KEDA_SIOP Industry Day_Slides All_Final_v2.pdf

Shipyard Infrastructure Optimization Program (SIOP) Across the Nation

Speaker: Bryan Cochran

Shipyard Infrastructure Optimization Program (SIOP)

Program Executive: Mr. Mark Edelson Program Manager: CAPT David Matvay

Briefer: Bryan Cochran; Deputy Director, SIOP Puget Sound Naval Shipyard

Kitsap Industrial Readiness Summit

20 August 2026

Shipyard Infrastructure Optimization Program

CUI

Problem Statement Condition, capacity, and configuration of facilities, dry docks, and equipment at the four public shipyards contribute to inadequate throughput and loss of fleet operational availability.

Shipyards designed for constructing conventional ships are not optimized for repairing the nuclear fleet.

SIOP North Star Enable increased submarine and carrier maintenance throughput by recapitalizing shipyard infrastructure and equipment required to conduct scheduled depot maintenance and by reconfiguring infrastructure layout to deliver reductions in availability durations.

Baseline Performance (2018) Dry dock capability/survivability gaps: insufficient dry docks for VIRGINIA VPM subs and GERALD R. FORD carriers.

Inadequate facilities and equipment led to maintenance delays that contributed to >1,300 lost operational days for carriers and >12,500 lost operational days for submarines. (FY00-16, GAO).

Solution – SIOP

LOE 2: Recapitalize and reconfigure infrastructure for optimization

LOE 3: Modernize Industrial Plant Equipment

LOE 1: Construct and recapitalize dry docks and piers

Program Benefits

Operational ROI Dry docks to support new platforms and fleet maintenance requirements Adequate inventory Dimensions Shore services (power and water)

Facilities Building envelope Life/health/safety, fire protection, seismic

Utilities Capacity to meet total demand Reliability

Financial ROI Baseline of lost operating days from GAO audit Submarine idle time cost of $800K / day

SIOP digital modeling Based on historic performance data Captures industrial processes through the yard Reduces submarine availabilities by average of 118 days across all four shipyards

ROI = The Value of a Submarine at Sea

Return on Investment

Program Initiatives Programmatic approach

• Visibility of entire problem and solution

• Standardization across the four shipyards

• Robust governance

Digitally modelled solutions Contracting methods

• Early contractor involvement

• Economic price adjustments and award fees

• Multi-contract projects

Utilities privatization

Additional Opportunities Progressive design-build (to budget) Eliminate federal environmental permits for military construction Section 2818 & multi-year O&MN for construction Accept technical risk (ATFP, life span, life cycle costs) Private financing of military construction (OMB

Circular A-11)

Continuous Improvement

SIOP Performance

CNO Approved KPPs – 17 August 2023

Capacity Increase Resiliency Increase

Availability Duration Reduction Availability Man Day Reduction

SIOP Capability Delivery

KPP 10 - Reduce dry dock duration and maintenance availibilities Targets reductions of 8% for submarines and 5% for aircraft carriers; 15% and 10% respectively

KPP 11 - Reduce average number of man days for maintenance availibilities Targets reductions of 10% for submarines and 5% for aircraft carriers; 25% and 15% respectively

Dry docks support the class maintenance plans for nuclear ships (quantity, size, power, and cooling)

Dry docks survive seismic and flooding events Pier-side berths to achieve maintenance throughput Facilities and equipment are laid out for efficient ship maintenance Reduced duration of availabilities Reduced man day expenditure

Buildings can be occupied and used (roof, structural integrity, life-safety code, utilities)

Capital equipment is available for use Force protection requirements met Critical functions sustained for 14 days off grid Power Water

Completed 59 facility projects ($1.8B) 340 pieces of industrial plant equipment ($772M )

Work Underway 49 projects ($7B) under construction, including seven dry docks 80 pieces of industrial plant equipment in procurement ($809M ) Three new dry docks under construction; four dry docks are being modernized

SIOP Construction

PNSY Dry Dock 1 Expansion

PSNS Shipyard Electrical Backbone

FY 26 Accomplishments Achieved Gate 4 (configuration baseline) for PNSY and PSNS Completed PHNS central air compressor plant upgrade Completed PSNS Pier 5 restoration Awarded PSNS relocaƟons for seismically vulnerable faciliƟes

Awarded NNSY Dry Dock 3 modernization Received proposals for NNSY electrical privatization Delivered 25-ton portal cranes to PSNS (4 of 4) Delivered plasma cutters to PSNS (3 of 4) Awarded 175-ton portal crane to PNSY (7 of 7)

PNSYNNSYPSNSPHNS

3 / $36M3 / $79M5 / $330M3 / $4MMILCON Design

2 / $1,857M3 / $398M2 / $329M1 / $3,069MMILCON Construction

12 / $21M4 / $6M10 / $4M9 / $44MRM Design

9 / $159M6 / $395M17 / $634M8 / $225MRM Construction

8 / $215M35 / $307M14 / $202M12 / $94MIPE Procurement

23 / $716M11 / $436M16 / $557M9 / $74MConstruction Complete

Dry Docks – New Construction

Avoid Navy $800k per day of idle submarines awaiting maintenance

PHNS Dry Dock 5 PNSY Dry Dock 1 Expansion

Increases PNSY from 3 to 5 submarine dry docks On schedule for FY29 completion; high confidence of completing within authorized amount

Strong Navy and contractor partnership to synchronize construction and ongoing submarine maintenance

Project milestone resequencing will gain 45 days of operational availability for next two LOS ANGELES class refueling, plus a $16M return on investment

Increases PHNS from 2 to 3 VACL Blk V dry docks Project is more than 50% complete; tremie concrete ongoing; dewatering basin next milestone

Senior Navy engagement with parent companies facilitated increased staffing, resources, and delivery of request for equitable adjustment

PSNS Multi-Mission Dry Dock (M2D2)

The PACOM AOR does not have a dry dock to accommodate FORD class depot maintenance

The FORD class has increased power and cooling requirements, different line-loading and dimensions, and reduced lifting access than the NIMITZ class

Multi-contract approach, extensive modeling, collaborative design, and Phase 0 preparations reduce maintenance conflict and acquisition risk

CVN Accessibility to the Pacific

Primary Facilities Delivered Dry Dock Pier 2 Shipyard Support Building Forge & Heat Treatment Facility Radio Hill Complex (laydown area) Shipfitter & Welder Facility

3-Dimensional Design & BIM 130 Revit Models 150 Navisworks Models 6400 Drawing Sheets

The U.S. Navy will construct the nation’s largest repair dry dock to support FORD class aircraft carriers in the Pacific

Dry Docks – Modernization

NNSY Dry Dock 8 NNSY Dry Dock 3PSNS Dry Dock 4

PSNS Dry Dock 4 (ca. 1940) NNSY Dry Dock 8 (ca. 1941) NNSY Dry Dock 3 (ca. 1935)

Modernizes dry dock with comprehensive structural system upgrades to enable VIRGINIA class submarine maintenance

Widens floor for increased efficiency

Rebuilds two circa 1940 berths incapable of supporting ships or cranes

Increases cooling capacity to provide FORD class dry dock in the Atlantic

Dry Dock Modernization Extends operational capability of century old dry docks by another 100 years Cheaper to modernize than construct new graving dry docks Incorporating existing infrastructure, reduces complexity of shipyard operations

86 years old 85 years old 91 years old

Installs wall anchors to prevent collapse during seismic event, ensuring safety of workforce, community, submarine

Strengthens surrounding soil to reduce liquefaction concern

Completed Facilities

PHNS Low Pressure Air

Modernized LPA generation and distribution to provide resilient maintenance infrastructure

Restored LPA capacity supporting 4 dry docks, 47 repair berths, and 47 buildings at JBPHH

PHNS Water Line

Replaced 3,100 feet of deteriorated 1922-era 24-inch cast iron water line

Serves as primary water source for PHNS and Hickam Airfield

PSNS Pier 5

Replaced, repaired, and reinforced degraded piles and ship connection jewelry

Restored 1,100 LF of submarine berthing

Reskinned and reroofed circa 1939, 100KSF warehouse

Created watertight envelope and addressed life/safety deficiencies of nuclear refueling & radiological material storage facilities

NNSY Radiological Storage PNSY Waterfront Production Facility PNSY Paint, Blast and Rubber Facility

120KSF, 4-story facility consolidates shops, support, and engineers

Reduces availability durations by 2% and saves $1.8M in labor per availability

74KSF facility consolidated nine dispersed, aged buildings making all submarine gaskets

Efficiencies save 2,000 labor hours per year and $2.5M

Industrial Plant Equipment (IPE)

NNSY Pipe Bending Machine PSNS 25-ton Portal Crane

Average age reduced from 24 years to 20 years

NNSY Reactor Servicing Complex

PNSY Shaft Lathe

PHNS 5 Axis Router

Ongoing Construction at PSNS & IMF

Speakers: CAPT Troy Brown and CDR John Daly

Workload Projections by Location

PRE-DECISIONAL

0.00

500.00

1000.00

1500.00

2000.00

2500.00

3000.00

3500.00

4000.00

FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32

Bremerton (SIOP) Bangor (NNDM/TRF) Spokane WA South Sound MCON South Sound SRM North Sound MCON North Sound SRM

Multi-Mission Dry Dock Construction, EIS Status

Speaker: Dave Gibson

The Navy’s Largest Construction Project Puget Sound Naval Shipyard – Multi-Mission Dry Dock

20 August 2026

Disclaimer

This presentation represents planning by the Department of the Navy and a National Environmental Policy Act decision has not been rendered.

A Generational Challenge

The U.S. Navy will construct the nation’s largest repair dry dock to support Ford-class carriers in the Pacific.

Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier

CVN-78 USS Gerald R. Ford undergoing sea trials, 8 Apr 17

CVN-79 USS John F. Kennedy undergoing sea trials, 30 Jan 26

Crew due to automation

3,200Nimitz

2,600Ford

-600

Voltage

Shore Power Capacity

Cooling Capacity

4.16kVNimitz

13.8kVFord +9.6kV

20MVA Nimitz

40MVA Ford

+20MVA

10,000gpmNimitz

17,620gpmFord +7.6Kgpm

Saltwater Fire WaterSaltwater CoolingCooling Water

Non-potable WaterLP AirHP Air

Pure WaterOily WastePotable Water

Pressure ReliefSteamSanitary Sewer

Strategic Importance

USS Carl Vison in INDOPACOM

USNS Comfort traversing Panama Canal

Panama Canal Limitation 168 ft Canal beam width

257 ft Ford flight deck width

Multi-Mission Dry Dock (M2D2)

Pier 2

M2D2

Renderings of the Multi-Mission Dry Dock (M2D2)

630K CY Chamber896k CY Excavation

867k CY Dredging

817k CY Concrete 361K SF Support Facilities

PNSY DD1

P381

PHNS DD5

P209

PSNS M2D2

P454

Pentagon

0.4x 0.8x 3x

0.6x 2x0.5x

0.7x 0.6x 2.5x

804,750 tons 435,000 cubic yards

Concrete

Total concrete used

Eiffel Tower 11x6x5x 10,100 tons

Steel

Empire State Building

9.5 Megawatts

Peak electrical demand

Volume

Electric

Note: Does not include Pier 2 or ancillary buildings of P454

Weight of iron

235,941 cubic yards

Roman Colosseum Volume above arena

Dry Dock Size Comparison

Major Above Grade Features

Dry Dock (1,210’ L X 210’ W)

40’ Gage Crane Track

Support Buildings

Process Water & Dewatering Pumphouse

Process Water Collection Storage Tanks

Freight and Personnel Elevator

Stairway to Dry Dock

Seat & Sill Structure

Caisson

Major Below Grade Features

Upland Slurry Wall

Permanent Cofferdams

Saltwater Pumpwells

Process Water and Dewatering Pumpwell

Engineered Backfill

Crane Track Piles

Apron Piles

Entrance Wall and Caisson Seats

Electrical, Mechanical, and Telecom Tunnels

Pressure Relief System

Farragut Utility Tunnel

Process Systems and Utilities

Closed Loop Cooling

Shore Chilled Water

Saltwater (Closed Loop Cooling Backup)

Saltwater (Fire Protection)

Low-pressure & High-pressure Compressed Air

Non-potable Freshwater

Oily Waste

Potable Freshwater

Pure Water

Sanitary Sewer

Steam

Industrial power

Shore power

Construction Constraints

Shipyard nuclear ship maintenance must continue, and local community must operate

• 15,000 shipyard workers – largest in the Navy

• Maintaining CVNs, SSBNs, SSGNs, and SSNs

• Limited security access (Controlled Industrial Area)

• Limited laydown area

• Aged utilities and buildings

• Commercial and hydroculture waterway

• Competing construction programs

• Surrounded by local community

PSNS Dry Dock 3, future site of M2D2

PSNS Dry Dock 6 with USS Nimitz Sinclair Inlet, Bremerton WA 25

Construction Logistics

P454 Construction Footprint Temporary Construction Port Security Barrier

CIA

Train Rail

Relocating 1,355 Shipyard Workers

240K sqft Leased

Offsite Multi-use Area For Contractors

What you build and how you build it

N

Logistics Pier

Batch Plant

Temporary Mooring For Construction

Train Rail Availability in CIA

Providing Solutions

Batch Plant Dedicated to P454

Community Considerations

N

M2D2

Downtown Bremerton

P454 Primary Facilities

Multi-Mission Dry Dock (M2D2) Reinforced concrete, pressure relieved graving dry dock with caisson for FORD and NIMITZ class maintenance, with supporting electrical and mechanical systems

Pier 2 136KSF reinforced concrete with pile caps and precast deck panels, replacement for Piers 6 and 7

Shipyard Support Building 280KSF facility consolidates multiple functions and existing buildings

Forge & Heat Treat Facility 78KSF facility (at Bangor)

Radio Hill Complex 494KSF laydown area and employee support building (at Bangor)

Shipfitter & Welder Facility 310KSF heavy industrial shop

PSNS Piers 6 & 7 Metal Forger

Caisson

Industry Feedback – What do the best owners do?

Project Information Contracting Access Collaboration Government

Management Soil Borings

Utility Connections

Equipment Specifications

HazWaste Rules

Contractor Laydown

Source Selection

Economic Price Adjustments

IDIQ Items

Contract Structure

Bonding

Delivery Milestone Achievement Award

Installation (gate) access

Laydown areas

Harbor security

Safety procedures

Ferry schedule

Work hours

Site Logistics

Design files

Alternative technical solutions

Value engineering

Submittals

Schedule and invoice format

Contractor synchronization

OICC and A/E staffing

Electronic systems

Staff Availability

Staff location

Speed of response

29What can the Navy do to reduce risk and uncertainty?

Environmental Impact Statement Status

Draft EIS Released: 18 July 2025 (complete)

Draft EIS Public Comment Period Ended: 3 September 2025 (complete)

Final EIS Public Release: Pending

Anticipated Record of Decision: Pending

The Way Ahead

NOTIONAL SCHEDULE

• FY25: Preparatory leases, renovations, and moves

• 500+ people to relocate

• FY27: Forge Shop, Shipfitter/Welder Facility, Pier 2 construction (in-water work), demolish facilities

• FY28: Demolish Piers 6 & 7, dredging, logistics pier

• FY29: Cofferdam, dredging

• FY30: CVN 79 first pier side maintenance

• FY32: Demolish DD3

• FY33: Dry dock structure

• FY35: Utility buildings and cranes

• FY38: Completion

PRELIMINARY

ACQUISITION STRATEGY

• Multiple primary construction contracts

• Various multiple award or single award contract vehicles

• Competitive best-value source selection contracts

• Set-asides for small business

• Additional contracts for environmental work

• Early contractor involvement throughout design

• Fixed price contracts potentially with delivery milestone achievement awards

• Economic price adjustments and indefinite quantity elements

For additional information see:

https://multimissiondrydock.com/

Navy Panel Audience Q&A

Speakers: David Gibson, Bryan Cochran, CAPT Brown and CDR Daly

How to do Business with the Government

Speaker: James Davis

Services to Help Your Business Grow Presented by James Davis

KEDA, WA Apex Accelerator, Region 1

August, 20th 2026 This APEX Accelerator is funded in part through a cooperative

Agreement with the Department of Defense.

Experience in private industry

• Do you have stable clientele already?

• Do you have experience in the Scope?

Prime Contracting

• Do you have capacity

• Are you ready?

Subcontracts

• Partners

• Does it complement what you do?

Where to Start?

About Apex Accelerator Congress established the Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement

Program in 1985 as part of the Department of Defense (DoD) Authorization Act

PTAC was designed to assist businesses (focusing on small businesses) with federal, state and local government contracting

The program is funded by the federal government through the United States Department of Defense (DoD) and locally by Thurston EDC and Kitsap Economic Development Alliance

In 2023 the name changed from PTAC to APEX Accelerator

We help businesses of all sizes, small and large

WINFIND

Services for Small & Large Business Clients

COMPETE

One to One Counseling

Register as a WA APEX Accelerator client

• At washingtonapex.org

• If not in WA, visit https://www.napex.us to find your local APEX Accelerator Advisor

APEX Accelerator services are free

Profile and Marketing Reviews

Who buys what you sell?

How often do they buy it?

How are they buying?

DSBS, Dynamic Small Business Search

• Linked from SAM or SBA account

EMAIL ADDRESSCAPABILITIES NARRATIVEADDRESSCONTACTCOMPANY

tracht@accommotrac.com We manufacture and distribute the Zone-Trac? AR (augmented reality) device. The device trains enhanced vision, concentration and relaxation and is based on NASA research.

5008 PULLMAN AVE NE

SEATTLE, WA 98105-2138

JOSEPH TRACHTMANELITE PERFORMANCE & LEARNING CENTER PS9

leigh.stylos@tamazari.com

487C HOTCHKISS RD

COLVILLE, WA 99114-8740

LEIGH STYLOSTAMAZARI INC10

lovoltcomm@yahoo.com

4816 244TH ST CT E

GRAHAM, WA 98338-8371

DOLANNA BURNETTLOVOLT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.11

Capability Statement 1 page Front and back Photos Color Informative

Elevator Pitch

• Introduction, NOT a sales pitch Company name Certifications What you sell Capability statement

SAM Registration and Updates

What role does State & IRS play?

UEI?

CAGE Code?

DSBS?

Certification Assistance

Federal

SB

SDB

HUBZone

8 (a)

SDVOSB

WOSB

WA State

WBE

MBE

MWBE

CBE

SEDBE

ACDBE

SBE

DBE

PWSBE

Bid Match

Subcontracting with Large Primes

Events Networking Agency Lists of Contractors Introductions

Classes & Workshops

• Government Contracting 101

• Federal Contracting Lexicon

• Steps Leading to a Government Contract

• DoD Cybersecurity Requirements

• Marketing

• Socio-economic Certifications

• Solicitation Review, the Go – No Go Decision

• Cost & Price Proposal Preparation

• Contract Modifications

Free Access to Live and Recorded Webinars

WA APEX Accelerator online https://washingtonapex.org/

APEX Accelerator YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@WashingtonAPEX

KEDA APEX Accelerator page online Govology

Plus: Outreach Events & Workshops Wednesdays with the Deputies for Small Business

(Last Wednesday each month, 10-11:30 am)

Partnering & Networking Opportunities

Where Government and Business Connect

Save the Dates:

March 24,25th 2026

Monthly, 2nd Wednesday 8-9 am

Annually in March Greater Tacoma Convention Center

Monthly, 1st Wednesday 8-9:30 am

Articles and Resources

WA APEX online KEDA APEX page online Newsletter

We can’t (in case you were wondering) Provide general business planning or advising services … but we can provide warm referrals to our partners

Advocate or lobby for specific socio-economic groups or clients

Represent the firms we work with in the marketplace

Prepare your proposal

Where to find your Apex Accelerator?

www.napex.us.orgWashingtonapex.org

James Davis APEX Program Manager

Terry Homburg APEX Advisor

Mary Jo Juarez APEX Advisor

Thank You!

Kitsapeda.org/APEX Washington APEX.org

360.377.9499 54

Daniel Miller Apex Volunteer Advisor

Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification

(CMMC)

Speaker: Terry Homburg

DoW Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Current Status

NAVFAC NW Industry Day August 20, 2026

This APEX Accelerator is funded in part through a cooperative agreement with the Department of War.

Overview of CMMC

• There are 15 departments of the federal executive branch.

• DoW is 1 of 15 departments.

• DoW cybersecurity requirement is CMMC.

• None of the other departments use CMMC

• Overview

• The Hierarchy

• Current status

• CMMC Implementation

• CMMC Certifications

• Impact on the Contractor

• What will it Cost ??

• CMMC Certification Level Requirements

• CMMC Level-1 Contract Information Safeguards

• PIEE & SPRS

• What is CUI ??

• The Cybersecurity Clauses

• Organizations to Help

• Summary

• Q & A

Agenda

Abbreviations & Acronyms CA, Certified Assessor CMMC, Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Cyber-AB, Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Accreditation Body CUI, Controlled Unclassified Information C3PAO, Certified Third-Party Assessor Organization NIST, National Institute of Standards and Technology OSC, Organization Seeking Certification PIEE, Procurement Integrity Enterprise Environment RP, Registered Practitioner RPO, Registered Practitioner Organization RPA, Registered Practitioner Advanced SPRS, Supplier Performance Risk System

• CMMC is for unclassified procurements

• Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

• CMMC is not for classified procurements

• Such a “secret” or “top secret” contracts.

• CMMC is not the DoD Interim Rule

• Need DoD Interim Rule at a minimum for JCP certification now

• You need CMMC Level-2 for JCP certification starting 11/10/2028

CMMC

The Hierarchy DoW - Department of Defense

Cyber-AB - Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification – Accreditation Board (Body) (a non-profit, independent organization)

C3PAO - Certified Third-party Assessor Organization (Commercial company) (Issues the 3-year certificate)

CA - Certified Assessor (sub-contractor to or employee of C3PAO)

OSC - Organization Seeking Certification (you, the company)

CMMC Current Status

• CFR Title 32, CMMC became law on Dec. 16, 2024.

• CFR Title 48, CMMC acquisition final rule was issued on Sep. 10, 2025.

• CMMC will be phased-in over a 3-year period.

• Phase-1, Nov. 10, 2025, some Level-1 and Level-2 (self-certification) solicitations

• Phase-2, Nov. 10, 2026, some Level-2 solicitations and the above

• Phase-3, Nov. 10, 2027, some Level-3 solicitations and the above

• November 10, 2028, all solicitations

• Phase-2 is suspended, effective July 13, 2026, for a 60-day review of the program.

CMMC Implementation

The DoW Numbers

• DoW has more than 300,000 contractors (Prime + Subcontractors)

• 60-70% will need CMMC Level-1 certification

• So, 90,000 will need CMMC Level-2 certification

• There are about a dozen contractors that will need CMMC Level-3 certification

CMMC for all DoW contracts

• 3 levels of cybersecurity maturity from basic to advanced

• Level-1, 15 safeguards from FAR clause 52.204-21

• Level-2, 110 controls from NIST SP 800-171A Revision 2

• Level-3, 134 controls from NIST SP 800-171A Revision 2 & NIST SP 800-172

• All Practices & Controls must be implemented

• All DoW contractors will need a certification (some exceptions)

• COTS and MPT (now $15K for DoW)

• Self-assessment for Level 1 and Level 2 (non-critical)

CMMC Certification

• CMMC Certification required to be awarded a contract or subcontract

(at any tier)

• Level-2 (self-assessed or assessed) , All practices & requirements are laid out for contractors to start implementing in NIST SP 800-171A rev. 2

• The Cyber-AB is currently training Registered Practitioners and C3PAOs

• Assessments (certifications) are available now

• As of July 28, 2026, there are: 2,261 RP

429 RPO

307 RPA

111 C3PAO 811:1

CMMC Certification Numbers

• As of July 28, 2026, there are:

Certified Level-2 companies: 1,866 Conditional Level-2 companies: 58 Level-2 audits in progress: 168

• Level 1 & Level 2 (non-critical), Requires self-assessment and certification prior to award and annual affirmation

• Levels 2 (critical) & 3, Requires 3rd party assessment and certification prior to award and annual affirmation

• CAs will most likely charge by the hour plus travel costs - ask for an estimate

• Certification costs are allowable, as an overhead expense

Impact on the Contractor

• Subcontractors will have the same CMMC level as the prime contractor or lower based on the Statement of Work (SoW)

• Prime contractors are responsible for all subcontractor tiers

• Increased non-compliance penalties and risks including: the loss of current and future contracts, personal & corporate liability, & negative company brand

• Does not apply to Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) or Micro-purchases (<=$15K)

Impact on the Contractor (continued)

What Will it Cost?

Affirmation Reqts.Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) Reqts.Assessment Reqts.Source & Number of Security Reqts.CMMC Status

After each assessment Entered into SPRS

Not permitted

Conducted by Organization Seeking Assessment (OSA) annually

Results entered into the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS)

15 required by FAR clause 52.204-21

Level 1 (Self)

After each assessment and annually thereafter Assessment will lapse upon failure to annually affirm Entered into SPRS

Permitted as defined in § 170.21(a)(2) and must be closed out within 180 days

Final CMMC Status will be valid for three years from the Conditional CMMC Status Date

Conducted by OSA every 3 years Results entered into SPRS CMMC Status will be valid for three years from the

CMMC Status Date as defined in § 170.4

110 NIST SP 800-171 R2

required by DFARS clause 252.204-7012

Level 2 (Self)

After each assessment and annually thereafter Assessment will lapse upon failure to annually affirm Entered into SPRS

Permitted as defined in § 170.21(a)(2) and must be closed out within 180 days

Final CMMC Status will be valid for three years from the Conditional CMMC Status Date

Conducted by C3PAO every 3 years Results entered into CMMC Enterprise Mission

Assurance Support Service (eMASS) CMMC Status will be valid for three years from the

CMMC Status Date as defined in § 170.4

110 NIST SP 800-171 R2

required by DFARS clause 252.204-7012

Level 2

(C3PAO)

After each assessment and annually thereafter Assessment will lapse upon failure to annually affirm Level 2 (C3PAO) affirmation must also continue to be completed annually Entered into SPRS

Permitted as defined in § 170.21(a)(3) and must be closed out within 180 days

Final CMMC Status will be valid for three years from the Conditional CMMC Status Date

Pre-requisite CMMC Status of Level 2 (C3PAO) for the same CMMC Assessment Scope, for each Level 3 certification assessment

Conducted by DIBCAC every 3 years Results entered into CMMC eMASS CMMC Status will be valid for three years from the

CMMC Status Date as defined in § 170.4

110 NIST SP 800-171 R2

required by DFARS clause 252.204-7012

24 selected from NIST SP 800-172 Feb2021, as detailed in table 1 to § 170.14(c)(4)

Level 3

(DIBCAC)

(i) Limit information system access to authorized users, processes acting on behalf of authorized users, or devices (including other information systems).

(ii) Limit information system access to the types of transactions and functions that authorized users are permitted to execute.

(iii) Verify and control/limit connections to and use of external information systems.

(iv) Control information posted or processed on publicly accessible information systems.

(v) Identify information system users, processes acting on behalf of users, or devices.

(vi) Authenticate (or verify) the identities of those users, processes, or devices, as a prerequisite to allowing access to organizational information systems.

(vii) Sanitize or destroy information system media containing Federal Contract

Information before disposal or release for reuse.

(viii) Limit physical access to organizational information systems, equipment, and the respective operating environments to authorized individuals.

CMMC Level 1 Federal Contract Information Safeguards

FAR 52.204-21

CMMC Level 1 Federal Contract Information Safeguards

(ix) Escort visitors and monitor visitor activity; maintain audit logs of physical access;

and control and manage physical access devices.

(x) Monitor, control, and protect organizational communications (i.e., information transmitted or received by organizational information systems) at the external boundaries and key internal boundaries of the information systems.

(xi) Implement subnetworks for publicly accessible system components that are physically or logically separated from internal networks.

(xii) Identify, report, and correct information and information system flaws in a timely manner.

(xiii) Provide protection from malicious code at appropriate locations within organizational information systems.

(xiv) Update malicious code protection mechanisms when new releases are available.

(xv) Perform periodic scans of the information system and real-time scans of files from external sources as files are downloaded, opened, or executed.

Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment https://piee.eb.mil

Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/

How do you know what is CUI ?

DoDI 5200.48, Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

• CUI will be identified in the Security Classification Guide to ensure such information receives appropriate protection

• The program office or requiring activity must identify DoW CUI in the solicitation and resulting contract and which CMMC level certification is required

CUI Link: https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520048p.PDF?ver=2020-03-06-100640-800

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

Examples of Controlled Technical Information (CTI)

Federal Contract Information Technical Reports

Research & Engineering Data Technical Orders

Engineering Drawings Catalog-item Identifications

Specifications Data Sets

Standards Studies & Analyses

Process Sheets Computer Software Executable Code

Manuals Source Code

Examples of NAICS Codes with CUI

NAICS Title 236220 Building Construction 541330 Engineering 541519 Computer Services 561210 Facility Support Services

Look for these Cybersecurity Clauses FAR clause 52.204-21, Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems (NOV 2021)

DFARS clause 252.204-7012, Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting (May 2024)

DFARS clause 252.204-7019, Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements (NOV 2023)

DFARS clause 252.204-7020, NIST 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements

(NOV 2023)

DFARS clause 252.204-7021, Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Requirements

(MAY 2024)

DFARS CLAUSE 252.204-7025, NOTICE OF CYBERSECURITY MATURITY MODEL CERTIFICATION LEVEL

REQUIREMENTS (NOV 2025)

DFARS CLAUSE 252.204-7025, NOTICE OF CMMC LEVEL REQUIREMENTS (NOV 2025)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision, “controlled unclassified information (CUI),” “current,” “Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) status,” “Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification unique identifier (CMMC UID),” “Federal contract information (FCI)”, and “plan of action and milestones” have the meaning given in the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement 252.204-7021, Contractor Compliance With the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Level Requirements, clause of this solicitation.

(b)(1) Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) level. The CMMC level required by this solicitation is: ____________ Contracting Officer insert: CMMC Level 1 (Self);

CMMC Level 2 (Self); CMMC Level 2 (C3PAO); or CMMC Level 3 (DIBCAC). This CMMC level, or higher (see 32 CFR part 170), is required prior to award for each contractor information system that will process, store, or transmit Federal contract information (FCI) or controlled unclassified information (CUI) during performance of the contract.

Organizations to Help Contractors

Project Spectrum - https://www.projectspectrum.io/#/

(they provide no-cost training)

Impact Washington - https://www.impactwashington.org/cybersecurity-consulting.aspx

(for manufacturing companies)

CMMC Level-2 C3PAO Mock Assessment

• It’s a pre-assessment

• It’s a non-certification assessment

• No recommendations or advice from the C3PAO

• C3PAO provides a written assessment

• You may contract with the same C3PAO for the actual assessment

• A local C3PAO charges about $2,500 for a Level-1 mock assessment

• Get started now, if you want to be a DoW contractor or subcontractor

• Expect to wait: C3PAOs are in short supply, so plan for several months delay before an audit can start

• There are qualified assessors now (111 C3PAOs)

• You may request an audit anytime now

• Get a C3PAO that knows your industry

• Must be certified at time of contract award

• Add CMMC certification level to the Capability Statement

• Phase-2 is suspended, effective July 13, 2026, for a 60-day review of the program

TASK: Read all future solicitations to see if there are cybersecurity requirements.

Summary

Thank You Program Supporters

QUESTIONS

For Terry

Mr. Terry Homburg homburg@kitsapeda.org

WA APEX Accelerator Advisor

Proposal Preparation Information

Speaker: Nancy Coffee and Jodus Hortin

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 89

Multi-Mission Dry Dock Multiple Award Construction Contract

(MMDD MACC)

• Proposal Preparation Information:

• Acquisition Process and Solicitation Overview

• Instructions to Proposers

• Basis of Award

• Base Contract Administration

• Important Reminders and Next Steps

Introductions

• Contracting Team: NAVFAC

NW

• Rabi Peifer, Chief of the Contracting Office

• Jodus Hortin, Contracting Officer

• Nancy Coffee, Contracting Officer

Acquisition Process and Solicitation Overview

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 92

Acquisition Process

• A MACC is a contract awarded from a single solicitation and may result in award to multiple Contractors.

• This MACC is anticipated to be a single-phase solicitation.

• Offerors must provide best and final offers, non-cost/price factors and price factor considered, at time of proposal submission.

• Award will consist of base Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) type construction contract(s), with issuance of minimum guarantee task orders.

• It is anticipated that most work under the MACC will be initiated by task order(s) that are competed amongst all the MACC holders.

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 93

• The focus of the MACC will be military construction (MCON) project P-454 –

Multi-Mission Dry Dock at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PSNS & IMF) but may include other SIOP projects located anywhere within the NAVFAC area of responsibility.

• Potential Task Orders:

• Package #1 – Marine:

• Pier, Building, Upland Utility Demo

• Dredging

• Construction of upland shoring and cutoff wall

• Construction of double-wall cofferdam

• Upland ground Improvements

• Package #2 – Dry Dock:

• Construction dewatering

• Installation of upland shoring wall tie-backs

• Dry Dock 3 demolition

• Upland excavation

• Construction of pressure relief system

• Construction of dry dock including entrance and quay walls

• Electrical substations

• Utility tunnels

• Partial Farragut Avenue tunnel replacement

• Procure and install process equipment

• Installation of permanent upland utilities

• Package #4 – Caisson:

• Fabrication and delivery of caisson

• Paving and crane rail installation

• Fabrication and installation of fendering system

• Temporary double-wall cofferdam demolition

• Caisson installation

• Testing and Commissioning

• Package #3 – Infrastructure:

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 94

• Potential Risk Mitigations:

• The Navy is considering the following risk mitigation measures including:

• Early Contractor Involvement (ECI)

• Limiting task order performance bonds to a maximum of $2 Billion

• Economic Price Adjustment (EPA)

• Award Fee Schedule Incentive

• Reduced small business subcontracting goals

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 95

• MACC Overview

• Area of Responsibility

• Design-Build (DB) and Design-Bid-Build (DBB) type projects

• Unrestricted, Full & Open Competition is anticipated for this MACC

• Small Business Subcontracting Requirements, as applicable

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 96

• North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes anticipated for this MACC:

• 236220 – Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

• 237990 – Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction

• Anticipated Period of Performance/Option Periods for this MACC:

• One (1) 60-month Base Period

• One (1) 60-month Option Period

• Total anticipated Period of Performance of 10-years

Instructions to Proposers

• Proposal Submission:

• Proposals SHALL ONLY be submitted via the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) Solicitation Module

• Proposals submitted via email, hand-delivered, or mailed WILL NOT be accepted

• Allow sufficient time for proposal upload into the PIEE Solicitation Module

• Late proposals will be handled in accordance with FAR Clause 52.215-1

• The Offeror is responsible for contacting the PIEE helpdesk for any system concerns

• Proactive use of the PIEE Web-Based Training (WBT) module is highly recommended

• Offerors may designate multiple personnel as proposal managers within PIEE, which is highly recommended to ensure sufficient notification for any amendments

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 98

• Contractor Teaming Arrangements

• Offeror must provide a signed copy of:

• Partnership Agreement

• Teaming Arrangement, or

• Letter of Commitment for each member of the offeror’s team

• Provide the correct CAGE code for the JV or each individual member of the teaming agreement

• The Government will not assume or independently investigate the existence and nature of a relationship between the offeror and any other entity that has a different Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) and CAGE code

• Sole utilization of company logos and graphics in the organizational chart without supporting narrative/text will not be acceptable.

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 99

• Offerors should not assume they will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to qualify, discuss, or revise their proposals

• Proposals containing qualifications or conditions may be considered ineligible for award

• Page limitations will be strictly enforced

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 100

• Ensure inclusion of all specified NAICS codes are included in the Offeror’s

Representations and Certifications; submitted with the proposal and/or within the Offeror’s entity registration on the System for Award Management (SAM).

• Ensure the Offeror’s entity registration on SAM is complete and active.

• Ensure confirmation of filing of current VETS-4212 report with the Department of Labor (DoL) is included with the proposal and completed annually.

• Ensure the Offeror’s NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 and CMMC Assessments are properly submitted within PIEE Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS).

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 101

• SAM (https://sam.gov/):

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 102

• SAM Help Desk (https://sam.gov/help):

• PIEE (https://piee.eb.mil/):

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 103

• PIEE Help Desk (https://piee.eb.mil/#help-piee):

• Phone: 1-866-618-5988

Basis of Award

Basis of Award

• Best Value Trade-off (Anticipated):

• Allows consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror

• Comparative assessment against all evaluation criteria

• Evaluation Factors for Award (Anticipated):

• Factor 1 – Technical Approach (acceptable/unacceptable)

• Factor 2 – Experience

• Factor 3 – Past Performance

• Factor 4 – Small Business Utilization and Participation

• Factor 5 – Safety

• Factor 6 – Technical Factor (to be determined)

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 105

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 106

Experience vs Past Performance

• Experience:

• Experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity.

• Past Performance:

• Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts, and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 107

Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs)

• Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI):

• Submit all questions via email using the PPI form

• Limit one (1) question per PPI Form

• Do not combine PPI Forms into a single file

• Multiple PPIs may be sent in a single email

• Reference Section and Paragraph in the PPI

• Solicitation Remains Unchanged Unless Altered by Amendment

Base Contract Administration

Base Contract Administration

• Contract Review

• Conducted at Option Exercise and annually on the anniversary of the base contract award

• Construction Wage Rates updated annually

• Wages applicable to task orders issued during that one-year period

• Wages incorporated based on task order location and requirement

• Contract awardee updates to any pertinent information

• SAM entity registration

• Point of Contact Information (for task order Requests for Proposal distribution, etc.)

• VETS 4212 filings

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 109

Important Reminders and Next Steps

Important Reminders

• Submit pricing for all CLINs

• Ensure signatory has documented authority to bind the firm

• Email addresses remain valid

• Register in the VETS 4212 database

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 111

• Acknowledge all amendments

• Bid Bond (if applicable) is properly executed

• Register in SAM prior to bidding

• Maintain access in PIEE

Next Steps

• Pre-Solicitation Notice to be posted to SAM.gov

• Solicitation Notice to be posted to SAM.gov

• Pre-Proposal Conference (Approx. 7-10 days after solicitation issuance)

• Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs) and Solicitation Amendments, as-needed

• Proposal Development and Submission

• Source Selection

• Award

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 112

Wrap up & Questions

Thank you for attending the proposal preparation brief for the Multi- Mission Dry Dock MACC. We look forward to working with you.

Multi-Mission Dry Dock 113

Breakout Time:

Prime & Subcontractor Matchmaking