N3220524R4093_Building Maintenance RFP Q_A_0002.pdf
PDF 208 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N3220524R4093
About this file
This document contains Questions and Answers related to a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the Military Sealift Command (MSC) for Building Maintenance Services of Government facilities. The RFP is seeking non-personal services to provide in-house utility and maintenance services, including basic, general, emergency, preventative, predictive, and other facilities maintenance functions at various MSC locations. The key details provided in the Q&A include information about the current staffing levels at the different locations, the labor categories required, and that the Pensacola, FL location is a new requirement. The Q&A also addresses topics such as site visits, security clearance requirements, and details about the facilities to be maintained. Overall, this document provides clarification and additional context around the building maintenance requirements outlined in the RFP.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N3220524R4093_Building Maintenance RFP Q_A.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
MILITARY SEALIFT COMMAND
N3220524R4093 Building Maintenance
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
The following are answers to questions received from potential offerors. The answers provide clarification only and DO NOT constitute an amendment to the solicitation.
1. In Subfactor 2 you have requested that we provide a staffing approach; number of employees, number of positions, number of personnel in each position, number of hours required per each employee or position to meet work requirements. And provided a list of key personnel we must include in Section 1.6.8. Not enough information is provided in the scope to deduce the required number of FTEs. Can you either provide the minimum number of qualified FTE's required by location or more information on the facilities assets, anticipated work tickets by type, and buildings so we can clearly judge the number of FTE's required for the workload.
ANSWER - 1: Please see paragraph 1.6.8.4
2. Are you planning to schedule a site visit before the proposal deadline?
ANSWER - 2: No.
3. How many FTEs are currently assigned to each location, and what is the labor category for each?
ANSWER - 3:
In San Diego, CA there are 3 (three) FTEs. In Norfolk, VA there are 10 (ten) FTEs.
Pensacola, FL is a new location and will required 3 (three) FTEs. The number of FTE’s is not meant to indicate a required number of FTEs. Labor category make-up of FTEs are 23000 – Mechanics and Maintenance and Repair Occupations and 23370 – General Maintenance Worker.
4. Is the Pensacola location part of the current contract? If not how is it being presently managed?
ANSWER - 4: No. Pensacola, FL location is not presently being managed.
5. Can you please provide sufficient detail about each site to include number of buildings, sqft of buildings to be maintained, mechanical assets assigned to be maintained, order of anticipated magnitude of work tickets / workload by site?
ANSWER - 5: See paragraphs 1.2., 1.6.4 through 1.6.4.5.
6. What specified SCA wage labor classification codes apply to this contract?
ANSWER – 6:
23000 – Mechanics and Maintenance and Repair Occupations 23370 – General Maintenance Worker
7. Page 6, Paragraph 1.6.7.1. DOD MANUAL 5220.22, VOLUME 2 NATIONAL
INDUSTRIAL SECURITY PROGRAM: INDUSTRIAL SECURITY PROCEDURES FOR
GOVERNMENT ACTIVITIES and 32 CFR Part 117.9(b) Entity Eligibility Determination for Access to Classified Information require reciprocity for an FCL issued by any CSA stating that the FCL will be considered valid and acceptable for use on a fully reciprocal basis by all federal departments and agencies if it meets or exceeds the level of classified access. Will the Government accept a contractors Top Secret FCL with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, a
NSIPOM CSA?
ANSWER - 7: Yes, as long as it’s a higher secuity clearance than what is required.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .