Pre-Proposal Inquiry Response Matrix Amend 0002.pdf

Pre-Proposal Inquiry Response Matrix for Sol. N62470-20-R-1004 Amendment 0002

Industry Submitted Information ID # RFP Document Section Subsection Page # Information Request (Question) Government Response

1 Specification 2.3 2.3.2 37

The Specifications States "The existing wire identification convention shall not be re-used unless identical to the new system" Question, if a new wire identification system is used would existing field wiring need to be re-labeled to match the new wiring convention? would this include all point where the existing wire terminates in junction boxes, slip rings and motor/brake conduit boxes?

Answer to 1st question - Yes Answer to 2nd question - Yes

2 Specification 2.3 2.3.3 38

Gantry Conduit Replacment. Cranes DC-38, DC-39, DC-42 and P-81 have three undersized LB's associated with the Shore Power Conduit. There are currently 2 outside and 1 at the slip ring on these 4 cranes. Question, Does the Government wish to have all LB's replaced?

Yes

3 Specification 2.3 2.3.2 37

Wiring System. "terminal blocks shall not be reused" Question, Does this apply to only the terminal blocks were wires are being replaced or re-landed? Or all of the terminal blocks on the crane?

Answer to 1st question - Yes Answer to 2nd question - No

4 Specification 2.3 2.3.21 65

Specification calls out eight laptops to be provideded. Is the intent to include one laptop with each crane upgrade or are we to supply all laptops on the seed project.

Laptops to be provided with each crane upgrade (one for each Norfolk Naval Shipyard cranes, two for Puget Crane 81).

5 Specification 1.4 SD-02.E 11

It was mentioned that the Navy wants all wiring on both sides of terminal block locations to match. If the schematic drawings are creted using the exisitng field wire numbers, is this OK?

Is it also OK to assume that any wiring that runs between two devices and does not land on a terminal block can have its own unique wire number. i.e. a power supply wire feeding another device on the panel.

Answer to 1st question - Yes Answer to 2nd question - Yes

6 RFP 252.222-7000 28

paragraph a infers contractor shall employ individuals who are residents of Bremerton, WA & Portsmouth VA. For that portion of the work? We do not employ any residents from those specific areas.

DFARs 252.222-7000 will be deleted from the solicitation via Amendment 00002.

7 RFP 52.211-11 a 9 of 51

Liquidated damages at 7076.00 per day, seems excessive, Key suppliers (Sole Sourced) will not accept any LD's without a cap on project. Will Government consider reduced LD's amount with a 5% max cap?

The LD rate will be reduced to $2,000 per day per Amendment 00002, and there will not be a cap.

8 Specification SD-06.5 19 of 76

Can the Government provide a complete list of parts that would be identified as "support the hook loads" that would need to be magnetic particle inspected?

NDT is required for all new cast steel components that support hook loads. If there are specific components for which this requirement is unclear, please submit a new PPI.

9 Specification 2.3.3 38 of 76

All outdoor conduit located on primary and secondary equalizers shall be replaced with new SOOW type cable, except for lighting, main shore power, phone and receptacles. Does that mean the existing conduit and wire remains(for lighting, main shore power, phone and receptacles) or those runs need to be replaced with new wire and conduit?

Lighting, main shore power, phone and receptacle wires and conduit remain.