META Industry Day Brief.pptx

PPTX presentation 1 MB Posted

Attached to
INDUSTRY DAY ANNOUNCEMENT/REQUEST FOR INFORMATION -- MULTI-ENGINE TRAINING AIRCRAFT (META) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N6134019R0118
Issued by
Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command

About this file

This document contains a Request for Information (RFI) from the Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command regarding a Multi-Engine Training Aircraft (META). The Navy seeks information to identify potential solutions to satisfy its advanced multi-engine training aircraft needs from 2025 onward. Responses should address capabilities for a new training aircraft, unit training device, and operational flight trainer to support the Chief of Naval Air Training's multi-engine syllabi. The RFI details capability requirements and questions for industry. All final responses must be submitted by September 16, 2019 to inform the Navy's decision support analysis, requirements generation, acquisition strategy, and budget submission for a future multi-engine training system.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to INDUSTRY DAY ANNOUNCEMENT/REQUEST FOR INFORMATION -- MULTI-ENGINE TRAINING AIRCRAFT (META), newest first.
File Type Posted
META Industry Day Meeting Notes 20200204.pdf PDF
META Industry Day Agenda.pptx PPTX presentation
META_Requirements.pdf PDF
META Industry Day Announcement.docx DOCX document
Questions_2_20190710_FINAL.pdf PDF
Questions_1_20190702_FINAL.pdf PDF
META_DAS_Request_for_Information_20190520_FINAL_R2.docx DOCX document
META_DAS_Request_for_Information_20190520_FINAL_R1.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Multi-Engine Training Aircraft (META) Industry Day Industry META Team 4 -5 February 2020 DISTRIBUTION A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited."

Presented to:

Presented by:

Confirm who’s all on the call Am I missing any other emblems?

Confirmation Source Selection Sensitive Marking should be removed.

Confirmation that Distribution should be changed from B to A DISTRIBUTION A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited.

Purpose & Agenda Purpose: To facilitate discussions with Industry and assist the Government in identifying a potential path forward for the Multi-Engine Training Aircraft replacement system Agenda Brief Objectives Schedule Overview Training Pipeline Mission Overview and Requirements from RFI Mission Profile Open Forum Discussion One-on-one Discussions (Today and Tomorrow if necessary)

Acquisition Objectives Aircraft procurement beginning in FY23 Successfully transition from T-44C to T-XX (META) Procure via commercial acquisition Procurements:

ItemType of Procurement
Aircraft (META)COTS
GBTS/SimulatorsHardware and/or Services?
Maintenance/SustainmentHardware and/or Services?

META Notional Schedule

Qty Subject to change

U.S. Navy Pilot Training Pipeline F/A-18

AV-8B

/EA-18G/

F-35

Primary T-6B

H-60 H-53

H-1
H-46

V-22 P-3/P-8

EP-3/

C-130 E-6A

E2/C2

Advanced Multi-Engine T-44C

Advanced Maritime

T-44C/META

Advanced Multi-Engine T-44C

Advanced Helicopter

TH-57D

Rotary Jet Jet E2 / C2

Multi- Engine Tilt Rotor

Pipeline Selection Intermediate Jet / Advanced Strike T45C Intermediate Jet T45C

F L E E T

R E P L A C E M E N T

S Q U A D R O N S

Advanced Tilt Rotor

TH-57D

‘Tailhook Track’

Capability Requirements

Capability RequirementOperational Attribute/MetricInitial Objective
Human EngineeringCockpitAircrew anthropometric accommodation representative of fleet aircraft. Two-seats, side-by-side arrangement with a jump seat behind the two. All seats will allow for associated survival equipment compatible with (current) USN Aviation Life Support System (ALSS) flight gear.
Cockpit ConfigurationOperationally Flown from either cockpit seat, including all actions necessary to safely recover the aircraft.
Cabin ConfigurationThe ability for the two pilot seats and two crew seat directly behind the pilot seat to have the following independent abilities; optionally monitor radio and NAVAID, adjust volume of ICS
Power PlantEngineTwin engine, non-centerline thrust, capable of simulating single engine operations
Air Vehicle PerformanceRange of Action
Crew Load2 aircrews, 3 passengers; 200 lbs. of baggage
Single Engine Rate of Climb(1)
Critical Field Length (ft.)(2)
Stall Characteristics(3)Adequate airframe buffet warning provided in landing configuration
Starting
AvionicsInstruments and NavigationRadar Altimeter, INS/GPS, Auto-pilot, Tactical Collision Avoidance System (TCAS), RNAV Terminal, RNAV (GPS) Approaches, and Instrument Landing System (ILS) Category 1.

Capability Requirements

Capability RequirementOperational Attribute/MetricInitial Objective
AvionicsIdentificationIdentify Friend or Foe (IFF)
Controls and DisplaysIntegrated Digital Cockpit Displays
Controls and Displays

Mission Systems

Weather Radar
InteroperabilityCommunicationsTwo VHF/UHF dual-band radios and Inter-Communication System (ICS) for pilot communications.
SupportabilityUsage Rate (flying hours per year)(4)
SustainmentFatigue Life

(flight hours)

Size, Weight, Power and Cooling (SWaP-C)
Ground Based Training System (GBTS)GBTS Configuration FidelityA GBTS with complete and dimensionally accurate layout and features to represent cockpit and flying characteristics of a Design Basis Aircraft.
GBTS Motion Acuity
GBTS Visual AcuityOperational Flight Trainer (OFT) Wide field of view visual image generation and display system with a terrain and object data base to include accurate and relative aircraft sizing, shape, features, angle off, aspect angle and closure rates.

Notes:

(1) At design mission take-off gross weight at sea level under MIL-STD-210A, Hot Day (103° F) conditions. with propeller feathered on inoperative engine and take-off power (5) on the other engine, with flaps in the takeoff position, with landing gear extended

(2) Design mission take-off gross weight at sea level under MIL-STD-210A, Hot Day (103°F) conditions, no wind, brakes only

(3) In landing configuration at maximum landing weight

(4) On average there will be 30 RFT aircraft per day, 69 sorties, and 137 flight hours per day, with 237 flight days per year

META Mission Profile

Mission: Cruise to Mission Training, Descent for Extended Landing Pattern Training
SEGMENTFUELTIMEDISTANCESPEEDALTITUDETHRUST SETTING
Take-Off5 minutes at maximum continuous power at installed, sea level static conditions with all engines operating (5 crew and 200 lbs. payload)
ClimbMax Rate of Climb (ROC)Max Continuous
High Work Loiter1.5 HoursNo CreditMax Range15,000 ft
No Credit DescentNo CreditNo CreditTo 1,000 ft.
Holding Pattern Loiter2.5 HoursNo CreditMax Range1,000 ft.
No Credit to LandingTo Sea Level
Taxi Shut Down5 minsNo CreditSea LevelGround Idle
Reserve Fuel Allowance5% initial usable fuel20 minsNo CreditMax EnduranceSea Level

15,000 ft.

1,000 ft.

1.5 hr. loiter

2.5 hr. loiter 5 mins.

Sea-level

Cruise alt no less than 15,000 and not greater than cruise ceiling (300 ft./min. climb potential).

This segment captures a period of time in the holding pattern with 32 or more touch and go’s per flight with 2 student pilots and 1 instructor pilot. Vary the time on this leg to finish the mission with zero fuel.

Reserve fuel is 5% of initial useable fuel and fuel required for 20 min. loiter at sea level at max endurance plus all engines operating.

Questions for Industry What acquisition and execution strategy does your company recommend for META? If applicable, how has previous platform procurements and lifecycle sustainment experience influenced your recommendation?

What is your company’s thoughts on the associated aircraft simulator strategy and expertise? In-house development as with the META platform or contracted out with a simulator centric company? Owned or leased by the navy?

What is your company’s throughout capacity for similar META platforms? What about surge capacity reserve?

What is your company’s thoughts on the associated training curriculum and training resources?

What is your company’s thoughts on providing the Government access to technical data to allow a 100% Government organic depot capability? Also, your thoughts on Government technical reach back partnerships with the OEM.

Regarding structural repair, at what point is it required for organizational level maintainers to request and obtain engineering support?

What efforts/initiatives has your company demonstrated to not only build a robust trainer but also to reduce the life-cycle support cost of a 30+ year platform.

Does your company have a single, standard cabin and avionics suite configuration? How difficult is it to change configuration to meet the Navy’s current configuration requirements (if required)?

Does your company produce an aircraft, based on the current configuration requirements that has the ability to shorten landing rollouts (e.g., reverse thrust/BETA)?

Can your company offer alternate brakes and tires to suit the requirement for above average landings and touch-an-go landings?

Thank you!

image5.png image14.png image15.png image16.png image17.png image18.png image19.jpeg image20.png image1.png image2.png image3.png image4.png image6.png image7.png image8.png image9.png image10.png image11.png image12.png image13.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .