15-2100_ATTACHMENTS.docx

DOCX document 29 KB Posted

Attached to
Tractor-Like Tugs, Kings Bay, GA and Mayport, FL
Solicitation number
N62387-15-R_2100
Issued by

About this file

15-R-2100 ATTACHMENTS (Word version)

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
15-2100_AMEND_2.pdf PDF
15-2100_Q_ _A_Part_Three.pdf PDF
15-2100_Q_ _A_Part_Two.pdf PDF
15-2100_Q__A_Part_One.pdf PDF
15-2100_Amend_1.pdf PDF
15-2100_RFP.pdf PDF
15-2100_DD254.pdf PDF
N62398-15-R-2100_Synopsis.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENT A – TUG CHARACTERISTIC SHEET

CHARACTERISTIC

MINIMUM

CHARACTERISTIC

MINIMUM

FLAG

CLASSIFICATION

PROPULSION TYPE

SHAFT HORSEPOWER

ENDURANCE

BOLLARD PULL

TRANSIT SPEED

PASSENGER CAPACITY

SEWAGE CAPACITY

DRAFT

SURFACE FENDERING

LENGTH OVERALL

BROW

SUBSURFACE FENDERING

LINES

BOOM

CAPSTANS/WINCHES

FIREFIGHTING

COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT

ATTACHMENT B – STRIKE CONTINGENCY PLAN & VESSEL CASUALTY PLAN

STRIKE CONTINGENCY PLAN

Describe how services will be provided without interruption if there is a labor strike (See paragraph 33 of the PWS):

VESSEL CASUALTY PLAN

Describe how services will be provided without interruption if there is a severe casualty to a vessel that makes the vessel inoperable (See paragraph 34 of the PWS):

ATTACHMENT C – OFFERED RATES SHEET

(To be filled in by the Contractor)

KINGS BAY TUGS DAILY RATE

Tug #1
Firm Period
Option One
Option Two
Option Three
Option Four

Daily Hire Rate

Overtime Rate

Mob/Demob

Tug #2
Firm Period
Option One
Option Two
Option Three
Option Four
Tug #3
Firm Period
Option One
Option Two
Option Three
Option Four

MAYPORT TUGS DAILY RATE

Tug #1
Firm Period
Option One
Option Two
Option Three
Option Four
Tug #2
Firm Period
Option One
Option Two
Option Three
Option Four
Tug #3
Firm Period
Option One
Option Two
Option Three
Option Four

ATTACHMENT D – PAST PERFORMANCE DATA SHEET

1. Complete Name of Reference (Government agency, commercial firm, or other organization)

2. Complete Address of Reference

3. Contract Number or other control number

4. Date of contract

5. Date work was begun

6. Date work was completed

7. Contract type, initial contract price, estimated cost and fee, or target cost and profit or fee

8. Final amount invoiced or amount invoiced to date

9a. Reference/Technical point of contact (name, title, address, telephone no. and email address)

9b. Reference/Contracting point of contact (name, title, address, telephone no. and email address)

10. Location of work (country, state or province, county, city)

11. Current status of contract (choose one):

[ ] Ongoing [ ] Complete [ ] Terminated for Convenience [ ] Terminated for Default [ ] Other (explain)

12. Provide a summary description of contract work. Describe the scope and complexity of work, its relevancy to the efforts to be performed under this solicitation and a description of any problems encountered and your corrective actions. Additional details, to include past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience and subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement can be attached to this form, but shall not exceed two (2) pages in length.

13a. Did this contract require a Small Business Subcontracting Plan pursuant to FAR 52.219-9? Yes __, No__.

13b. If “Yes” to 13a, have you regularly submitted your reports in the Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (ESRS) in a timely manner? Yes __, No__.

If no, why not?

14. Address historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-8 (Utilization of Small Business Concerns) for government contracts. (Large Businesses: Address historical compliance with the requirements of FAR 52.219-9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan, DOD Requirements).

ATTACHMENT E – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

TO: FACSIMILE:

PHONE: EMAIL:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION to Jessica Chu. Information can also be sent via facsimile to the attention of Jessica Chu at (202) 433-0726. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you,
Jessica Chu
Contract Specialist

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing/faxing is provided below.

Military Sealift Command
Attn: Jessica Chu

U.S. Navy’s Military Sealift Command 914 Charles Morris Ct SE Washington Navy Yard, DC 20398-5540

From: (Name and Address of Organization) _______________________________________________

________________________________________________
(Point of Contact Name)________________________________________________
(Facsimile/Phone Number)________________________________________________
(E-mail Address)________________________________________________
To(Point of Contact Name)Jessica Chu
(Facsimile Number)(202) 433-0726
(E-mail Address)jessica.chu@navy.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organization.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .