N33191-23-R-4001.pdf

N33191-23-R-4001, DESIGN-BUILD / DESIGN-BID-BUILD MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION, REPAIR, AND DEMOLITION OF FACILITIES, WATERFRONT, AIRFIELDS, OR OTHER RELATED INFRASTURE PRIMARILY AT NSA NAPLES.

GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Construction projects to be performed w ill include both design-build and design-bid-build, primarily consisting of renovation or repair, and demolition of facilities, w aterfront, airf ields, or other related infrastructure primarily at NSA Naples and surrounding areas to include Naval Support Activity Gaeta, Admiral Carney Park in Pozzuoli, Mount Camaldali Radio Site and Satellite Receiver Site in Lago Patria and throughout the NAVFAC EURAFCENT area of responsibility.

Duration of the contract w ill be for a single Base Period of f ive (5) years, i.e., a total of 60 months, or a total aggregate value of Not To Exceed (NTE) $95,000,000 for all MACC task orders aw arded across all contractors, w hichever comes f irst. All task orders w ill be aw arded in U.S. Dollars.

The minimum guarantee for each offeror aw arded a contract is $5,000 over the f ive (5) year period.

SUNSHINE HERNANDEZ 314-626-6015

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

28-Apr-2023

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______ calendar days and complete it w ithin ________ calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________ copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________31 May 2023 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, X is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______150 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFAC EURAFCENT FEAD NAPLES

AEROPORTO DI CAPODICHINO

BASE AMERICANA (ROICC)

80144

NAPOLI 81044

N33191

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

12:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

39-081-568-5260FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N3319123R4001 68

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N3319123R4001

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 95,000,000 Each

IDIQ BASE

FFP

This is an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract, with no pre-established fixed contract prices. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined by the Contracting Officer or his/her properly authorized representatives, who will issue Task Order Requests for Proposal to MACC awardees. Award of task orders will be on a firm fixed price basis. The effective period of the resultant contract will be a Base Period of five (5) years or a total aggregate MACC value not to exceed $95,000,000, whichever occurs first.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 21-SEP-2023 95,000,000 NAVFAC EUROPE AFRICA CENTRAL

SUNSHINE HERNANDEZ

PSC 817 BOX 51

FPO AE 09622-0051

314-626-6015 FOB: Destination

N33191

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

** PLEASE READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY**

I. INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARATION OF PROPOSALS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC)

1.2 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT

1.3 ENGLISH SPEAKING REPRESENTATIVE

1.4 JOINT VENTURES (JV), LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (LLC), LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS

(LTD), ETC.

1.5 SOCIETA’ ORGANISMI D’ATTESTAZIONE (SOA) CERTIFICATION

1.6 ANTI-MAFIA LAW

1.7 OTHER CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

1.8 SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT

1.9 CAGE/NCAGE CODE

1.10 PREAWARD SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION

1.11 AMENDMENTS

1.12 INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPI)

1.13 INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIRED DOCUMENTS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF OFFER

1.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC)

A Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) is a contract awarded from a single solicitation, and may result in award to multiple contractors. This procurement consists of one solicitation with the intent to award approximately five (5) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts to the offerors whose proposals, conforming to the solicitation, will be most advantageous to the Government resulting in the best value, price and non-price factors considered. The Government reserves the right to award less than or more than five (5), should it be deemed to be in the best interest of the Government to do so. Successful offerors will compete for future work during the term of the contract.

Construction projects to be performed will be for the multiple Sustainment, Restoration and Maintenance (SRM), Special Projects, Energy projects and other construction or repair projects for FY 2023 through FY 2027 located at NSA Naples and surrounding areas to include Naval Support Activity Gaeta, Admiral Carney Park in Pozzuoli, Mount Camaldali Radio Site and Satellite Receiver Site in Lago Patria and throughout the NAVFAC EURAFSWA area of responsibility (AOR). Construction projects to be performed will primarily consist of general building type projects (new construction, renovations, alterations, demolition, repair work, and any necessary design) including:

waterfront, pier, quay, industrial, airfield, aircraft hangar, infrastructure, administrative, training, retail, food service, dormitory, community support facilities and both vertical and horizontal construction for Department of Defense activities in the Naples area managed by NAVFAC EURAFSWA PWD Naples. Work required outside the NSA Naples and surrounding areas, within the NAVFAC EURAFSWA’s AOR, shall be procured based on approval by the NAVFAC EURAFSWA Chief of Contracts. These projects range in value between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000 however, task orders under or above these amounts may be considered if deemed to be in the Government’s best interest. All task orders issued under the MACC will be awarded in U.S Dollars.

1.2 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT

The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Pre-proposal conference and Site Visit information will be provided via a future amendment. Offerors are strongly recommended to participate in the site visit, examine the scope of work, drawings, specifications, schedule, and all instructions. Failure to do so will be at the offeror's risk. Site visit information will be provided with future amendment, date is TBD. A site visit is not mandatory for this procurement.

1.3 ENGLISH SPEAKING REPRESENTATIVE

At all times when any performance of the work at the site is being conducted by an employee of the Contractor or his subcontractors, the contractor shall have a representative present on the site capable of explaining the work operations and receiving instructions in the English language. The Contracting Officer shall have the right to determine, without appeal of such decision, whether the proposed representative has sufficient technical and lingual capabilities, and the Contractor shall immediately replace any individual not acceptable to the Contracting Officer.

1.4 JOINT VENTURES (JV) AGREEMENTS

FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SOLICITATION, A JOINT VENTURE (JV) REFERS TO A U.S.-STYLED

FORMAL LEGAL ENTITY IN THE NATURE OF A PARTNERSHIP COMPRISED OF TWO OR MORE

PERSONS OR COMPANIES. EACH JOINT VENTURE MUST PROVIDE ONE (1) CAGE/NCAGE CODE,

ONE (1) DUNS NUMBER FOR THE JOINT VENTURE AND ONE (1) DUNS NUMBER FOR EACH

MEMBER COMPRISING THE JOINT VENTURE. EACH JOINT VENTURE MUST BE REGISTERED IN

THE CCR USING THE NAME OF THE JOINT VENTURE.

Joint Venture Offerors (JV) offerors, shall provide with their proposal a notarized legal document that establishes the JV. The JV Agreement shall take effect upon the submission of the proposal and remain irrevocable until one

(1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government. Submission of the notarized legal document that establishes the JV shall be furnished with the proposal in its original language version along with a certified English translation of the notarized JV document. The Joint Venture must be formed and valid at the time of submission of the proposal. The validated notarized legal document must include language that each member of the JV will be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the whole contract and will be incorporated into the contract award if award is made to the JV.

1. The Joint Venture Agreement shall include, at a minimum, the following:

(a) Name of firms that form the JV and the name of the JV.

(b) Name and title of the corporate officials signing on behalf of each party.

(c) Solicitation number.

(d) Description of the responsibilities in terms of work category for each member (for example: Firm A performing 100% of design).

(e) The statement "The composition and structure of the JV will remain unchanged from award to one (1) year after contract completion.”

(f) Date of issuance of the agreement and notarized signature of the corporate officials signing in behalf of each party.

(g) Statement under oath stating that the Joint Venture(JV) is in compliance at the time of proposal submission with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. This statement must be signed under oath by all members comprising the Joint Venture.

The U.S. Government reserves the right to review the actual JV Agreement to determine its basis and compliance with the applicable laws. Any internal agreements affecting the internal composition of the existing JV and its potential liabilities in relation to the contract (performance guarantee, insurance, etc) will be sent to the Contracting Officer to provide notice of the same. Any change in the composition of the JV will require the JV to formally request a Novation Agreement in accordance with FAR 42.12, which will be approved/disapproved at the discretion of the Contracting Officer.

**Only offers from Prime Contractors and Joint Ventures (JV) will be accepted. Offers from Associazione Temporanea d’Imprese (ATI) or offers using a contract of availment (contratto de avvalimento) will not be accepted for this procurement and will be considered non-responsive to the solicitation.**

1.5 SOCIETA’ ORGANISMI D’ATTESTAZIONE (SOA) CERTIFICATION

a. Societa’ Organismi d’Attestazione (SOA) Certification Requirement. The following qualification standards shall be met by the offeror for the overall MACC:

Category Classification

OG1 IV

OG3 IV

OG6 IV

OG11 IV

Note: SOA certification requirements will vary on subsequent task orders under the MACC in accordance with the projects.

b. Submission of a SOA Certification and Article 38 of the DL 163/06 (DeLise Code). Offerors shall demonstrate that they meet the SOA certification requirements and demonstrate compliance with Article 38 of DL 163/06. An offeror shall submit the following as part of its proposal:

(1) An unexpired SOA Certificate (including joint venture partner, consortium partners or subcontractors that will be utilized to meet the qualification standard).

(2) Current self-certification documentation required by Article 38 of DL 163/06.

(3) If the potential offeror is a joint venture or a consortium, the offeror shall demonstrate how each member or partner meets the SOA certification requirements stated in paragraph (a) above. Include a description of the responsibilities in terms of work category for each member or partner (for example - Firm A performing 70% of OG-II and Firm B performing 30% of OG-II). Each member or partner who has the SOA Certification must perform the majority of the work pertinent to the certification.

(4) An offeror's proposal will be rejected for failure to provide the current SOA certificates required under this solicitation.

In the case of a Joint Venture (JV), each member of the JV must have at least one of the required SOA Certifications. In the case of a JV, certification submitted by a subcontractor will not be accepted.

1.6 ANTI-MAFIA LAW

The Offeror is responsible for complying with Italian Anti-Mafia laws with respect to its subcontractors, including, but not limited to, obtaining subcontractor C.C.I.A.A. certificates inclusive of the anti-mafia "nulla osta" statement in accordance with Art. 67 of Legislative Decree no. 159/2011; and, if necessary, requesting additional information regarding attempts of mafia infiltration from a competent Prefect (Prefetto). The Offeror agrees to provide the Government appropriate documentation showing results of any Prefect (Prefetto) investigations. If after award, a competent Prefect (Prefetto) determines that mafia infiltration attempts have occurred with a subcontractor, then the Offeror agrees to promptly terminate the subject subcontract and replace the mafia-colluded subcontractor at its own cost with a compliant company.

Pre-Award Effect of Anti-Mafia Procedures: Inasmuch as the work of this solicitation is to be performed on land owned by the Italian State, the prospective contractor will be subject to Italian legislation concerning anti-mafia documentation, including, without limitation: Legislative Decree no. 159 of September 6, 2011, Decree of the President of the Republic no. 252 of June 3, 1998, Legislative Decree no. 490 of August 8, 1994 and Law Decree No. 629 of September 6, 1982, and subsequent integrations and amendments. Only firms that submit the requested documentation will be considered for award. In the event that prior to award any mafia infiltration attempt is determined by the competent Prefect (Prefetto) against an offeror, pursuant to Art. 4 of Legislative Decree no.

490/1994 and Art. 10 of Decree of the President of the Republic no. 252/1998, no award will be made to said offeror. Furthermore, in the event that prior to award any additional information against an offeror is provided by the competent Prefect (Prefetto) pursuant to Art. 1, Section 7 of Law decree 629/1982 and Art. 10, paragraph 9, of Decree of the President of the Republic no. 252/1998, the Government may decide, at its sole discretion, that no award will be made to said offeror.

Termination Under Decree of the President of the Republic no. 252/1998: If during the life of this contract, any mafia infiltration attempt is determined by the Prefect (Prefetto) against any component of the Contractor or any Subcontractor, pursuant to Art 4 of Legislative Decree no. 490/1994 and Art. 10 of Decree of the President of the Republic no. 252/1998, the Government will consider this a failure to execute the work and terminate the contractor's right to proceed with the work under the "Default" clause of this contract. If during the life of this contract, any additional information is provided by the Prefect (Prefetto) pursuant to Art. 1, Section 7 of Law Decree 629/1982 and Art. 10, paragraph 9, of Decree of the President of the Republic no. 252/1998, against any component of the Contractor or any subcontractor, the Government at its sole discretion may consider this a failure to execute the work and terminate the contractor’s right to proceed with the work under the “Default” clause of this contract.

Documentation Requirements, Contractor shall submit the following:

If available, include the Certificato di Iscrizione alla Camera di Commercio - Original, unexpired and not older than SIX (6) months old from the date of proposal submission from the Chamber of Commerce Certificate of Membership (Certificato di Iscrizione alla Camera di Commercio) inclusive of the Anti-Mafia Nulla Osta statement reading: "Nulla osta ai fini dell'articolo 67 del Decreto legislativo n. 159 del 6 settembre 2011 (gia Art. 10 della legge 31 maggio 1965, n 575) e successive modificazioni. La presente certificazione è emessa dalla C.C.I.A.A.

utilizzando il collegamento telematico con il sistema informativo utilizzato dalla prefettura di Roma.

If the offeror has attempted and is unable to obtain the certificate from the Chamber of Commerce, please include an explanation why not, along with official correspondence from the Chamber of Commerce, if available. This documentation is to be included in your Price Proposal.

1.7 OTHER CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

Other certifications may be required based on the location (country) of the work issued under the various task orders throughout the NAVFAC EURAFCENT area of responsibility. Those certifications will be requested and evaluated as part of the task orders submittal requirements; no evaluation other than that of the SOA certification requirement will be conducted as part of the MACC award.

1.8 SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT

1. System for Award Management (SAM) registration is required for all offerors, including Joint Venture (JV) offerors (registration must state the NAME of the JV). SAM registration can be accomplished at https://www.sam.gov. Offerors not registered in SAM shall obtain a Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) number and a CAGE or NCAGE prior to registering in SAM.

2. A UEI number is required for all offerors, including JV offerors. In addition to the UEI number required for JV offerors, JV offerors must provide a UEI number for each member comprising the JV. DUNS numbers can be obtained at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. The UEI number is required in order to register in

SAM.

1.9 CAGE/NCAGE CODE

1. A CAGE/NGAGE Code is required for all offerors, including JV offerors. JV offerors must acquire a CAGE/NCAGE Code registered in the JV name.

2. U.S. Offerors, including Joint Venture offerors: U.S. offerors must obtain a CAGE Code prior to registering in the SAM database, which is part of the SAM registration process.

3. Non-U.S. (Foreign) Offerors ONLY: Non-U.S. offerors must obtain a NATO CAGE (NCAGE) Code instead of a CAGE Code prior to registering in the SAM database. NCAGE codes may be obtained at the NCAGE website http://www.dlis.dla.mil/Forms/Form_AC135.asp.

1.10 PREAWARD SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION

FAR §9.104 requires prospective contractors to demonstrate, among other things, that they have adequate financial resources to perform the contract or ability to obtain them, capability to comply with the required performance schedule, a satisfactory performance record, and be otherwise eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations. The pre-award survey is not a part of the technical evaluation. The following information shall be submitted by the offerors included in Phase II of the solicitation.

a. Company financial statement summaries (balance sheets and income statements) for the past two years.

b. Financial resources available to perform the contract. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital that will be used for the performance of the contract. If the offeror plans to rely on financial support from other sources, identify the maximum lines of credit that will be available to include documentation to support the amounts. The maximum lines of credit should be based upon the inclusion of this contract effort. For joint ventures, discuss the financial responsibilities among companies and provide the same information for each partner.

1.11. AMENDMENTS

If necessary, any Amendment issued will be posted to Contract Opportunities on the website at https://SAM.gov. It is the offeror’s responsibility to check the designated website for any amendments to the solicitation.

1.12. INSTRUCTION FOR SUBMITTING PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES

Offerors who determine that the technical and/or contractual requirements of this RFP require clarification(s) in order to permit submittal of a responsive proposal shall submit all questions in writing. Inquiries shall be submitted using the Pre-Proposal Inquiry (PPI) form provided as Attachment 1, via e-mail to Ms. Sunshine Hernandez at sunshine.m.hernandez.civ@us.navy.mil. Receipt will be acknowledged. The PPI shall reference the drawing/detail and/or the specification section, including the paragraph number and include only one question per form. Verbal queries will not be entertained. Responses to the PPI will be provided by Amendment and will be posted to https://beta.sam.gov. The Government does not intend to respond to any pre-proposal inquiries submitted less than 15 business days before the solicitation closing date in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiries. Any inquiries made after that date may not be answered.

1.13. INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIRED DOCUMENTS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

Proposals, as detailed below, shall be submitted electronically to Ms. Sunshine Hernandez at sunshine.m.hernandez.civ@us.navy.mil on or before the time specified in Block 13 of the Standard Form (SF) 1442.

Compliance with the submittal closing time and receipt of proposals shall be determined by using the time indicated on the receiving Contract Specialist’s computer. The offeror is responsible to verify that the Government has received the proposals.

All documents submitted as part of the proposals shall be in English and sent in PDF format via email to the address stated above. Submit the Price Proposal and Non-Price Proposal in two separate PDF files. Total size per email shall not exceed 10 megabytes to ensure receipt by U.S. Government email systems.

Proposals are due no later than Wednesday 31 May 2023 at 12:00 p.m. Central European Summer Time

(CEST).

All items listed below are required for the offeror to be found responsive and the offer to be considered for award. Any unrequested information will not be considered as part of the offer and will not be reviewed.

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Phase One:

Factor 1 – Technical Approach Factor 2 – Recent, Relevant Experience of the Firm Factor 3 – Past Performance Factor 4 – Safety

Phase Two:

Factor 5 – Technical Solution (Based on Proposed Task Order 0001) Factor 6 – Price (Based on Proposed Task Order 0001)

2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical factors are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

This Two-Phase Design-Bid-Build (D-B) procurement will result in the award of approximately five (5) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) type contracts under a Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) for a five year base period.

For this Two-Phase D-B procurement, Factor 1 – Technical Approach, Factor 2 – Recent, Relevant Experience of the Firm, Factor 3 – Past Performance and Factor 4 – Safety will be evaluated in Phase One. Factor One will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an Offeror is rated Unacceptable in Factor One, then they will not be considered for Phase II. Factor 5 – Technical Solution and Factor 6 – Price will be evaluated in Phase Two.

Phase One of the solicitation is a narrowing process of offerors based on responsiveness and evaluation of non-price technical factor submittals. Based on the Phase One evaluation criteria, approximately ten (10) of the most highly rated offerors will proceed to Phase Two. The Government however reserves the right to select less than or more than ten (10) offerors to proceed to Phase Two, should it be deemed to be in the best interest of the Government to do so. Phase Two offerors will be required to submit both a Price Proposal and Non-Price Proposal.

Phase One:

Factor 1 – Technical Approach Factor 2 – Recent, Relevant Experience of the Firm Factor 3 – Past Performance

All ratings from Phase One will be carried into Phase Two unless new or revised information is provided.

Phase Two:

Factor 5 – Technical Solution (Based on Proposed task Order 0001) Factor 6 – Price (Based on Proposed task Order 0001)

1. The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that is comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is the technical factors – Factor 1 Technical Approach, Factor 2 Experience, Factor 4 Safety, and Factor 5 Technical Solution – are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor, Factor 3 Past Performance. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to Price.

Factor 1 – Technical Approach

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The composition and management of the firm’s Design-Build (D-B) Team for this contract will be evaluated in this factor.

The offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firms and primary design firms for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6). The narrative shall also include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor 2, that entity must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart.

The technical approach narrative shall be limited to two (2) pages, including the organizational chart. If more than two (2) pages are submitted, only the first two (2) pages will be evaluated. The information requested in item #2 below is not included in this page limitation.

(2) In addition to the narrative, the offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.) in English.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means to evaluate the organizational structure and teaming relationships proposed by the offeror. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.

Factor 2 – Recent, Relevant Experience of the Firm

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(1) Construction Experience:

Submit a minimum of two (2) and a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the solicitation.

Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience will not be considered. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as infrastructure construction or repair projects with a construction contract value equal to or exceeding $1,000,000 (or the equivalent foreign currency) with multiple construction trades to provide a complete and usable facility. Projects submitted for the offeror must have been completed within five (5) years of the proposal due date of this solicitation.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project;

rather offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

Experience in the geographic area of Italy may be considered more relevant than experience in other countries.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment 2) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed two (2) pages.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this solicitation (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S.

Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower.

Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

The offeror may utilize experience of a subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement that the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract.

More weight may be given to the Offeror’s projects than to those submitted for subcontractors.

(2) Design Experience

Submit a minimum of two (2) and a maximum of five (5) relevant design projects for the design team that best demonstrates design experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the solicitation. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as infrastructure construction or repair projects with a construction contract value equal to or exceeding $1,000,000 (or the equivalent foreign currency) with two or more different engineering disciplines required in the design phase.

Experience in the geographic area of Italy may be considered more relevant than experience in other countries.

Projects submitted must have been completed within five (5) years of the proposal due date of this solicitation. For design-build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past five (5) years of the proposal due date of this solicitation.

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment 2) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed two (2) pages.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this solicitation (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S.

Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

The offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the solicitation. The Government will only review five projects for construction and five for design. If more than 5 projects are submitted for Construction Experience or Design Experience, only the first 5 will be reviewed in the evaluation.

Relevant projects where the offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together may be considered more favorably than those that have not worked together.

Relevant projects that demonstrate design-build experience may be considered more favorably than those that do not have design-build experience.

Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with sustainable features may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate experience with sustainable features.

Offerors who submit relevant projects that demonstrate experience self-performing relevant features of work may receive a higher rating than those who do not demonstrate self performance.

Relevant projects that demonstrate construction experience in Italy may be considered more favorably than those that do not have experience in this country.

Proposals demonstrating the capability to manage multiple relevant projects simultaneously may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate this capability.

Factor 3 – Past Performance:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

If a completed Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for construction experience. If a completed A-E Contractor Appraisal Support System (ACASS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for design experience. If there is not a completed CCASS or ACASS evaluation then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment 3) for each project included in Factor 2 for both Construction Experience and Design Experience. The offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other solicitations. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the

PPQ information. However, offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed four pages in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation focuses on how well the offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience and past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources. More emphasis will be placed on more relevant projects. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government.

Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination.

The assessment of the Offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably in past performance and will receive an Unknown Confidence rating.

(a) Submittal Requirements:

1. Technical Approach to Safety:

The Offeror shall submit a safety narrative, as described further below. For a partnership of joint venture, only one safety narrative is required. Any fatalities experienced within the past 5-years must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

i. Technical Approach to Safety: Submit a narrative that addresses the following:

a. Describe the Offeror’s approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describe the evaluation process used to select potential subcontractors.

c. Describe the processes of how the Offeror will oversee safety compliance of subcontractors at all levels throughout performance of the contract (to include the Offeror’s own in-house workforce).

d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one

(1) double-sided page. Information on pages beyond this will not be considered.

ii. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

(b). Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The evaluation will collectively consider the Technical Approach to Safety and other sources of information available to the Government as part of such collective evaluation. The board will evaluate to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

(1) Technical Approach to Safety: To determine the degree to which the Offeror:

a. Describes a viable SMS that addresses elements; such as Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describes a methodical process of evaluating subcontractor’s safety performance in their selection process.

c. Describes a logical management plan to hold themselves and their subcontractors accountable for adhering to the safety requirements of the contract.

d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one

(1) double-sided page. Information on pages beyond this will not be considered.

(2) The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

Factor 5 – Technical Solution

Provide a narrative describing the technical solution to the Seed Project that meets the requirements of the solicitation. Include the following:

- Describe a step-by-step methodology and process of how the offeror will proceed with the project from start to finish.

- Identify any unusual, complex, or high risk activities inherent to accomplishing the requirements of the Seed Project and how these items will be addressed by the offeror.

- A proposed duration for the Seed Project based on critical activities. All other non-critical activities can run parallel of the critical activities.

- A project schedule (simple bar chart) showing the overall proposed schedule, not to exceed one (1) sheet, 11” x 17”.

The narrative shall not exceed three (3) pages, minimum 12 font. The project schedule is not included in the 3-page limit.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the narrative considering the extent to which the offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the offeror's technical solution to determine adherence to the technical requirements of the solicitation.

PRICE EVALUATION FACTOR

Phase I:

(1) Cover letter in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(2), including Solicitation Number; name, address, telephone and email address of the offeror; in case the Offeror is a JOINT VENTURE (JV), the name of the JV MUST BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED; Name, title, and signature of the person authorized to sign the proposal;

DUNS Number and CAGE or NCAGE Code of the Offeror, in case the Offeror is a JOINT VENTURE (JV), provide a DUNS Number for each member of the JV.

(2) Completed (Blocks 14 through 20c), signed and dated Standard Form (SF) 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award.

(3) Acknowledgement of all amendments;

(4) Solicitation Section 00600, “Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors”.

Offerors shall comply with the requirements in accordance with 52.204-8.

(5) Societa’ Organismi d’Attestazione (SOA) Certification Requirement. Submit the qualification standards required by Paragraph 1.5 of Section 00100 Instructions to Offerors, for the overall MACC.

(6) Applicable to Italian Offerors: The offeror’s Certificato di Iscrizione alla Camera di Commercio – original, unexpired and not older than SIX (6) months at the date of proposal submission of the Chamber of Commerce Certificate of Membership (Certificato di Iscrizione alla Camera di Commercio); and if available, inclusive of the Anti-Mafia Nulla Osta statement reading: "Nulla osta ai fini dell'articolo 67 del Decreto Legislativo

n. 159 del 6 settembre 2011 (gia Art 10 della legge 31 maggio 1965, n. 575) e successive modificazioni. La presente certificazione è emessa dalla C.C.I.A.A. utilizzando il collegamento telematico con il sistema informativo utilizzato dalla prefettura di Roma" or any similar statement having the same scope as provided for by applicable Laws.

If the offeror has attempted and is unable to obtain the certificate from the Chamber of Commerce that includes the Anti-Mafia Nulla Osta statement, include an explanation why not along with official correspondence from the Chamber of Commerce, if available.

(7) If available, the Chamber of Commerce Certificate mentioned in Paragraph 1 above for each of its subcontractors.

If the offeror has attempted and is unable to obtain the certificate from the Chamber of Commerce that includes the Anti-Mafia Nulla Osta statement for its subcontractors, include an explanation why not along with official correspondence from the Chamber of Commerce, if available. This documentation is to be included in your Price Proposal.

Phase II:

(1) Cover letter in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(2), including Solicitation Number; name, address, telephone and email address of the offeror; in case the Offeror is a JOINT VENTURE (JV), the name of the JV MUST BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED; Name, title, and signature of the person authorized to sign the proposal;

DUNS Number and CAGE or NCAGE Code of the Offeror, in case the Offeror is a JOINT VENTURE (JV), provide a DUNS Number for each member of the JV.

(2) Completed (Blocks 14 through 20c), signed and dated Standard Form (SF) 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award.

(3) Acknowledgement of all amendments;

(4) Completed…