N40085-22-R-2573 MEP Great Lakes.pdf
PDF 271 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N4008522R2573
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment C- PIEE Vendor Access Instructions.pdf | ||
| Attachment A- Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).pdf | ||
| Attachment B - PPI Inquiry Log.xls | XLS spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N4008522R2573 MID-ATLANTIC, Great Lakes AOR
WON 1689148
IDIQ Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Great Lakes
N4008522R2573, INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) CONTRACT FOR
MULTI-DISCIPLINE ARCHITECT-ENGINEER (A-E) SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF MECHANICAL,
ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING (MEP) AND FIRE PROTECTION SMALL DESIGN PROJECTS
ENGINEERING AND DESIGN SERVICES, IN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (PWD) GREAT
LAKES, IL AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY (AOR)
ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM
SF 330, ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO
SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD.
1.0 DESCRIPTION:
This procurement will result in one IDIQ contract for multi-discipline A-E services for Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing (MEP) projects primarily located within the Great Lakes, IL Area of Responsibility (AOR) and may also include work in other NAVFAC MIDLANT AORs. These services will be procured in accordance with 40 USC Chapter 11, Selection of Architects and Engineers, as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6.
2.0 CONTRACT INFORMATION:
The IDIQ contract will be for a five year ordering period not to exceed 60 months. The total fee for the contract term shall not exceed $15,000,000. The guaranteed minimum for the contract term is $5,000 and will be satisfied by simultaneous award of the initial task order with the basic contract. Firm-fixed price task orders will be negotiated for this contract. Contract capacity shall be limited to $15,000,000.
Otherwise, there will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. The estimated start date is January 2023.
This proposed contract is being solicited as a TOTAL SMALL BUSINESS SET ASIDE basis. The Small Business size standard classification is North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code 541330, Engineering Services, and the Small Business size standard is $36,500,000. Most task orders issued for this contract are for military construction or maintenance projects with construction costs ranging from $250,000 to $750,000, some projects maybe larger or smaller than this range.
3.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
Comprehensive A-E services are required for planning, design, and construction services in support of the new construction, renovations, repairs, replacement, demolition, alteration, and/or improvement of military and other governmental facilities for MEP small design projects. AE services may include multiple disciplines or single disciplines, including but not limited to architectural, landscape architecture, structural, mechanical, electrical, civil, geotechnical, fire protection, and cost engineering.
These services will be procured in accordance with 40 United States Code (USC) Chapter 11, Selection of Architects and Engineers, as implemented by Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 36.6.
The types of projects may include: administrative, industrial, maintenance, warehouses, communication, personnel support, recreation, lodging, medical, training, and ranges. Utilities include steam; low pressure compressed air; fresh water; sanitary sewer; oily waste water collection; high voltage to low voltage electrical; fire protection and alarm systems; control systems; lighting; and communications (telephone, television, fiber optics, cyber security, Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) control system, and Local Area Network (LAN)).
Work may also include A-E services for projects ancillary to MEP projects: such as: buildings; roads;
parking areas; railroads; bridges; foundations; retaining walls; failure investigation including destructive and non-destructive testing; seismic evaluation and design; progressive collapse analysis; blast resistant design; structural engineering investigations; utility systems including sanitary and storm; water systems; storm water management; sediment and erosion control; earthwork; surveying; pavement design; and civil engineering studies.
Specialized service for telecommunications, physical security, audio-visual and collateral equipment may be required. Facility types may include, but are not limited to, pavements and associated infrastructure, base utilities, personnel housing facilities (Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (BEQ) and Bachelor Officers Quarters (BOQ), hospitality; office facilities (medical, training, secure facilities);
training facilities (operational, maintenance, and classroom); and industrial maintenance facilities (vehicle maintenance shops, intermediate maintenance activities, public works shops, and warehouses) renovation/construction of laboratory spaces and facilities and Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E) spaces and facilities.
4.0 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
4.1 System for Award Management (SAM) Database
All contractors are advised that registration in System for Award Management (SAM) Database be required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM Database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Web site: https://www.sam.gov.
4.2 Conflicts of Interest
The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest such as those described below. The offeror will be required to perform throughout the contract term. The offeror will be required to self-perform material portions of the work on all awarded task orders.
Subcontracting an entire design effort on any given task order will be prohibited
A-E firms are advised that the selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates, and its sub-consultants which design, prepare, or provide engineering services in support of construction contract documents cannot provide construction services for the same contract. This includes concept design, preparation of project programming documents (DD Form 1391), facility siting studies, environmental assessments, geotechnical services, engineering studies and services, design-build RFPs, or other activities that result in identification of project scope and cost.
The Organizational Conflict of Interest restrictions described herein shall apply to the awardees and their affiliates, consultants and sub-consultants under this contract. If the Contractor under this contract prepares or assists in preparing a statement of work, specifications and plans, the Contract and its affiliates shall be ineligible to bid or participate, in any capacity, in any contractual effort which is based on such statement of work or specifications and plans as the prime contractor, subcontractor, consultant of in any similar capacity. The Contractor shall not incorporate its products or services in such statement of work or specifications unless so directed in writing by the Contracting Officer, in which case the restrictions shall not apply. This contract shall include this clause in its subcontractor’s or consultants’ agreements concerning the performance of this contract.
4.3 Registered/Licensed Firm
In accordance with the FAR 36.601-4(b), the A-E firm must be a registered/licensed architectural and/or engineering firm to be eligible for award. Provide proof that firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering, (e.g., state registration number, or a brief explanation of the firm’s licensing in jurisdictions that do not register firms, etc.). Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration.
FIRMS WHO ARE OFFERING AS A JOINT VENTURE SHOULD INCLUDE WITH THEIR
SUBMISSION A COPY OF THE JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT. FAILURE TO INCLUDE THE
JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT WILL RESULT IN THE FIRM’S ELIMINATION FROM
FURTHER EVALUATION
Interviews may be scheduled with firms slated as the most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to clarify information contained in the SF 330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired.
5.0 SF-330 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:
A-E firms desiring to be considered for this contract must submit:
1. One electronic SF330 package (.pdf format) marked “Original” via PIEE. Please see below and
Attachment C – PIEE Vendor Access Instructions.
2. One hard copy marked “copy” including one (1) CD with all documents as Portable Document Format (PDF)’s and properly bookmarked with searchable bookmarks for ease in navigation. See below for mailing instructions
The SF 330 shall be typed, one sided, at least 11 point Times New Roman or larger. Part I shall not exceed 100 single-sided 8.5 by 11 inch pages (the page limit does not include ISRs, certificates, PPQs, licenses, or the draft subcontracting plan, as required by the Small Business Subcontracting criterion, nor does the page limit include cover sheets or dividers, provided that these do not contain any substantive information submitted in response to the synopsis or intended to demonstrate the qualifications of the firm). Part I pages shall be numbered sequentially. The organizational chart of the proposed team (Section D of the SF-330) showing the names and roles of all key personnel listed in Section E with the associated firm as listed in Section C, may be one page single sided 11 by 17 foldout, using 11 point font or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables). Introductions shall be included in
Sections E and F. Please include your Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), CAGE, and TIN numbers in Block 30 of the SF 330.
**The Government will not consider information submitted beyond the page limits set forth.**
Electronic and Hard Copy submission of proposals will be required.
Electronic submission of proposals will be required in accordance with the following:
Offerors shall submit an electronic SF-330 (.pdf format) in response to this solicitation. Only the PIEE Solicitation Module is authorized for the submission of electronic SF-330s in response to this solicitation. Electronic SF-330 submissions should be no larger than 1.9 GB per file. Offerors shall ensure that the Government has received the electronic submission prior to the date and time specified.
PIEE Solicitation Vendor Access Instructions are provided via Attachment. Emailed submissions will not be accepted. Submissions must be correctly linked to the subject solicitation number within the PIEE module. Submissions that are incorrectly linked may not be considered. Upon successful submission of bid through PIEE, the Offeror should receive an email confirmation. Please keep this for your records.
Offerors shall allow adequate time to upload files which may be slower for non-DoD users and to avoid other technical difficulties that may be encountered. Offerors are also responsible for submitting files in the format specified and consistent with requirements stated elsewhere in this solicitation. Files that cannot be opened, or are otherwise missing the required content are the responsibility of the Offeror. It is the sole responsibility of the Offeror to obtain the RFP files, along with any amendments, from Opportunities (www.sam.gov).
PIEE system will record the date and time of package submittal. The date and time of package submittal recorded in PIEE shall govern the timeliness of any bid submission. LATE RESPONSES WILL NOT
BE CONSIDERED.
Hard Copy submission of proposals will be required in accordance with the following:
The HARD COPY SF330 submissions shall be delivered by MAIL ONLY within 5 business days of the due date for electronic submission. Firms should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access Naval Station Norfolk. NOTE: Hard copy SF330s shall mirror the electronic versions submitted. In the event of discrepancy between the electronic and hard copies, the electronic copy received by the due date and time will be the governing document.
Hand delivered proposals will not be accepted.
Interested firms shall submit one (1) hard copy of the SF330 and 1 PDF CD properly bookmarked for ease in navigation.
SF330 submissions shall be labeled http://www.sam.gov/
“SF330 SUBMISSION FOR N4008522R2573, ATTN: Michelle Corsino; DO NOT OPEN IN MAIL
ROOM”.
Express Mail to:
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Mid-Atlantic 9324 Virginia Avenue Building Z-140, Room 216 Norfolk, Virginia 23511 Attn: Michelle Corsino, CON22 It is the sole responsibility of the firm to obtain this synopsis and any attachments, along with any modifications, from Opportunities (www.beta.sam.gov).
If an SF 254/SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. As required above, provide verifiable evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of Architecture or engineering (e.g., state registration number).
Responses are due no later than 20 MAY 2022 at 2:00 pm (EDT). Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. The point of contact is Michelle Corsino, Contract Specialist, at michelle.a.corsino.civ@us.navy.mil.
Inquiries concerning this procurement should include solicitation number and title and be forwarded via email to (michelle.a.corsino.civ@us.navy.mil).
SELECTION CRITERIA: Firms responding to this synopsis will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firms to perform the required services in accordance with the published selection criteria.
Failure to comply with instructions, or provide complete information may affect the firm’s evaluation or disqualify the firm from further consideration. Evaluation criteria (1) through (4) are considered most important and are equal among themselves; criteria (5) and (6) are of slightly less importance and are equal among themselves; criteria (7) is of the least importance and will be used as a tie-breaker among technically equal firms. Specific selection criteria include:
1. Specialized Experience
2. Professional Qualifications and Technical Competence
3. Past Performance
4. Quality Control
5. Program Management and Capacity
6. Firm Location
7. Volume of Work
Criterion 1 —Specialized Experience (SF 330, Part I, Section F):
Firms will be evaluated on specialized experience in performance of services similar to those anticipated under this contract through evaluation of experience in:
1. Design of Building Systems, Utilities Infrastructures, and Ancillary Constriction as described in the
Description paragraphs of this Solicitation and utilizing the DoD Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC).
http://www.beta.sam.gov/ mailto:michelle.a.corsino@navy.mil mailto:michelle.a.corsino.civ@us.navy.mil
2. Conducting on-site design development workshops and functional analysis;
3. Demonstrated ability to design to project budget and schedule;
4. Experience preparing design-bid-build RFP packages;
5. Experience providing Post Construction Award Support (PCAS) services; and
Firms may be considered more favorably by demonstrating the following:
1. Experience on multiple facility types.
2. Demonstrated design at Navy facilities within the primary geographic area of the contract.
3. Demonstrated experience specific to Navy facility projects, demonstrating capability of A-E firm and individual design team members (A-E staff, key personnel, sub-consultants) to work within the Navy project planning process including:
a. DD 1391 validation procedures including cost validation.
NOTE: Project examples with only inspection and condition assessment effort and associated report, do NOT demonstrate specialized experience and will NOT be considered services similar to those anticipated under this contract. Required item 2: Only projects demonstrating charrette or Functional Analysis Concept Design (FACD) workshop effort with varied stakeholder groups will be considered services similar to those anticipated under this contract.
Submission requirements:
Provide up to a maximum of eight (8) projects completed (project completion to be defined below) within the past seven (7) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice that best demonstrate specialized experience of the proposed team in the areas outlined above. Sufficient information to determine the date of completion of the project must be included in the project description or the project will not be considered. If more than the maximum number of projects is submitted, the Government will only evaluate projects up to the maximum number authorized in the order submitted.
NOTE: Date of project completion is defined as date of final design acceptance by client. For Full Design Projects, date of project completion is the date of final signed sealed plans & specifications to client. For DB RFP Preparation, date of project completion is the date of final RFP documents submission. For DB RFP representing Contractor as DOR, date of project completion is the date of final design acceptance to client. For Design Development/DD1391 and Studies/Investigations, date of project completion is the date of final submission of design development/DD1391 and/or report. A project may not be considered if insufficient information is provided to clearly show the date of completion.
All projects provided in the SF 330 must be completed by the actual office/branch/regional office/individual team member proposed to manage and perform work under this contract. Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from consideration in the evaluation. To enable verification, firms should include the UEI number along with each firm name in the SF 330 Part I, Section F, block 25, “Firm Name” include a contract number or project identification number in block 21. Include an e-mail address and phone number for the point of contact in block 23(c). In block 24, include in the project description the contract period of performance, date of project completion (MM/DD/YEAR), award contract value, current contract value, and a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience as outlined above. For projects performed as a subcontractor or a joint venture involving different partners, specifically indicate the value of the work performed as a subcontractor or by those firms proposed for this contract, and identify the specific roles and responsibilities performed as a subcontractor or by those firms on the project rather than the work performed on the project as a whole.
If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration. In block 25, clearly define professional service role in relationship to the owner.
NOTE: If the firm is a joint venture, projects performed by the joint venture should be submitted;
however, if there are no projects performed by the joint venture, projects must be submitted for each joint venture partner, not to exceed a total of eight (8) projects. Firms failing to provide projects from all joint venture partners will be considered to have not met the requirements of the criterion.
Projects shall be submitted on the SF 330 at Part I, Section F and shall be completed projects. Projects not completed will be excluded from evaluation consideration. For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not submit an IDIQ contract as an example project. Instead, list relevant task orders or stand-alone contract awards that fit within the definition above. The Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract. Examples of project work submitted that do not conform to this requirement will not be evaluated.
All information for Criterion 1 should be submitted in the SF 330, Part I, Section F. The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part I, Section F in the evaluation of Criterion 1.
Criterion 2—Professional Qualifications and Technical Competence (SF 330, Part I, Sections E & G):
Firms will be evaluated on professional qualifications, competence, and experience of the proposed key personnel in providing services to accomplish the tasks required under this contract, including participation in example projects in the SF 330, Part I, Section G. Key personnel are individuals who will have major contract or project management responsibilities and/or will provide unusual or unique expertise. Specific disciplines that must be included in key personnel are Quality Control personnel;
Project Managers; Civil; Structural; Mechanical; Electrical; Fire Protection; Geotechnical and a licensed Fire Protection Engineer is required. Firm must state that key personnel, including sub- consultants, are U.
S. citizens and able to obtain security clearances as required.
Submission Requirements:
SF 330, Part I, Section E - Provide resumes for all proposed key personnel that illustrate experience in the work proposed under this contract. Resumes are limited to one page and should indicate: professional registration, certification, licensure and/or accreditation in appropriate disciplines; cite recent (within the past 10 years) project-specific experience in work relevant to the services required under this contract;
and indicate proposed role in this contract. Indicate participation of key personnel in example projects in the SF 330, Part I, Section G.
Criterion 3—Past Performance (SF 330, Part I, Section H):
Firms will be evaluated on past performance with Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and stakeholder/customer satisfaction. Evaluating past performance and experience will include information provided in Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) or CPARS/ACASS for Criterion 1 projects and may include customer inquiries, Government databases, and other information available to the Government including contacts with points of contact in other criteria. Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers could result in a firm being considered less qualified.
Submission Requirements:
SUBMIT A COMPLETED CPARS/ACASS EVALUATION FOR EACH PROJECT UNDER
CRITERION 1. IF A COMPLETED CPARS/ACASS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment (A)) included in this notice is provided for the firm or its team members to submit to the client for each project included under Criterion 1—Specialized Experience. DO NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS/ACASS IS AVAILABLE.
IF A CPARS/ACASS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF330. If the firm is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the response date set forth in this notice, firms should complete and submit with their responses the first page of the PPQ (Attachment (A), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s).
Firms may submit a PPQ previously submitted under a different Notice/RFP (legible copies are acceptable) as long as it is on the same form as posted with this Synopsis. Firms should follow up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If requested by the client, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Michelle Corsino, via email at michelle.a.corsino.civ@us.navy.mil, prior to the response date. Firms shall not incorporate by reference into their response PPQs or CPARS previously submitted in response to other A-E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.
Firms may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Criterion 1—Specialized Experience. Firms may also address any adverse past performance issues. Information shall not exceed two double-sided pages (or four single-sided pages) in total.
Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation.
Criterion 4—Quality Control Program (SF 330, Part I, Section H):
Firms will be evaluated on the strength of the quality control program proposed by the firm to ensure quality products and services under this contract, and means of ensuring quality services from their consultants/subcontractors. Maximum of 5 pages (one-sided) for Criterion 4 response. Offeror who exceed the page limit, the first 5 pages will be evaluated and pages after page 5 will not be evaluated.
Submission Requirements:
mailto:michelle.a.corsino@navy.mil
Describe the quality control program that will be utilized for all deliverables of this contract and the management approach for quality control processes and procedures. The description shall:
1. Explain the quality control program including an example of how the plan has worked for one of the projects submitted as part of Criterion 1 or how the plan will work if it has not been used previously.
2. Provide a quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and team components.
3. Describe specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract to achieve technical accuracy of and assurance of overall coordination of plans and specifications, and engineering and design services.
4. Identify the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program and a description of their roles and responsibilities.
5. Describe how the firm’s quality control program extends to management of subcontractors.
Criterion 5—Program Management and Capacity (SF 330, Part I, Section H):
Firms will be evaluated on the firm’s ability to plan for and manage work under the contract, the capacity to accomplish the work in the required time. AE firm must provide organization and office management as evidenced by management approach (management plan for these projects), and personnel roles in organization, in particular; management's approach/plan to engage and fully integrate with consultants and sub-consultants, ability to perform multiple tasks simultaneously and provide timely responsiveness to the requests, and an understanding of national and regional standards, programs for interagency coordination requirements. Maximum of 5 pages (one-sided) for Criterion 5 response. Offeror who exceed the page limit, the first 5 pages will be evaluated and pages after page 5 will not be evaluated.
Note: In response to Criterion 5, the organizational chart provided in Part 1, Section D is permissible to be referenced in Part 1, Section H. The remaining response for Criterion 5 must be included in Part 1, Section H.
Submission Requirements:
1. Provide an organizational chart for the team and discuss the management plan for this contract and personnel roles in the organization. Describe the ability of the firm to manage, coordinate and work effectively with team members, both internal staff and consultants. Discuss the history of working relationships with team members, including joint venture partners where applicable.
2. Describe the firm’s present workload and the availability of the project team (including consultants) for the specified contract performance period. Describe the workload/availability of the key personnel during the anticipated contract performance period and the ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of services. General statements of availability/capacity may be considered less favorably.
3. Describe the firm’s ability to sustain the loss of key personnel while accomplishing work within required time limits, to ensure continuity of services and ability to meet surges in unexpected project demands and ability to adhere to schedules and budgets.
Criterion 6—Firm Location (SF 330, Part I, Section H)
Provided that the application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the contract, firms will be evaluated on the locations of their office or offices that will be performing the work under this contract and demonstrated knowledge of the general geographic areas in which projects could be located. Evaluation of firms will include consideration of their location within the general geographic area of the anticipated projects, primarily at the Great Lakes Naval Station in Illinois, with selected projects possible throughout other Midwestern states.
Submission Requirements:
1. Indicate location of the office(s) that will be performing the work, including main offices, branch offices, and offices of team members.
2. Provide a narrative describing the team’s knowledge of the primary geographic areas to be covered by this contract.
3. Provide a narrative to describe the team’s ability to provide timely response to requests for on-site support. Provide timelines and examples of the team’s success in providing this response. Include both primary and sub-contractor support as required. Teams with a demonstrated history of providing timely support may be considered more favorably.
Criterion 7 —Volume of Work (SF 330, Part 1, Section H)
Firms will be evaluated in accordance with DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) 236.602-1, from data extracted from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by DoD within the past twelve (12) months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified A-E firms including small, disadvantaged business firms, and firms that have not had prior DoD A-E contracts.
Submission Requirements:
Firms do not submit data for this factor.
APPENDIX “A” SPECIFIC TYPES OF AE SERVICES
Specific types of AE services that may be required under this contract include:
A.1 → Facility Planning & Project Development
Facility planning services and project development, including:
A.1.1 Strategic Planning, Master Planning, Capital Planning, and Facilities and Infrastructure Planning, including project development
A.1.2 Strong knowledge of Federal and DoD budget process, including the Planning, Programming, & Budget Execution System (PPBES)
A.1.3 Planning studies A.1.4 Historical studies and Historic American Engineering Record Recordation
Documentation A.1.5 Cultural resource investigations A.1.6 Project programming documents (DD Form 1391 development) prepared in the Navy's Electronic Procurement Generator (EPG) A.1.7 Functional Analysis Concept Development (FACD)/Design Charrette/other design related workshops and meetings A.1.8 Developing of requirements A.1.9 Preparing engineering evaluations A.1.10 Development of project scope A.1.11 Unit guidance or parametric cost estimating A.1.12 Project programming and requirements development A.1.13 Conceptual pricing development A.1.14 Analysis of proposed sites for foundations, utilities, access, constraints A.1.15 Development of Alternatives including Economic Analysis A.1.16 Supporting Program Objective Memorandum (POM) exhibits, including conceptual graphics representing strategic alignment with DoD and DoN priorities
A.2 → Site Investigation Services
A.2.1 Geotechnical investigation in support of foundation design and site pavement recommendations
A.2.2 Pre-design site assessment A.2.3 Utility location/identification A.2.4 Site access studies including wayfinding and pedestrian corridors A.2.5 Site topographic studies and property boundary studies, including flood zones and wetlands topographic and boundary surveys to include survey, mapping, utility investigations
A.2.6 Environmental investigations
A.2.7 Environmental soil sampling and ground water sampling and analysis A.2.8 Storm Drainage analysis A.2.9 Traffic analysis
A.3 → Facility Analysis
A.3.1 General condition assessment including code compliance A.3.2 Energy utilization studies A.3.3 Cost valuation surveying A.3.4 Concept and site sketches A.3.5 Recommendations on potential utilities impacts A.3.6 Identification of sustainable features A.3.7 Analysis of proposed sites for foundations, utilities, access, constraints A.3.8 Facility Life Safety Code analysis A.3.9 Exterior and interior hazardous material surveys and analysis A.3.10 Studies, evaluations and testing with associated work A.3.11 Electrical utility surveys A.3.12 Seismic studies A.3.13 Preparation of performance work statements, plans, specifications, and cost estimates A.3.14 Identification of environmental issues A.3.15 Asbestos, Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs), and lead assessments to determine the presence of asbestos, PCBs or lead
A.4 → Design Supporting Services
Design Services, including all supporting activities such as site investigation, surveys, design charrettes, cost estimates, etc.:
A.4.1 Development of Design-Build (DB) Request for SF330 package (RFP) packages including schematic concept drawings and environmental studies
A.4.2 Development of comprehensive Design-Bid-Build (DBB) packages that include full plans and specifications
A.4.3 Design of new construction, both vertical and horizontal A.4.4 Alteration of facilities A.4.5 Design Reviews A.4.6 Value engineering A.4.7 Life cycle costing A.4.8 Blast Design A.4.9 Geospatial Information Systems (GIS) A.4.10 Building Information Modeling (BIM) A.4.11 Maintenance and repair of real property
A.4.12 Construction Cost Estimates A.4.13 HVAC and Mechanical experience to include work in the following areas:
A.4.13.1 Energy Supply (oil, gas, steam, hot or chilled water supply) A.4.13.2 Heat Generating Systems (boilers, primary pumps, auxiliary equipment, etc.)
A.4.13.3 Cooling Generating Systems (chillers, cooling towers, primary pumps, condensing units, split system heat pump -outdoor units, etc.)
A.4.13.4 Distribution Systems (AHUs, FCUs, VAV systems, fans, exhaust fans, supply fans, heat exchangers, pumps, convectors, duct heaters, etc.)
A.4.13.5 Terminal & Package Units (PTACs, PTHPs, WSHPs, Package/Rooftop Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps, Furnaces, etc.)
A.4.13.6 Controls (DDC, stand-alone controllers, etc.)
A.4.13.7 System Testing & Balancing (piping and air system testing and balancing) A.4.13.8 Commercial Equipment (walk-in refrigerators/freezers, condensers and condensing units for refrigeration systems, display cases, etc.)
A.5 → Interior Space Planning Design & Collateral Equipment Inventories
A.6 → Construction Services
A.6.1 Contractor submittal reviews A.6.2 Field consultation and special inspections A.6.3 Electronic Operation and Maintenance Support Information (eOMSI) with a final list of equipment installed and equipment removed during the project that is provided to the government
A.6.4 Obtaining environmental permits and regulatory approvals A.6.5 As-built and Record Document preparation A.6.6 Commissioning HVAC and mechanical systems
APPENDIX “B” – ADDITIONAL TYPES OF SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
Additional types of Special Requirements required under this contract include:
B.1 → System of Units
While it is NAVFAC’s policy to use the metric system International System of Units (SI) of measurement for projects, it should be assumed that projects executed under this contract would use imperial units. Government’s project manager will prepare a NAVFAC metric waiver for each project task order. As defined by paragraph 1-5 of United Facilities Criteria (UFC) 3-600-01.
B.2 → Contract Drawings AE firms are required to prepare drawings in computer-aided design (CAD) and drafting (CADD) software application marketed by Autodesk® (AutoCAD) using version (2018 or higher) or Revit® marketed by Autodesk using version (2021 or higher) utilizing the National CADD Standards format with NAVFAC specified modifications. Three-Dimensional (3D) renderings and Building Information Modeling (BIM) may also be required.
AE firm will be required to provide documents in Portable Document Format (PDF) format and source files. Final documents will require electronic signatures following the NAVFAC signature process per Facilities Criteria (FC) 1-300-09N.
B.3 → Specifications
AE firms are required to prepare cost estimates utilizing the MCACES MII estimating system, specifications in the SPECSINTACT program, design-build RFPs utilizing NAVFAC Design-Build Masters, and drawings in AutoCAD DWG format (2018 or higher) for civil related tasks and Revit (2021 or higher) utilizing the National CADD Standards format with NAVFAC specified modifications. 3D renderings and BIM modeling may also be required. AE firms or others under contract or providing services to NAVFAC may request software installation packages from NAVFAC Atlantic CI Cost. The AE is to send an email to NAVFAC-CI-Cost@navy.mil with the following in the Subject Section "MII License Request". Software is generally distributed to AEs free of charge; however, accompanying database licenses must be purchased and licensed as appropriate by the user.
B.4 → Communications Registered Communications Distribution Designer (RCDD) may be required for telecommunication systems. Audio-visual systems may be required on this contract with services of Certified Technology Specialist-Designer (CTS-D). CTS-D whose certification is American National Standards Institute (ANSI) accredited under the International Organization of Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) ISO/IEC 17024 certification of personnel.
B.5 → Fire Protection As defined by paragraph 1-5 of Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 3-600-01, Fire Protection Engineering for Facilities, this contract will require the services of a licensed fire protection engineer or sub-consultant.
mailto:NAVFAC-CI-Cost@navy.mil
B.6 → Hazardous Materials Asbestos, Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) and or lead-based paint assessments may be required on this contract to determine the presence of hazardous material in existing facilities or at utility points of connections. When asbestos, PCBs, or lead is found, comprehensive asbestos, PCBs, or lead surveys, to include sampling and testing, and the preparation of plans and specifications showing the location of asbestos, PCBs and lead, and specifying the procedure to be followed during construction and/or demolition for removal or abatement, will be required. Work on and around waterfront structures, including under deck and underwater, and work in confined spaces may be required on this contract. A-E firms must be able to accept work that involves asbestos, PCBs, lead paint, contaminated ground-water/soil and other hazardous materials, work on and under waterfront structures, on active airfields, and in confined spaces.
B.7 → Cost Estimates Per NAVFAC Cost Engineering Policy and Procedures dated 20 Jan 17, Chapter 7 Cost Engineering Software – AE firms are required to prepare cost estimates utilizing the Micro-Computer Aided Cost Estimating System (MCACES) Second Generation MII estimating system. MII is the second generation of the Micro-Computer Aided Cost Estimating System (MCACES). It is a detailed cost estimating software application developed in conjunction with Project Time & Cost, LLC© (PT&C).
MII is one of several modules of an integrated suite of cost engineering tools called Tri-Service Automated Cost Engineering Systems (TRACES). It interfaces with other PC based support modules and databases used by the Tri-Service Cost Engineering community. AE firms or others under contract providing services to NAVFAC may request software installation packages from NAVFAC Atlantic Capital Improvements (CI) Cost. The AE is to send an email to NAVFAC-CI- Cost@navy.mil with the following in the Subject Section "MII License Request." Software is generally distributed to AEs free of charge; however, accompanying database licenses must be purchased and licensed as appropriate by the user.
B.8 → Whole Building Design Guide All engineering and design services shall comply with the most current edition of UFC 1-300-09N Navy & Marine Corps Design Procedures, and other requirements as indicated on the Whole Building Design Guide Web Site (www.wbdg.org). Selected A-E firm is required to have online access to web-based support programs and email via the internet for routine exchange of correspondence/information.
B.9 → Accident Prevention Plan A-E firm is required to submit and maintain an A-E Accident Prevention Plan (APP) in accordance with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Engineer Manual (EM) 385-1-1, “Safety & Health Requirements,” for each project on this contract and Activity Hazard Analysis (AHA) for each in-field action.
B.10 → Security Clearances Key personnel, including sub-consultants, MUST be U.S. CITIZENS and able to obtain security clearances as required.
END OF DOCUMENT
mailto:NAVFAC-CI-Cost@navy.mil mailto:NAVFAC-CI-Cost@navy.mil http://www.wbdg.org/
| Criterion 1 —Specialized Experience (SF 330, Part I, Section F): |
| All information for Criterion 1 should be submitted in the SF 330, Part I, Section F. The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part I, Section F in the evaluation of Criterion 1. |
| Criterion 3—Past Performance (SF 330, Part I, Section H): |
| Criterion 4—Quality Control Program (SF 330, Part I, Section H): |
| Criterion 5—Program Management and Capacity (SF 330, Part I, Section H): |
| Criterion 6—Firm Location (SF 330, Part I, Section H) |
| Criterion 7 —Volume of Work (SF 330, Part 1, Section H) |
| APPENDIX “A” SPECIFIC TYPES OF AE SERVICES |
| A.1 → Facility Planning & Project Development |
| A.2 → Site Investigation Services |
| A.3 → Facility Analysis |
| A.4 → Design Supporting Services |
| A.5 → Interior Space Planning Design & Collateral Equipment Inventories |
| A.6 → Construction Services |
| APPENDIX “B” – ADDITIONAL TYPES OF SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS |
| B.1 → System of Units |
| B.2 → Contract Drawings |
| B.3 → Specifications |
| AE firms are required to prepare cost estimates utilizing the MCACES MII estimating system, specifications in the SPECSINTACT program, design-build RFPs utilizing NAVFAC Design-Build Masters, and drawings in AutoCAD DWG format (2018 or higher) for civ... |
| B.4 → Communications |
| B.5 → Fire Protection |
| B.6 → Hazardous Materials |
| B.7 → Cost Estimates |
| B.8 → Whole Building Design Guide |
| B.9 → Accident Prevention Plan |
| B.10 → Security Clearances |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .