Amendment_0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 3

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

0003 01-NOV-2013

6. ISSUED BY Code N62470 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6.) Code

Commander NAVFAC Atlantic Navy Crane Center

Norfolk Naval Shipyard

Building 491

Portsmouth, Virginia 23709-5000

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

N62470-13-R-4022

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) 27-SEP-2013

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended is not extended . Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14. ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATION CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103 (b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER: (specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return 1 copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

NAVFAC ATLANTIC SOLICITATION N62470-13-R-4022 – ONE NEW 15 TON GPS OVERHEAD ELECTRIC TRAVELING

CRANE, NAVAL AIR WEAPONS CENTER WEAPONS DIVISION, MICHELSON LAB, CHINA LAKE, CA

This amendment is issued to revise the specification, respond to inquiries, incorporate a new Price Proposal Sheet, and add Appendix J.

The date for receipt of proposals is extended to November 12, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. (ET)

SEE CONTINUATION PAGE AND ATTACHED

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR (Same as Item 8)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV.10-83) 0224-3(10-90)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA

FAR (49 CFR) 53.243

N62470-13-R-4022 Amendment 0003

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

1.3.6 Crane Removal

Following this paragraph, add this new paragraph:

“1.3.7 Runway Rail Realignment

The existing survey shows that the current runway does not meet the requirements of the standard (CMAA Specification 70, Table 1.4.2 - 1). The Contractor shall realign runway rails to within the tolerances listed in CMAA Specification 70, Table 1.4.2 – 1. Following realignment, perform a runway rail survey, and submit survey data and report showing final alignment is within specification. The nominal span of the runway may be adjusted to provide the best fit to the existing alignment, and minimize the amount of rail adjustment needed. The runway rail survey conducted by the activity is in Appendix J.”

1.4 Submittals

SD-07.3 Crane Runway Rail

Delete this submittal item in its entirety and replace with the following:

“SD-07.3 Crane Runway Rail Survey and Report

Following runway rail realignment, the contractor shall submit a survey report which includes the runway rail survey data, showing that the runway has been aligned to the tolerances provided by this contract. The contractor shall provide a certificate stating that the newly aligned runway is suitable for the new crane to operate on without any restrictions.”

Appendix J

Runway Rail Survey and Report

A runway rail survey and report performed by the Activity is included in Appendix J, and accompanies this Amendment.

Amendment 0003

RESPONSE TO INQUIRIES

1. Where is the door located to access the bay?

Answer: The door is on the West end of the building, leading straight to the bay, but not necessary at center of the bay.

2. What is the size of the door? Any special supports needed to cross the door?

Answer: Door is about 11'-8" wide x 17' high. The floor inside the door is concrete on grade, the contractor will need to evaluate the need for additional support to prevent damage to the facility based on their intended equipment and loadings.

3. Dwg IR14486 Is the spacing between the runway supports continuous or are there columns? 1'-0" is shown but is that true for the full length of runway?

Answer: The rail support corbels are at each column. The column spacing is about 20' typically. Column spacing at the ends are slightly less. The walls between the columns are about 54' apart. In other words each columns extend into the space by about 18" excluding the corbel.

(End Summary of Changes)

November 1, 2013

ATTACHMENT 1

PRICE PROPOSAL FORM (Rev. 01)

NAVFAC SOLICITATION N62470-13-R-4022

Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices

BASE PRICE

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 15 TON OET CRANE 1 EA $ $

Design, fabricate, assemble, deliver, install, inspect and field test one 15 Ton double girder, radio controlled, overhead electric traveling crane and remove existing crane in the Machine Shop of the Michelson Laboratory at Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, China Lake, CA, in accordance with the drawings and specifications.

Upon acceptance of the crane, 3% of CLIN 0001 will be withheld until completion of the one year warranty period.

TOTAL OF CLIN 0001 $

0002 RUNWAY RAIL RE-ALIGNMENT 1 EA $ $

Analyze provided runway rail survey data (Appendix J), determine the appropriate corrections to meet CMAA 70 alignment criteria, and provide survey of aligned rails in the Machine Shop of the Michelson Laboratory at Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, China Lake, CA, in accordance with the specifications.

TOTAL OF CLIN 0002 $

TOTAL PRICE FOR THE SUM OF ITEMS 0001 and 0002: $

1.2 CONTRACT LINE ITEM NOTES

a. At time of award, separate CLINs will be created for the 3% withholding from CLIN 0001for warranty period performance. In the event there is a difference between a unit price and the extended total, the unit price will be held to be the intended offer. If the offeror shows only the total price, but fails to enter a unit price, the total divided by the estimated quantity will be held to the intended unit price.

b. The Government may reject an offer as non-responsive if it is materially unbalanced as to prices for the basic requirement. An offer is unbalanced when it is based on prices significantly less than cost for some work and prices which are significantly higher for other work.

November 1, 2013

AMENDMENTS ACKNOWLEDGED:

Amendment No. Date Amendment No. Date

Offeror:

Address:

Phone:

Fax & email

Signature

Date:

APPENDIX J

Runway Rail Survey

ATTACHMENT 1

CHINA LAKE

KONECRANES RAIL Q

GEOMETRIC ANALYSIS - RUNWAY

CRS RUNWAY REPORT

Steve Baker 9/20/2013 1:48:27 PM KC Trail 1.13.1

This document and the information contained herein, is the exclusive property of Konecranes Plc and represents a non-public, confidential and proprietary trade secret that may not be reproduced, disclosed to third parties, altered or otherwise employed in any manner whatsoever without the express written consent of Konecranes Plc. Copyright © (2007) Konecranes Plc. All rights reserved.

GEOMETRIC ANALYSIS - RUNWAY

Measured runway:

Type:

Length: 393.7 ft Span: 49'-0" Rail to rail H: 0 in Manufacturer of runway:

Year of installation: 1946 Date of earlier measurement: None Date of inspection: 9/11/2013 12:00:00 AM

1 GENERAL

The condition of the runway strongly influences how well a crane moves on its rails, and also affects the usability and lifetime of the travelling machinery units. The CRS Runway Analysis checks that the permitted geometrical tolerances are met, by measuring them and by visually inspecting the rails and their fixings. The method and measuring devices of the CRS Runway Analysis and Konecranes’s requirements for the analysis are described in detail in the corresponding CRS instructions.

A visual and optical inspection was conducted on the crane runway, which is used by cranes 402627. Only the part of the runway was measured at this time, because it is in heavier use and the given time was too short to measure the whole runway. The measured section was

358.3 ft in length, which is approximately 91% of the length of the whole runway. The visual inspection, however, was conducted on the whole runway. The distances between the measuring points were about 119 in. The measured values were compared to tolerances defined in CMAA Specification 70, Table 1.4.2 - 1. The findings of the visual inspection were compared to the installation drawings and to Konecranes’s requirements.

The inspection was made by: Steve Baker

Description:

The runway rail type is ‘60 lb’. The rails inspected were 1 (NORTH) and 2 (SOUTH), as shown in Fig. 1.

This document and the information contained herein, is the exclusive property of Konecranes Plc and represents a non-public, confidential and proprietary trade secret that may not be reproduced, disclosed to third parties, altered or otherwise employed in any manner whatsoever without the express written consent of Konecranes Plc. Copyright © (2007)

Fig. 1. Geometry of the runway and the measuring points.

Locations of the runway columns:

Rail 1 under the measure point 1001 (H24) Rail 1 under the measure point 1003 (H23) Rail 1 under the measure point 1005 (H22) Rail 1 under the measure point 1007 (H21) Rail 1 under the measure point 1009 (H20) Rail 1 under the measure point 1011 (H19) Rail 1 under the measure point 1013 (H18) Rail 1 under the measure point 1015 (H17) Rail 1 under the measure point 1017 (H16) Rail 1 under the measure point 1019 (H15) Rail 1 under the measure point 1021 (H14) Rail 1 under the measure point 1023 (H13) Rail 1 under the measure point 1025 (H12) Rail 1 under the measure point 1027 (H11) Rail 1 under the measure point 1029 (H10) Rail 1 under the measure point 1031 (H9) Rail 1 under the measure point 1033 (H8) Rail 1 under the measure point 1035 (H7) Rail 1 under the measure point 1037 (H6)

Rail 2 under the measure point 2001 (F24) Rail 2 under the measure point 2003 (F23) Rail 2 under the measure point 2005 (F22) Rail 2 under the measure point 2007 (F21) Rail 2 under the measure point 2009 (F20) Rail 2 under the measure point 2011 (F19) Rail 2 under the measure point 2013 (F18) Rail 2 under the measure point 2015 (F17) Rail 2 under the measure point 2017 (F16) Rail 2 under the measure point 2019 (F15) Rail 2 under the measure point 2021 (F14) Rail 2 under the measure point 2023 (F13) Rail 2 under the measure point 2025 (F12) Rail 2 under the measure point 2027 (F11) Rail 2 under the measure point 2029 (F10) Rail 2 under the measure point 2031 (F9) Rail 2 under the measure point 2033 (F8) Rail 2 under the measure point 2035 (F7) Rail 2 under the measure point 2037 (F6)

This document and the information contained herein, is the exclusive property of Konecranes Plc and represents a non-public, confidential and proprietary trade secret that may not be reproduced, disclosed to third parties, altered or otherwise employed in any manner whatsoever without the express written consent of Konecranes Plc. Copyright © (2007) Konecranes Plc. All rights reserved.

2 RESULTS

2.1 Geometry

Geometry of the runway is calculated by using the measuring points. Geometry is analysed and the runway span, straightness, elevation and rail to rail elevation are compared to the allowed values.

2.1.1 Span

Span difference values are given in Table 1. According to the selected standard it is required that the measured runway span compared to the nominal span (588 in) does not differ more than ±0.189 in.

The maximum allowed span deviation (±0.189 in) is exceeded in 34 of the measured points.

The biggest measured span deviation is 0.73 in at the measure point 1017 on the rail 1. This is 0.54 in outside the allowed tolerance.

Table 1 Span difference values (from the measure points on rail 1)

Measure Point

Name of the Support

Measured Span

Difference to nominal span

Outside Tolerance

1001 H24 588.30 in 0.30 in 0.11 in 1002 588.38 in 0.38 in 0.19 in 1003 H23 588.27 in 0.27 in 0.09 in 1004 588.40 in 0.40 in 0.21 in 1005 H22 588.48 in 0.48 in 0.29 in 1006 588.36 in 0.36 in 0.17 in 1007 H21 588.58 in 0.58 in 0.39 in 1008 588.62 in 0.62 in 0.43 in 1009 H20 588.58 in 0.58 in 0.39 in 1010 588.69 in 0.69 in 0.50 in 1011 H19 588.72 in 0.72 in 0.53 in 1012 588.63 in 0.63 in 0.44 in 1013 H18 588.53 in 0.53 in 0.35 in 1014 588.51 in 0.51 in 0.32 in 1015 H17 588.59 in 0.59 in 0.40 in 1016 588.58 in 0.58 in 0.39 in 1017 H16 588.73 in 0.73 in 0.54 in 1018 588.56 in 0.56 in 0.38 in 1019 H15 588.44 in 0.44 in 0.25 in 1020 588.23 in 0.23 in 0.04 in 1021 H14 588.47 in 0.47 in 0.28 in 1022 588.36 in 0.36 in 0.17 in 1023 H13 588.06 in 0.06 in 0 in 1024 588.42 in 0.42 in 0.23 in 1025 H12 588.47 in 0.47 in 0.28 in 1026 588.54 in 0.54 in 0.35 in 1027 H11 588.51 in 0.51 in 0.32 in

This document and the information contained herein, is the exclusive property of Konecranes Plc and represents a non-public, confidential and proprietary trade secret that may not be reproduced, disclosed to third parties, altered or otherwise employed in any manner whatsoever without the express written consent of Konecranes Plc. Copyright © (2007) Konecranes Plc. All rights reserved.

1028 588.55 in 0.55 in 0.36 in 1029 H10 588.68 in 0.68 in 0.49 in 1030 588.69 in 0.69 in 0.50 in 1031 H9 588.66 in 0.66 in 0.47 in 1032 588.61 in 0.61 in 0.42 in 1033 H8 588.62 in 0.62 in 0.43 in 1034 588.38 in 0.38 in 0.20 in 1035 H7 588.24 in 0.24 in 0.06 in 1036 588.17 in 0.17 in 0 in 1037 H6 588.12 in 0.12 in 0 in

The chart below illustrates the span difference along the measured runway. Note! Negative value indicates that the measured span is too narrow and positive value that the measured span is too wide.

Chart 1 Measured span difference values (from the measure points on rail 1)

Span difference is visualised in Fig. 2. Colors indicate, how good the runway is compared to the requirements of the selected standard (Green = close to optimal, Yellow/Orange = under the required tolerance, Red = permitted geometrical tolerances are NOT met).

This document and the information contained herein, is the exclusive property of Konecranes Plc and represents a non-public, confidential and proprietary trade secret that may not be reproduced, disclosed to third parties, altered or otherwise employed in any manner whatsoever without the express written consent of Konecranes Plc. Copyright © (2007)

Fig. 2. Geometry of the runway. Span deviations are scaled to 75 times larger

2.1.2 Straightness

Straightness deviation is calculated by comparing the horizontal location of each measured point to the regression line of the runway rail. Straightness deviation values are given in Table 2 and Table 3. Maximum allowed deviation in straightness is ±0.375 in according to the selected standard.

The maximum allowed straightness deviation (±0.375 in) is exceeded in 1 of the measured points. The biggest measured straightness deviation is -0.43 in at the measure point 1001 on the rail 1. This is -0.05 in outside the allowed tolerance.

Table 2 Straightness deviation values (rail 1)

Measure Point

Name of the Support

Horizontal deviation to the regression line

Outside tolerance

1001 H24 -0.43 in -0.05 in 1002 -0.28 in 0 in 1003 H23 -0.04 in 0 in 1004 0.01 in 0 in 1005 H22 -0.12 in 0 in 1006 -0.07 in 0 in 1007 H21 0.12 in 0 in 1008 0.27 in 0 in 1009 H20 0.27 in 0 in 1010 0.22 in 0 in 1011 H19 0.25 in 0 in 1012 0.08 in 0 in 1013 H18 -0.02 in 0 in

This document and the information contained herein, is the exclusive property of Konecranes Plc and represents a non-public, confidential and proprietary trade secret that may not be reproduced, disclosed to third parties, altered or otherwise employed in any manner whatsoever without the express written consent of Konecranes Plc. Copyright © (2007)

1014 0.01 in 0 in 1015 H17 0.01 in 0 in 1016 -0.15 in 0 in 1017 H16 0.03 in 0 in 1018 0.06 in 0 in 1019 H15 -0.09 in 0 in 1020 -0.18 in 0 in 1021 H14 0.05 in 0 in 1022 -0.05 in 0 in 1023 H13 -0.24 in 0 in 1024 -0.12 in 0 in 1025 H12 0.12 in 0 in 1026 0.25 in 0 in 1027 H11 0.23 in 0 in 1028 0.14 in 0 in 1029 H10 0.13 in 0 in 1030 0.05 in 0 in 1031 H9 0.10 in 0 in 1032 0.09 in 0 in 1033 H8 0.08 in 0 in 1034 -0.02 in 0 in 1035 H7 -0.16 in 0 in 1036 -0.29 in 0 in 1037 H6 -0.32 in 0 in

Table 3 Straightness deviation values (measure points on rail 2)

Point

Name of the Support

Horizontal deviation to the regression line

Outside tolerance

2001 F24 0.21 in 0 in 2002 0.15 in 0 in 2003 F23 -0.20 in 0 in 2004 -0.11 in 0 in 2005 F22 0.09 in 0 in 2006 -0.07 in 0 in 2007 F21 -0.03 in 0 in 2008 -0.16 in 0 in 2009 F20 -0.18 in 0 in 2010 -0.02 in 0 in 2011 F19 -0.02 in 0 in 2012 0.06 in 0 in 2013 F18 0.06 in 0 in 2014 0.01 in 0 in 2015 F17 0.09 in 0 in 2016 0.25 in 0 in 2017 F16 0.22 in 0 in 2018 0.02 in 0 in 2019 F15 0.04 in 0 in

This document and the information contained herein, is the exclusive property of Konecranes Plc and represents a non-public, confidential and proprietary trade secret that may not be reproduced, disclosed to third parties, altered or otherwise employed in any manner whatsoever without the express written consent of Konecranes Plc. Copyright © (2007) Konecranes Plc. All rights reserved.

2020 -0.07 in 0 in 2021 F14 -0.06 in 0 in 2022 -0.06 in 0 in 2023 F13 -0.17 in 0 in 2024 0.07 in 0 in 2025 F12 -0.12 in 0 in 2026 -0.18 in 0 in 2027 F11 -0.18 in 0 in 2028 -0.06 in 0 in 2029 F10 0.09 in 0 in 2030 0.18 in 0 in 2031 F9 0.10 in 0 in 2032 0.07 in 0 in 2033 F8 0.09 in 0 in 2034 -0.05 in 0 in 2035 F7 -0.04 in 0 in 2036 0.01 in 0 in 2037 F6 -0.02 in 0 in

The chart below illustrates the straightness deviations of both rails along the measured runway. Note! Negative value indicates that the measured point locates too close to the other rail.

Chart 2 Measured straightness deviation values of the measure points.

Results of the straightness requirements are visualised in Fig. 3. Colors indicate, how good the runway is compared to the requirements of the selected standard (Green = close to optimal, Yellow/Orange = under the required tolerance, Red = permitted geometrical tolerances are NOT met).

This document and the information contained herein, is the exclusive property of Konecranes Plc and represents a non-public, confidential and proprietary trade secret that may not be reproduced, disclosed to third parties, altered or otherwise employed in any manner whatsoever without the express written consent of Konecranes Plc. Copyright © (2007)

Fig. 3. Geometry of the runway. Horizontal errors to the regression lines are scaled to 75 times larger

2.1.3 Elevation

Elevation deviation is calculated by comparing the vertical location of each measured point to the regression line of the runway rail. Elevation deviation values are given in Tables 4 and

5. Maximum allowed deviation in elevation is ±0.375 in according to the selected standard.

The maximum allowed elevation deviation (±0.375 in) isn't exceeded in any of the measured points. The biggest measured elevation deviation is 0.37 in at the measure point 2036 on the rail 2.

Table 4 Elevation deviation values (rail 1)

Measure Point

Name of the Support

Vertical deviation to the regression line

Outside tolerance

1001 H24 0.01 in 0 in 1002 -0.10 in 0 in 1003 H23 0.08 in 0 in 1004 -0.01 in 0 in 1005 H22 -0.01 in 0 in 1006 -0.09 in 0 in 1007 H21 0.00 in 0 in 1008 0.04 in 0 in 1009 H20 -0.09 in 0 in 1010 -0.09 in 0 in 1011 H19 0.03 in 0 in 1012 -0.02 in 0 in 1013 H18 -0.01 in 0 in 1014 -0.05 in 0 in

This document and the information contained herein, is the exclusive property of Konecranes Plc and represents a non-public, confidential and proprietary trade secret that may not be reproduced, disclosed to third parties, altered or otherwise employed in any manner whatsoever without the express written consent of Konecranes Plc. Copyright © (2007)

1015 H17 -0.05 in 0 in 1016 -0.11 in 0 in 1017 H16 -0.05 in 0 in 1018 -0.05 in 0 in 1019 H15 0.02 in 0 in 1020 -0.05 in 0 in 1021 H14 0.13 in 0 in 1022 0.11 in 0 in 1023 H13 0.15 in 0 in 1024 0.17 in 0 in 1025 H12 0.04 in 0 in 1026 -0.16 in 0 in 1027 H11 -0.01 in 0 in 1028 0.00 in 0 in 1029 H10 0.05 in 0 in 1030 0.05 in 0 in 1031 H9 0.02 in 0 in 1032 -0.08 in 0 in 1033 H8 -0.02 in 0 in 1034 -0.01 in 0 in 1035 H7 0.03 in 0 in 1036 -0.02 in 0 in 1037 H6 0.16 in 0 in

Table 5 Elevation deviation values (measure points on rail 2)

Point

Name of the Support

Vertical deviation to the regression line

Outside tolerance

2001 F24 0.01 in 0 in 2002 -0.03 in 0 in 2003 F23 -0.05 in 0 in 2004 -0.13 in 0 in 2005 F22 -0.01 in 0 in 2006 -0.02 in 0 in 2007 F21 -0.01 in 0 in 2008 -0.03 in 0 in 2009 F20 -0.10 in 0 in 2010 -0.13 in 0 in 2011 F19 -0.15 in 0 in 2012 -0.25 in 0 in 2013 F18 -0.20 in 0 in 2014 -0.29 in 0 in 2015 F17 -0.23 in 0 in 2016 -0.25 in 0 in 2017 F16 -0.24 in 0 in 2018 -0.27 in 0 in 2019 F15 -0.28 in 0 in 2020 -0.28 in 0 in 2021 F14 -0.18 in 0 in

This document and the information contained herein, is the exclusive property of Konecranes Plc and represents a non-public, confidential and proprietary trade secret that may not be reproduced, disclosed to third parties, altered or otherwise employed in any manner whatsoever without the express written consent of Konecranes Plc. Copyright © (2007) Konecranes Plc. All rights reserved.

2022 -0.13 in 0 in 2023 F13 -0.10 in 0 in 2024 0.07 in 0 in 2025 F12 0.20 in 0 in 2026 0.21 in 0 in 2027 F11 0.23 in 0 in 2028 0.20 in 0 in 2029 F10 0.22 in 0 in 2030 0.23 in 0 in 2031 F9 0.27 in 0 in 2032 0.12 in 0 in 2033 F8 0.23 in 0 in 2034 0.31 in 0 in 2035 F7 0.35 in 0 in 2036 0.37 in 0 in 2037 F6 0.33 in 0 in

The chart below illustrates the elevation deviations of both rails along the measured runway.

Note! Negative value indicates that the measured point locates lower than the regression line of the runway.

Chart 3 Measured elevation deviation values of the measure points.

Results of the elevation requirements are visualised in Fig. 4. Colors indicate, how good the runway is compared to the requirements of the selected standard (Green = close to optimal, Yellow/Orange = under the required tolerance, Red = permitted geometrical tolerances are NOT met).

This document and the information contained herein, is the exclusive property of Konecranes Plc and represents a non-public, confidential and proprietary trade secret that may not be reproduced, disclosed to third parties, altered or otherwise employed in any manner whatsoever without the express written consent of Konecranes Plc. Copyright © (2007)

Fig. 4. Geometry of the runway. Vertical errors to the regression lines are scaled to 75 times larger

2.1.4 Rail to Rail elevation

Rail to rail elevation difference is calculated by comparing the vertical location of each measured point to the vertical location of the closest point of the other rail. Rail to rail elevation deviation values are given in Tables 6. Maximum allowed deviation in rail to rail elevation is ±0.189 in according to the selected standard.

The maximum allowed rail to rail elevation deviation (±0.189 in) is exceeded in 23 of the measured points. The biggest measured rail to rail elevation deviation is -0.71 in at the measure point 1036 on the rail 1. This is -0.53 in outside the allowed tolerance.

Table 6 Rail to rail elevation difference values (rail 1) Measur e Point

Name of the Support

Z co-ordinate Rail-To- Rail elevation error

Outside tolerance Measure point Closest point of other rail 1001 H24 -55.80 in -55.48 in -0.32 in -0.13 in 1002 -55.91 in -55.52 in -0.39 in -0.20 in 1003 H23 -55.73 in -55.54 in -0.18 in 0 in 1004 -55.82 in -55.62 in -0.20 in -0.01 in 1005 H22 -55.82 in -55.50 in -0.32 in -0.13 in 1006 -55.90 in -55.52 in -0.38 in -0.19 in 1007 H21 -55.81 in -55.50 in -0.31 in -0.12 in 1008 -55.77 in -55.52 in -0.25 in -0.06 in 1009 H20 -55.91 in -55.59 in -0.31 in -0.12 in 1010 -55.90 in -55.63 in -0.27 in -0.08 in 1011 H19 -55.78 in -55.64 in -0.14 in 0 in

This document and the information contained herein, is the exclusive property of Konecranes Plc and represents a non-public, confidential and proprietary trade secret that may not be reproduced, disclosed to third parties, altered or otherwise employed in any manner whatsoever without the express written consent of Konecranes Plc. Copyright © (2007) Konecranes Plc. All rights reserved.

1012 -55.83 in -55.74 in -0.09 in 0 in 1013 H18 -55.83 in -55.69 in -0.13 in 0 in 1014 -55.86 in -55.78 in -0.08 in 0 in 1015 H17 -55.86 in -55.72 in -0.14 in 0 in 1016 -55.92 in -55.75 in -0.17 in 0 in 1017 H16 -55.86 in -55.73 in -0.13 in 0 in 1018 -55.86 in -55.76 in -0.10 in 0 in 1019 H15 -55.79 in -55.77 in -0.02 in 0 in 1020 -55.86 in -55.78 in -0.09 in 0 in 1021 H14 -55.68 in -55.68 in -0.01 in 0 in 1022 -55.70 in -55.63 in -0.07 in 0 in 1023 H13 -55.66 in -55.59 in -0.07 in 0 in 1024 -55.64 in -55.42 in -0.22 in -0.03 in 1025 H12 -55.77 in -55.29 in -0.48 in -0.29 in 1026 -55.97 in -55.29 in -0.68 in -0.49 in 1027 H11 -55.82 in -55.27 in -0.56 in -0.37 in 1028 -55.81 in -55.29 in -0.52 in -0.33 in 1029 H10 -55.77 in -55.27 in -0.49 in -0.30 in 1030 -55.76 in -55.26 in -0.50 in -0.31 in 1031 H9 -55.79 in -55.22 in -0.57 in -0.38 in 1032 -55.89 in -55.38 in -0.51 in -0.32 in 1033 H8 -55.83 in -55.26 in -0.57 in -0.38 in 1034 -55.82 in -55.18 in -0.63 in -0.44 in 1035 H7 -55.78 in -55.14 in -0.64 in -0.45 in 1036 -55.83 in -55.12 in -0.71 in -0.53 in 1037 H6 -55.65 in -55.16 in -0.50 in -0.31 in

The chart below illustrates the rail to rail elevation deviations measured from the rail 1. Note!

Negative value indicates that the measured point locates lower than the closes point on the opposite rail.

This document and the information contained herein, is the exclusive property of Konecranes Plc and represents a non-public, confidential and proprietary trade secret that may not be reproduced, disclosed to third parties, altered or otherwise employed in any manner whatsoever without the express written consent of Konecranes Plc. Copyright © (2007)

Chart 4 Measured rail to rail elevation deviation

Results of the rail-to-rail elevation requirements are visualised in Fig. 5. Colors indicate, how good the runway is compared to the requirements of the selected standard (Green = close to optimal, Yellow/Orange = under the required tolerance, Red = permitted geometrical tolerances are NOT met).

Fig. 5. Geometry of the runway. Rail-to-Rail elevation errors are scaled to 75 times larger

2.2 Recommended adjustments to the runway

Following adjustments to the runway geometry are recommended:

Table 7 recommended adjustments for Rail 1 measuring points

Measure Point

Name of the support

Adjustment Vertical Horizontal

This document and the information contained herein, is the exclusive property of Konecranes Plc and represents a non-public, confidential and proprietary trade secret that may not be reproduced, disclosed to third parties, altered or otherwise employed in any manner whatsoever without the express written consent of Konecranes Plc. Copyright © (2007) Konecranes Plc. All rights reserved.

’+’ value => Lift the point

’+’ value => Increase the span

1001 H24 0.16 in 0 in 1002 0.24 in -0.20 in 1003 H23 0 in -0.25 in 1004 0.04 in -0.24 in 1005 H22 0.16 in -0.20 in 1006 0.20 in -0.20 in 1007 H21 0.16 in -0.43 in 1008 0.08 in -0.63 in 1009 H20 0.16 in -0.63 in 1010 0.12 in -0.51 in 1011 H19 0 in -0.55 in 1012 0 in -0.47 in 1013 H18 0 in -0.35 in 1014 0 in -0.35 in 1015 H17 0 in -0.43 in 1016 0 in -0.25 in 1017 H16 0 in -0.38 in 1018 0 in -0.39 in 1019 H15 0 in -0.28 in 1020 0 in -0.08 in 1021 H14 0 in -0.31 in 1022 0 in -0.20 in 1024 0.04 in -0.24 in 1025 H12 0.31 in -0.31 in 1026 0.51 in -0.35 in 1027 H11 0.39 in -0.39 in 1028 0.35 in -0.39 in 1029 H10 0.31 in -0.51 in 1030 0.31 in -0.51 in 1031 H9 0.39 in -0.47 in 1032 0.35 in -0.43 in 1033 H8 0.39 in -0.47 in 1034 0.47 in -0.20 in 1035 H7 0.47 in -0.08 in 1036 0.55 in 0 in 1037 H6 0.31 in 0 in

Table 8 recommended adjustments for Rail 2 measuring points

Point

Name of the support

Adjustment Vertical

’+’ value => Lift the point

Horizontal ’+’ value =>

Increase the span 2001 F24 0 in -0.16 in 2002 0 in -0.04 in 2003 F23 0 in 0.13 in 2005 F22 0 in -0.13 in 2008 0 in 0.10 in

This document and the information contained herein, is the exclusive property of Konecranes Plc and represents a non-public, confidential and proprietary trade secret that may not be reproduced, disclosed to third parties, altered or otherwise employed in any manner whatsoever without the express written consent of Konecranes Plc. Copyright © (2007)

2009 F20 0 in 0.13 in 2016 0 in -0.25 in 2017 F16 0 in -0.25 in 2023 F13 0.08 in 0 in 2024 0 in -0.04 in 2027 F11 0 in 0.04 in

The chart below illustrates the span difference (as measured and adjusted) along the measured runway. Note! Negative value indicates that the measured span is too narrow and positive value that the measured span is too wide.

Chart 5 Measured span difference values (from the measure points on rail 1)

The chart below illustrates the elevation deviations of both rail (as measured and adjusted) along the measured runway. Note! Negative value indicates that the measured point locates lower than the regression line of the runway.

This document and the information contained herein, is the exclusive property of Konecranes Plc and represents a non-public, confidential and proprietary trade secret that may not be reproduced, disclosed to third parties, altered or otherwise employed in any manner whatsoever without the express written consent of Konecranes Plc. Copyright © (2007)

Chart 6 Measured elevation deviation values of the measure points

2.3 Visual inspection

3 ASSESSMENT OF RESULTS

The geometrical measurement shows that the runway does NOT meet the requirements of the standard (CMAA Specification 70, Table 1.4.2 - 1).

The maximum allowed span deviation (±0.189 in) is exceeded in 34 of the measured points.

The biggest measured span deviation is 0.73 in at the measure point 1017 on the rail 1. This is 0.54 in outside the allowed tolerance.

The maximum allowed straightness deviation (±0.375 in) is exceeded in 1 of the measured points. The biggest measured straightness deviation is -0.43 in at the measure point 1001 on the rail 1. This is -0.05 in outside the allowed tolerance.

The maximum allowed elevation deviation (±0.375 in) isn't exceeded in any of the measured points. The biggest measured elevation deviation is 0.37 in at the measure point 2036 on the rail 2.

The maximum allowed rail to rail elevation deviation (±0.189 in) is exceeded in 23 of the measured points. The biggest measured rail to rail elevation deviation is -0.71 in at the measure point 1036 on the rail 1. This is -0.53 in outside the allowed tolerance.

We would recommend correction of both the horizontal and vertical deviations.

Thank you for the opportunity to conduct this analysis and please don’t hesitate to call and discuss these results in detail.