Amendment_1.pdf
PDF 46 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N62470-19-R-4016
About this file
This solicitation seeks proposals for an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity architect-engineer contract to provide environmental engineering support services to the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic area of responsibility. Services include program management, technical support, and environmental restoration for sites impacted by CERCLA, RCRA, munitions response, and other programs. The contract ceiling is $480 million over a one-year base period and four one-year options. Proposals are due by September 9, 2019 and will be evaluated on specialized experience with Navy and Marine Corps environmental projects, professional qualifications of key personnel, past performance, safety record, program management and quality control approach. The incumbent is CH2M Hill, Inc. under contract N62470-16-D-9000. This is a full and open competition with proposals evaluated based on published criteria to select the most highly qualified firm.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Commerical_Vehicle_and_Truck_Inspection_Procedures.pdf | ||
| Small_Bus_Subcontracting_Plan_template.doc | DOC document | |
| PPQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| SF330_rev_08-2016.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N62470-19-R-4016 Amendment 1 This Amendment is being issued to amend the SF330 Submission Requirements and address questions received in response to the Solicitation.
The SF330 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS are amended as follows:
From:
SF330 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Architect-Engineer firms desiring to be considered for this contract must respond by submitting a completed SF-330 package. The SF-330 shall be typed, one sided, at least 11-point Times New Roman font or larger. Part I shall not exceed 70 single-sided 8.5 by 11 inch pages (two 11 by 17 inch foldout sheets may be substituted for 8.5 by 11 sheets). The page limit does not include ISRs, certificates, PPQs, licenses, or the draft subcontracting plan, as required by the Small Business Subcontracting criterion, nor does the page limit include cover sheets, dividers, or other requested documentation (e.g., joint venture agreement, proof of AE firm registration) provided that these do not contain any substantive information submitted in response to the synopsis or intended to demonstrate the qualifications of the firm. Firms are requested to number the pages that are included in the overall page limit consecutively. Please include your and all team members’ DUNS, CAGE, and TIN numbers in Block 30 of the SF-330.
To:
SF330 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Architect-Engineer firms desiring to be considered for this contract must respond by submitting a completed SF-330 package. The SF-330 shall be typed, one sided, at least 11-point Times New Roman font or larger using any of the following fonts/font sizes: Times New Roman 11 point or larger, Arial 11 point or larger, Arial Narrow 12 point or larger. Font limitations do not apply to page headers and footers. Part I shall not exceed 70 single-sided 8.5 by 11 inch pages (two 11 by 17 inch foldout sheets may be substituted for two of the 8.5 by 11 sheets). The page limit does not include ISRs, certificates, PPQs, licenses, or the draft subcontracting plan, as required by the Small Business Subcontracting criterion, nor does the page limit include cover sheets, dividers, or other requested documentation (e.g., joint venture agreement, proof of AE firm registration, statement addressing the avoidance of conflicts of interest) provided that these do not contain any substantive information submitted in response to the synopsis or intended to demonstrate the qualifications of the firm. Firms are requested to number the pages that are included in the overall page limit consecutively. Please include your and all team members’ DUNS, CAGE, and TIN numbers in Block 30 of the SF-330.
Questions and Answers:
Q1. Is an incumbent contract or contractor associated to the requirement? If any, please provide the contractor's name and contract number.
A1. Yes. The incumbent contractor is Ch2m Hill, Inc., contract number N62470-16-D-9000.
Q2. May offerors use Arial or other sans serif font for graphics?
A2. Yes. Please see revised SF330 Submission Requirements above. Arial 11 point or larger or Arial Narrow 12 point or larger may be used.
Q3. May offerors use smaller than 11-point font for graphics?
A3. No. Please use 11 point font or larger in all parts of the submission with the exception of page headers and footers which are not included in the font limitations.
Q4. Criterion 3 – Past Performance. When submitting CPARS, is it acceptable for offerors to submit only the interim and final reports that are currently in the PPIRS database?
A4. No. In accordance with the Submission Requirements for Criterion 3 - Past Performance, firms shall submit all completed CPARS, including all interim evaluations, for each example project listed under Criterion 1.
Q5. Avoidance of Conflicts of Interest, Item C. Where in the submittal should offerors include the statement describing relevant facts concerning past, present, or currently planned interest? Will NAVFAC confirm this statement is considered “other requested documentation” and is therefore not included in the page count?
A5. Statements addressing the avoidance of conflicts of interest may be included as an attachment in the SF330 package and as noted in the revised SF330 Submission Requirements above, are not included in the page limit.
Q6. Criterion 8 – Volume of Work. Please confirm that offerors are not to provide any data in Section H related to Volume of Work.
A6. Correct. Firms do not submit data for Criterion 8—Volume of Work
Q7. Criterion 3 – Past Performance. If the offeror is providing a project performed as a JV partner, should the offeror submit CPARS only for the specific task orders the firm worked on?
A7. No. In accordance with the Submission Requirements for Criterion 3 - Past Performance, firms shall submit all completed CPARS, including all interim evaluations, for each example project listed under Criterion 1. If an IDIQ contract is submitted as a project, please submit all CPARS evaluations for all task orders under the IDIQ.
Q8. For the proof the firm is permitted by law to practice architecture or engineering, please confirm offerors are to provide proof for the states listed in the Solicitation, as well as for the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Is proof required for any states or territories that are not named in the Solicitation?
A8. Please provide proof the firm is permitted by law to practice architecture or engineering (i.e. state registration number, licensing information, etc.) for all of the states and territories the firm is permitted by law to practice architecture or engineering in. Please include a brief explanation of the firm’s licensing for states or territories listed in the solicitation that do not register firms.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .