META Industry Day Brief.pptx
PPTX presentation 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- INDUSTRY DAY ANNOUNCEMENT/REQUEST FOR INFORMATION -- MULTI-ENGINE TRAINING AIRCRAFT (META) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N6134019R0118
About this file
This document contains a Request for Information (RFI) from the Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command regarding a Multi-Engine Training Aircraft (META). The Navy seeks information to identify potential solutions to satisfy its advanced multi-engine training aircraft needs from 2025 onward. Responses should address capabilities for a new training aircraft, unit training device, and operational flight trainer to support the Chief of Naval Air Training's multi-engine syllabi. The RFI details capability requirements and questions for industry. All final responses must be submitted by September 16, 2019 to inform the Navy's decision support analysis, requirements generation, acquisition strategy, and budget submission for a future multi-engine training system.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| META Industry Day Meeting Notes 20200204.pdf | ||
| META Industry Day Agenda.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| META_Requirements.pdf | ||
| META Industry Day Announcement.docx | DOCX document | |
| Questions_2_20190710_FINAL.pdf | ||
| Questions_1_20190702_FINAL.pdf | ||
| META_DAS_Request_for_Information_20190520_FINAL_R2.docx | DOCX document | |
| META_DAS_Request_for_Information_20190520_FINAL_R1.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Multi-Engine Training Aircraft (META) Industry Day Industry META Team 4 -5 February 2020 DISTRIBUTION A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited."
Presented to:
Presented by:
Confirm who’s all on the call Am I missing any other emblems?
Confirmation Source Selection Sensitive Marking should be removed.
Confirmation that Distribution should be changed from B to A DISTRIBUTION A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited.
Purpose & Agenda Purpose: To facilitate discussions with Industry and assist the Government in identifying a potential path forward for the Multi-Engine Training Aircraft replacement system Agenda Brief Objectives Schedule Overview Training Pipeline Mission Overview and Requirements from RFI Mission Profile Open Forum Discussion One-on-one Discussions (Today and Tomorrow if necessary)
Acquisition Objectives Aircraft procurement beginning in FY23 Successfully transition from T-44C to T-XX (META) Procure via commercial acquisition Procurements:
| Item | Type of Procurement |
| Aircraft (META) | COTS |
| GBTS/Simulators | Hardware and/or Services? |
| Maintenance/Sustainment | Hardware and/or Services? |
META Notional Schedule
Qty Subject to change
U.S. Navy Pilot Training Pipeline F/A-18
AV-8B
/EA-18G/
F-35
Primary T-6B
H-60 H-53
| H-1 |
| H-46 |
V-22 P-3/P-8
EP-3/
C-130 E-6A
E2/C2
Advanced Multi-Engine T-44C
Advanced Maritime
T-44C/META
Advanced Multi-Engine T-44C
Advanced Helicopter
TH-57D
Rotary Jet Jet E2 / C2
Multi- Engine Tilt Rotor
Pipeline Selection Intermediate Jet / Advanced Strike T45C Intermediate Jet T45C
F L E E T
R E P L A C E M E N T
S Q U A D R O N S
Advanced Tilt Rotor
TH-57D
‘Tailhook Track’
Capability Requirements
| Capability Requirement | Operational Attribute/Metric | Initial Objective |
| Human Engineering | Cockpit | Aircrew anthropometric accommodation representative of fleet aircraft. Two-seats, side-by-side arrangement with a jump seat behind the two. All seats will allow for associated survival equipment compatible with (current) USN Aviation Life Support System (ALSS) flight gear. |
| Cockpit Configuration | Operationally Flown from either cockpit seat, including all actions necessary to safely recover the aircraft. | |
| Cabin Configuration | The ability for the two pilot seats and two crew seat directly behind the pilot seat to have the following independent abilities; optionally monitor radio and NAVAID, adjust volume of ICS | |
| Power Plant | Engine | Twin engine, non-centerline thrust, capable of simulating single engine operations |
| Air Vehicle Performance | Range of Action | |
| Crew Load | 2 aircrews, 3 passengers; 200 lbs. of baggage | |
| Single Engine Rate of Climb(1) | ||
| Critical Field Length (ft.)(2) | ||
| Stall Characteristics(3) | Adequate airframe buffet warning provided in landing configuration | |
| Starting | ||
| Avionics | Instruments and Navigation | Radar Altimeter, INS/GPS, Auto-pilot, Tactical Collision Avoidance System (TCAS), RNAV Terminal, RNAV (GPS) Approaches, and Instrument Landing System (ILS) Category 1. |
Capability Requirements
| Capability Requirement | Operational Attribute/Metric | Initial Objective |
| Avionics | Identification | Identify Friend or Foe (IFF) |
| Controls and Displays | Integrated Digital Cockpit Displays | |
| Controls and Displays |
Mission Systems
| Weather Radar | ||
| Interoperability | Communications | Two VHF/UHF dual-band radios and Inter-Communication System (ICS) for pilot communications. |
| Supportability | Usage Rate (flying hours per year)(4) | |
| Sustainment | Fatigue Life |
(flight hours)
| Size, Weight, Power and Cooling (SWaP-C) | ||
| Ground Based Training System (GBTS) | GBTS Configuration Fidelity | A GBTS with complete and dimensionally accurate layout and features to represent cockpit and flying characteristics of a Design Basis Aircraft. |
| GBTS Motion Acuity | ||
| GBTS Visual Acuity | Operational Flight Trainer (OFT) Wide field of view visual image generation and display system with a terrain and object data base to include accurate and relative aircraft sizing, shape, features, angle off, aspect angle and closure rates. |
Notes:
(1) At design mission take-off gross weight at sea level under MIL-STD-210A, Hot Day (103° F) conditions. with propeller feathered on inoperative engine and take-off power (5) on the other engine, with flaps in the takeoff position, with landing gear extended
(2) Design mission take-off gross weight at sea level under MIL-STD-210A, Hot Day (103°F) conditions, no wind, brakes only
(3) In landing configuration at maximum landing weight
(4) On average there will be 30 RFT aircraft per day, 69 sorties, and 137 flight hours per day, with 237 flight days per year
META Mission Profile
| Mission: Cruise to Mission Training, Descent for Extended Landing Pattern Training | ||||||
| SEGMENT | FUEL | TIME | DISTANCE | SPEED | ALTITUDE | THRUST SETTING |
| Take-Off | 5 minutes at maximum continuous power at installed, sea level static conditions with all engines operating (5 crew and 200 lbs. payload) | |||||
| Climb | Max Rate of Climb (ROC) | Max Continuous | ||||
| High Work Loiter | 1.5 Hours | No Credit | Max Range | 15,000 ft | ||
| No Credit Descent | No Credit | No Credit | To 1,000 ft. | |||
| Holding Pattern Loiter | 2.5 Hours | No Credit | Max Range | 1,000 ft. | ||
| No Credit to Landing | To Sea Level | |||||
| Taxi Shut Down | 5 mins | No Credit | Sea Level | Ground Idle | ||
| Reserve Fuel Allowance | 5% initial usable fuel | 20 mins | No Credit | Max Endurance | Sea Level |
15,000 ft.
1,000 ft.
1.5 hr. loiter
2.5 hr. loiter 5 mins.
Sea-level
Cruise alt no less than 15,000 and not greater than cruise ceiling (300 ft./min. climb potential).
This segment captures a period of time in the holding pattern with 32 or more touch and go’s per flight with 2 student pilots and 1 instructor pilot. Vary the time on this leg to finish the mission with zero fuel.
Reserve fuel is 5% of initial useable fuel and fuel required for 20 min. loiter at sea level at max endurance plus all engines operating.
Questions for Industry What acquisition and execution strategy does your company recommend for META? If applicable, how has previous platform procurements and lifecycle sustainment experience influenced your recommendation?
What is your company’s thoughts on the associated aircraft simulator strategy and expertise? In-house development as with the META platform or contracted out with a simulator centric company? Owned or leased by the navy?
What is your company’s throughout capacity for similar META platforms? What about surge capacity reserve?
What is your company’s thoughts on the associated training curriculum and training resources?
What is your company’s thoughts on providing the Government access to technical data to allow a 100% Government organic depot capability? Also, your thoughts on Government technical reach back partnerships with the OEM.
Regarding structural repair, at what point is it required for organizational level maintainers to request and obtain engineering support?
What efforts/initiatives has your company demonstrated to not only build a robust trainer but also to reduce the life-cycle support cost of a 30+ year platform.
Does your company have a single, standard cabin and avionics suite configuration? How difficult is it to change configuration to meet the Navy’s current configuration requirements (if required)?
Does your company produce an aircraft, based on the current configuration requirements that has the ability to shorten landing rollouts (e.g., reverse thrust/BETA)?
Can your company offer alternate brakes and tires to suit the requirement for above average landings and touch-an-go landings?
Thank you!
image5.png image14.png image15.png image16.png image17.png image18.png image19.jpeg image20.png image1.png image2.png image3.png image4.png image6.png image7.png image8.png image9.png image10.png image11.png image12.png image13.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .