N0018925QG006 Past Performance_Report_FORM.docx
DOCX document 19 KB Posted
- Attached to
- T010 - VISUAL INFORMATION SERVICE CENTER (VISC) SUPPORT SERVICE Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N0018925QG006
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Information Report Form related to a federal contract opportunity solicitation number N00189-25-Q-G006 for video, photographic, imaging, artistic, digital processing, and graphic design support services for the Visual Information Services Center (VISC) located at the Naval Submarine Support Facility in Groton, CT. The government is requesting feedback from customers on the past performance of the contractor in areas such as quality, timeliness, responsiveness, and cost control. The contract is a Firm-Fixed-Price with a 12-month Period of Performance, and is set aside for small businesses. The current incumbent contractor is Fisher-Cal Industries. The government will use the information provided in this report to evaluate the probability of successful performance on the new contract.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N0018925QG006 PAST_PERFORMANCE_INFORMATION_FORM.docx | DOCX document | |
| N0018925QG0060001.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION REPORT FORM (To be filled by customers and sent directly to the Contract Specialist) Solicitation N00189-25-Q-G006
Complete and return NLT the solicitation closing date to:
Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk (FLCN) Groton Office Contracting Department, Attn: Larissa Benoit, Code 245.2 Email larissa.benoit@navy.mil
On behalf of :
| Company's Name: | _________________________________ | |
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | |
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract/Purchase Order No.: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Amount: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Type: | _________________________________ | |
| Period of Performance: | _________________________________ | |
| Business Address: | _________________________________ | |
| _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | ||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
NOTE: DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR WHO ORIGINATED THIS REQUEST
The completion of this questionnaire is requested from your agency/company in order for the U.S. Naval Supply System (NAVSUP) Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk (FLCN) to evaluate the aforementioned contractor’s past performance on previous contracts and efforts as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the Government, relative to the award of a contract.
Completed by :
| Command/Company’s Name: | _________________________________ | ||
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | ||
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | |||
| _________________________________ | |||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
PAST PERFORMANCE QUALITY RATING TABLE
Quality:
1. Quality/Meeting Contract Requirements: The offeror’s demonstrated history of delivering products and services that met or exceeded the requirements of the contract.
0. How would you describe your level of customer satisfaction?
0. Were there instances of rework and/or deficiency reports? (If yes, explain)
0. Did the contractor engage in effective and/or innovative work applications that were beneficial to the Government?
1. Quality/Timeliness.
1. Did the Contractor meet/comply with performance schedules?
1. Rate the timeliness of submission of requested information, reports and invoicing.
1. Quality/Contractor Responsiveness. The offeror’s demonstrated ability to:
1. respond to customer concerns
1. isolate and resolve problems
· the number and severity of problems
· the effectiveness of corrective actions taken.
1. Contractor's cost control. Did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/under-run, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.)
1. Additional Observations/Information
1. Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.
1. Given hindsight, are you satisfied that the contract was awarded to this contractor? Would you be pleased to have this contractor perform work for you again? Why?
1. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.
1. Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.
(If more comment space needed, please attach additional pages.)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .