AMEND1.docx
DOCX document 14 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6247013R3005
About this file
AMEND1.docx
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ATTACHMENT_1.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| ATT_B_SBSP_Template_(6).docx | DOCX document | |
| SynopsisN6247013R3005.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATT_A_PPQ_Attachment_(3).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N62470-13-R-3005
AMENDMENT 0001
Amendment 0001 is issued for the following reason:
1) To revise Criterion 1 – Specialized Experience Criterion 1 is revised as follows:
FROM:
Criterion 1 – Specialized Experience (SF 330 Part 1 Section F): Offerors will be evaluated on specialized experience and technical competence of the proposed team and/or proposed consultants in the following services: Preparation of AICUZ, RAICUZ, Aircraft Noise, and other encroachment-related studies.
Submission Requirements: Firms shall provide a maximum of 10 projects showing specialized experience of the proposed team in provision of the services noted above. Projects submitted by the Offeror shall have been completed within the five years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this Notice. All projects provided in the SF 330 must be completed by the office/branch/regional office/individual team member actually proposed to manage and perform work under this contract. Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from evaluation. To enable verification, firms should include the DUNS number along with each firm name in the SF 330 Part 1, Section F Item 25 “Firms from Section C Involved in this Project,” block (1). Include a contract number or project identification number in block 21. Include an e-mail address, and phone number for the point of contact in block 23(c). Include in the project description the contract period of performance, award contract value, current contract value, a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience as outlined above. If the contractor served as a subcontractor on a project, indicate the value of the work they provided towards the performance of the overall project. If a project was performed by a joint venture, and not all joint venture partners are on the team proposed for this contract, the offeror/team should specifically address the work performed by the joint venture partner offering/teaming on this contract. Likewise, if the offeror/team member worked as a subcontractor on a project, the description should clearly describe the work actually performed by the offeror/team member and the roles and responsibilities of each on the project, rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration.
If the Offeror is a joint venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for the joint venture if shared experience is available; if no shared experience is available, offers may submit projects performed by either joint venture partner. Offerors are still limited to a maximum of ten (10) projects.
Projects shall be submitted on the SF-330 at Part 1 Section F and shall be completed. Projects not completed will be excluded from evaluation consideration. For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not list an IDIQ contract as an example of a completed project. Instead, list relevant completed task orders or stand-alone contract awards that fit within the definition above. Examples of project work submitted that do not conform to this requirement will not be evaluated.
Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers could result in a firm being considered less qualified.
All information for Criterion 1 should be submitted in Part 1, Section F of the SF330. The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part 1, Section F in evaluating Criterion 1.
TO:
Criterion 1 – Specialized Experience (SF 330 Part 1 Section F): Offerors will be evaluated on specialized experience and technical competence of the proposed team and/or proposed consultants in the following services: Preparation of AICUZ, RAICUZ, Aircraft Noise, and other encroachment-related studies.
Submission Requirements: Firms shall provide a maximum of 10 projects showing specialized experience of the proposed team in provision of the services noted above. Projects submitted by the Offeror shall have been SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED within the five years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this Notice. All projects provided in the SF 330 must be SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED by the office/branch/regional office/individual team member actually proposed to manage and perform work under this contract. Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from evaluation. To enable verification, firms should include the DUNS number along with each firm name in the SF 330 Part 1, Section F Item 25 “Firms from Section C Involved in this Project,” block (1). Include a contract number or project identification number in block 21. Include an e-mail address, and phone number for the point of contact in block 23(c). Include in the project description the contract period of performance, award contract value, current contract value, a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience as outlined above. If the contractor served as a subcontractor on a project, indicate the value of the work they provided towards the performance of the overall project. If a project was performed by a joint venture, and not all joint venture partners are on the team proposed for this contract, the offeror/team should specifically address the work performed by the joint venture partner offering/teaming on this contract. Likewise, if the offeror/team member worked as a subcontractor on a project, the description should clearly describe the work actually performed by the offeror/team member and the roles and responsibilities of each on the project, rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration.
If the Offeror is a joint venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for the joint venture if shared experience is available; if no shared experience is available, offers may submit projects performed by either joint venture partner. Offerors are still limited to a maximum of ten (10) projects.
Projects shall be submitted on the SF-330 at Part 1 Section F and shall be SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED. Projects not SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED will be excluded from evaluation consideration. For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not list an IDIQ contract as an example of a SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED project. Instead, list relevant SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED task orders or stand-alone contract awards that fit within the definition above. Examples of project work submitted that do not conform to this requirement will not be evaluated.
Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers could result in a firm being considered less qualified.
All information for Criterion 1 should be submitted in Part 1, Section F of the SF330. The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part 1, Section F in evaluating Criterion 1.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .