FY21CC IDIQ SOW_working draft for posting_10 Dec 2019.docx

DOCX document 1 MB Posted Dec 20, 2019

Attached to: Industry Notice - Future FY21 Content Conversion for Ready Relevant Learning Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: N61340-20-R-0037
Issued by: Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Dec 31, 2023

This notice provides information regarding the Fiscal Year 2021 Ready Relevant Learning Content Conversion contract. The Navy intends to award an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contract for individual delivery orders for various ratings, including Fire Control Technician, Master at Arms, Aviation Structural Mechanic, Electronics Technician Navigation Submarines, Cryptologic Technician Maintenance, Mineman, Information Systems Technician, and Aviation Machinist's Mate. Contractors will design, develop, test and deliver Interactive Multimedia Instruction products for each rating based on Functional Requirements Documents and Military Characteristics Documents provided by the Navy. Pricing will be fixed for IMI levels at the IDIQ level, while pricing for Complex Media, Production Support, and higher classification work will be negotiated on delivery orders. Industry is requested to provide feedback on the proposed approach by January 13, 2020. The notice includes draft documents such as a Statement of Work, terms and definitions, a CDRL list, descriptions of content delivery methods, and a sample delivery order CLIN structure.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Industry Notice - Future FY21 Content Conversion for Ready Relevant Learning, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
Atch (1)_APPENDIX D CDRL List - 10 Dec 2019.docx	DOCX document	Dec 20, 2019
Atch (1)_APPENDIX G Sailor 2025 RRL Content Delivery Modes - 06 Dec 2019.docx	DOCX document	Dec 20, 2019
FY21 RRL CLIN Structure_19 Dec 2019.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Dec 20, 2019
Atch (1)_APPENDIX C Terms and Definitions - 06 Dec 2019.docx	DOCX document	Dec 20, 2019

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

FOR

SAILOR 20205 (S2025) FY21 READY RELEVANT LEARNING (RRL)

CONTENT CONVERSION (CC)

Prepared For:

Commander, United States Fleet Forces Command (CFFC) Norfolk, VA 23551-2487 Prepared By:

Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD) 12211 Science Drive Orlando, FL 32826

DISTRIBUTION A. Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited.

This page intentionally left blank.

REVIEWED BY:	DATE: _____________
	TBD
	S2025 Lead Systems Engineer
	NAVAIR – 5.7.7.

REVIEWED BY:		DATE: _____________
	TBD
	FY21CC Lead Instructional System Designer
	NAVAIR – 5.3.6

APPROVED BY:		DATE: _______________
	Eric Smith
	Program Management Office
	NAVAIR – 1.3.6.3

Change Log

Date

Section Number

Section Title

Change

Table of CONTENTS

1. Scope	2
1.1 Rating Requirements	2
1.2 Course, Module and Lesson Structure	Error! Bookmark not defined.
1.3 Content Delivery Modes and Media Types	Error! Bookmark not defined.
1.4 Content Conversion Process Flows	2
1.4.1 Interactive Multimedia Instruction (IMI) Development Process	Error! Bookmark not defined.
1.4.2 Performance Support (PS) and Structured On The Job Training (SPJT) Development Process	Error! Bookmark not defined.
1.4.2.1 PS Hosted in Training Delivery Environments	Error! Bookmark not defined.
1.4.2.2 PS Hosted in Operational Environments	Error! Bookmark not defined.
1.4.3 Complex Media Development Process	Error! Bookmark not defined.
1.4.4 Coordination with Third-Parties	Error! Bookmark not defined.
1.5 List of SOW Appendices	Error! Bookmark not defined.
1.6 Terms and Definitions	2
1.7 Government-Furnished Information (GFI)	2
1.8 Government-Furnished Software, Tools and Equipment	2
1.9 Government-Furnished Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)	2
2. Applicable Documents	2
2.1 Government Documents	2
2.2 Department of Defense (DOD) Documents	2
2.3 Department of the Navy (DON) Documents	2
2.4 Sailor 2025 Documents	2
2.5 Authoring Instruction Materials (AIM) Documents	2
2.6 Industry Standards	2
2.7 Other Documents	2
3. Requirements	2
3.1 General Requirements	2
3.1.1 Program Planning	2
3.1.1.1 Life-Cycle Model Management	2
3.1.1.2 Infrastructure Management	2
3.1.1.3 Program Assessment and Control	2
3.1.1.4 Program Decision Management	2
3.1.2 Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs)	2
3.1.3 Online Management System (OMS)	2
3.1.4 Data Library	2
3.1.5 Configuration Management (CM)	2
3.1.6 File Sharing	2
3.1.7 Contractor SMEs	2
3.1.8 Data and Software Rights	2
3.1.9 Contractor Acquired Property	2
3.1.10 Copyrights	2
3.1.11 Risk Management	2
3.1.12 Quality Assurance and Management Plan (QAMP)	2
3.1.13 Communications Plan	2
3.2 Security	2
3.2.1 Classified Processing and Access to Classified Systems	2
3.2.2 Operations Security (OPSEC)	2
3.2.3 Unclassified Contractor-Owned Network Security – Safeguarding of Unclassified Controlled Technical Information	2
3.2.4 Cyber Incident and Compromise Reporting	2
3.2.5 Access to DOD Installations, Government Information and Information Technology (IT) Systems – Personnel Security Background Checks	2
3.2.6 Personnel Security – Background Checks	2
3.2.7 International Traffic and Arms Regulation	2
3.2.8 Personnel Security – Reporting of Adverse or Derogatory Information Related to Contractors	2
3.2.9 Government-Issued Personal Identification Credentials	2
3.2.10 Contractor “Out-Processing” Policy	2
3.2.11 Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) For National Security Systems	2
3.2.12 Protection of Critical Program Information (CPI)	2
3.2.13 Transmission of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Via Email	2
3.2.14 Transmission of CUI Via Army Research Laboratory Safe Access File Exchange (ARL SAFE)	2
3.3 Cybersecurity	2
3.3.1 Cybersecurity for Training Content Products	2
3.3.2 Cybersecurity for Other Products	2
3.3.3 Cybersecurity Compliance	2
3.3.4 Cybersecurity Control Considerations	2
3.3.5 Cybersecurity Certification and Accreditation Support	2
3.3.6 Cybersecurity and Personnel Security Requirements for Accessing Government IT Systems - Credentialing Standards	2
3.3.7 Software Integrity Testing and Certification	2
3.3.8 Information Assurance Vulnerability Management Program (IAVMP)	2
3.3.9 Critical Program Information (CPI)	2
3.3.10 Cybersecurity Training & Certification	2
3.4 Management Requirements	2
3.4.1 Lead Integrator	2
3.4.2 Integrated Product Team (IPT)	2
3.4.3 Integrated Management Plan (IMP)	2
3.4.4 Work Planning and Scheduling	2
3.4.5 Development of the Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS)	2
3.4.6 Subcontractor Management and Reporting	2
3.4.7 Schedule Risk Assessment (SRA)	2
3.4.8 Program Progress, Tracking, and Reporting	2
3.4.9 Conferences, Meetings, and Reviews	2
3.4.9.1 Post Award Conference (PAC)	2
3.4.9.2 In-Process Review (IPR) Meetings	2
3.4.9.3 Weekly or Biweekly IPT Meetings	2
3.4.9.4 Data-Gathering Trips	2
3.5 RRL Content Conversion Requirements	2
3.5.1 Instructional Media Design Package (IMDP) Development	2
3.5.2 IMI, Mobile Ready, Mobile Optimized, and Responsive Design Mobile Website Media Types	2
3.5.2.1 CTM Rating Gap Analysis	Error! Bookmark not defined.
3.5.2.2 Instructional Media Design Package (IMDP) Development (Style Guide) and Model Products (i.e. Prototypes)	2
3.5.2.3 Instructional Media Package (IMP) (Script Storyboards)	2
3.5.2.4 Instructional Media Package (IMP) (On-screen Lessons (OSLs))	2
3.5.2.5 Courseware Reviews	2
3.5.2.6 Test Package Development (Assessments)	2
3.5.2.7 Course Testing Plan (Administration)	2
3.5.2.8 Training Conduct Support Document (TCSD)	2
3.5.2.9 Training Program Structure Documents (TPSD)	2
3.5.2.10 Training Systems Support Document (TSSD)	2
3.5.2.11 IMI Test & Evaluation (T&E) Program Components (IMI Product Acceptance) for Hosting in NeL Training Environment	2
3.5.2.11.1 NeL Contractor Testing (NeL DT-D1)	2
3.5.2.11.2 NeL Content Training Readiness Review (TRR)	2
3.5.2.11.3 NeL Government Testing (NeL DT-D2)	2
3.5.2.11.4 NeL DT-D2 Corrections	2
3.5.2.11.5 Government Content Acceptance Testing (GCAT)	2
3.5.2.11.6 Instructional Media Package (Media Source Files)	2
3.5.2.11.7 Instructional Media Package (CD-ROM/DVD )	2
3.5.2.11.8 T3 and Course Pilot Regression Testing	2
3.5.2.12 IMI T&E Program Components (IMI Product Acceptance Testing) for Hosting in Non-NeL Training Environments	2
3.5.2.12.1 NeL Contractor Testing (NeL DT-D1) per SOW 3.5.2.11.1	2
3.5.2.12.2 NeL Content TRR	2
3.5.2.12.3 NeL Government Testing (NeL DT-D2)	2
3.5.2.12.4 Non-NeL Environments Contractor Internal Testing (Non-NeL DT-D1)	2
3.5.2.12.5 Non-NeL Environments TRR	2
3.5.2.12.6 Non-NeL Environments Integrated Testing (Non-NeL IT-D1)	2
3.5.2.12.6.1 Non-NeL IT-D1 Entry Criteria	2
3.5.2.12.7 Instructional Media Package (Media Source Files)	2
3.5.2.12.8 Instructional Media Package (CD-ROM/DVD)	2
3.5.2.12.9 T3 and Course Pilot Preparation	2
3.5.2.12.10 T3 and Course Pilot Regression Testing	2
3.5.3 Performance Support (PS) and Structured On-The-job Training (SOJT) Media Types	2
3.5.3.1 PS Model Products (i.e. Prototypes)	2
3.5.3.2 PS Design Specification Document	2
3.5.3.3 PS Instructional Media Package (IMP) (Script Storyboards)	2
3.5.3.4 PS Instructional Media Package (IMP) (On-screen Lessons (OSLs))	2
3.5.3.5 PS Product Reviews	2
3.5.3.6 PS Training Conduct Support Document	2
3.5.3.7 Acceptance Testing (for PS products)	2
3.5.3.7.1 Government Content Acceptance Testing (GCAT)	2
3.5.3.8 PS Instructional Media Package (Media Source Files)	2
3.5.3.9 PS Final Acceptance	2
3.5.3.10 Instructional Media Package-IMP (CD-ROM/DVD Inspect/Acceptance)	2
3.5.4 Complex Media Types (e.g. PC Simulation, Augmented/Mixed/Virtual Reality, and Immersive Virtual Environment)	2
3.5.4.1 Systems Engineering Processes	2
3.5.4.1.1 System Requirements Definition	2
3.5.4.1.2 System Requirements Analysis	2
3.5.4.1.3 Traceability	2
3.5.4.1.4 System Architectural Design	2
3.5.4.1.5 System Implementation	2
3.5.4.1.6 System Integration	2
3.5.4.1.7 System Verification	2
3.5.4.1.8 System Transition	2
3.5.4.2 Systems Engineering Technical Reviews (SETRs)	2
3.5.4.2.1 Systems Requirements Review-II/System Functional Review (SRR-II/SFR)	2
3.5.4.2.1.1 SRR-II/SFR Entry Criteria	2
3.5.4.2.1.2 SRR-II/SFR Exit Criteria	2
3.5.4.2.2 Preliminary Design Review (PDR)	2
3.5.4.2.2.1 PDR Entry Criteria	2
3.5.4.2.2.2 PDR Exit Criteria	2
3.5.4.2.3 Critical Design Review (CDR)	2
3.5.4.2.3.1 CDR Entry Criteria	2
3.5.4.2.3.2 CDR Exit Criteria	2
3.5.4.2.4 Test Readiness Review	2
3.5.4.3 Software Engineering Processes	2
3.5.4.3.1 Software Requirements Analysis	2
3.5.4.3.2 Software Architectural Design	2
3.5.4.3.3 Software Product Design	2
3.5.4.3.4 Software Implementation	2
3.5.4.3.4.1 Software Unit Construction and Testing	2
3.5.4.3.5 Software Integration	2
3.5.4.3.6 Cold Start Process	2
3.5.4.3.6.1 Software Product Execution	2
3.5.4.3.6.2 Media and Storage Devices	2
3.5.4.4 Test and Evaluation (T&E) Processes	2
3.5.4.4.1 Test Planning and Procedures	2
3.5.4.4.2 Responsibility for Tests	2
3.5.4.4.3 Test Authority	2
3.5.4.4.4 Test Resources and Facilities	2
3.5.4.4.5 Test Methods	2
3.5.4.4.6 Verification Criteria	2
3.5.4.4.7 Configuration	2
3.5.4.4.8 Verification Log	2
3.5.4.4.9 Changes During Testing	2
3.5.4.4.10 Software Changes During Government Testing	2
3.5.4.4.11 Changes After Testing	2
3.5.4.4.12 T&E Non-Conformance Reporting System	2
3.5.4.4.13 Deficiency Review Board (DRB)	2
3.5.4.4.14 Deficiency and Discrepancy Adjudication	2
3.5.4.5 Detailed Tasks for Complex (e.g. PC Simulation, Augmented/Mixed/Virtual Reality, and Immersive Virtual Environment Blended Approach) Courseware	2
3.5.4.5.1 Logic Tables	2
3.5.4.5.2 Test Package (Assessments)	2
3.5.4.5.3 Navy Preliminary Evaluation	2
3.5.4.5.4 Training Support Products	2
3.5.4.5.5 Complex Media (e.g. PC Simulation, AR/MR/VR, and IVE Blended Approach) T&E Program Components	2
3.5.4.5.5.1 Baseline Configuration Audit	2
3.5.4.5.5.2 Navy Preliminary Evaluation (per increment – lessons delivered in increments)	2
3.5.4.5.5.3 Navy Final Evaluation (per increment – lessons delivered in increments	2
3.5.4.5.5.4 Pre-Modification Inspection	2
3.5.4.5.5.5 Contractor Internal Testing (Simulation DT-D1)	2
3.5.4.5.5.6 Test Readiness Review	2
3.5.4.5.5.7 Integrated Testing (Simulation IT-D1 )	2
3.5.4.5.5.8 Train the Trainer for Systems Engineering and Software Engineering Products	2
3.5.4.5.5.9 Course Pilot for Systems Engineering and Software Engineering Products	2
3.5.5 Human Factors Engineering (HFE)	2
3.5.6 Logistics (Sustainment) Conferences and Reviews	2
3.5.6.1 Logistics Guidance Conference (LGC)	2
3.5.6.2 Technical Manual Initial Guidance Conference	2
3.5.6.3 Provisioning Item Selection Conference (PISC)	2
3.5.6.3.1 PISC Entry Criteria	2
3.5.6.3.2 PISC Exit Criteria	2
3.5.6.4 TM and TDP In-Process Reviews (IPRs)	2
3.5.6.5 Integrated Logistics Support Verification (ILSV) Conference	2
3.5.7 RESERVED	Error! Bookmark not defined.
3.5.8 Commercial and Non-Developmental Items	2
3.5.9 Parts Standardization	2
3.5.9.1 Parts Management	2
3.5.9.1.1 Exempt Hardware	2
3.5.10 System Safety Tasks	2
3.5.10.1 Safety Assessment	2
3.5.11 Product Assurance Audits and Inspections	2
3.5.12 Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) Program	2
3.5.12.1 Maintenance Planning	2
3.5.12.2 Supportability Analysis	2
3.5.12.3 Logistics Product Data	2
3.5.12.4 Engineering Data for Provisioning	2
3.5.12.5 System Hardware Warranties	2
3.5.12.6 Obsolescence Management/Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)	2
3.5.12.7 Inventory Management	2
3.5.12.8 Parts Procurement	2
3.5.12.9 Provisioning	2
3.5.12.10 Technical Data Package	2
3.5.12.10.1 TDP Validation	2
3.5.12.10.2 TDP Verification	2
3.5.12.11 Technical Manuals	2
3.5.12.11.1 TM Validation	2
3.5.12.11.2 TM Verification	2
3.5.12.12 Training Program	2
3.5.12.12.1 Instructor/Operator Training (I/OT)	2
3.5.12.12.2 Maintainer Training	2
3.5.12.13 Interim Contractor Support	2
3.5.12.14 Facility Requirements	2
3.5.12.14.1 Site Surveys	2
3.5.12.14.2 Site Readiness Review	2
3.5.12.14.3 Equipment and Material Disposal	2
3.5.12.14.4 Training Product Installation	2
3.5.12.15 Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation	2
3.5.12.16 IUID Assignment	2
3.5.12.17 Physical Configuration Audit	2
3.5.12.17.1 Preliminary PCA	2
3.5.12.17.2 Final PCA	2
3.5.12.18 Centralized Configuration Management System (CMS) Audit	2
3.5.12.18.1 Centralized CMS Audit Completion Criteria	2
3.5.13 Train the Trainer (T3)	2
3.5.13.1 T3 Entry Criteria	2
3.5.13.2 T3 Exit Criteria	2
3.5.14 Course Pilot	2
3.5.14.1 Course Pilot Entry Criteria	2
3.5.14.2 Course Pilot Exit Criteria	2
3.5.14.3 Regression Testing	2

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Rating and Classification Requirements	2
Table 2. Content Delivery Modes and Media Types	2
Table 3. Government Documents	2
Table 4. DOD Documents	2
Table 5. DON Documents	2
Table 6. Sailor 2025 Documents	2
Table 7. AIM Documents	2
Table 8. Industry Standards	2
Table 9. Other Documents	2

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. IMI, Mobile Ready, Mobile Optimized and Responsive Design Mobile Website Content Conversion Process	2
Figure 2. Training Environment and Devices	2
Figure 3. Simulation, Augmented/Mixed/Virtual Reality and Immersive Eirtual Environment Content Conversion Process	Error! Bookmark not defined.

This page intentionally left blank.

Statement of Work for the RRL FY21 Content Conversion 10 Dec 2019 xiii

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

FOR

SAILOR 2025 (S2025) FY21 READY RELEVANT LEARNING (RRL)

CONTENT CONVERSION (CC)

Scope This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the basic requirements to be performed under this Ready Relevant Learning Fiscal Year 21 Content Conversion (RRL FY21 CC) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) contract. The detailed requirements will be defined in this ID/IQ SOW and each specific Delivery Order (DO). This ID/IQ documents the contractor tasks for the design, development, testing, and delivery of products in support of the RRL FY21 CC effort (see especially Appendices C, G, H, J, L, M, N, O). The contractor shall employ innovative instructional systems design (see Appendices H, L, and M), systems engineering, and training assessment approaches in conjunction with new and modernized technologies (see Appendix G) to support specified ratings accession training while simultaneously supporting the broader S2025 overarching goal of improving Sailors’ transfer of training to the operational work environment. The following represents examples of the broader Sailor 2025 (S2025) goals:

· Converting and/or improving designated courses so they are compatible with the waterfront or shipboard environment and contribute to the acquisition of actionable knowledge (i.e., practical knowledge that will be activated by and recognized as relevant to operational work contexts and events).

· Employing modernized media, instructional, and motivational strategies that are engaging (see Appendices G and H).

· Scheduling the converted and/or improved content closer in time to when the training will be put into practice in the work environment.

Rating Requirements The Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD), as the RRL Training Systems Program Manager (TSPM), is responsible for A School and accession C School content conversion in support of RRL. The contractor shall perform tasks for the design, development, testing, and delivery of products for the ratings listed in Table 1 (highest classification is Unclassified FOUO unless otherwise noted). The contractor shall also prepare for and conduct Train-the-Trainer (T3) events (SOW 3.5.13) and Course Pilot events (SOW 3.5.14) as part of this effort.

Table 1. Rating and Classification Requirements

Rating

Highest Information Classification

Facilities Access Classification

When Classification Required

Fire Control Technician (FT)

SECRET

At Contract Award

Master at Arms (MA)

Unclassified

At Contract Award

Aviation Structural Mechanic (AM)

Unclassified

At Contract Award

Electronics Technician Navigation, Submarines (ETV)

SECRET

At Contract Award

Cryptologic Technician, Maintenance (CTM)

Classified (TS/SCI)

At Contract Award

Mineman (MN)

Unclassified

At Contract Award

Information Systems Technician (IT)

SECRET

At Contract Award

Aviation Machinist’s Mate (AD)

Unclassified

At Contract Award

Course, Module and Lesson Structure Using the Government provided Functional Requirements Documents (FRDs) and corresponding SOW Appendix A, Knowledge Capture Reports (KCRs), Military Characteristics Documents (MCDs), and supporting data workbooks as a basis, the contractor shall determine the course, module, and lesson structure for each course for each rating and shall design, develop, test, and deliver products meeting the specified requirements.

Content Delivery Modes and Media Types Training products are grouped under four content delivery modes: Instructor-Facilitated Interactive Training (IFIT), Self-Directed Interactive Training (SDIT), Structured On-The-Job Training (SOJT), and Performance Support (PS) (see Appendices C, G, and J). Table 2 shows the four overarching content delivery modes and a high-level view of associated media types to support the RRL effort, as identified in the FRD and MCD.

NOTE: there is no traditional Instructor-Led Training Computer-Assisted Instruction (ILT-CAI) media type or instructional strategy in the RRL Content Conversion effort; rather, the contractor shall design and develop interactive multimedia instruction (IMI) for use as IFIT that meets the requirements for being hosted in Navy eLearning (NeL). In context for Ready Relevant Learning, “IMI” is the preferred term and shall be interpreted generically as electronic media, replacing both “ICW” and “ILT-CAI” as terms regardless of whether the product is instructor-led or student-led, and including considerations for software management tools (e.g. Learning Management System, Learning Record Store).

Table 2. Content delivery modes and Media Types

Media

Delivery Method

IFIT

SDIT

SOJT

In Training Environment

In Operation Environment

Actual Equipment

Augmented Reality (AR)

Checklist

Decision Tables

Demonstration Animation

Demonstration Video

Electronic Performance Support System (EPSS)

Full System Trainer

Hybrid Mobile App

Immersive Virtual Environment (IVE)

Intelligent Tutoring System

Job Aid (JA)

Level 1 IMI

Level 2 IMI

Level 3 IMI

Mixed Reality (MR)

Mobile Friendly/Mobile Ready Website

Mobile Optimized Website

Mobile Web App

Native App

Paper/Paper-based

PC Simulation

Picture/Diagram

Responsive Design Website

Technical Training Equipment

Training Aid

Training Support Material

Virtual Reality (VR)

Content Conversion Process Flows Depending on the specific content delivery method and media type, the contractor shall follow slightly different development process flows with different CDRL deliverables, some following traditional ISD processes, some following systems engineering processes, and some blending the two.

Interactive Multimedia Instruction (IMI) Development Process The contractor shall follow a systematic approach for converting content into IMI, Mobile Ready, Mobile Optimized, and Responsive Design Mobile Website media types detailed within the SOW (see SOW Appendices C and G). Figure 1 identifies such a high-level process.

Figure 1. IMI Levels 1 – 3 (and Mobile Ready, Mobile Optimized and Responsive Design Mobile Website) Content Conversion Process Performance Support (PS) and Structured On The Job Training (SOJT) Development Process The contractor shall follow a systematic approach for converting content into Performance Support (PS) and Structured On-the-job Training (SOJT) media types detailed within the SOW (see SOW Appendices C and G). Note the term “Performance Support” is generic unless used specifically in context with the intended host environment – training environment PS to be used in a training setting and operation environment PS to be used in an on-the-job operation setting.

PS Hosted in Training Delivery Environments The contractor shall create and convert training PS products (i.e. training aids, training support materials, supplemental training materials), following the same general process in Figure 1, to be hosted within specific training environments (e.g. NeL). Figure 2 identifies some of the training environments and devices capable of presenting training content within the current Naval training enterprise.

Figure 2. Training Environment and Devices PS Hosted in Operational Environments The contractor shall create and convert on-the-job PS products to be hosted within specific workplace (operation) environments and devices capable of presenting PS content within the current Naval training enterprise (e.g. MyNavy).

Complex Media Development Process The contractor shall follow a systematic approach for converting content into complex media types (e.g. PC simulation, Augmented/Mixed/Virtual Reality, and Immersive Virtual Environment (IVE)) detailed within the SOW (see SOW Appendices C and G).

Figure 3 identifies such a high-level process that blends the traditional IMI development process with the Systems Engineering Process specifically for these types of media products.

NOTE: Any reference in an FRD (and SOW Appendix A), KCR, MCD, and supporting data workbook to “VSIM” or “ICW 4” or a variant of that term shall be interpreted as complex media (either, or a blend of, PC simulation, Augmented/ Mixed/Virtual Reality, or Immersive Virtual Environment (see SOW Appendix C)).

Figure 3. Complex Media (e.g. PC Simulation, Augmented/Mixed/Virtual Reality and Immersive Virtual Environment Content Conversion Process Coordination with Third-Parties As required, the contractor shall coordinate with the Government and any third-party contractor responsible for developing complex media (e.g. PC simulation, Augmented/Mixed/Virtual Reality, or Immersive Virtual Environment system development (e.g. Government labs, MRTS 3D, PORTS, etc.)). In such cases contractor shall be required to design and develop training support materials that work together with the third-party developed system.

List of SOW Appendices To complete this effort, the contractor shall follow the guidance and requirements in the following Content Conversion appendices to this SOW:

· Appendix A (per rating): rating requirements covered by this SOW.

· Appendix B: acronyms used within this SOW.

· Appendix C: terms and definitions used within and outside this SOW regarding RRL Content Conversion.

· Appendix D: list of the Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs) identified within this SOW.

· Appendix E: Risk Assessment Example Format.

· Appendix G: descriptions of the four RRL content delivery modes.

· Appendix H: operational definitions of engaging instructional strategies to be used in content development under this SOW.

· Appendix I: list of Bloom’s taxonomy action verbs.

· Appendix J: description of media type characteristics.

· Appendix L: mobile learning roadmap.

· Appendix M: Experience Application Program Interface (xAPI) requirements for this SOW.

· Appendix N: guidance on Naval Educational Training Center (NETC) RRL Single User Gaming and Simulation.

· Appendix O: guidance on NETC RRL Video Streaming.

Terms and Definitions Appendix C provides the terms definitions that are critical to this SOW. These terms and definitions supersede any similar terms and definitions that may be found in other sources. If the contractor and the Government have differences in opinion over interpreting a given term, Appendix C shall be the baseline from which a mutual agreement can be made.

Government-Furnished Information (GFI) The Government will provide the following, along with other relevant GFI:

1. Functional Requirements Document (FRD), corresponding SOW Appendix A, and corresponding supporting data workbook for each rating

1. Military Characteristics Document (MCD) for each rating

1. Preliminary Analysis Results Data for each rating

1. FRD Reports (one document for each rating, etc.)

1. KC data for each rating

1. Training Guides, Lesson Plans, TCCD, COI for each rating

1. Existing courseware (ICW, IMI, etc.) examples for ratings

1. Applicable Style Guides (e.g. NETC, CENNAVINST 1554.1 and CNATT DELTIS templates required for CNATT courseware, etc.)

Government-Furnished Software, Tools and Equipment The Government will not furnish software (MS Office, Adobe Acrobat, etc.) or tools. The Government will not furnish equipment, hardware, software personnel, personnel, or materials for the Contractor’s use during this effort. The Government will provide a developer’s seat, within the test bed, for the Contractor to debug training materials tested. The Contractor shall provide the necessary hardware, software, tools, personnel, materials, and facilities, not otherwise furnished by the Government, to perform the tasks specified by this SOW.

Government-Furnished Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) Government SME access will be provided on a not-to-interfere basis. The Government is sensitive to overburdening SMEs. NAWCTSD will serve as the liaison between the fleet, Type Commander (TYCOM), Learning Centers (LCs) and/or Schoolhouses and the Contractor to coordinate access to SMEs in support of SOW activities and requirements. Location for SME support will be provided by the Government. The Government’s SMEs will be available face-to-face for key data collection activities (interviews, workshops, and reviews) and will be available for providing follow up information via phone, video-teleconference (VTC), or by Defense Collaboration Services (DCS), whenever practical.

Applicable Documents The following represent a list of applicable guidance documents for this effort. In the event of a conflict between the SOW and the references cited herein, the contents of this SOW take first precedence. Nothing in this SOW, however, supersedes applicable laws and regulations, unless a specific exemption has been obtained. These documents will be provided to the Contractor as GFI, if they are not readily available to the Contractor via the Internet. For all documents listed below, the latest versions apply.

Government Documents Table 3. Government Documents

Document Number

Document Title and/or Description

22 CFR, Parts 120-130

Foreign Relations, Chapter 1 Department of State, Subchapter M, International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR)

National Security Agency (NSA) Configuration Guide

NAVAIRINST 4355.19E

System Engineering Technical Review Process

NIST SP 800-44

Guidelines on Securing Public Web Servers

U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Final Credentialing Standards for Issuing Personal Identity Verification

21 CFR 1040

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 21, Part 1040, Performance Standards for Light-Emitting Products

29 CFR 1910

Occupational Safety and Health Standards (OSHS)

IEEE Std. 15288-2015

Systems and Software Engineering- Systems Life Cycle Processes

· Copies of the CFR sections can be obtained from http://www.pmddtc.state.gov/regulations_laws/itar_offical.html.

· Copies of U.S. Code can be obtained from https://ile-help.nko.navy.mil/ile/content/policy/section508.aspx.

· Copies of DISA Configuration Guide can be obtained from http://disa.mil/.

· Copies of CFR documents can be obtained from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR

· Copies of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses can be obtained from http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm.

· Copies of NSA Configuration Guides can be obtained from http://www.nsa.gov/ia/mitigation_guidance/security_configuration_guides/index.shtml.

· Copies of National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) documents can be obtained from http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/PubsSPs.html. Copies of OSHA standards can be obtained from http://www.osha.gov.

· Copies of OPM document can be obtained from http://www.opm.gov/investigate/resources/index.aspx.

· Copies of IEEE Std 15288-2015 can be obtained from http://www.ieee.org/.

Department of Defense (DOD) Documents Table 4. DOD Documents

DOD Document Number

Document Title and/or Description

DODI 1322.26

Distributed Learning (DL) dated 05 October 2017

(https://adlnet.gov/dodi/dodi-xapi)

DODI 5000.02

Operation of the Defense Acquisition System

DODI 8500.01

Department of Defense Instruction 8500.01 Cyber Security dated 14 Mar 2014

DODI 8510.01

Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Information Technology (IT), Change 1, dated 24 May 2016

DODI 5220.22-M

National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual, dated 28 Feb 2006

DOD 8570.01-M

Information Assurance (IA) Workforce Improvement Program, dated 19 Dec 2005 w/Change 4, 11/10/2015

DOD Implementation Plan for Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) dated 19 May 2000

MIL-HDBK-881D

Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materiel Items

MIL-HDBK-29612-1A

Department of Defense Handbook for Guidance for Acquisition of Training Data Products and Services (Part 1 of 5)

MIL-HDBK-29612-2A

Department of Defense Handbook for Instructional Systems Development/Systems Approach to Training and Education (Part 2 of 5)

MIL-HDBK-29612-3A

Development of Interactive Multimedia Instruction (Part 3 of 5)

MIL-HDBK-29612-4A

Department of Defense Handbook Glossary for Training (Part 4 of 5)

MIL-HDBK-29612-5A

Department of Defense Handbook for ADL Products and Systems (Part 5 of 5)

MIL-PRF-29612B

Performance Specification Training Data Products

MIL-HDBK-217F, Notice 2

Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment

MIL-HDBK-472, Notice 1

Maintainability Prediction

· Copies of DOD Directives and Instructions can be obtained from the DOD Issuances Website (http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/).

· DOD Implementation Plan for ADL can be obtained from http://prhome.defense.gov/Portals/52/Documents/RFM/Readiness/docs/adl_implementplan.pdf.

· Copies of the DOD Specifications and Handbooks can be obtained online from the DOD Single Stock Point or from the Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information System (ASSIST) website (http://everyspec.com/DoD/DoD-HDBK/)

Department of the Navy (DON) Documents Table 5. DON Documents

DON Documents

Document Title and/or Description

DON Department of Defense Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process (DIACAP) Handbook Version 1, dated 15 July 2008

NETCINST 5510.1

Content Segmentation and Classification Guide

NETCNOTE 1500.6

Metadata Instruction

NMCI.10011.01.UA3.E

Core Build Contents Version 2.3, 02 Aug 07

Copies of the Navy Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI) Core Build Standard can be obtained from http://www.nmci-eds.com/downloads/core-build

OPNAVINST 1500.76C

Naval Training System Requirements, Acquisition, and Management

SECNAVINST 5000.36A

Department of the Navy Information Technology Application and Data Management

SECNAVINST 5870.4A

SECNAV M-5239.1

Department of the Navy Information Assurance Program, Information Assurance Manual, dated Nov 2005

SECNAV M-5510.36

Department of the Navy, Information Security Program, dated Jun 2006

· Copies of the CON DIACAP Handbook can be obtained from http://www.doncio.navy.mil/PolicyView.aspx?ID=73

· Copies of the DON documents can be obtained online from the Navy’s Integrate Learning Environment website (http://www.secnav.navy.mil/rda/Policy/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2frda%2fPolicy%2fSECNAVINST%205000&FolderCTID=0x012000C996D88A9F817948AB69758011503AE2).

· Copies of the Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) documents can be obtained from http://doni.daps.dla.mil/allinstructions.aspx.

Sailor 2025 Documents Table 6. Sailor 2025 Documents

Document Number

Document Title and/or Description

Ready Relevant Learning (RRL) Analysis Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Sailor 2025 (includes process flows)

Authoring Instruction Materials (AIM) Documents Table 7. AIM Documents

Document Number

Document Title and/or Description

AIM Content Planning Module (CPM) User’s Manual

AIM Learning Object Module (LOM) User’s Manual

· Copies of the AIM documentation can be obtained from (https://studylib.net/doc/18638038/netc-e2e-sop---authoring-instructional-materials--aim/)

Industry Standards Table 8. Industry Standards

Document Owner

Document Title and/or Description

ADL Co-Laboratories

Shareable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) 2004—SCORM is a collection of standards and specifications adapted from multiple sources to provide a comprehensive suite of e-learning capabilities that enable interoperability, accessibility and reusability of Web-based learning content. SCORM documents and important information about SCORM can be obtained from: http://www.adlnet.gov/policy.

ADL Co-Laboratories

SCORM 2004 Conformance Testing Tool—This is a self-testing tool downloaded from http://www.adlnet.org to verify SCORM compliant courseware.

ADL Co-Laboratories

The Advanced Distributed Learning Registry (ADL-R): Best Practices for Updating Registered Content https://www.atsc.army.mil/tadlp/implementation/scorm/conformance/tools_scorm.asp

Experience API SCORM Profile

Guidelines for representing SCORM data and events as xAPI Statements. Provides a representation of the SCORM® data model as well as limited SCORM®-specific features, but uses xAPI for run time communications and tracking. The SCORM® profile was created as a compatibility approach to xAPI. It can be used to:

· create content that can track to both an LMS and learner record store (LRS)

· convert existing SCORM® data to xAPI Statements that can be stored in an LRS

· track experiences from a learning record provider in a manner consistent with how they would've been tracked in SCORM® (http://adlnet.github.io/xAPI-SCORM-Profile/)

xAPI LRS Conformance Requirements

The Experience API (xAPI)Conformance Requirements for Learning Record Stores

(https://adl.gitbooks.io/xapi-lrs-conformance-requirements/content/)

cmi5 Profile Specification

A profile specification for xAPI that describes packaging, launch, and important data capture concepts for traditional LMSs that include an LRS.

(https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current)

ANSI/ASQ Q9000-2000

Quality Management Systems - Fundamentals and Vocabulary

ANSI/ASQ Q9001-2000

Quality Management Systems - Requirements

ANSI/ASQ Q9004-2000

Quality Management Systems - Guidelines for Performance Improvements

ANSI Z535.1-2006 (R 2011)

Safety Colors

ANSI Z535.2-2011

Environmental and Facility Safety Signs

ANSI Z535.3-2011

Criteria for Safety Symbols

ANSI Z535.4-2011

Product Safety Signs and Labels

ANSI Z535.5-2011

Safety Tags and Barricade Tapes (for Temporary Hazards)

IEEE Std. 12207-2008, 2nd Edition

Systems and Software Engineering – Software Life Cycle Processes

IMS Global Learning Consortium

Question & Test Interoperability (QTI) Specification

Joint ADL Co-Lab

Best Practices Guide for Design and Development of SCORM Assessments (https://adlnet.gov/research/scorm/scorm-2004-4th-edition/scorm-2004-4th-edition-conformance-test-suite/)

· Copies of the industry standard documents can be found by visiting the web addresses indicated.

· Copies of the following Industry Standards can be obtained from the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/American Society for Quality Control (ASQC) (http://www.ansi.org).

· (Copies of the ANSI/Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) documents are available from http://standards.ieee.org/ or IEEE Service Center, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854-1331.)

Other Documents Table 9. Other Documents

Document Number

Document Title and/or Description

CJCSI 6510.01F

IA and Computer Network Defense (CND)

Executive Order 13465

Economy and Efficiency in Government Procurement Through Compliance with Certain Immigration and Nationality Act Provisions and Use of an Electronic Employment Eligibility Verification System, dated 6 June 2008 (Amendment to Executive Order 12989 of 13 February 1996)

NMCI.10011.01.UF0.E

Core Build Contents Version 7, 22 May 2012

NAVAIRINST 5000.21B

Naval SYSCOM Risk Management Policy dated 24 Jan 2008

Unnumbered Document

Joint ADL Co-Lab, ADL Acquisition Guidance, dated 9 Aug 2006

NAVPERS 18068F

Volume I Navy Enlisted Occupational Standards

Unnumbered Document

NeL Content Hosting Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Unnumbered Document

Navy Education and Training Center (NETC) Course Hosting Process

Unnumbered Document

Content Hosting and Report Management Service (CHaRMS) Developer User Guide V2

Unnumbered Document

Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) Specifications Brief

Unnumbered Document

VDI Risk Management Framework package

Unnumbered Document

Mobile Learning & Technology Roadmap

· Copies of the CJCSI document can be obtained from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/

· Copies of the Presidential document can be obtained from the Federal Register at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/08-1348.pdf

· Copies of the NMCI document can be obtained from the Navy’s Integrate Learning Environment website (https://www.public.navy.mil/netc/ile/Default.aspx).

· Copies of the SCORM documents can be obtained from http://www.adlnet.gov/capabilities/scorm/scorm-2004-4th#tab-resources.

· Copies of the Joint ADL Co-Lab document can be obtained from https://adlnet.gov/collaboration/dadlac.

· Copies of NAVAIRINST 5000.21B can be obtained from https://directives.navair.navy.mil/.

OPNAVINST 11010.20H

Facilities Project Instruction

· Copies of these instructions are available at http;//doni.daps.dla.mil

MIL-STD_130N

Department of Defense (DoD) Standard Practices – Identification Markings of U.S. Military Property

· Copies of this standard is available online at: http://quicksearch.dla.mil/qsSearch.aspx

DOD 5010-12M

Procedures for Acquisition Management of Technical Data

· The publication shown above is available at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/501012m.pdf

DFARS 252.211-7003

Item Identification and Valuation (August 2008)

DFARS 252.239-7001

Information Assurance Contractor Training and Certification (January 2008)

· DFARS clauses are downloadable from http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfarspgi/current/index.html

DFAR 2.101

Definitions

DFAR 52.204-9

Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel

DFAR 52.222-54

Employment Eligibility Verification

DFAR 252.204-7012

Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting

· DFAR clauses are downloadable from http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm

DODD 8140.01

Cyberspace Workforce management, dated 11 August 2015

DODI 8520.02

Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and Public Key (PK) Enabling, dated 24 May 2011

NIST SP 800-53r4

National Institute of Standards and technology (NIST) – Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations, dated 22 January 2015

CNSSI 1253

Committee on National Security Systems Instruction (CNSSI) – Security Categorization and Control Selection for National Security Systems, dated 27 March 2014

SECNAV M-5239.2

Department of the Navy Cyberspace Information Technology and Cybersecurity Workforce management and Qualification manual, dated June 2016

(The above documents are available from the following sources:

· DOD Instructions, Directives, and Manuals are available at http://www.esd.whs.mil/DD/DoD-Issuances/

· NIST Special Publications are available at https://csrc.nist.gov/Publications

· CNSSI Instructions are available at https://www.cnss.gov

· SECNAV Manuals are available at https://doni.documentservices.dla.mil/manuals-secnav.aspx)

DoN NAVEDTRA Documents

NAVEDTRA 130B (series)

Task Based Curriculum Development Manual, (Volumes 1-3)

NAVEDTRA 131B (series)

Personnel Performance Profile Based Curriculum Development Manual, Volumes (1 – 3)

NAVEDTRA 132 (series)

Navy School Testing Program Management Manual

NAVEDTRA 136

Naval Education and Training Command Integrated Learning Environment Course Development and Life Cycle Maintenance

· Copies of the NAVEDTRA documents are available for download from https://www.public.navy.mil/netc/ntt/pdfs/

Naval Air Systems Command Instructions (NAVAIRINST)

NAVAIRINST 4355.19E

Systems Engineering Technical Reviews, dated 6 February 2015

NAVAIRINST 500.21B

Naval SYSCOM Risk Management Policy, dated 24 January 2008

· Copies of the NAVAIRINSTs are available for download from https://directives.navair.navy.mil

NAWCTSD Documents

NAVAIR Training Systems Domain Guide

Naval Air Systems Command Training Systems Domain Guide, version 1.0, dated October 2016

Security Assessment Procedures Document

NAWCTSD Assessment Procedures for the Omnibus Standalone-Unclassified Training Systems, dated 22 September 2016

TDPCR 18-17

Technical data Package Contract Requirements (TDPCR) for the Surface Training Immersive Gaming and Simulations (STIGS) Program, dated 24 October 2018

TMCR 18-20

Technical manual Contract Requirements (TMCR) for the Surface Training Immersive Gaming and Simulations (STIGS) Program, dated 24 October 2018 (new)

TMCR 18-21

· Copies of these NAWCTSD documents will be provided as part of the contract or Government Furnished Information (GFI)

U.S. Code

Title 10, Section 2451 – 2456

Defense Standardization Program

· U.S. Code is downloadable from http://uscode.house.gov/search/criteria.shtml

Non-Government Documents

Industry Standards

ANSI = American national Standards Institute ISO = International Organization for Standardization

ANSI/ASQ/ISO 9001-2015

Quality Management Systems - Requirements

· Copies of the ANSI/ISO document is available from http://www.ansi.org

Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA)/SAE International

SAE/EIA-649-B

Configuration Management Standard

SAE/EIA-649-1 2014

Configuration Management Requirements for Defense Contracts

SAE/EIA 748-C

Earned Value Management Systems

GEIA-HB-649-A

Configuration Management Standard Implementation Guide, Revision A of February 2016

· Copies of the EIA/SAE documents are available from http://ansi.org

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)/ISO/International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)

IEEE/ISO/IEC

Systems and Software Engineering – Software Life Cycle Processes

IEEE/ISO/IEC

Systems and Software Engineering – Software Life Cycle Processes

IEEE/ISO/IEC

Systems and Software Engineering – content of Life Cycle Information Items (Documentation)

IEEE/ISO/IEC

Systems and Software Engineering – Software Life Cycle Processes – Requirements Engineering

· Copies of the IEEE/ISO/IEC documents are available from http://www.ieee.org

Requirements The Contractor shall organize, coordinate, and control program activities to ensure compliance with contract requirements and timely delivery of products specified herein.

General Requirements The Contractor shall provide the necessary hardware, software, personnel, supervision, management, materials, services, equipment, facilities, technical, logistics, and clerical support to perform the tasks specified in this SOW. The requirements defined herein form the basis for work performed for the Government during the entire contract. The Contractor shall meet the requirements of the SOW IAW the guidance documents provided and the contents of this document.

Program Planning The purpose of the program planning process is to produce and communicate effective and workable program plans. The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply program planning processes IAW IEEE Std 12207-2008, sections 6.1.2.3.4.5, 6.3.1, and 7.1.1.3.1.

Life-Cycle Model Management The purpose of the life cycle model management process is to define, maintain, and assure availability of policies, life cycle processes, life cycle models, and procedures for use by the program. The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply life cycle model management, at the program level, IAW IEEE Std 12207-2008, section 6.2.1. References to the organizational implementation of life cycle model management within IEEE Std 12207-2008, section 6.2.1 shall only apply to the program.

Infrastructure Management The purpose of the infrastructure management process is to provide the enabling infrastructure and services to the program and program objectives throughout the life cycle. The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply infrastructure management, at the program level, IAW IEEE Std 12207-2008, section 6.2.2. References to the organizational implementation of infrastructure management within IEEE Std 12207-2008, section 6.2.2 shall apply only to the program.

Program Assessment and Control The purpose of the program assessment and control process is to determine the status of the program and direct program plan execution. The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply program assessment and control IAW IEEE Std 12207-2008, section 6.3.2.

Program Decision Management The purpose of the decision management process is to select the most beneficial course of program action where alternatives exist. The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply a program decision management process IAW IEEE Std 12207-2008, section 6.3.3.

Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs) The Contractor shall update, improve, manage, and deliver acceptable contractually required data. The Contractor shall implement data management procedures and policies to provide control and configuration management (CM) of contractually required data. CDRL items shall be submitted via NAWCTSD form 4330/60 (Data Item Transmittal or Acceptance or Rejection Sheet [DITS]). The Contractor shall:

a.	Ensure data items to be delivered to the Government meet the quantity and quality requirements of the CDRL.
b.	Establish data management procedures and policies to provide control and CM of contractually required data. To ensure sub-Contractors meet the contract data requirements set forth in the CDRL, the prime Contractor shall maintain control of work completed by sub-Contractors.
c.	Establish and maintain data libraries consisting of technical manuals, parent system technical description, and software documentation for the work completed for academic training systems and other data pertaining to training systems.

Online Management System (OMS) The Contractor shall establish, implement, and make available an OMS throughout the entire contract completion date. The Contractor shall use the OMS as a tool for communication between the Contractor and the Government. The Contractor shall maintain deliverables (all versions) and corresponding Government comments on the OMS. The Contractor shall include on the OMS supporting materials, agendas, and minutes for conferences (e.g., Post Award Conference [PAC]), meetings (e.g., Integrated Product Team [IPT]), reviews (e.g., In-Progress Report [IPR]) and materials (presentations, agendas, etc.). The Contractor shall make available the OMS to be used at the PAC.

Data Library The Contractor shall establish and maintain a data library consisting of non-proprietary documentation, data, and information. The Contractor shall record and maintain a master listing of non-proprietary contract related documentation, data, and information used, maintained, updated, and improved for use in this effort. File sharing (Section 3.1.6) between the Contractor and the Government reviewers shall be provided. An intuitive file structure and naming convention, file directories, and final deliverables shall be provided on the file-sharing website (i.e., OMS Section 3.1.3). The latest version of files (text, graphics, animations, videos, etc.) shall be made available by close of business on Fridays for download by the Government.

Configuration Management (CM) The Contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply a CM process. CM shall be controlled by the Contractor to ensure only files associated with a specific date, location, and rating are in the directory for those files. The Contractor shall notify the Government, via e-mail, what directories on the OMS have new or revised files by close of business each Friday.

File Sharing The Contractor shall allow for file sharing between the Contractor and the Government reviewers. An intuitive file structure and naming convention, file directories, and final deliverables shall be provided on the OMS (see Section 3.1.3). The Contractor shall provide the Government notification, via e-mail, of the latest version of files (text, graphics, animations, videos, etc.) by close of business on Fridays for download by the Government.

Contractor SMEs The Contractor shall employ personnel who are recent SMEs in the domain areas specific to the applicable ratings with experience in operations and/or maintenance as required by rating. The Government strongly encourages the Contractor to utilize SMEs (i.e., domain, Engineer and Instructional Design) to ensure technical accuracy, data, information, and reports developed by the Contractor meet Government specification and requirements. The Contractor shall ensure personnel assigned to the contract have the appropriate security clearance necessary to access information and facilities required (see Table 1).

Data and Software Rights The Contractor shall provide the Government with Licensing/Ownership Rights. All technical data and computer software, including, but not limited to source files, two- and three-dimensional imagery, three-dimensional models and wire-frames, video, audio, animations, design documentation, other supporting documentation, and courseware developed by the Contractor with Government funding, not private funding, are property of the Government and are not to be used for resale to any Government agency, organization, or command. If the Contractor is involved in any future efforts with the Government, pursuant to the Government’s Unlimited Rights as provided for under the contract, the Government will not be charged again for the technical data and computer software developed under this contract when provided to, or expected to be used by, or for the use by any Government agency, organization or Command including, any modifications, derivative, works, and any integrated products created through a non-segregable interface to the technical data or computer software.

Contractor Acquired Property During the performance of this SOW, the contractor shall transfer title of contractor acquired property procured for the performance of the efforts in this SOW in accordance with the Government Furnished Property (GFP) clauses of the delivery order.

Copyrights The Contractor shall follow Federal copyright laws and DON Instructions (Secretary of the Navy Instruction [SECNAVINST] 5870.4A, Copyright) during the effort. Media assets, content, and files that are not expressly created or written by the Contractor shall be accompanied with copyright permission requests and copyright granted documentation.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Dec 20, 2019.