Section_00100 _Attachment_C.1_PPQ_Construction_Experience.docx

DOCX document 27 KB Posted

Attached to
NAVFAC Northwest Regional 8(a) Small MACC Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N44255-16-R-2002
Issued by
Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command

About this file

From the source

Attachment C.1 PPQ Construction Experience

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to NAVFAC Northwest Regional 8(a) Small MACC, newest first.
File Type Posted
N44255-16-R-2002 _Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
Attachment_D_PPI_Responses _N44255-16-R-2002 _Amend_0003.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_D_PPI_Responses _N44255-16-R-2002 _Amend_0002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N44255-16-R-2002 _Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
Attachment_D_PPI_Responses _N44255-16-R-2002 _Amend_0001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N44255-16-R-2002 _Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
N44255-16-R-2002.pdf PDF
Section_00100 _Attachment_D_PPI_Responses _Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Section_00100 _Attachment_C.2_PPQ_Design_Experience.docx DOCX document
Section_00100 _Attachment_B_Construction_and_Design_Experience_Data_Sheet.docx DOCX document
Section_00100 _Attachment_A_PPI_Form.doc DOC document
N44255-16-R-2002_ _Pre-Solicitation_Notice.pdf PDF
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

SECTION 00100, ATTACHMENT C.1

NAVFAC PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ) - Offeror

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information:

Firm Name:
Address:
DUNS:
Phone Number:
Point of Contact:Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub Contractor |_| Joint Venture |_| Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Title:
Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Award Amount:
Final Price:

4. Project Description:

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information

Name:
Organization/Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed:

NOTE: NAVFAC REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVFAC. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR NAVFAC POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

E (EXCELLENT) – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds the Client’s/Government’s expectations. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V (VERY GOOD) – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some of the Client’s/Government’s expectations. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S (SATISFACTORY) – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element contains some minor problems for which corrective action taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M (MARGINAL) –Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U (UNSATISFACTORY) – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and/or recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N (NOT APPLICABLE) – No past performance record is identifiable or the element is not applicable to this project.

PLEASE MARK THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

E
V
S
M
U
N
1. Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
2. Compliance with contractual terms and conditions.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
3. Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
4. Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
5. Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
6. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program).
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
7. Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors?
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
8. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports).
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
9. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
10. Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
E
V
S
M
U
N
11. Effectiveness of material management.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
12. Effectiveness of acquisition management.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
13. Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
14. Contractor’s management of their safety program.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
15. Responsiveness regarding safety issues.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
16. If this was a cost type contract, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (underruns or overruns).
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
17. If this is/was a Government cost type contract, the Contractor’s timeliness in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation and monthly status reports/budget variance reports.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
18. If this is/was a Government cost type contract, the Contractor’s accuracy regarding monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation and monthly status reports/budget variance reports.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
19. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
20. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
21. If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
|_| Yes|_| No
22. Have there been any indications that the designer has had any financial problem? If yes, please explain below.
|_| Yes|_| No
23. In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Any additional comments related to the contractor’s performance:

Client’s Signature:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .