AMENDMENT 0001 - PPI RESPONSES.pdf

PDF 214 KB Posted

Attached to
INDEFINITE DELIVERY / INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) ARCHITECT-ENGINEERING (A-E) CONTRACT FOR UTILITY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE NAVFAC MIDLANT NORTH AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY (AOR)
Solicitation number
N40085-20-R-0020
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment A - Past Perf Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Attachment B - Small Bus Subcontract Plan.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES

N40085-20-R-0020

QUESTION: First, the opportunity states that "The Department of Defense (DoD) has assigned goals for FY2018 in terms of percentage of total planned subcontracting dollars...", and then it describes the FY2019 goals. Is the mention of FY2018 goals relevant, or is it simply an administrative error and should instead be written as FY2019 or FY2020? Finally, is the total FY2019 goal for all small business utilization under this contract 45%, or is the intent that there is an additional 45% on top of the 3% Hubzone, 5% SDB, 15% WOSB, 5% SDVOSB and 5% VOSB goals? I am assuming that it is 45% total small business, but I wanted to make sure.

RESPONSE: The mention of FY2018 is an administrative error and should read FY2019. The 45% is total small business utilization and each socio-economic group including the HUBZone, SDB, WOSB, SDVOSB and VOSB would help to make up that 45%.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .