N62387-15-R-8027-0007.doc

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 20-Oct-2015 01:00 PM to 08-Apr-2016 02:00 PM.

The following have been added by full text:

TECHNICAL EVALUATION

Technical Evaluation

Technical/Management Approach:

In order for an offeror’s proposal/quotation to be rated Technically Acceptable overall, each of the following factors must be rated Acceptable (see table 1 for definition).

Technical Factor 1: PWS Section 4 Technical Direction Letters

Offeror must demonstrate an understanding of, and an ability to meet, the requirements of each of the five general support categories:

PWS Section 4.1 – Knowledge Management

PWS Section 4.2 – Portfolio Management

PWS Section 4.3 – Enterprise Architecture

PWS Section 4.4 – Financial Management

PWS Section 4.5 – Funds Execution

General statements that the offeror can or will meet the requirements, that standard procedures will be used, that well known techniques will be used, or paraphrases of this RFP's Performance Work Statement/Specification in whole or in part, will not constitute a responsive proposal.

The offeror will be evaluated against the following criteria for each of the five general support categories:

1. Understanding and definition of the general support category supported by citation of a law, regulation, or official policy.

2. Written plan to support the requirements of each general support category. The plan must address specific steps/methodology, resources, risks, and priorities.

3. Provide at least one example of prior experience for each general support category that includes at a minimum: socioeconomic description of the customer, a general description of the scope of support, and specific accomplishments by the offeror for the duration of support.

Technical Factor 2: PWS Section 5 Place of Performance

The offeror must have facilities within the local commuting area of Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia. The offeror will be expected to attend frequent meetings at Naval Station Norfolk and must have individuals on the contract that are capable of gaining and maintaining access to Naval Station Norfolk.

Offeror must provide supporting documentation of contractor’s facilities location. Offeror must acknowledge and provide support for all key personnel (PWS 12.1) that they are located within the local commuting area.

Technical Factor 3: PWS Section 12.1 Key Personnel

The offeror must provide, for all proposed key personnel, the resumes (maximum length two pages per resume), offer letters, and copies of valid certifications that substantiate the personnel requirements for each key personnel position.

12.1.1.1 ITGPS Contract Lead:

- PMP Certification

- No less than 10 years’ experience managing multilayered projects

- Manage an annual budget equal to or greater than $175M

12.1.2.1 Knowledge Management TDL Lead:

- Proficiency in understanding of IT Governance policy and processes

- No less than 7 years managing an integrated data repository and complex data calls

- PMP Certification

12.1.2.2 Portfolio Management TDL Lead:

- Manage an annual budget equal to or greater than $175M

- No less than 7 years’ experience in verbal and written communication, project and program management, and implementation of the GAO ITIM Framework and assessment

12.1.2.3 Enterprise Architecture TDL Lead:

- Demonstrate knowledge in IT principles, methods, and practices in enterprise architecture within the DoD environment

12.1.2.4 Financial Management TDL Lead:

- No less than 7 years of defense budgeting and lifecycle cost estimation

12.1.2.6 Funds Execution TDL Lead:

- No less than 7 years of funds execution experience

Table 1. Technical/Management Ratings

(End of Summary of Changes)