USFFC HQ IT Industry Day Presentation_Contracting.pptx
PPTX presentation 315 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N0018925HQITUSFFC
About this file
This is an Industry Day presentation from NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk (FLCN) regarding IT Support Services for U.S. Fleet Forces Command Headquarters. The contract will be a single-award, firm-fixed-price task order via SeaPort-NxG for a 12-month base period plus four 12-month options and potential 6-month extension under FAR 52.217-8, running from September 2025 through February 2031. The requirement calls for approximately 43 FTEs across various IT roles including application developers, network engineers, cybersecurity specialists, VTC/AV support, and database administrators.
Key dates include RFP release on March 10, 2025, proposals due April 10, 2025, with award planned for June 2025 (without exchanges) or August 2025 (with exchanges). The evaluation will prioritize non-cost factors over price, with Facilities Security Clearance as the highest-weighted factor, followed by Technical (Performance Approach and Staffing/Management Approach), Past Performance, and Price. All contractor personnel must have minimum Secret clearance with 4 positions requiring Top Secret eligibility. The contract allows for telework subject to COR approval and most positions fall under Service Contract Labor Standards. The procurement is being managed by NAVSUP FLCN with POCs Samantha Miller (Contracting Officer) and John Hill (Contract Specialist).
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFI_Industry Day Questions Answers-N0018925HQITUSFFC.pdf | ||
| Industry Dat Attendee-N0018925HQITUSFFC.pdf | ||
| Industry Day_1-22-25.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| RFI and Industry Day Notice - HQ IT.pdf | ||
| Visit Attendee Request.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFI Industry Day Notice - HQ IT.pdf | ||
| HQ IT PWS - Draft.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Contracting Overview, Tentative Source Selection and Key Contract Requirements Information Technology (IT) Support Services 28 January 2025
The NAVSUP Enterprise
Contracting Overview
Any correspondence pertaining to this acquisition should be directed to the below NAVSUP FLCN points of contact:
FLCN Points of Contact are:
Ms. Samantha Miller, Division Director/Contracting Officer Samantha.a.miller77.civ@us.navy.mil
Mr. John Hill, Contract Specialist john.c.hill36.civ@us.navy.mil
Key Points
The Request for Proposal, attachments, and any amendments will be published on Seaport-NxG (https://govnxg.seaport.navy.mil).
Separate emails/notifications will not be sent.
Nothing stated during this Industry Day or contained in any of the documents provided will qualify the terms and conditions of the RFP.
The RFP is currently being developed and no final decisions have been made.
Projected Milestones
05 February 2025 – Responses to RFI were due 10 March 2025 – RFP Published 10 April 2025 – Offers due April 2024 - May 2025 – Evaluation June 2025 – Award (without exchanges)
*June 2025 – Exchanges (*If required) *July 2025 – Evaluation (with exchanges) *Award – 01 August 2025 (with exchanges)
All dates are approximate and subject to change
Tentative Acquisition Strategy
Type of Contract: Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) Task Order Term of Contract: 12 month base with four 12-month options and FAR clause 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services) Base: 01 September 2025 – 31 August 2026 Option 1: 01 September 2026 – 31 August 2027 Option 2: 01 September 2027 – 31 August 2028 Option 3: 01 September 2028 – 31 August 2029 Option 4: 01 September 2029 – 31 August 2030 FAR Clause 52.217-8: 01 September 2030 – 28 February 2031 Single award task order via Seaport-NxG (not an IDIQ type contract) Commercial
The Government’s tentative source selection criteria to be used in the evaluation of offers for this procurement is as follows:
Non-Cost/Price Proposal: The Non-Cost/Price Proposal is significantly more important than the Cost/Price proposal and consist of the below factors and subfactors. The Non-Price Proposal factors are listed in descending order of importance:
Factor 1 – Facilities Security Clearance Factor 2 – Technical (The Technical subfactors are also listed in equal order of importance):
Subfactor 1 - Performance Approach Subfactor 2 - Staffing and Management Approach Factor 3 - Past Performance
Factor 4 – Price Proposal: Price Proposals will be evaluated based on price reasonableness in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b), Price Analysis. The Government may evaluate any and all information submitted by the offeror to support the reasonableness of the prices proposed.
Source Selection
The following tables will be used to evaluate technical and past performance portions of the offerors’ proposals:
Technical Ratings Table
Source Selection (cont.)
| Rating | Definition |
| Outstanding | Proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths and/or at least one significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low. |
| Good | Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength or significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate. |
| Acceptable | Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate. |
| Marginal | Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high. |
| Unacceptable | Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is unawardable, and/or risk of performance is unacceptably high. |
Source Selection (cont.)
Past Performance Relevancy Ratings
Past Performance Confidence Rating
| Rating | Definition |
| Very Relevant | Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. |
| Relevant | Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and |
complexities this solicitation requires.
Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
| Rating | Definition |
| Substantial Confidence | Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Satisfactory Confidence | Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Neutral Confidence | No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance. |
| Limited Confidence | Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| No Confidence | Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. |
Estimated Full Time Equivalents (FTE)
Government estimates approximately 43 FTEs per year.
| Labor Category | FTE |
| Staff IT Service Support Lead | 1 |
| Staff IT Service Support | 2 |
| Staff IT Service Support - CMSALANT | 1 |
| Application Developer Lead | 1 |
| Application Developer | 5 |
| N8/9 Developer | 1 |
| N02R Developer | 1 |
| FURS & NARS Application Developer | 1 |
| Portal Training & Support | 1 |
| Database Administrator | 1 |
| Share Point Portal Administrator | 1 |
| Knowledge Management Support | 1 |
| VTC Support Technician | 2 |
| VTC Services Operations | 1 |
| VTC and AV Systems Technician | 1 |
| AV Support Technician | 1 |
| AV Support Technician CSL | 1 |
| Network Engineer Lead | 1 |
| Labor Category | FTE |
| Network Engineer Senior | 1 |
| Network Engineer | 1 |
| Network / Systems Analyst Senior | 1 |
| Network / Systems Analyst | 1 |
| Network / Systems Technician Senior | 1 |
| Network / Systems Technician | 1 |
| Converged Infrastructure Engineer | 2 |
| Cable Technician Senior | 1 |
| Cable Technician | 1 |
| Fleet/HQ COMSEC Program Support | 1 |
| SATCOM | 1 |
| Tactical Systems Analyst Senior | 1 |
| Tactical Systems Analyst | 1 |
| Tactical System Administrator | 1 |
| Cybersecurity Specialist Lead | 1 |
| Cybersecurity Specialist | 1 |
| Cybersecurity Network Engineer Senior | 1 |
| Cybersecurity Network Engineer | 1 |
Key Contract Requirements
Security Requirements:
All contractor personnel supporting this contract must have a minimum of a Secret security clearance.
Approximately 4 personnel supporting this contract will be required to maintain eligibility for a Top Secret (TS) security clearance. Access is granted on as need basis.
Telework:
Alternate Work Location. Work tasks may be performed at remote locations (telework) by contracted personnel subject to approval by the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR). Ability and specific timeframe for contractor personnel to work remotely will be at the COR’s discretion. The Government reserves the right to rescind this ability to work remotely at any time. Authorization to work remotely shall incur no additional cost to the Government.
Key Contract Requirements
Service Contract Act (SCA):
It is anticipated the Service Contract Labor Statutes (SCLS) will be applicable to the preponderance of the FTEs.
Some FTEs will be exempt from the SCA as the employees that qualify for Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) exemption for bona fide executive, administrative, or professional employees.
Thank you!
image4.jpeg image5.jpeg image1.jpeg image2.png image3.wmf
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .