J-13-PastPerfQuestionaire(2022.11.22).docx
DOCX document 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- USNS ZEUS (T ARC 7) Mid Term and Dry-Docking
- Solicitation number
- N3220524R4052
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity. The Military Sealift Command (MSC) is soliciting offers for a contract and has requested performance information from the provided reference regarding the offeror's past performance under a previous contract. The questionnaire asks the reference to provide ratings and comments on the contractor's performance in areas such as technical quality, schedule/timeliness, management, and small business subcontracting. The reference is also asked whether they would hire the contractor again. The related federal contract opportunity is for the USNS ZEUS (T ARC 7) Mid Term and Dry-Docking, which is a Total Small Business Set-Aside with a response date of 02 July 2024 at 1:00 PM Eastern Standard Time. Work items, references, and the Contract Data Requirements List will be provided to contractors who have submitted the required Technical Non-Disclosure Agreement.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFC 02 REV 1.pdf | ||
| N3220524R4052 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFC 01.pdf | ||
| J-3-Cat-B REV 1 (2023.11.03).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFC 02.pdf | ||
| J-14-TechnicalNDA(2023.07.07).docx | DOCX document | |
| J-12 Past Perf Data.docx | DOCX document | |
| J-8-RFC(2022.12.28).docx | DOCX document | |
| J-7 MSC Ship Repair Facility Survey.docx | DOCX document | |
| J-3-Cat-B(2023.11.03).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| J - 11 Dry Dock Evaluation Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| CDRLs_ShipRepairAvails_2024_01_11.pdf | ||
| J-2-Cat-A(2022.11.22).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| J-1 Work Item Index.docx | DOCX document | |
| J-10 Interport Differential.docx | DOCX document | |
| J-9 Disclsr Lobbying Act.doc | DOC document | |
| GFP_Template_Version_2.0_4-24.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| N3220524R4052.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
ATTACHMENT J-13
TO: EMAIL:
PHONE:
INFORMATION REQUEST
Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract.
___________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under contract number ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:
In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION 02 July 2024 at 1400 hours, 1:00 PM Eastern) to Tommy Hale at tommy.a.hale.civ@us.navy.mil and Christopher Ward at christopher.s.ward1.civ@us.navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.
| Thank you, |
| Tommy Hale |
| Contracting Officer |
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:
1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation. ______________________
2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.
| FACTOR |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
TECHNICAL (QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE)
SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS
MANAGEMENT OR BUSINESS RELATIONS
SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING
OTHER (AS APPLICABLE)
3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.
Signed: __________________________________ Title: ____________________________________ Organization: _____________________________
DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .