17-R-

0824, REMAIN UNCHANGED. THE OFFEROR MUST ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF ALL

AMENDEMENTS.

(End of Summary of Changes)