AMENDMENT 0001.pdf

NAVFAC

SPECIFICATION

7333917 Replace Vehicle Arrest

System Main Gate Cunningham and

Slocum

MCAS Cherry Point, NC AMENDMENT

#0001

IMPORTANT

This amendment should be acknowledged when your proposal is submitted. Failure to acknowledge the amendment may constitute grounds for rejection of the proposal.

If your proposal has been submitted prior to the receipt of this amendment, acknowledgement should be made by telegram, which should state whether the price contained in your proposal is to remain unchanged, is to be decreased by an amount, or is to be increased by an amount. The acknowledgement must be received prior to proposal opening time.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 2

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

0001 8/7/2024 7333917

6. ISSUED BY Code N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6.) Code

CG MCAS Cherry Point

FACILITIES, ROICC

B-163, CURTIS ROAD

PSC BOX 8006

CHERRY POINT, NC 28533

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

Replace Vehicle Arrest System Main Gate Cunningham and Slocum

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

AMENDMENT MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED WITH YOUR PROPOSAL 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended is not extended. Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copy of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14. ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATION CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103 (b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER: (specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return original to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

7333917 Replace Vehicle Arrest System Main Gate Cunningham and Slocum, Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, NC

Amendment 0001 is being issued to respond to pre-award RFI.

The deadline to submit pre-award RFI’s HAS PASSED. No further RFI will be answered.

The proposal due date of 15 August 2024 at 12:00 PM local time REMAINS unchanged.

See Attached.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR (Same as Item 8) 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV.1-83) 0224-3(10-90)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA

Amendment 0001 7333917 Replace Vehicle Arrest System Main Gate Cunningham and Slocum

RFI Responses:

1. How many SSHO's are required for this project?

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments.

Note: One SSHO is required.

2. Div01 states mobilization to site must take place within 60 calendar days of award. Per the manufacturer, there is a (at least a 70-calendar day) lead time, after submittal approval.

There is a 75d from NTP to present a site condition report. Considering there are some design and submittal windows, the 60d requirement is unrealistic. Is there a site reason for this requirement, or can it be pushed back to normal similar project milestone timing?

Response:

See revised specification 01 30 00 Administrative Requirements, dated 08/06/24 in the footer.

3. Other than the local guard booth, is there a central control location that requires a re-use or new user panel, and re-use or new wiring/fiber between?

Response:

See revised drawings 12908504, 12908505 and 12908506, dated 08/06/24.

Note: A new master control panel station would be provided at the guard house per gate and overwatch panels located adjacent to static side as shown. New wiring/fiber is required.

4. Does the demo of existing bollard equipment require full removal of all metal/concrete from the bollard foundation, or can the pipes be removed and demo downed to 2ft and filled with dirt, then place the new trough on top?

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments.

Demo of the existing bollard equipment requires full removal of all metal/ concrete within the limits shown on the demo drawings.

5. Are loops to go in as depicted in the electrical drawing or per the Safety Scheme in the spec?

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments.

Note: Loops to go in as depicted in the electrical drawings, E100, E101 and E102.

6. Are touch screens or pushbutton panes required for barrier control locations?

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments.

Note: Pushbutton panes are required for barrier control locations.

7. What is the make and model of the existing bollards?

Note the existing bollards are from Delta Scientific. The make and model are unknown.

8. 34 75 13.13 1.7 states cybersecurity info, but the barriers systems are standalone systems and not on the base’s system. Can this spec line item be waived?

See revised Specification 34 75 13.13 dated 08/06/24 in the footer.

Note: Specification 34 75 13.13 Section 1.7 Cybersecurity Certification has been deleted as this is a standalone system.

9. 34 75 13.13 1.4.3 c, f, g, h, l, p are not shown on the drawings so qty and location cannot be determined. Can these spec line items be waived?

Note: Reference item c, traffic signs can be reused. Item f is deleted from the specification.

Items g, h, l, p shall be provided at the vehicle barrier active side.

10. 34 75 13.13 1.4.3 d – Can the existing pole/masts be re-used, or do new pole/masts or posts need to be installed?

Note: Existing pole/masts may be re-used. New LED lights will be required.

11. 34 75 13.13 1.16.1 – Does this warranty service last for 1 year past turnover as well?

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings, and all amendments.

Note: The warranty for the vehicle arrest system parts and labor would be 1 yr past turnover.

12. 34 75 13.13 1.16.1 – Warranty code time requirements are not realistic to have barrier certified technicians onsite to evaluate and fix issues. Can we expect to be allowed to negotiate realistic time requirements during contract negotiations?

Note: These are the Government target response times.

13. 34 75 13.13 2.2 – SDDCTEA issued docs in multiple years and there is a variance in systems from 2001 to 2020. Can the base please provide the 2014 document this is pulled from?

Note: Reference revised Appendix A of Specification Section 34 75 13.13 for the required features and operational sequences of this safety scheme

14. 34 75 13.13 2.2 – Given the existing equipment of traffic pole/mast and warning signals, can that equipment be excluded from being required by the scheme layouts?

15. 34 75 13.13 2.3.11 – The specified layout is for 1 and 2 lane systems. Can this spec line item be waived?

Note: The drawings show the lane coverage of the required barrier systems. The main gate has a separate inbound and outbound lane barrier while Cunningham and Slocum have a single barrier system for both lanes.

16. 34 75 13.13 2.6 – Please confirm barrier heater is required for this location in the southeast?

Note: Specification 34 75 13.13 Section 2.6 Heater has been deleted.

17. 34 75 13.13 2.6 – “provide heat tape in drain pipe” is not typical for this industry, especially in the southeast. Also, the existing barrier drain plumbing is expected to be reused and may not accommodate this application. Can this spec item be waived?

Response:

See revised Specification 34 75 13.13 dated 08/06/24 in the footer.

Note: Specification 34 75 13.13 Section 2.6 Heater has been deleted.

18. 34 75 13.13 2.8.3 b, c is not shown on the drawings so qty and location cannot be determined. Can these spec line items be waived?

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments.

Note: Note, the controllers, items b and c of 34 75 13.13 paragraph 2.8.3b would be located in the vicinity of the vehicle arrest systems at the active end.

19. 34 75 13.13 2.8.4 – Is the PLC’s logic to be non-proprietary, so that future access and service to the programming is possible without having to involve the companies used on this project?

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments.

Note: The specifications have no requirement for PLC logic to be non-proprietary.

20. 34 75 13.13 2.14 – Can the existing traffic signal supports be re-used?

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments.

Note: The existing traffic signal supports may be reused.

21. 34 75 13.13 2.17 – Are the current (August 1, 2024) barrier systems on a facility UPS provided power circuit?

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments.

Note: No, the current systems do not have a UPS system.

22. 34 75 13.13 2.20 – This excerpt is copied from a fire alarm signal system and is not practically available for this industry? Can this spec line item be waived?

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments.

Note: Section 2.20 of Spec Section 34 75 13.13 is required.

23. 34 75 13.13 App A3 – High Efficiency Prescence Detection contradicts the earlier requirement for 2014 Signal and Sign. Which is required?

Response:

See revised Specification 34 75 13.13 dated 08/06/24 in the footer.

Note: Section 2.2 of Spec Section 34 75 13.13 has been removed.

24. 1 CU01-CU03 – In the notes, “provide lights/signs per barrier mfr”, “local control panel IAW mfr”, and assumed programming. Given specs typically override drawings, are the manufacturer’s signs, signals, control panels required rather the specification’s and related RFI’s? If so, please state and issue the mfr drawings for reference.

Response:

See revised Specification 34 75 13.13 dated 08/06/24 in the footer.

25. 34 75 13.13 1.15 – Does this require mfr’s recommend monthly maintenance for the 1 year period? If so, is this in conjunction with or in addition to the major/minor inspections?

Response:

See revised Specification 34 75 13.13 dated 08/06/24 in the footer.

Note: Refer to Specification 34 75 13.13 paragraph 1.14 regarding minor and major inspections.

The equipment manufacturer should provide the recommended maintenance schedule in the operating and maintenance instructions submittal.

26. 34 75 13.13 2.3.9 – this requirement is not practical for this net system as a 60# will be able to lift the whole net at one time. A UPS system is being provided that will power the system, along with an electric backup winch. Is this acceptable?

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments.

Note: The 60 lb lift requirement is required. Correct, a UPS system along with an electric backup winch is required.

27. 34 75 13.13 2.3.10 – the specified net barrier’s side stanchions are 4ft deep, though the trough seems to be 1.5ft deep. The net is not surface mounted. Is this acceptable?

Note: Yes, that is acceptable.

28. 34 75 13.13 2.4.1 – the specified net barrier’s side stanchions are 8ft long (foundation). Is this acceptable?

29. 34 75 13.13 2.5.1 – “provide a containment area around”. Mfr’s stanchion pad is part of the crash system, and you can’t have containment on only 3.5 sides, due to the trench on the middle of the 4th side. Is the oil containment submitted to the govt from the mfr, acceptable?

Note: The supplier may use a tank for containment along with an enclosed pan for secondary containment.

30. 34 75 13.13 2.8.7.2 – Is an EFO panel required inside each of the guard shelters near the barrier locations? If so, do current conduit/wiring exist from the existing barrier systems?

Note: Yes. The existing conduit may be reused with new wiring.

31. 34 75 13.13 2.8.7.4 – Is an EFO button required outside an guard booth or overwatch? If so, do current conduit/wiring exist from the existing barrier systems?

32. 34 75 13.13 2.12 – If blank out signs are not required in the 2014 Signs and Signals scheme, are they still required?

Note: Blank out signs have been removed.

33. 34 75 13.13 2.19.7 – is a tamper switch system required (potential requirement of installing new conduit and handholes through ACP)?

Note: Yes, tamper switches are required. Conduits and handholes can be reused where possible.

34. Div01 states mobilization to site must take place within 60 calendar days of award. Per the manufacturer, there is a (at least a 70-calendar day) lead time, after submittal approval.

There is a 75d from NTP to present a site condition report. Considering there are some design and submittal windows, the 60d requirement is unrealistic. Is there a site reason for this requirement, or can it be pushed back to normal similar project milestone timing?

See revised specification 01 30 00 Administrative Requirements, dated 08/06/24 in the footer.

35. Other than the local guard booth, is there a central control location that requires a re-use or new user panel, and re-use or new wiring/fiber between?

See revised drawings 12908504, 12908505 and 12908506, dated 08/06/24.

Note: A new master control panel station would be provided at the guard house per gate and overwatch panels located adjacent to static side as shown. New wiring/fiber is required.

36. Does the demo of existing bollard equipment require full removal of all metal/concrete from the bollard foundation, or can the pipes be removed and demo downed to 2ft and filled with dirt, then place the new trough on top?

Note: Demo of the existing bollard equipment requires full removal of all metal/ concrete within the limits shown on the demo drawings.

37. Are loops to go in as depicted in the electrical drawing or per the Safety Scheme in the spec?

Note: Loops to go in as depicted in the electrical drawings, E100, E101 and E102.

38. Are touch screens or pushbutton panes required for barrier control locations?

Note: Pushbutton panes are required for barrier control locations.

39. What is the make and model of the existing bollards?

Note the existing bollards are from Delta Scientific. The make and model are unknown.

40. 34 75 13.13 1.7 states cybersecurity info, but the barriers systems are standalone systems and not on the base’s system. Can this spec line item be waived?

Note: Specification 34 75 13.13 Section 1.7 Cybersecurity Certification has been deleted as this is a standalone system.

41. 34 75 13.13 1.4.3 c, f, g, h, l, p are not shown on the drawings so qty and location cannot be

Note: Reference item c, traffic signs can be reused. Item f is deleted from the specification.

Items g, h, l, p shall be provided at the vehicle barrier active side.

42. 34 75 13.13 1.4.3 d – Can the existing pole/masts be re-used, or do new pole/masts or posts need to be installed?

43. 34 75 13.13 1.16.1 – Does this warranty service last for 1 year past turnover as well?

Note: The warranty for the vehicle arrest system parts and labor would be 1 yr past turnover.

44. 34 75 13.13 1.16.1 – Warranty code time requirements are not realistic to have barrier certified technicians onsite to evaluate and fix issues. Can we expect to be allowed to negotiate realistic time requirements during contract negotiations?

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings, and all amendments.

Note: These are the Government target response times.

45. 34 75 13.13 2.2 – SDDCTEA issued docs in multiple years and there is a variance in systems from 2001 to 2020. Can the base please provide the 2014 document this is pulled from?

Response:

See revised specification 34 75 13.13, dated 08/06/24 in the footer.

Note: Reference revised Appendix A of Specification Section 34 75 13.13 for the required features and operational sequences of this safety scheme.

46. 34 75 13.13 2.2 – Given the existing equipment of traffic pole/mast and warning signals, can that equipment be excluded from being required by the scheme layouts?

Response:

See revised specification 34 75 13.13, dated 08/06/24 in the footer.

Note: Existing pole/masts may be re-used. New LED lights will be required.

47. 34 75 13.13 2.3.11 – The specified layout is for 1 and 2 lane systems. Can this spec line item be waived?

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments.

Note: The drawings show the lane coverage of the required barrier systems. The main gate has a separate inbound and outbound lane barrier while Cunningham and Slocum have a single barrier system for both lanes.

48. 34 75 13.13 2.6 – Please confirm barrier heater is required for this location in the southeast?

Response:

See revised specification 34 75 13.13, dated 08/06/24 in the footer.

Note: Specification 34 75 13.13 Section 2.6 Heater has been deleted.

49. 34 75 13.13 2.6 – “provide heat tape in drain pipe” is not typical for this industry, especially in the southeast. Also, the existing barrier drain plumbing is expected to be reused and may not accommodate this application. Can this spec item be waived?

See revised specification 34 75 13.13, dated 08/06/24 in the footer.

50. 34 75 13.13 2.8.3b, c is not shown on the drawings so qty and location cannot be

Note: Note, the controllers, items b and c of 34 75 13.13 paragraph 2.8.3b would be located in the vicinity of the vehicle arrest systems at the active end.

51. What is the volatage and phase available from the existing barrier systems?

Note: The existing system is fed from a 208 Volt panel, 3 phase.

52. CU01-CU03 – In the notes, “provide lights/signs per barrier mfr”, “local control panel IAW mfr”, and assumed programming. Given specs typically override drawings, are the manufacturer’s signs, signals, control panels required rather the specification’s and related RFI’s? If so, please state and issue the mfr drawings for reference.

53. 34 75 13.13 1.15 – Does this require mfr’s recommend monthly maintenance for the 1 year period? If so, is this in conjunction with or in addition to the major/minor inspections?

Note: Refer to Specification 34 75 13.13 paragraph 1.14 regarding minor and major inspections.

The equipment manufacturer should provide the recommended maintenance schedule in the operating and maintenance instructions submittal.

54. 34 75 13.13 2.3.9 – this requirement is not practical for this net system as a 60# will be able to lift the whole net at one time. A UPS system is being provided that will power the system, along with an electric backup winch. Is this acceptable?

Note: The 60 lb lift requirement is required. Correct a UPS system along with an electric backup winch is required.

55. 34 75 13.13 2.3.10 – the specified net barrier’s side stanchions are 4ft deep, though the trough seems to be 1.5ft deep. The net is not surface mounted. Is this acceptable?

56. 34 75 13.13 2.5.1 – “provide a containment area around”. Mfr’s stanchion pad is part of the crash system, and you can’t have containment on only 3.5 sides, due to the trench on the middle of the 4th side. Is the oil containment submitted to the govt from the mfr, Note: The supplier may use a tank for containment along with an enclosed pan for secondary containment.

57. 34 75 13.13 2.8.7.2 – Is an EFO panel required inside each of the guard shelters near the barrier locations? If so, do current conduit/wiring exist from the existing barrier systems?

58. 34 75 13.13 2.8.7.4 – Is an EFO button required outside an guard booth or overwatch? If so, do current conduit/wiring exist from the existing barrier systems?

59. 34 75 13.13 2.12 – If blank out signs are not required in the 2014 Signs and Signals scheme, are they still required?

Note: Blank out signs have been removed.

60. 34 75 13.13 2.19.7 – is a tamper switch system required (potential requirement of installing new conduit and handholes through ACP)?

61. CU01-CU-03: in the notes, “provide lights/signs per barrier mfr,” “local control panel IAW mfr,” and assumed programming. Given specs typically override drawings, are the manufacturer’s signs, signals, control panels required rather the specification’s and related RFI’s? If so, please state and issue the mfr drawings for reference.

Note: See revised specification 34 75 13.13, dated 08/06/24 in the footer.

62. 34 75 13.13 para 1.15 – Does this require mfr’s recommend monthly maintenance for 1 year period? Is so, is this in conjunction with or in addition to the major/minor inspection?

Note: See revised specification 34 75 13.13, dated 08/06/24 in the footer.

63. 34 75 13.13 para 2.3.9 – This requirement is not practival for this net system as a 60# will be able to lift the whole net at one time. A UPS system is being provided that will power the system, along with an electric backup winch. Is this acceptable?

Note: The 60 lb lift requirement is required. Correct, a UPS system along with an electric backup winch is required. See revised specification 34 75 13.13, dated 08/06/24 in the footer.

64. 34 75 13.13 para 2.3.10 – The specified net barrier’s side stanchions are 4 ft deep, though the trough seems to be 1.5ft deep. The net is not surface-mounted. Is this acceptable?

65. 34 75 13.13 para 2.4.1 – The specified net barrier’s side stanchions are 8 ft long (foundation). Is this acceptable?

66. 34 75 13.13 para 2.5.1 – “Provide a containment area around.” Mfr’s stanchion pad is part of the crash system, and you can’t have containment on only 3.5 sides, due to the trench on the middle of the 4th side. Is the oil containment submitted to the govt from the mfr acceptable?

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments.

Note: The supplier may use a tank for containment along with an enclosed pan for secondary containment.

67. 34 75 13.13 para 2.8.7.2 – Is an EFO panel required inside each of the guard shelters near the barrier locations? If so, does current conduit/wiring exist from the existing barrier systems?

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments.

Note: Yes. The existing conduit may be reused with new wiring.

68. 34 75 13.13 para 2.8.7.4 – Is an EFO button required outside a guard booth or overwatch? If so, does current conduit/wiring exist from the existing systems?

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments.

Note: Yes. The existing conduit may be reused with new wiring.

69. 34 75 13.13 para 2.12 – If blank out signs are not required in the 2014 Signs and Signals scheme, are they still required?

Response:

See revised specification 34 75 13.13, dated 08/06/24 in the footer.

70. 34 75 13.13 para 2.19.7 – Is a tamper switch system required (potential requirement of installing new conduit and handholes through ACP)?

Response:

71. Please provide desired vehicle barrier control details for this project. Control shall be provided in accordance with drawings and specifications.

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings, and all amendments.

Note: Reference drawings and specification for control details.

72. Please provide count and location for desired vehicle barrier controls for this project.

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings, and all amendments.

Note: Reference drawings and specification for control details

73. Please confirm we are to reuse conduit between vehicle barrier locations and the controls locations (guardhouse).

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings, and all amendments.

Note: Conduit may be reused between barrier locations and control locations where practical.

74. Please provide desired traffic light layout or safety scheme to be used for this project.

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings, and all amendments.

Note: See revised specification 34 75 13.13, dated 08/06/24 in the footer, paragraph 1.13 Traffic Signals and revised Appendix A.

75. Please confirm added duration associated with bid options 1 & 2.

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings, and all amendments:

Note: Vehicle arrest systems shall be installed in a sequential manner. No more than one gate shall be impacted at a time.

76. Does the vehicle barrier supplied as part of this project need to be tested and certified as bi-directional?

Note: Yes, the vehicle barrier needs to be tested and certified as bi-directional.

77. Does the vehicle barrier supplied as part of this project need to be immediately resettable after a normal impact?

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings, and all amendments.

Note: Yes, the vehicle barrier needs to be immediately resettable after a normal impact.

78. 34 spec states use of traffic drop arms but are not shown on the drawings, are these required?

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings, and all amendments.

Note: There is no requirement for traffic drop arms.

79. 34 specs state use of inground lighting at barriers but are not shown on the drawings, are these required?

Response:

See revised specification 34 75 13.13, dated 08/06/24 in the footer. The section on pavement luminaries in Spec Section 34 75 13.13 has been deleted.

80. 34 spec states use of wrongway detection systems but are not shown on the drawings, are these required?

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings, and all amendments.

Note: Yes, the wrong way detection system would be located at the active end of the vehicle barrier.

81. 34 spec states use of overspeed detection systems but are not shown on the drawings, are these required?

Response:

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings, and all amendments.

Note: Yes, the overspeed detection system would be located at the active end of the vehicle barrier.

82. The drawings show a guardrail perimeter around the active vehicle barrier housings. Is this crash rated and what is that rating? Should this be considered passive barrier and listed on the DoD list?

Note: The guard rail goes to the edge of the vehicle barrier as shown on the drawings. It’s part of the road guardrail system. It’s a passive barrier.

83. Are the bollards shown on CU04 to be crash rated and what is that raring? Should they be considered passive bollards and listed on the DoD list?

Note: The bollards shown are considered a passive barrier.

84. Spec section 34.75.13.13 page 18 paragraph 2.2 states “2014 Conventional Signs & Signals safety scheme” and spec section 34.75.13.13 page 17 paragraph 2.13 states “TRAFFIC SIGNALS/HYBRID BEACON TRAFFIC SIGNALS”. Is Hybrid Beacon Safety Scheme requested?

Will mast arms be required?

Note: Yes, Hybrid Beacons would be required.

85. Is a DoD Letter of Certification required to be submitted with the proposal if the proposed solution is already on the DoD Anti-Ram Vehicle Barrier List and the crash-test report matching is supplied?

Note: Yes, the DOD Letter of Certification is required.

86. Does the Government accept any Active Net Barrier on the DoD Anti-Ram Vehicle Barrier to be considered an approved equal to the basis of design referenced on CU04 and CU05?

See drawings 12908492, with revision date 08/06/24.

87. Will the Government accept an Active Net Barrier that does not have springs but is on the

DoD Anti-Ram Vehicle Barrier List which utilizes Energy Absorbing Pistons to reduce the overall G-force of an impact?

See drawing 12908492, with revision date 08/06/24.

88. The Active Net Barrier in the basis of design utilizes an in-ground vault to house its active net, which may be susceptible to the collection of dirt, debris, and significant moisture. Therefore, will the government accept an Active Net Barrier already on the DoD Anti-Ram Vehicle Barrier list that does not utilize an in-ground vault, as an approved equal.

89. Would the Government accept a fully electric Active Net Barrier on the DoD Anti-Ram

Vehicle Barrier list?

90. In the notes, “provide lights/signs per barrier mfr”, “local control panel IAW mfr”, and assumed programming. Given specs typically override drawings, are the manufacturer’s signs, signals, control panels required rather the specification’s and related RFI’s? If so, please state and issue the mfr drawings for reference.

Note: The Specification govern the location of signals and control panels. Existing signal poles and foundations may be reused.

91. Spec 34 75 13.13 1.15 – Does this require mfr’s recommend monthly maintenance for the 1 year period? If so, is this in conjunction with or in addition to the major/minor inspections?

See revised specification 34 75 13.13, dated 08/06/24 in the footer, paragraph 1.14 regarding minor and major inspections.

92. Spec 34 75 13.13 2.3.9 – this requirement is not practical for this net system as a 60# will be able to lift the whole net at one time. A UPS system is being provided that will power the system, along with an electric backup winch. Is this acceptable?

Note: This is a project requirement.

93. Spec 34 75 13.13 2.3.10 – the specified net barrier’s side stanchions are 4ft deep, though the trough seems to be 1.5ft deep. The net is not surface mounted. Is this acceptable?

Note: Yes, the net is mounted into the trench.

94. Spec 34 75 13.13 2.4.1 – the specified net barrier’s side stanchions are 8ft long (foundation).

Is this acceptable?

Note: Yes, that dimension is on the drawings.

95. Spec 34 75 13.13 2.5.1 – “provide a containment area around”. Mfr’s stanchion pad is part of the crash system, and you can’t have containment on only 3.5 sides, due to the trench on the middle of the 4th side. Is the oil containment submitted to the govt from the mfr, Note: One way a manufacturer could meet this specification is to provide internal containment with an enclosed pan.

96. Spec 34 75 13.13 2.8.7.2 – Is an EFO panel required inside each of the guard shelters near the barrier locations? If so, do current conduit/wiring exist from the existing barrier systems?

Note: Yes, existing conduits can be reused but new wiring is required.

97. Spec 34 75 13.13 2.8.7.4 – Is an EFO button required outside on guard booth or overwatch?

If so, do current conduit/wiring exist from the existing barrier systems?

Note: The EFO button is required inside the guard house and outside at the overwatch.

98. Spec 34 75 13.13 2.12 – If blank out signs are not required in the 2014 Signs and Signals scheme, are they still required?

99. Spec 34 75 13.13 2.19.7 – is a tamper switch system required (potential requirement of installing new conduit and handholes through ACP)?

100. Please provide desired vehicle barrier control details for this project.

Note: Reference drawings and specification for control details.

101. Please provide count and location for desired vehicle barrier controls for this project.

Note: Reference drawings and specification for control details.

102. Please confirm we are to reuse conduit between vehicle barrier locations and the controls locations (guardhouse).

Note: Conduit may be reused between barrier locations and control locations where practical.

103. Please provide desired traffic light layout or safety scheme to be used for this project.

104. Please confirm added duration associated with bid options 1 & 2.

Note: Vehicle arrest systems shall be installed in a sequential manner. No more than one gate shall be impacted at a time.

105. Please confirm the overall lengths of the Vehicle Arrestor barrier and trough include a four (4’) set back off the pavement on each side. (+8’ per barrier location).

Note: Yes, confirmed.

106. Please confirm a UPS system is required at each ACP for back up power to Vehicle Arrestors.

Note: Yes, confirmed.

107. Please confirm that heat trace or some form of “heat” is required for this USMC site. Annual temps in this area may NOT require any heaters for operational purposes.

108. Does the vehicle barrier supplied as part of this project need to be tested and certified as bi-directional?

Note: Yes, the vehicle barrier needs to be tested and certified as bi-directional.

109. Does the vehicle barrier supplied as part of this project need to be immediately resettable after a normal impact?

Note: Yes, the vehicle barrier needs to be immediately resettable after a normal impact.

110. Is preventative maintenance based on a monthly or quarterly cycle?

See revised Specification 34 75 13.13 dated 08/06/24 in the footer, part 3.5.

CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION 34 75 13.13 Crash Rated Active Vehicle Barriers and Control and SECTION 01 30 00 Administrative Requirements is deleted and SECTION NUMBER 34 75 13.13 Crash Rated Active Vehicle Barrier date August 6, 2024 and SECTION 01 30 00 dated August 6, 2024, as shown in the footer, is added to the Project Table of Contents and accompanies this Amendment.

SECTION 25 05 11 CYBERSECURITY FOR FACILITY RELATED CONTROL SYSTEM is deleted from this project in its entirety.

DOCUMENT 00 01 15

1.2 CONTRACT DRAWINGS

The following drawings are revised as of August 6, 2024:

NAVFAC DWG NO. TITLE

12908492 General Notes Rev. 1 dated 8/6/24 12908504 New Work Plan Slocum Gate Rev 1 dated 8/6/24 12908505 New Work Plan Cunningham Gate Rev 1 dated 8/6/24 12908506 New Work Plan Main Gate Rev 1 dated 8/6/24

These drawings accompany this Amendment.

Replace Vehicle Arrest Systems 7333917

SECTION 01 30 00

ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS

11/ 20, CHG 3: 08/ 23

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 REFERENCES

The publications listed below form a part of this specification to the extent referenced. The publications are referred to within the text by the basic designation only.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (USACE)

EM 385-1-1 (2024) Safety and Occupational Health Requirements

1.2 SUBMITTALS

Government approval is required for all submittals. Submit the following in accordance with Section 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES:

SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals

View Location Map Progress and Completion Pictures

1.3 VIEW LOCATION MAP

Submit, prior to or with the first digital photograph submittals, a sketch or drawing indicating the required photographic locations. Update as required if the locations are moved.

1.4 PROGRESS AND COMPLETION PICTURES

Photographically document site conditions prior to start of construction operations. Provide monthly, and within one month of the completion of work, digital photographs, 1600x1200x24 bit true color minimum resolution in JPEG file format showing the sequence and progress of work. Take a minimum of 20 digital photographs each week throughout the entire project from a minimum of ten different viewpoints selected by the Contractor unless otherwise directed by the Contracting Officer. Submit with the monthly invoice two sets of digital photographs, each set on a separate compact disc (CD) or data versatile disc (DVD), cumulative of all photos to date. Indicate photographs demonstrating environmental procedures.

Provide photographs for each month in a separate monthly directory and name each file to indicate its location on the view location sketch. Also provide the view location sketch on the CD or DVD as a digital file.

Include a date designator in file names. Photographs provided are for unrestricted use by the Government.

1.5 MINIMUM INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

Provide the minimum insurance coverage required by FAR 28.307-2 Liability, during the entire period of performance under this contract. Provide other insurance coverage as required by North Carolina law.

Rev. 1 8/6/24 SECTION 01 30 00 Page 1

1.6 SUPERVISION

1.6.1 Superintendent Qualifications

Provide project superintendent with a minimum of 10 years experience in construction with at least 5 of those years as a superintendent on projects similar in size and complexity. The individual must be familiar with the requirements of EM 385-1-1 and have experience in the areas of hazard identification and safety compliance. The individual must be capable of interpreting a critical path schedule and construction drawings. The qualification requirements for the alternate superintendent are the same as for the project superintendent. The Contracting Officer may request proof of the superintendent's qualifications at any point in the project if the performance of the superintendent is in question.

For projects where the superintendent is permitted to also serve as the Quality Control (QC) Manager as established in Section 01 45 00 QUALITY CONTROL, the superintendent must have qualifications in accordance with that section.

1.6.2 Minimum Communication Requirements

Have at least one qualified superintendent, or competent alternate, capable of reading, writing, and conversing fluently in the English language, on the job-site at all times during the performance of Contract work. In addition, if a QC representative is required on the Contract, then that individual must also have fluent English communication skills.

1.6.3 Duties

The project superintendent is primarily responsible for managing subcontractors and coordinating day-to-day production and schedule adherence on the project. The superintendent is required to attend Red Zone meetings, partnering meetings, and QC meetings. The superintendent or qualified alternative must be on-site at all times during the performance of this contract until the work is completed and accepted.

1.6.4 Non-Compliance Actions

The Project Superintendent is subject to removal by the Contracting Officer for non-compliance with requirements specified in the contract and for failure to manage the project to ensure timely completion.

Furthermore, the Contracting Officer may issue an order stopping all or part of the work until satisfactory corrective action has been taken. No part of the time lost due to such stop orders is acceptable as the subject of claim for extension of time for excess costs or damages by the Contractor.

1.7 PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING

, prior to commencing any work at the site, coordinate with the Contracting Officer a time and place to meet for the Preconstruction Meeting . The purpose of this meeting is to discuss and develop a mutual understanding of the administrative requirements of the Contract including but not limited to: daily reporting, invoicing, value engineering, safety, base-access, outage requests, hot work permits, schedule requirements, QC, schedule of prices or , shop drawings, submittals, cybersecurity, prosecution of the work, government acceptance, final inspections, and

Rev. 1 8/6/24 SECTION 01 30 00 Page 2 contract close-out. Contractor must present and discuss their basic approach to scheduling the construction work and any required phasing.

1.7.1 Attendees

Contractor attendees must include the Project Manager, Superintendent, Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO), QC Manager and major subcontractors.

1.8 FACILITY TURNOVER PLANNING MEETINGS (Red Zone Meetings)

Meet with the Government to identify strategies to ensure the project is carried to expeditious closure and turnover to the Client. Start planning the turnover process at the Pre-Construction Conference meeting with a discussion of the Red Zone process and convene at regularly scheduled NAVFAC Red Zone Meetings beginning at approximately 75 percent of project completion. Include the following in the facility Turnover effort:

1.8.1 Red Zone Checklist

a. Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) will provide the Contractor a copy of the Red Zone Checklist template.

b. Prior to 75 percent completion, modify the Red Zone Checklist template by adding or deleting critical activities applicable to the project and assign planned completion dates for each activity. Submit the modified Red Zone Checklist to the Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer may request additional activities be added to the Red Zone Checklist at any time as necessary.

1.8.2 Meetings

a. Conduct regular Red Zone Meetings beginning at approximately 75 percent project completion, or three to six months prior to Beneficial Occupancy Date (BOD), whichever comes first.

b. The Contracting Officer will establish the frequency of the meetings, which is expected to increase as the project completion draws nearer.

At the beginning, Red Zone meetings may be every two weeks then increase to weekly towards the final month of the project.

c. Using the Red Zone Checklist as a Plan of Action and Milestones (POAM) and basis for discussion, review upcoming critical activities and strategies to ensure work is completed on time.

d. During the Red Zone Meetings discuss with the COTR any upcoming activities that require Government involvement.

e. Maintain the Red Zone Checklist by documenting the actual completion dates as work is completed and update the Red Zone Checklist with revised planned completion dates as necessary to match progress.

Distribute copies of the current Red Zone Checklist to attendees at each Red Zone Meeting.

1.9 PARTNERING

Contractor shall host the partnering session within 45 calendar days of contract award. To most effectively accomplish this Contract, the Contractor and Government must form a cohesive partnership with the common goal of drawing on the strength of each organization in an effort to

Rev. 1 8/6/24 SECTION 01 30 00 Page 3 achieve a successful project without safety mishaps, conforming to the Contract, within budget, and on schedule. The partnering team must consist of personnel from both the Government and Contractor including project level and corporate level leadership positions. Key Personnel from the supported command, end user, PWD, FEAD, Contractor, key subcontractors, and the Designer of Record are required to participate in the Partnering process.

1.9.1 Team-Led (Informal) Partnering

a. The Contracting Officer will coordinate the initial Team-Led (Informal) Partnering Session with key personnel of the project team, including Contractor and Government personnel. The Partnering Session will be co-led by the Government Construction Manager and Contractor's Project Manager.

b. The Initial Team-led Partnering session may be held concurrently with the meeting. Partnering sessions will be held at a location mutually agreed to by the Contracting Officer and the Contractor, typically at a conference room on-base or at the Contractor's temporary trailer.

c. The Initial Team-Led Partnering Session will be conducted and facilitated using electronic media (a video and accompanying forms) provided by Contracting Officer.

d. The Partners will determine the frequency of the follow-on sessions.

e. Participants will bear their own costs for meals, lodging, and transportation associated with Partnering.

1.10 MOBILIZATION

Contractor shall mobilize to the jobsite within prior to equipment is delivered to the jobsite. Mobilize is defined as having equipment AND having a physical presence of at least one person from the contractor's team on the jobsite.

PART 2 PRODUCTS

Not Used

PART 3 EXECUTION

Not Used

-- End of Section --

Rev. 1 8/6/24 SECTION 01 30 00 Page 4

SECTION 34 75 13.13

CRASH RATED ACTIVE VEHICLE BARRIERS AND CONTROLS

02/22

PART 1 GENERAL

This UFGS replaces UFGS 34 75 13.19. All references in other documents, standards, and criteria to 34 75 13.19 now apply to 34 75 13.13.

1.1 REFERENCES

The publications listed below form a part of this specification to the extent referenced. The publications are referred to within the text by the basic designation only.

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS

(AASHTO)

AASHTO GDHS-7 (2018; Errata 2019) A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

AASHTO LTS (2013; Errata 2013) Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires and Traffic Signals

AASHTO RSDG-4 (2011; Errata 1 2012; Errata 2 2015) Roadside Design Guide

AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY (AWS)

AWS D1.1/D1.1M (2020; Errata 1 2021) Structural Welding Code - Steel

ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)

ASTM A106/A106M (2019a) Standard Specification for Seamless Carbon Steel Pipe for High-Temperature Service

ASTM A123/A123M (2017) Standard Specification for Zinc (Hot-Dip Galvanized) Coatings on Iron and Steel Products

ASTM D4956 (2013) Standard Specification for Retroreflective Sheeting for Traffic Control

ASTM F2656/F2656M (2023) Standard Test Method for Crash Testing of Vehicle Security Barriers

INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS (IEEE)

IEEE 142 (2007; Errata 2014) Recommended Practice for Grounding of Industrial and Commercial Power Systems - IEEE Green Book

IEEE C37.90 (2005; R 2011) Standard for Relays and

Rev. 1 8/6/24 SECTION 34 75 13.13 Page 1

Relay Systems Associated With Electric Power Apparatus

IEEE C37.90.1 (2013) Standard for Surge Withstand Capability (SWC) Tests for Relays and Relay Systems Associated with Electric Power Apparatus

IEEE C62.41.1 (2002; R 2008) Guide on the Surges Environment in Low-Voltage (1000 V and Less) AC Power Circuits

IEEE C62.41.2 (2002) Recommended Practice on Characterization of Surges in Low-Voltage (1000 V and Less) AC Power Circuits

INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION (IEC)

IEC 61131-3 (2013) Programmable Controllers - Part 3:

Programming Languages

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO)

ISO ISO/IEC 17025 (2017) General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories

NATIONAL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION (NEMA)

NEMA 250 (2020) Enclosures for Electrical Equipment (1000 Volts Maximum)

NEMA ICS 1 (2022) Standard for Industrial Control and Systems: General Requirements

NEMA ICS 2 (2000; R 2020) Industrial Control and Systems Controllers, Contactors, and Overload Relays Rated 600 V

NEMA ICS 4 (2015) Application Guideline for Terminal Blocks

NEMA MG 1 (2021) Motors and Generators

NEMA TC 2 (2020) Standard for Electrical Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Conduit

NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA)

NFPA 70 (2023; ERTA 4 2023; ERTA 5 2023; ERTA 6

2023) National Electrical Code

NFPA 70E (2024) Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace

SOCIETY OF AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERS INTERNATIONAL (SAE)

SAE J517 (2020) Hydraulic Hose

Rev. 1 8/6/24 SECTION 34 75 13.13 Page 2

U.S. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (FHWA)

MUTCD (2009; Rev 2012) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

NCHRP 350 (1993) Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features

U.S. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION (NARA)

21 CFR 1040 Performance Standards for Light-Emitting Products

29 CFR 1910 Occupational Safety and Health Standards

47 CFR 15 Radio Frequency Devices

UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES (UL)

UL 486A-486B (2018; Reprint Jul 2023) UL Standard for Safety Wire Connectors

UL 508 (2018; Reprint Jul 2021) UL Standard for Safety Industrial Control Equipment

UL 651 (2011; Reprint May 2022) UL Standard for Safety Schedule 40, 80, Type EB and A Rigid PVC Conduit and Fittings

UL 796 (2020; Reprint Oct 2023) UL Standard for Safety Printed Wiring Boards

UL 1059 (2019; Reprint Jul 2022) UL Standard for Safety Terminal Blocks

UL 1076 (2018; Reprint Feb 2021) UL Standard for Safety Proprietary Burglar Alarm Units and Systems

1.2 ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS

1.2.1 Abbreviations

a. ACP - Access Control Point

b. AIE - Automated Installation Entry

c. AVB - Active Vehicle Barrier

d. AVBCS - Active Vehicle Barrier Control System

e. BMS - Balanced Magnetic Switch

f. CCTV - Closed Circuit Television System

g. CPU - Central Processing Unit (Computer)

h. CSMS - Central Security Monitoring Station (e.g., Installation Police

Station)

i. CVT - Contractor Verification Test

j. DTS - Data Transmission System

k. ECF - Entry Control Facility

l. EFO - Emergency Fast Operate (active barrier emergency fast close control)

m. FAT - Factory Acceptance Test

Rev. 1 8/6/24 SECTION 34 75 13.13 Page 3

o. IDS - Intrusion Detection System

p. PLC - Programmable Logic Controller

q. PVT - Performance Verification Test

r. RSM - Remote Status Monitor

s. SDC - Standard Design/Criteria

t. SDDC - Surface Deployment and Distribution Command

u. SDDCTEA - Surface Deployment and Distribution Command Traffic

Engineering Agency

v. TCU - Traffic Controller Unit

w. UPS - Uninterruptible Power Supply

x. VCC - Visitors Control Center

y. VPD - Vehicle Presence Detector

1.2.2 Definitions

Command & Control. Command & Control function refers to location the main guard will be located to oversee the activity at the ECF/ACP. This is typically the Gatehouse, but not in all cases.

Crash-rated active vehicle barrier. Crash-rated active vehicle barrier and active vehicle barrier in this specification refer to a vehicle barrier that has been tested to impede or stop a vehicle of a specific weight and speed. The barrier is operable either manually or through electrical controls.

1.3 SUBMITTALS

Government approval is required for all submittals. Submit the following in accordance with Section 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES:

SD-02 Shop Drawings

Overall…