Attachment 4 Addendum FAR 52.212-2.pdf

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES (NOV 2021)

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror that will be most advantageous to the Government under the selection criteria set forth in this solicitation. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award based on initial proposals. Therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a cost/price standpoint.

The Offeror’s proposal shall be in the form prescribed by and shall contain a response to each of the areas identified in the solicitation.

The award decision will be made to the Lowest Price Offeror that receives an acceptable rating in both technical capability and contractor capacity.

(1) Factor 1 - Technical Narrative

(a) Technical Narrative - Technical narrative will represent the assessment of how well you understand and propose to fulfill the requirements outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Vendors must submit a max of sufficient narrative demonstrating their ability to successfully execute the Performance Work Statement. This document should clearly outline their understanding of the requirements, proposed execution strategies, and operational readiness.

Technical acceptability will be defined as follows:

Technical Evaluation Ratings

Contractors who fail to possess an acceptable technical narrative will not be considered for award and the other elements of their quotation will not be evaluated.

(2) Factor 2 - Capacity

(a) Capacity – The purpose of this evaluation is to assess the Offeror’s proposed capacity to satisfy the Government’s requirements. The evaluation of risk is related to the assessment of the Offeror’s demonstrated capacity. Risk, as it pertains to source selection, is the potential for unsuccessful contract performance. The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an Offeror’s demonstrated capacity to satisfy the Government’s requirement may involve risk of disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance. Risk will be considered in the evaluation. Capacity will be rated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis based on the information provided in attachment 6.

(3) Factor 3 - Price Reasonableness

(a) Price Reasonableness - The Government will evaluate the proposed price for reasonableness in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)Subpart 13.5 - Simplified Procedures for Certain Commercial Items and FAR 13.106-3. The estimated amount for each line item will be added together to determine the total estimated price, which will become the evaluated price.

The vendor’s proposed price will be evaluated on the basis of price reasonableness. All prices must be considered fair and reasonable as determined by the Government. Price quote shall be held firm and valid for sixty (60) days

(End of provision)

Rating Description Acceptable Quote meets all of the requirements identified.

Unacceptable Quote does not meet all of the requirements identified.